Protocol - Is the use of renewable natural resources in the developing world more or less sustainable, pro-poor and profitable under controlled access compared to open access?

Protocol for a rigorous literature review

Abstract

This is the protocol for a rigorous literature review which is intended to answer the question: Is the use of renewable natural resources in the developing world more or less sustainable, pro-poor and profitable under controlled access compared to open access? It will also consider the following sub-questions:

(a) Under what conditions is controlled access more or less sustainable, pro-poor and profitable than open access?
(b) Is the use of renewable natural resources in the developing world more or less sustainable, pro-poor and profitable under private ownership compared to common property?

The protocol provides background information and details of the methods to be used.

Citation

University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK, 30 p.

Protocol - Is the use of renewable natural resources in the developing world more or less sustainable, pro-poor and profitable under controlled access compared to open access?

Updates to this page

Published 1 January 2010