Accredited official statistics

Criminal court statistics quarterly: July to September 2023

Published 14 December 2023

Applies to England and Wales

We are seeking user feedback on the use of HTML for the publication of statistical bulletins. Please send any comments to: datausers@justice.gov.uk.

Main Points

Magistrates’ court: outstanding caseload increased	Case receipts increased by 2%, while disposals fell on the previous quarter. Disposal volumes were lower than receipts, resulting in outstanding cases increasing by 3% on the previous quarter to 352,945 in Q3 2023.
Crown Court: outstanding caseload increased	Receipts (up 6%) and disposals (up 9%) increased on the previous quarter. Disposals remained below receipts, so the outstanding caseload increased 3% on the previous quarter to 66,547 in Q3 2023.
Crown Court: rise in outstanding cases open for a year or more	The volume of outstanding cases that had been open for a year or more rose to 17,790– this represents 28% of outstanding cases – slightly below the series peak (29%).
Effective trial rates stable	The effective trial rate at the magistrates’ courts and Crown Court remains in line with the previous 2 quarters (42% and 41% respectively).
Offence to completion duration reduced on average for magistrates’ court cases	The median time from offence to completion at the magistrates’ court fell slightly on the previous quarter (from 183 to 178 days) but remains a little above pre-COVID levels (175 days in Q1 2020).
Offence to completion duration reduced on average for Crown Court cases	The median time from offence to completion at the Crown Court decreased slightly on the previous quarter (from 400 to 374 days) but remains above pre-COVID levels (254 days in Q1 2020).

The technical guide to ‘Criminal court statistics’ and ‘Language interpreter and translation services in courts and tribunals’ can be found at the links below:

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/a-guide-to-criminal-court-statistics

https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/guide-to-language-interpreter-and-translation-services-statistics

Statistician’s comment

This report covers the period to the end of September 2023.

The volume of receipts in the Crown court has continued to increase in the latest quarter and represents the highest volume in over two years. Although disposals have also increased (to their highest level since 2019), the fact that receipts exceed disposals means the outstanding caseload has grown in the quarter. Latest management information from HMCTS indicates this continues into the autumn with receipts still exceeding disposals in October.

The effective trial rate remains stable in both magistrates’ and Crown Courts; and the average length of time from offence to completion (end-to-end timeliness) decreased at both magistrates’ and Crown Court.

1. Changes to note

Common Platform and reform to criminal court data^{[footnote 1]}

‘Common Platform’ is a new digital case management system for the magistrates’ and Crown Courts. The system seeks to streamline data collection, data accessibility and improve the way criminal cases are processed across the Criminal Justice System. It will eventually replace the existing ‘legacy’ criminal court systems Libra (magistrates’) and XHIBIT (Crown), with a single, streamlined system.

Early adopter courts across England and Wales are testing the system before the subsequent rollout to all criminal courts concludes. Derbyshire magistrates’ and Crown Court began this process in September 2020 and the roll out has continued across England and Wales^{[footnote 2]}.

New cases entering courts from the point at which they adopt the Common Platform are held on the new system – cases that began at court prior to that court transitioning to Common Platform will remain on the ‘legacy’ system (e.g., LIBRA or XHIBIT).

All measures relating to magistrates’ courts and Crown Court cases include both ‘legacy’ and Common Platform estimates on a ‘best equivalent’ basis. This includes all key breakdowns in published quarterly tables and associated data tools.

Methodologies are as similar as possible however there are areas of known difference. The ‘legacy’ and ‘new’ data systems are fundamentally different, they do not record information in the same way and as such it is not possible to exactly replicate the existing published methodologies.

Areas of known difference that impact the statistics in this release include: the allocation of case type (such as triable-either-way, indictable only, committed for sentence and appeal), the inability to account for case transfers, main hearing allocation and changes to case ownership.

We will continue to develop data processes from the new system in collaboration with HMCTS and partner agencies as the Common Platform roll out continues. As we continue to develop these solutions, some series may be disrupted, with an increased likelihood of revisions to data in future.

We are committed to ensuring that published statistics remain accurate, robust and coherent for users during the operational transition of data systems at the criminal courts. For further information regarding the extent of the differences summarised above please see the Guide to criminal court statistics.

2. Criminal cases in the magistrates’ courts

---

Outstanding caseload at the magistrates’ courts increased as disposals volumes remained below case receipts.

