Mr R Doroja v Harvard Technology Ltd (In Administration): 1800696/2019

Employment Tribunal decision.

From:
HM Courts & Tribunals Service and Employment Tribunal
Published
23 August 2019
Last updated
21 November 2019 — See all updates
Country:
England and Wales
Jurisdiction code:
Breach of Contract, Protective Award, Redundancy
Decision date:
5 November 2019

Read the full decision in Mr R Doroja v Harvard Technology Ltd (In Administration): 1800696/2019 - Rule 21.

Read the full decision in Mr R Doroja v Harvard Technology Ltd (In Administration): 1800696/2019 - Partial Strike Out.

Updates to this page

Published 23 August 2019
Last updated 21 November 2019 + show all updates

  1. Case No: 1800696/2019 6.3 Strike Out Judgment – claim – part - rule 37 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr R Doroja Respondent: Harvard Technology Ltd (In Administration) JUDGMENT The complaints of a claim for redundancy payment and for breach of contract (notice pay) are struck out. REASONS By a letter dated 17 October 2019 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the complaints of a claim for redundancy payment and for breach of contract (notice pay) should not be struck out because: The claimant had not complied with the Order of the Tribunal dated 17 October 2019. It has not been actively pursued. The claimant has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done or to request a hearing. The complaint of a claim for redundancy payment and for breach of contract (notice pay) therefore struck out. The judgment making a protective award still stands Employment Judge Lancaster 5th November 2019

  2. First published.