Independent report

Armed Forces’ Pay Review Body 43rd report: 2014

Recommendations from the Armed Forces Pay Review Body (AFPRB) on the armed forces' pay.

• From: Armed Forces' Pay Review Body, Ministry of Defence, Office of Manpower Economics and Office for the Pay Review Bodies
• Published: 13 March 2014

Documents

Armed Forces’ Pay Review Body 43rd report: 2014

Ref: ISBN 9781474100830, Cm. 8828

PDF, 3.64 MB, 92 pages

Order a copy

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.

Request an accessible format.

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email afprb@businessandtrade.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Armed Forces’ Pay Review Body 43rd report: 2014 print PDF

Ref: ISBN 9781474100823, Cm. 8828

PDF, 5.83 MB, 95 pages

Order a copy

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.

Request an accessible format.

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email afprb@businessandtrade.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Details

This report sets out the AFPRB’s analysis of evidence given by relevant organisations and makes proposals on the armed forces’ pay from April 2014.

The AFPRB provides independent advice to the Prime Minister and Secretary of State for Defence on pay and charges for the armed forces.

Note: During the compilation of the AFPRB 43rd Report 2014 a typographical error occurred on page 63. The EOD Supplements should read as follows:

Cat 5a Supplement for Explosive Ordinance Disposal (EOD) Operators. In receipt of RRP(Diving) Level 5 and qualified beyond CMD Level.

Cat 5b Supplement for Explosive Ordinance Disposal (EOD) Operators. In receipt of RRP(Diving) Level 5 and qualified only in CMD skills.

All recommendations and other details within the report are correct.

Published 13 March 2014