Policy paper

Feasibility study on improving the evidence base for industrial energy efficiency

Reports from Verco Global on the evidence of industrial process energy use trends, economic energy efficiency potential and barriers to take-up.

• From: Department of Energy & Climate Change
• Published: 26 November 2013
• Last updated: 20 March 2015 — See all updates

This was published under the 2010 to 2015 Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government

Documents

Phase 1 Report: Rapid evidence base assessment

PDF, 2.1 MB, 103 pages

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.

Request an accessible format.

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email enquiries@beis.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Phase 2 Report: Evidence gaps and options for improving evidence base

PDF, 1.48 MB, 68 pages

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.

Request an accessible format.

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email enquiries@beis.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Details

Verco were commissioned by DECC to review the UK industrial energy efficiency evidence base. These are the reports from the 2-phase project to answer three key questions: what are the existing trends in industrial process energy use; what is the technical and economic energy efficiency potential over the coming decades; and what are the barriers to uptake of energy efficiency improvements, including the question of what evidence exists that quantifies or compares barriers.

The report on Phase I provides a survey of all significant evidence that contributes to answering the key questions.

The report on Phase II identifies and reviews the gaps in the current evidence base; sets out options for approaches to filling these gaps; and indicates where there are opportunities for making cost-effective improvements to the evidence base.

Published 26 November 2013
Last updated 20 March 2015 + show all updates

1. 20 March 2015

   New report added.

2. 26 November 2013

   First published.