Receipts increased slightly on the previous quarter while disposals fell. Disposals were below receipts and as a result the outstanding caseload increased by 3% on the previous quarter.

---

Figure 1: Magistrates’ courts caseload, Q2 2012 – Q3 2023 (Source: Table M1)

Magistrates’ court caseload

Receipts and disposals have both tended to rise from series lows in Q2 2020 when the initial measures were put in place to manage the immediate risks of the COVID-19 pandemic in courts^{[footnote 3][footnote 4][footnote 5]}. The levels remain a little below those seen prior to the pandemic.

• Receipts into the magistrates’ courts increased by 6% compared to the previous year and were slightly higher (2%) than in the previous quarter.

• Disposals at the magistrates’ court increased by 8% on the previous year and fell slightly on the previous quarter – the annual increase was driven by a 30% increase in summary non-motoring disposals.

• At the end of September 2023 there were 352,945 outstanding cases at the magistrates’ courts. This represents a 3% increase on the previous quarter (342,103) and a 16% decrease on the series peak seen in Q2 2020 (422,156).

The latest HMCTS management information provides monthly volumes of receipts, disposals and the open (‘outstanding’) caseload for all case types at the magistrates’ courts (e.g., including civil and enforcement) beyond the published period. The data to October 2023 shows that the open caseload increased – up 3% on the previous month.

Trial efficiency at magistrates’ court

There were 19,664 trials listed for Q3 2023, this represents a 14% decrease on the previous year (22,771).

• Of trials listed for Q3 2023, the proportion that were effective was 42% (up from 41% in the last quarter). The cracked rate was 36% and ineffective rate 22% – the ineffective rate remains above pre-COVID levels (~15-17%).

Figure 2: Magistrates’ courts listed trials and ineffective trial rate (%), Q1 2014 – Q3 2023 (Source: Table M2)

3. Criminal cases in the Crown Court

---

Increase in the outstanding caseload at the Crown Court

Receipts and disposals increased on the previous quarter – both remain above volumes seen a year ago. There were more receipts than disposals, so the outstanding caseload increased, up by 3% on the previous quarter.

---

Crown Court caseload

The increased throughput from the magistrates’ courts as part of the initial recovery from the pandemic response saw the volume of receipts at the Crown Court exceed pre-COVID levels in late 2020. Following a slight decline, receipts have since returned to levels comparable to those pre-COVID.

Figure 3: Crown Court caseload, Q1 2014 – Q3 2023 (Source: Table C1)

Following the initial phased reintroduction of jury trials^{[footnote 6]} disposals have gradually increased from a series low in Q2 2020 and returned to pre-COVID levels in Q1 2022. The Criminal Bar Association industrial action starting in April 2022 contributed to disposals falling in Q2 and Q3 2022. Following the resolution of that industrial action in October 2022^{[footnote 7]}, disposals increased.

• There were 27,833 case receipts into the Crown Court in Q3 2023. This is up 6% on the previous quarter and 16% above levels seen in Q3 2022.

• There were 25,682 case disposals at the Crown Court in Q3 2023. This is a 9% increase on the previous quarter and 28% above levels seen in the previous year which was at the height of the impact of the Criminal Bar Association action.

• There were 66,547 outstanding cases at the end of September 2023. This is up 3% on the previous quarter (64,835 cases) and 6% above the previous year (62,875 cases).

The latest published HMCTS management information provides monthly volumes of receipts, disposals and the open (‘outstanding’) caseload for all case types at the Crown Court. The data to October 2023 shows a further small increase (less than 1%) compared to September 2023.

Analysis of the outstanding caseload at the Crown Court – experimental statistics

To address additional interest in the outstanding case estimates at the Crown Court we are continuing to publish ‘experimental statistics’ providing estimates of the average length of time (days) that a case has been outstanding.

The age of an outstanding case is calculated from receipt at Crown Court to the end of the reporting period.

Figure 4: Age of outstanding cases at the Crown Court, Q1 2014 – Q3 2023 (Source: Table O1)

The average age of an outstanding case has increased markedly on pre-COVID levels. Both the median and mean averages have fallen in recent quarters but remain close to series peaks. In Q3 2023 the median age of all outstanding cases decreased by 1 day on the previous quarter, from 171 days to 170 days.

