ZS v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and SN (CSM): [2017] UKUT 402 (AAC)

Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Markus on 9 October 2017.

• From: HM Courts & Tribunals Service and Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
• Published: 26 October 2017

• Categories: Child support
• Sub-categories: Child support - tribunal practice, Child support - variation/departure directions: other
• Judges: Markus, K
• Decision date: 9 October 2017

Read the full decision in CCS/3034/2016.

Judicial Summary

Assets variation - whether the tribunal erred in excluding an asset on the ground that it was the non-resident parent’s home - whether tribunal failed to make a determination as to the “principal home” where it found that the non-resident parent had two homes - whether the tribunal properly addressed the evidence, made adequate findings of fact and gave adequate reasons.

Application of section 20(7)(a) Child Support Act 1991 – consideration of R (IS) 2/08

Published 26 October 2017