Official Statistics

Child death reviews: year ending 31 March 2014

Data from local safeguarding children boards (LSCBs) in England.

Applies to England

Documents

SFR21/2014: Text

SFR21/2014: Tables

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email alternative.formats@education.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

SFR21/2014: Pre-release access list

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email alternative.formats@education.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

SFR21/2014: underlying data

Details

This statistical first release (SFR) presents data collected from local safeguarding children boards (LSCBs) in England. The data collection was introduced from 1 April 2008 and is designed to collect information on the number of child deaths which have been reviewed by Child Death Overview Panels (CDOPs) on behalf of their LSCBs.

This is the sixth year of the collection and covers reviews completed between 1 April 2013 and 31 March 2014 and includes information about the characteristics of the children who died from all CDOPs (for example the age, gender and cause of death).

Data collected from CDOPs on the reviews completed in earlier years is also available.

Queries should be directed to:

Andy Brook

01325 735408

andrew.brook@education.gov.uk

Updates to this page

Published 10 July 2014
Last updated 1 August 2014 + show all updates
  1. Added 'SFR21/2014: underlying data' and 'SFR21/2014: underlying data - metadata' documents.

  2. Leeds Local Safeguarding Children Board identified an error with their data return and provided an amended version following the original publication of these data. The publication and tables have been revised accordingly. The impact of these revisions is minimal (in Table A and Table 5).

  3. First published.

Sign up for emails or print this page