Figure 5: Proportion of outstanding cases at the Crown Court by grouped age, Q1 2014 – Q3 2023 (Source: Table O3)

At the end of Q3 2023 there were 17,790 cases that had been outstanding for a year or more. This has tended to increase since Q4 2019 and accounted for 28% of the outstanding caseload in the latest quarter.

• Within the ‘year or more’ grouping there were 6,505 cases which had been outstanding for two years or more – this accounts for 10% of the outstanding caseload.

Trial efficiency at Crown Court

There were 7,186 listed trials in Q3 2023 - an increase of 7% on the previous quarter and 8% above levels seen in the previous year.

The effective trial rate was unchanged on the previous quarter at 41%, this has tended to increase from a series low seen in Q3 2022 (25%). The cracked trials rate of 32% was a 1 percentage point increase on the previous quarter and the ineffective trial rate decreased by 3 percentage points to 26% – the ineffective rate, although lower than at any point in the last two years, remains above pre-COVID levels (~13-19%).

Figure 6: Crown Court listed trials and ineffective trial rate (%), Q1 2014 – Q3 2023 (Source: Table C2)

The defence or prosecution not being ready was the largest reason for ineffective trials, accounting for 18% (343 trials) in Q3 2023. This follows sharp falls in the volume of ineffective trials due to defence advocate availability following the conclusion of the Criminal Bar Association action in October 2022.

Guilty plea rate

The guilty plea rate^{[footnote 8]} increased sharply following the immediate COVID-19 response and the suspension of jury trials at the Crown Court. More recently it has fallen back to pre-COVID levels as the volume of ‘not guilty plea’ cases being disposed of has increased.

• In Q3 2023 the guilty plea rate was 66%, unchanged on the previous quarter.

• There were 3,232 defendants dealt with in Q3 2023 who entered a not guilty plea (e.g., went to trial) – this is an increase of 4% on the previous quarter and 68% higher than Q3 2022 reflecting the return to levels prior to the Criminal Bar Association industrial action and COVID.

Average waiting time at the Crown Court

The waiting time estimates are a ‘lagged measure’ and defendants are counted at the point of their case being disposed of. As such the waiting time estimates provide a ‘backwards’ look at the durations spent between receipt and main hearing at the Crown Court.

The median waiting time^{[footnote 9]} for defendants dealt with at the Crown Court was 8.7 weeks in Q3 2023. This represents an 5% decrease on the previous quarter (9.1 weeks), and a 7% increase on the previous year (8.1 weeks). Waiting times remain well above pre-COVID levels (5.3 weeks in Q1 2020).

• The median waiting time for defendants dealt with in ‘for trial’ cases where a not guilty plea was entered was unchanged from the previous quarter, at 41 weeks. This remains well above pre-COVID levels (25.4 weeks in Q1 2020).

Average hearing time at the Crown Court

The hearing time estimates are a ‘lagged measure’ and cases are counted at the point of disposal. As such the hearing time estimates provide a ‘backwards’ look at the duration of hearings at the Crown Court.

The median hearing time^{[footnote 10]} of ‘for trial’ cases where a not guilty plea was entered fell by 5% to 11.9 hours and by 7% on the year (12.9 hours in Q3 2022). In contrast, in ’for trial’ cases where a guilty plea was entered the median hearing time was 1.2 hours a similar level to the previous quarter and year.

4. Timeliness

---

Timeliness decreased at both the magistrates’ court and Crown Court

The median time from offence to completion for cases completing at the magistrates’ and Crown Court both decreased on the previous quarter, down 3% and 6% respectively.

---

The timeliness measures are based on defendants whose cases have been completed and as such are ‘backwards’ looking measures of timeliness between offence and completion at the relevant criminal court jurisdiction.

Experimental statistics using a new data linking methodology have been developed using the Ministry of Justices open-source statistical ‘Splink’ package to provide updated end-to-end timeliness estimates.

Alongside the gradual development of the experimental end-to-end series we will continue to best meet user demands via more granular data on separate (‘unlinked’) timeliness estimates for magistrates’ courts and Crown Court.

• Magistrates’ court timeliness estimates (T1 – T3) – providing estimates of the time from offence to completion for defendants dealt with at the magistrates’ courts.

• End-to-end timeliness estimates (T4) – providing estimates of the time from offence to completion for defendants dealt with at Crown Court.

• Crown Court timeliness estimates (E1 – E2) – providing estimates of the time from case receipt at the Crown Court to completion.

