Research and analysis
Summary of evaluation of RSH's In-depth assessment process – IFF report
Published 8 April 2021
Applies to England
© Crown copyright 2021
This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gov.uk.
Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned.
This publication is available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/evaluation-of-rshs-in-depth-assessment-process/summary-of-evaluation-of-rshs-in-depth-assessment-process-iff-report
This is a summary of the key findings of a report by IFF Research, which was commissioned by the Regulator of Social Housing to evaluate its In depth assessments process.
Executive summary
- The professionalism and conduct of In Depth Assessment teams were consistently praised, as was their knowledge and approach.
- The IDA was felt to be an important element of regulating the economic standards, alongside quarterly surveys and annual stability checks.
- Registered providers would benefit from greater guidance on the level and depth of their evidence submission.
- RPs consistently felt the IDA followed the guidance set out in Regulating the Standards.
- Some RPs were surprised by their regulatory grading, typically in the case of downgrades.
- All RPs mentioned making some changes as result of the IDA process, most commonly in the areas of stress testing and mitigation planning, risk management and board reporting.
- The investigative depth of the IDA process was occasionally questioned. The success of the IDA process was felt to be contingent on the RP being willingly transparent and honest.
- RPs would greatly value written as well as verbal feedback from the IDA process.