Research and analysis

Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill: impact assessment - RPC opinion (green-rated)

Regulatory Policy Committee (RPC) opinion relating to the Home Office’s impact assessment (IA).

Documents

RPC Opinion: Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill IA

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email enquiries@bis.gsi.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Details

The Bill makes provision about: border security; immigration and asylum; sharing customs and trailer registration data; articles for use in serious crime; serious crime prevention orders; and fees paid in connection with the recognition, comparability or assessment of qualifications.

The RPC has opined on an options assessment of the components of the Bill that fall within the RPC’s remit, rather than on the full IA published alongside the Bill on 30 January. The RPC’s scrutiny has been limited to the small impacts on business of the proposed new offences to criminalise the possession, importing, making, adaptation, supply and offering to supply articles for use in serious crime criminalising the possession, importing, making, adaptation, supply, and offering to supply of articles for use in serious crime.

As originally submitted, the assessment was considered not fit for purpose. The department did not include a long list of options in the assessment or assess the impact of its Option 2. The department has now provided a proportionate assessment, in line with the small business impact expected from these components. The assessment now provides sufficient evidence of the problem under consideration, referencing wider government objectives to support the argument for intervention. The assessment includes two short-listed options but could utilise the Green Book’s options framework filter and critical success factors to help detail the generation of long-list options. The assessment uses a qualitative assessment to justify the preferred way forward, relative to other options.

The assessment scrutinised is fit for purpose; green-rated.

Updates to this page

Published 6 February 2025

Sign up for emails or print this page