Magistrates’ courts timeliness

Timeliness at the magistrates’ courts measures the time from an offence being committed through key stages of the criminal justice system including charge, first listing and subsequent completion of a defendant’s case at the magistrates’ court.

Figure 7: Average number of days from offence to completion for defendants dealt with at the magistrates’ courts by stage, Q1 2014 – Q3 2023 (Source: Table T3)

The median duration from offence to completion at the magistrates’ courts has tended to fall back from series highs of around 200 days seen in late 2020 and early 2021. The latest quarterly estimates decreased slightly on the previous quarter, from 183 days in Q2 2023 to 178 days in Q3 2023.

• ‘Pre-court’: the median time from ‘offence to charge’ and ‘charge to first listing’ fell by 3% (to 127 days) and 6% (to 32 days) respectively compared to the previous quarter.

• ‘At court’: the median estimate remained stable at 0 days, where the first listing and completion occur on the same day. The mean duration fell slightly to 25 days – this follows sharp increases seen over the COVID period and a peak of 50 days in Q4 2020. Despite the fall since, the latest estimate remains above pre-COVID levels (e.g., 19 days in Q1 2020).

Crown Court timeliness - experimental statistics

‘Unlinked’ timeliness estimates at the Crown Court are measured from the point of a case entering a Crown Court, reaching a main hearing and then completing at court. This data series remains in development and is considered “experimental statistics”. Data presented here is not produced on the same basis as linked end-to-end timeliness data.

The median duration from case receipt to completion at the Crown Court for all cases was 130 days. This represents a 13% decrease on the previous quarter (149 days).

Figure 8: Median duration from receipt to completion in ‘for trial’ cases by plea at the Crown Court, Q1 2014 – Q3 2023 (Source: E2)

In ‘for trial’ cases where a not guilty plea was entered, the median duration from receipt to completion decreased, down 6% on the previous quarter (from 417 to 391 days). For guilty pleas, the median duration fell (by 10%), from 153 to 137 days.

End-to-end timeliness

The median duration from offence to completion for defendants dealt with at the Crown Court fell by 6% down from 400 days in Q2 2023 to 374 days in Q3 2023.

The latest median estimate of 374 days remains well above pre-COVID levels (254 days in Q1 2020).

Figure 9: Average number of days from offence to completion for defendants dealt with at the Crown Court, Q1 2014 – Q3 2023 (Source: T4)

• ‘Pre-court’: the median time from ‘offence to first listing’ decreased by 10% from 135 days in Q2 2023 to 122 days in Q3 2023.

• ‘At court’: the median time from first listing at the magistrates’ courts to completion at the Crown Court decreased by 6%, from 178 days in Q2 2023 to 167 days in Q3 2023. The latest estimate is well below the series peak seen in Q4 2021 (211 days) but remains well above levels seen pre-COVID (112 days in Q1 2020).

5. Enforcement of financial impositions

---

Total financial impositions increased

The total value of financial impositions made in Q3 2023 was £172.2 million, up 7% on Q2 2023 (£160.4m) and up 32% on the previous year (£130.5m).

The total value of outstanding financial impositions was £1.56 billion in Q3 2023, up by 3% on the previous quarter (£1.51 billion).

---

Financial impositions and amounts paid by imposition type

In Q3 2023 the total value of impositions increased compared to the previous quarter (up 7%). The latest imposition figure is 32% above that seen in the previous year, with increases seen across all imposition types – most notably a more than doubling in the amount imposed for victim surcharge, up from £12.8m in Q3 2022 to £27.4m in Q3 2023.

Outstanding financial impositions

In Q3 2023, the total value of financial impositions outstanding in England and Wales was £1.56 billion, up 3% on the previous quarter and 12% on the previous year.

The amount of outstanding financial impositions is now nearly 3 times the amount in Q1 2015 (£571m). A change in policy regarding the collection of financial impositions is partially behind this cumulative increase – unpaid accounts are no longer routinely closed and therefore, more outstanding impositions are carried over from previous periods.

6. Experimental statistics: Language interpreter and translation services

---

The number of completed language service requests reached a new series high. The success rate in Q3 2023 was 96%.

There were 48,170 completed requests in Q3 2023, up 4% on the previous quarter. This is a new series peak. The success rate fell by 1 percentage point to 96%.

---

Completed service requests

The volume of completed service requests increased to 48,170, a series peak. Completed requests were up 10% on the previous year (43,866).

