Phosgene: toxicological overview
Updated 5 November 2024
Main points
Kinetics and metabolism
The most likely routes of exposure are inhalation and ocular.
Phosgene is very rapidly hydrolysed within the respiratory tract to carbon dioxide and hydrochloric acid.
There is little or no systemic absorption.
Health effects of acute exposure
Signs of poisoning may be delayed by up to 24 hours post-exposure.
Inhalation may lead to eye, nose and throat irritation, wheezing, chest tightness and coughing.
Pulmonary oedema, cyanosis, shock, and respiratory arrest may also occur.
Skin exposure causes irritation, pain, blistering, ulceration, and erythema.
Ocular exposure results in lacrimation and irritation.
Health effects of chronic exposure
There is limited data on effects following chronic exposure.
Phosgene is not thought to be carcinogenic, mutagenic or a reproductive toxicant.
Kinetics and metabolism
Absorption
The main routes of exposure to phosgene are inhalation and ocular exposure. Ingestion is not considered a likely route as liquid phosgene vaporises rapidly on release from pressurised containers (1).
Distribution
Phosgene is highly reactive; its short half-life in aqueous solution (t½ around 0.026s) tends to preclude systemic absorption and distribution (2).
Metabolism
Following inhalation, phosgene is either rapidly hydrolysed to hydrochloric acid and carbon dioxide (and subsequently exhaled) or it penetrates the lower respiratory tract (alveoli) (3,4). In the lower respiratory tract phosgene rapidly reacts (acylation) with a range of macromolecules, including enzymes, proteins, and phospholipids; this may lead to a depletion of glutathione (3,4).
Sources and Route of Human Exposure
Phosgene is an important chemical intermediate, produced in large quantities in the EU (more than 10,000 tonnes a year) (3). It is required to produce various chemicals, including isocyanates, dyestuffs, polycarbonates, acid chlorides, insecticides, and pharmaceutical chemicals (5).
Phosgene is also used in the recovery of metals (5). There are 4 potential sources of phosgene in the environment: thermal decomposition of chlorinated hydrocarbons, photo-degradation of organochlorine compounds, fugitive release and deliberate release. When exposed to combustion or intense heat, chlorinated hydrocarbons such as methylene chloride (paint stripper), trichloroethylene and tetrachloroethane may liberate smoke and fumes containing phosgene (2,3). Contact of chlorinated solvents with hot metal surfaces may liberate significant quantities of phosgene, e.g. during the welding of metal that has been prepared by cleaning with chlorinated solvents (6). Organochlorine pollutants such as chloroform and tetrachloroethylene, and polymers such as polyvinyl chloride, may decompose in the atmosphere (on exposure to solar radiation) to form significant quantities (several hundred thousand tonnes) of phosgene each year (2).
Workplace exposure limits (WEL) have been set in the UK to protect workers from the harmful effects of phosgene. The long-term exposure limit (LTEL) is 0.08mg/m3 (8-hour time weighted average exposure (TWA) reference period). The short-term exposure limit (STEL) is 0.25mg/m3 (15-minute reference period) (7).
Health effects of acute or single exposure
Human data
Inhalation
The adverse health effects of phosgene exposure are primarily related to the pathological responses of the pulmonary system, the critical effect being pulmonary oedema (4). Pulmonary oedema may develop rapidly after high level exposure or after a latent period following low level exposure (1). The threshold toxicity levels for phosgene are summarised in the table below.
Estimated threshold toxicity values for inhalation exposure to phosgene
Dose | Effect | |
---|---|---|
ppm min | mg/m3 min | |
> 30 | > 120 | Onset of lung damage |
> 150 | > 600 | Pulmonary oedema |
~300 | ~1200 | LCt1 |
~500 | ~2000 | LCt50 |
~1300 | ~5200 | LCt100 |
LCt: dose that would result in 1, 50, or 100% fatalities in an exposed population. Dose expressed as Ct; the product of the concentration (C) and time (t) of exposure.
Phosgene generally conforms to Haber’s rule in that certain physiological effects of exposure (lung damage or death) are proportional to the product of concentration and duration of exposure (Ct). There is limited evidence to suggest that on repeated dosing or chronic exposure an adaptation response to phosgene may develop, which could cause some deviation from Haber’s rule (see the section on animal data under health effects of chronic/repeated exposure, below) (8).
Three distinct phases (initial, latent, and final phase) have been described for health effects following the inhalation of phosgene (2).
Immediately following exposure (the initial phase) an individual may experience eye, nose and throat irritation, pain and coughing, wheezing and chest tightness (9).
