Consultation outcome

MHRA: triennial review

This was published under the 2010 to 2015 Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government
This consultation has concluded

Read the full outcome

Detail of outcome

The main conclusion of the review was that MHRA performs necessary functions and should continue to operate as an executive agency. The review report also contains recommendations to improve performance, governance and efficiency.


Original consultation

Summary

Seeks views on the role and performance of the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA)

This consultation ran from
to

Consultation description

The department reviews its arm’s length bodies once every 3 years.

This triennial (3 yearly) review looks at what the MHRA does and how.

We want to know what you think of the MHRA, including:

  • whether the MHRA needs to continue in its current form
  • how the MHRA is performing
  • whether the MHRA is providing good value

Documents

Updates to this page

Published 1 December 2014
Last updated 21 July 2015 + show all updates
  1. Consultation outcome published

  2. First published.

Sign up for emails or print this page