MC v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (PIP): [2019] UKUT 264 (AAC)

Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Hemingway on 27 August 2019.

• From: HM Courts & Tribunals Service and Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
• Published: 3 October 2019

• Categories: Personal independence payment – mobility activities
• Sub-categories: Personal independence payment – mobility activities - Mobility activity 1: planning and following journeys
• Judges: Hemingway, M
• Decision date: 27 August 2019

Read the full decision in CPIP/2567/2018.

Judicial Summary

When considering the ability to follow the route of a journey, is it permissible to limit consideration to only a short journey?

Published 3 October 2019