The latent phase is a period defined by a lack of overt symptoms following the initial effects detailed above. During this phase, histology may reveal progressive detrimental changes; also, non-specific symptoms (headache, nausea and vomiting) may be observed (1,10,11). The duration of the latent phase is inversely proportional to the dose, it typically lasts from 30 minutes to 24 hours (1,10). The latent phase may be absent following exposure to a supra-lethal concentration of phosgene.
The final phase involves the clinical manifestation of pulmonary oedema, associated with shortness of breath, productive cough (white or yellow frothy fluid sometimes with haemoptysis), cyanosis, shock, and respiratory arrest. Pulmonary oedema may rarely be delayed for up to 72 hours (1). Hypervolaemia and hypoxia caused by pulmonary oedema may lead to cardiovascular effects, including hypotension and tachycardia (10). Death may follow pulmonary oedema as a result of anoxia (10).
Massive exposures may cause pulmonary intravascular haemorrhage, leading to immediate death by pulmonary vasculature occlusion (10). Infectious pneumonitis may develop 24 to 48 hours after exposure and has a high mortality rate (11). In most fatal cases, death is within 48 hours of exposure (1).
Dermal or ocular exposure
Exposure of (moist) skin to phosgene may cause skin irritation, pain, blistering, ulceration, and erythema (1,2). Ocular effects may also occur, such as excessive lacrimation and irritation. Splashes of liquefied phosgene may cause irritation, corrosive burns, frost-bite, complete corneal opacification, and perforation (1,2).
Delayed effects following acute exposure
Chronic bronchitis and emphysema have been reported following acute exposure (8). Reduced physical fitness and exertional dyspnoea may occur months after exposure (1). Case studies suggest normal levels of lung function are typically recovered within weeks; however, complete recovery may take years and there is a small chance of permanent lung damage (10). Long-term effects on exposure to phosgene appear to be more likely in those with existing chronic lung diseases (such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and chronic bronchitis) (1,5). In one study, the extent of chronic detriment to lung function correlated more closely with smoking habits than with the severity of intoxication (5).
There is some evidence that prolonged respiratory effects on exposure to phosgene do not tend to occur at doses of less than 150ppm min (9).
Delayed ocular effects on exposure to phosgene have also been reported, including photophobia and excessive lacrimation (1).
It has been suggested that anoxia (resulting from pulmonary oedema) may be responsible for other chronic effects that have been tentatively (not conclusively) associated with phosgene intoxication. These include neurasthenia, epilepsy, peripheral Raynaud-like syndrome, and dysfunction of the peroneal nerve (resulting in ‘foot drop’) (2).
Animal data and in-vitro data
The acute effects of phosgene observed in animal models are consistent with those described for humans. The lung is the primary target organ in all species with the characteristic pathological feature being the delayed clinical manifestation of pulmonary oedema. In most experimental animal species, the lethal dose (LCt50) for phosgene is 1,000 to 2,000mg/m3 min (2).
The pulmonary effects of sub-lethal phosgene exposure in animals include oedema, petechial haemorrhage, bronchial epithelial necrosis, increase in lung weight, changes in blood gas chemistry (consistent with hypoxia) and increased protein, collagen, and leukocytes in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) (12,13). Immunotoxic effects (ie net deficiencies in respiratory tract immunological response) have also been seen after acute exposure to phosgene in experimental animals (14).
Health effects following chronic or repeated exposure
Human data
General toxicity
There is a paucity of data concerning the effects of chronic phosgene exposure in humans.
In one study of workers at a phosgene factory, no instances of long-term illness or death were attributable to phosgene exposure (15). The average concentration of phosgene measured in the factory was 0.01mg/m3, equating to a Ct of 4.8mg/m3 min (1.2ppm min) for an 8-hour working day (15).
No excess deaths or deaths from respiratory disease were demonstrable in workers in a uranium processing plant routinely exposed to ‘low’ or occasionally ‘high’ levels of phosgene (16,17).
Genotoxicity
There is insufficient evidence with which to assess the mutagenicity of phosgene in humans.
Carcinogenicity
The limited available evidence does not suggest that phosgene is carcinogenic to humans. Two studies on the same cohort of chemical workers exposed for approximately 35 years to phosgene (and to peak exposures above 1ppm) showed no increase in mortality from cancer (5).
Reproductive and developmental toxicity
Owing to its highly reactive nature, it is considered unlikely that phosgene could reach the developing fetus (3).
