3D buffer strips - designed to deliver more for the environment: summary
Published 30 October 2020
© Crown copyright 2020
This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gov.uk.
Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned.
This publication is available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/3d-buffer-strips-designed-to-deliver-more-for-the-environment/3d-buffer-strips-designed-to-deliver-more-for-the-environment-summary
1. Chief Scientist’s Group research summary
This report considers how we can improve the effectiveness of riparian buffer zones to help tackle agricultural pollution. The project assesses the effectiveness of traditional grass buffer strips and suggests ways that buffers can deliver more for the environment.
The study shows that more careful vegetation management, including tree planting and additional ‘engineered’ design features such as incorporating ridges, swales, and mini-wetlands, can capture and retain diffuse agricultural pollutants most effectively. Three-dimensional buffer zones (those that intercept pollution below ground, as runoff travels over the soil surface and then above ground in the vegetation canopy) maximise multiple environmental, farm business and public goods outcomes.
1.1 Method
The review evaluated the effectiveness of five different types of riparian (the interface between land and river) buffer in preventing diffuse pollutant loss from a range of sources entering watercourses. The buffers ranged from simple grass strips to wooded, raised ground and engineered designs. Effectiveness was evaluated by an expert group which scored each design against a range of functions including flood mitigation and pollution reduction, as well as their potential to deliver multiple environmental benefits.
1.2 Results
Wooded and engineered buffers scored the highest and grass vegetated buffers the lowest for diffuse pollution control, carbon retention, and geomorphic and flood management benefits. Trees were highlighted as an important feature of buffers as they reduce airborne spray drift of agrochemicals, utilise soil nutrients and provide many ecosystem services (the benefits that we freely gain from the natural environment), over their long lifespan. Figure 1 shows how vegetation and additional features on the buffer zone next to a watercourse can capture and retain diffuse pollutants.
The width of a riparian buffer is an important factor and should be at least 6 m to enhance functionality, however the report demonstrates that more complex designs are required where there is a risk of the buffer capacity being overwhelmed.
1.3 Conclusions
For riparian buffers to function effectively, good soil and crop management is required in the upslope field. Buffer design should be based on the nature of the pollution pressure, status of the water environment and specific ecological and other goals.
There is a substantial body of evidence that establishing wooded buffers improves most ecosystem functions. Problematic sites with high pollutant pressures need greater intervention such as engineered buffer designs. Effective installation and maintenance of riparian buffer areas determines how well buffers function in the short and long-term.
This project will provide the evidence for improved advice and guidance on buffer design options and their effectiveness at field and catchment scale. Demonstration studies would increase awareness and potential uptake as part of a shared agenda with Natural Flood Management communities.
1.4 Publishing details
This summary relates to information from the following project: Improving the benefits from watercourse field margins using 3D buffer strips
October 2020
Project manager:
Jamie Letts, Environment Agency
Research contractor:
Professor Marc Stutter, Dr Mark Wilkinson. The James Hutton Institute, Aberdeen, Dr Tom Nisbet, Forest Research
Research collaborators:
Dr Paul Quinn, Newcastle University, Professor Adrian Collins, Rothamsted Research, Dr Chris Stoate, Game and Wildlife Conservation Trust, Jamie Letts, Rachael Dils, Dominic Coath, Environment Agency
This project was funded by the Forestry Commission and Environment Agency’s Research, Analysis and Evaluation group, which provides scientific knowledge, tools and techniques to enable us to protect and manage the environment as effectively as possible.
Enquiries:
research@environment-agency.gov.uk
© Environment Agency
Fig 1 shows how vegetation and additional features on the buffer zone next to a watercourse can capture and retain diffuse pollutants
