Unfair contract terms guidance: OFT311
Why the CMA considers that certain kinds of standard terms used in contracts with consumers have the potential for unfairness.
Documents
Details
This guidance was originally published by the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) and has been adopted by the CMA Board. The original text has been retained un-amended, therefore it does not reflect or take account of developments in case law, legislation or practice since its original publication.
Due to a change in the law, this guidance will be replaced on 1 October 2015 with ‘Unfair contract terms: CMA37’.
Please also note:
- all references must be read in the light of Consumer Protection: Guidance on the CMA’s approach to use of its consumer powers (CMA7); in the case of conflict, CMA7 prevails
- references to the OFT or the Competition Commission (CC) (except where referring to specific past OFT or CC practice or case law) should be read as referring to the CMA
- references to articles of the EC Treaty should be read as referring to the equivalent articles of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
- certain OFT or CC departments, teams or individual roles may not be replicated in the CMA, or may have been renamed; the CMA’s structure is set out in our organisation chart
- do not use any contact details quoted; please go to the home page for details on how to contact the CMA
For related materials, visit the Unfair contract terms: materials for businesses page.
Updates to this page
Published 1 September 2008Last updated 21 July 2014 + show all updates
-
Supporting annexe has been added alongside the guidance document.
-
Included link to 'Unfair contract terms: materials for businesses' page.
-
First published.