SL v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (IS) and Carlisle City Council (HB): [2017] UKUT 64 (AAC)

Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Lane on 9 February 2017.

• From: HM Courts & Tribunals Service and Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
• Published: 17 February 2017

• Categories: Tribunal procedure and practice
• Sub-categories: Tribunal procedure and practice - set aside applications
• Judges: Lane, S
• Decision date: 9 February 2017

Read the full decision in CH 2899 2016-00.

Judicial Summary

Adequacy of reasons in FTT’s decision refusing to set aside substantive decisions. Significance of rule 34(2) of Tribunal Rules (First-tier Tribunal) (SEC) Rules 2008 taken together with common law expectations: paragraphs 28 - 34; procedural error for rule 37 vs error of law or fact.

Published 17 February 2017