Previous regulatory judgement: The Community Housing Group Limited (14 December 2022)
Updated 13 December 2023
Applies to England
© Crown copyright 2023
This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gov.uk.
Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned.
This publication is available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/regulatory-judgement-community-housing-group-limited-the/current-regulatory-judgement-the-community-housing-group-limited-14-december-2022
RSH Narrative Regulatory Judgement
- Provider: The Community Housing Group Limited
- Regulatory code: LH4264
- Publication date: 14 December 2022
- Governance grade: G1
- Viability grade: V2
- Reason for publication: Viability regrade
- Regulatory route: Stability Check and Reactive Engagement
Regulatory judgement
This regulatory judgement regrades our previous published assessment of The Community Housing Group Limited’s financial viability from V1 to V2 and confirms its G1 grade for governance.
The regulator has assurance that The Community Housing Group Limited (TCHG) complies with the financial viability elements of the Governance and Financial Viability Standard and that its financial plans are consistent with, and support, its financial strategy. TCHG has an adequately funded business plan, sufficient security and is forecast to continue to meet its financial covenants.
TCHG is increasing investment in its existing homes and has a significant level of supported housing which operates at low margins. In the current economic environment, with uncertainty in relation to wider inflation and interest rate risks, these factors are putting pressure on its interest cover covenant and therefore reduce TCHG’s capacity to respond to risk.
The regulator’s assessment of TCHG’s compliance with the governance elements of the Governance and Financial Viability Standard remains unchanged. On the basis of the Stability Check, the regulator has concluded that there is no evidence to indicate a change to TCHG’s current governance grading.
Other providers included in the judgement
None
About the provider
Origins
TCHG is a community benefit society and company limited by guarantee. The asset holding parent of the group, it provides general needs homes as well as housing and care services for older and vulnerable people
Registered Entities
TCHG is the only registered entity in the group.
Unregistered Entities
TCHG has one unregistered subsidiary, Wyre Forest Land Company Limited, which provides office accommodation.
Geographic Spread and Scale
The group owns and manages around 6,100 homes in Worcestershire and Shropshire.
Staffing and Turnover
For the year ended 31 March 2022 TCHG’s turnover was £39.1m. It employed 422 full-time equivalent staff.
Development
TCHG intends to develop 620 homes between 2023 and 2027, including 65 for supported housing.
About our judgements
Key to Grades
Governance:
| Compliant | |
|---|---|
| G1 | The provider meets our governance requirements. |
| G2 | The provider meets our governance requirements but needs to improve some aspects of its governance arrangements to support continued compliance. |
| Non-compliant | |
|---|---|
| G3 | The provider does not meet our governance requirements. There are issues of serious regulatory concern and in agreement with us the provider is working to improve its position. |
| G4 | The provider does not meet our governance requirements. There are issues of serious regulatory concern, and the provider is subject to regulatory intervention or enforcement action. |
Viability:
| Compliant | |
|---|---|
| V1 | The provider meets our viability requirements and has the financial capacity to deal with a wide range of adverse scenarios. |
| V2 | The provider meets our viability requirements. It has the financial capacity to deal with a reasonable range of adverse scenarios but needs to manage material risks to ensure continued compliance. |
| Non-compliant | |
|---|---|
| V3 | The provider does not meet our viability requirements. There are issues of serious regulatory concern and, in agreement with us, the provider is working to improve its position. |
| V4 | The provider does not meet our viability requirements. There are issues of serious regulatory concern, and the provider is subject to regulatory intervention or enforcement action. |
Definitions of Regulatory Routes
In Depth Assessment (IDA): An IDA is a bespoke assessment of a provider’s viability and governance, including its approach to value for money. It involves on-site work and considers in detail a provider’s ability to meet its financial obligations and the effectiveness of its governance structures and processes.
Stability Checks: Based primarily on information supplied through regulatory returns, a Stability Check is an annual review of a provider’s financial position and its latest business plan. The review is focused on determining if there is evidence to indicate a provider’s current judgements merit reconsideration.
Reactive Engagement: Reactive engagement is unplanned work which is triggered by new information or a developing situation which may have implications for a provider’s current regulatory judgement.
Stability Checks and Reactive Engagement: In some cases, we will publish narrative regulatory judgements which combine evidence gained from both Stability Checks and Reactive Engagement.
For further details about these processes, please see Regulating the Standards.