CRP v Secretary of State for Defence (Armed Forces Compensation Scheme): [2022] UKUT 232 (AAC)

Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Najib on 12 August 2022.

From:
HM Courts & Tribunals Service and Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
Published
3 October 2022
Last updated
4 June 2024 — See all updates
Categories:
War pensions and armed forces compensation
Sub-categories:
War pensions and armed forces compensation - Armed Forces Compensation Scheme
Judges:
Najib, S
Decision date:
12 August 2022

Read the full decision in UA-2021-001017-WP.

Judicial Summary

Armed Forces and Reserve Forces (Compensation Scheme) Order 2011 Schedule 3 Table 3 Item 2 – whether footnotes (a) and (b) are mutually exclusive – the correct approach to footnote (b): meaning of “able to work regularly” and date at which the conditions in the relevant descriptor must be met in order for that descriptor to apply.

Updates to this page

Published 3 October 2022
Last updated 4 June 2024 + show all updates

  1. The upper tribunal decision reversed by the Court of Appeal in Christopher Pearson v The Secretary of State for Defence [2024] EWCA Civ 150.

  2. First published.