Figure 10: Number of completed language service requests and overall success rate, Q1 2014 – Q3 2023 (Source: Table L1)

Success rate

The overall success rate in Q3 2023 was 96% - this is a small (1 percentage point) fall compared to the previous quarter. This fall may reflect the extra demand seen in the increased volume of requests.

Complaints and complaint rate

The number of complaints has remained low since Q2 2020, with 146 complaints made in Q3 2023. This has decreased on the previous quarter (201) and remains well below levels seen pre-COVID (436 complaints in Q1 2020). The overall complaint rate was 0.3% in Q3 2023 and has remained below 1% since Q3 2020.

‘Off-contract’ requests

The number of ‘off-contract’ requests in Q3 2023 increased by 11% having shown a sharp fall in the previous quarter (from 1,626 to 1,811 in Q3 2023). This remains well above the average seen across the series (around 774 requests per quarter).

7. Further information on criminal courts data

The latest data presented in this publication are provisional. Final data for each calendar year is published in June, following further data cleaning and the incorporation of additional cases not available in our original extracts.

Accompanying files

As well as the bulletin, the following products are published as part of this release:

• Two technical guides providing background information and standalone quality guide.

• A set of overview tables, covering each section of this bulletin.

• Pivot tools and underlying data which feature further breakdowns of published data.

National Statistics status

National Statistics status means that official statistics meet the highest standards of trustworthiness, quality and public value. This bulletin recently underwent a compliance check with the Office for Statistics Regulation and retained its National Statistics status in January 2019^{[footnote 11]}. All official statistics should comply with all aspects of the Code of Practice for Statistics. They are awarded National Statistics status following an assessment by the Authority’s regulatory arm which considers whether the statistics meet the highest standards of Code compliance, including the value they add to public decisions and debate. It is the Ministry of Justice’s responsibility to maintain compliance with the standards expected for National Statistics. If we become concerned about whether these statistics are still meeting the appropriate standards, we will discuss any concerns with the Authority promptly. National Statistics status can be removed at any point when the highest standards are not maintained, and reinstated when standards are restored.

Experimental Statistics status

Experimental statistics are produced under the remit of the Code of Practice for Statistics. They are also produced impartially and are free from political influence^{[footnote 12]}.

Future publications

Our statisticians regularly review the content of publications. Development of new and improved statistical outputs is usually dependent on reallocating existing resources. As part of our continual review and prioritisation, we welcome user feedback on existing outputs including content, breadth, frequency and methodology. Please send any comments you have on this publication including suggestions for further developments or reductions in content to the contacts listed below.

Contact

Press enquiries should be directed to the Ministry of Justice press office:

Tel: 020 3334 3536

Email: newsdesk@justice.gov.uk

Other enquiries and feedback about these statistics should be directed to the ‘Data & Analysis: Courts and People’ division of the Ministry of Justice:

Criminal Courts and Sentencing Data and Statistics,
Ministry of Justice, 10 South Colonnade, London, E14 4PU

Email: statistics.enquiries@justice.gov.uk

Next update: 28th March 2024

URL: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/criminal-court-statistics

© Crown copyright

Produced by the Ministry of Justice

Alternative formats are available on request from criminal_court_sta@justice.gov.uk

1. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/common-platform-system-tested-in-criminal-courts/ ↩

2. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/hmcts-common-platform-participating-criminal-courts/ ↩

3. https://www.judiciary.uk/announcements/message-from-the-lord-chief-justice-latest-covid-19-restrictions/ ↩

4. https://www.judiciary.uk/announcements/review-of-court-arrangements-due-to-covid-19-message-from-the-lord-chief-justice/ ↩

5. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/more-face-to-face-hearings-as-courts-reopen ↩

6. https://www.judiciary.uk/announcements/jury-trial-sites-4/ ↩

7. https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-statements/detail/2022-10-12/HCWS317 ↩

8. Guilty plea rate is the number of defendants pleading guilty to all counts as a proportion of those with a plea. ↩

9. The waiting time is the duration between a case being sent to the Crown Court and the first main hearing. ↩

10. The hearing time is the time a case spends being heard in the Crown Court, including preliminary hearings, main hearings, and hearings where a sentence is given to a defendant. ↩

11. https://www.statisticsauthority.gov.uk/correspondence/compliance-check-on-court-statistics/ ↩

12. https://www.statisticsauthority.gov.uk/monitoring-and-assessment/code-of-practice/ ↩