Animal data
Inhalation
Rats exposed whole body to 0.1 or 0.2ppm five times a week, 0.5ppm twice a week or 1ppm once a week for up to 12 weeks showed no mortality. At and above 0.2ppm, relative lung weights were increased, histological effects were more pronounced and collagen deposition was observed. For the two highest doses (0.5 and 1ppm), body weights were decreased, and collagen and elastin were found at significantly higher levels in the lung homogenate. The study appears to conform to Haber’s rule as similar effects were observed in the 0.2 and 1ppm groups and these were greater than those in the 0.1ppm exposed group (3).
In one study, dogs were exposed one to three times a week to 96 to 160 mg/m3, for 30 minutes for up to 12 weeks. The main effects were chronic bronchiolitis and emphysema (2).
An ‘adaptation’ response to chronic/repeated phosgene exposure has been observed, where the dose was not overwhelming and repeated daily. The adaptation response was shown to decrease over the period of a month (18). Such data indicates the need for care when attempting to use Ct to predict the response in cases of chronic/repeated exposure (8).
Given that the pulmonary system is the target organ for phosgene, studies have investigated the effect of exposure on susceptibility to respired pathogens. Such studies have observed a decrease in host resistance to various pathogens (2).
Genotoxicity
Phosgene has tested negative in the Ames test (TA100 and TA98) in the presence and absence of metabolic activation (3).
Carcinogenicity
No adequate studies are available for the assessment of the carcinogenicity of phosgene in animals (2).
Reproductive and developmental toxicity
There is insufficient data available on the reproductive effects of phosgene.
References
-
National Poisons Information Service (NPIS). Phosgene. TOXBASE® , 2013.
-
International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS). Phosgene. Environmental Health Criteria 193, 1997. World Health Organization: Geneva.
-
European Commission (EC). Recommendation from the Scientific Committee on Occupational Exposure Limits for Phosgene, 2011.
-
Gift JS, et al. Health assessment of phosgene: approaches for derivation of reference concentration. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol, 2008; 51(1): 98–107.
-
National Research Council (NRC). Acute Exposure Guideline Levels for Selected Airborne Chemicals, Volume 2, 2002.
-
Leikauf GD and DR Prows. Inorganic compounds of carbon, nitrogen and oxygen. In Patty’s Toxicology, 5 th Edition, Volume 4 (E Bingham et al, Eds), 1991. John Wiley and Sons Ltd: Chichester.
-
Health and Safety Executive (HSE). EH40/2005 Workplace Exposure Limits, 2nd Edition, 2011.
-
Maynard RL. Chapter 24: Phosgene. In Chemical Warfare Agents: Toxicology and Treatment, 2 nd Edition (TC Marrs et al, Eds), 2007. John Wiley and Sons Ltd: Chichester.
-
Collins JJ, et al. Results from the US industry-wide phosgene surveillance: the Diller Registry. J Occup Environ Med, 2011; 53(3): 239–44.
-
International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS). Phosgene. Poisons Information Monograph 419, 1997. World Health Organization: Geneva.
-
Vaish AK, et al. Accidental phosgene gas exposure: a review with background study of 10 cases. J Emerg Trauma Shock, 2013; 6(4): 271–5.
-
Pauluhn J. Acute head-only exposure of dogs to phosgene. Part III. Comparison of indicators of lung injury in dogs and rats. Inhal Toxicol, 2006; 18(9): 609–21.
-
Brown RF, et al. Pathophysiological responses following phosgene exposure in the anaesthetized pig. J Appl Toxicol, 2002; 22(4): 263–9.
-
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Guidance Document for the Derivation of an Acute Reference Concentration (ARFC). Series on Testing and Assessment No. 153, 2011.
-
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Criteria for a Recommended Standard. Occupational Exposure to Phosgene, 1976. US Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Public Health Service Center for Disease Control, NIOSH: Washington DC.
-
Polednak AP. Mortality among men occupationally exposed to phosgene in 1943–1945. Environ Res, 1980; 22(2): 357–67.
-
Polednak AP and DR Hollis. Mortality and causes of death among workers exposed to phosgene in 1943–45. Toxicol Ind Health, 1985; 1(2): 137–51.
-
Hatch G, et al. An ‘injury-time integral’ model for extrapolating from acute to chronic effects of phosgene. Toxicol Ind Health, 2001; 17(5–10): 285–93.
Email chemcompendium@ukhsa.gov.uk if you have any questions about this guidance or enquiries@ukhsa.gov.uk if you have any other questions.
Feedback Survey
Help us improve the compendium of chemical hazards by taking our short survey.