Research and analysis

SPI-M-O: COVID-19 planning and reasonable worst-case scenarios, 20 May 2020

Paper prepared by the Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Modelling, Operational sub-group (SPI-M-O).

Documents

SPI-M-O: Planning and reasonable worst-case scenarios - 20 May 2020

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email contact@go-science.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Details

Paper prepared by SPI-M-O on planning and reasonable worst-case scenarios. This was considered at SAGE 38 on 21 May 2020.

This paper discusses the modelling approaches considered for the reasonable worst-case planning scenario (RWCS), as released under SAGE 38 and should be read in that context. The paper is an assessment of the evidence at the time of writing. As new evidence or data emerges, SAGE updates its advice accordingly. These modelling outputs are subject to uncertainty given the evidence available at the time, and dependent on the assumptions made.

Please note that the paper, ‘Reasonable worst-case planning scenario - 21 May 2020’, was amended shortly after SAGE 38, in order to reflect actions agreed within the meeting. Where there are conflicting figures between the 2 papers, those from the ‘Reasonable worst-case planning scenario - 21 May 2020’ should take precedence.

These outputs should not be interpreted as a forecast of what is most likely to happen, but rather scenarios to inform planning at the time. Reasonable worst-case scenarios are considered for planning to ensure that we are able to respond to a range of scenarios.

SAGE provides scientific advice to government. It does not make decisions on what scenario government should be planning for. Please note that this RWCS was not used for planning across government by the Cabinet Office Civil Contingencies Secretariat.

These documents are released as pre-print publications that have provided the government with rapid evidence during an emergency. These documents have not been peer-reviewed and there is no restriction on authors submitting and publishing this evidence in peer-reviewed journals.

Redactions in this document have been made to remove any security markings.

Updates to this page

Published 16 October 2020

Sign up for emails or print this page