Summary of code of practice changes for public consultation
Published 17 July 2023
Change number | Paragraph number | Proposed amendment |
---|---|---|
1. | N/A | Section removed from 2015 version: For BID applications made within the UK the Home Office has, since 2008, generally used a secure courier service to deliver the BID to its rightful holder. For those who apply from outside the UK the Home Office has introduced a secure collection arrangement using almost 200 branches of the Post Office network to overcome two potential problems not normally encountered by those who make their application from within the UK: - the absence, at the time of application, of an appropriately secure address in the UK to which the BID could be delivered; and - the substantially greater likelihood that the applicant will not be in the UK at the time the BID would normally become available for delivery by a secure courier. |
2. | 11 | Requirements has been reduced to 2 activities - Application and Maintenance. The third activity “collection” has incorporated into the maintenance requirement. |
3. | 12 | Paragraph contains slight change to application requirements. |
4. | 13 | Inserted section around maintenance requirements for applying for a bid. Added the collection requirement for people issued with a physical BID. Removed sections involving using bids in specific circumstances and surrendering. |
5. | N/A | Collection requirements have been incorporated into the maintenance requirements. |
6. | 14-17 | Update the types of sanctions that may be imposed for differing requirements |
7. | 18-24 | Now sets out the approach on handling non-compliance with an application requirement. This reflects the move to ATLAS and greater automation in our immigration processes. It sets out the sanctions for non-compliance which is to treat an application as invalid or to refuse and application. |
8. | 25 | This section makes it clear we can impose an application sanction on a person who seeks permission to stay on the basis they are a Stateless Person as defined by the Immigration Rules. |
9. | 26 | Paragraph setting out the maintenance sanctions. |
10. | 27-29 | Sets out paragraphs about the requirement to periodically update a facial image. |
11. | 30-31 | Describes how the sanction will be imposed automatically if the person fails to respond to notifications about updating their facial image. |
12. | 32 | Paragraph about maintenance sanctions other than failing to update a facial image. |
13. | 33-38 | Describes the process that needs to be followed before issuing a maintenance sanction, for reasons other than failing to update a facial image |
14. | 39-40 | Sets out the contents of the Warning Letter including the period for responding and the type of sanction that may be applied. |
15. | 41-42 | This sets out what will happen following the issuance of a warning letter. It changes the time from 20 days to 90 days, or a time set out in the warning letter for when the Secretary of State must impose a sanction. |
16. | 43-45 | Describes the process for issuing a civil penalty and when such a penalty may be imposed. |
17. | 46-47 | This sets out how the level of penalty will be determined. |
18. | 48-52 | Sets out how to take account of mitigating circumstances including the level of discount that may be applied. |
19. | 53 | Table of sanctions – new simplified penalty levels |
20. | 80-84 | New separate section setting out when the secretary of state will consider curtailing or varying a person’s permission. Makes it clear that this should only be undertaken in the most serious breaches and where non-compliance is linked to criminality. It includes the information about appeal rights. |
21. | 85-86 | Updates the provisions on vulnerable people to include people who are victims of modern slavery. |
22. | 87 | Updates the definition of serious medical conditions to include people detained under the Mental Health legislation. |
23. | 92 | Includes victims of modern slavery as requiring compassionate treatment. |
24. | 94 | Makes it clear the Secretary of State will not prevent a person aged over 70 from being able to create a Share-Code if they fail to update their facial image. |