Legal aid statistics England and Wales bulletin Apr to Jun 2022
Published 29 September 2022
© Crown copyright 2022
This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gov.uk.
Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned.
This publication is available at https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/legal-aid-statistics-quarterly-april-to-june-2022/legal-aid-statistics-england-and-wales-bulletin-apr-to-jun-2022
We are seeking user feedback on the use of HTML for the publication of statistical bulletins. Please send any comments to: statistics@justice.gov.uk.
Main Points
| In the magistrates’ court the volume of completed work decreased by 9% and associated expenditure decreased by 7% when compared to the same period last year. | ⬊ | Representation orders granted in magistrates’ court declined 3% while Crown Court decreased by 8%. | ||
| Overall Crown Court expenditure increased this quarter; up by 23% compared with the same period of the previous year. | ⬈ | This is driven by rising disposals in the Crown courts from extra sitting days being sat to reduce the backlog of trials. | ||
| Prison Law workload saw a 7% decrease this quarter, driven by a 31% decrease in prison discipline hearings. | ⬊ | Prison Law comprises just 2% of total criminal legal aid volume and 2% of corresponding expenditure. | ||
| Civil legal aid closed case expenditure increased this quarter; up by 16% compared to April to June 2021. | ⬈ | This increase is driven by family civil representation expenditure increasing by 20% over the same period. | ||
| Mediation Information and Assessment Meeting volumes were 16% lower than in the same quarter of 2021. | ⬊ | Mediation starts were 19% lower and outcomes also were 20% lower. | ||
| Applications for civil representation supported by evidence of domestic violence or child abuse decreased by 11%. | ⬊ | The volume of these granted decreased by 8% compared to the same period of 2021. | ||
| There were 877 applications for Exceptional Case Funding received in the last quarter. | ⬊ | This is a 10% decrease from the same quarter last year. |
This edition comprises the first release of official statistics for the three-month period from April to June 2022 and the latest statement of all figures for previous periods. For more detailed commentary, and statistics on providers of legal aid, Central Funds and diversity in legal aid, please refer to the annual publication. For technical detail, please refer to the User guide to legal aid statistics.
Statistician’s Comment
This publication shows that expenditure across both criminal and civil legal aid has increased year on year and has also increased more over the recent quarters, following recovery from covid-19.
Criminal legal aid expenditure increased compared to the same quarter last year in schemes that support the court system, including the magistrates’ and Crown Court. The incoming workload for representation at the courts had returned to levels seen in the period pre-covid-19 but in the last few quarters we’ve seen falls in both courts suggesting a sustained fall in cases reaching court. There are increases in expenditure this quarter compared to the previous year although expenditure has still not fully recovered to pre-pandemic levels.
Civil legal aid volumes and expenditure show a mixed picture compared to last year. Overall civil expenditure is returning to pre-pandemic levels driven by family law expenditure. Other non-family workload has not recovered to the same extent and this is driven by the slow recovery of housing work following the impact of covid-19 although in the last quarter this has increased. Overall civil legal aid workload still remains below pre-pandemic levels although trends are increasing in domestic violence, mental health and, within exceptional case funding, immigration.
It was expected that criminal and civil legal aid volumes would return to, and even temporarily exceed, historic trend levels and more recent falls could be due to this return to normal levels.
Things you need to know
These symbols are used throughout this release to navigate to other documents of interest:
| Web Tool | Help | Tables |
| Click for tool allowing user-defined charts and tables | Click for document giving definitions and explanations | Click for access to tables of figures |
To understand trends in legal aid as a whole, it is best to begin by looking at annual expenditure figures and then look at trends in both workload and expenditure for each category of legal aid. Summarising workload activity across the whole legal aid system meaningfully within a single number is difficult because of the diversity of services included and different stages in delivery. For example, legal aid work can be measured at the point when an order for legal aid is granted, or after all the legal aid work is completed and the provider has been paid. Expenditure on legal aid is measured differently for different purposes. The three most often-used measures, shown in Figure 1, are:
-
Closed-case expenditure is the measure used for expenditure figures throughout these legal aid statistics. It represents the total value of payments made to legal aid providers in relation to pieces of work that are completed in the period. This basis is comparable to volumes of completed work to which it relates, and to the same fine level of detail.
-
RDEL (Resource Departmental Expenditure Limits) nominal is the main budgeting measure used by government to control current spending, both to set budgets for future years and report on how much has been spent. It represents the value of work carried out in the period better than the closed-case measure but cannot be broken down to such a fine level of detail. This measure does incorporate income and expenditure in relation to debt. Nominal here means not adjusted for inflation.
-
RDEL real is the RDEL measure adjusted for inflation to make the value of spending in previous years directly comparable with the specified year.
These measures show a large reduction in legal aid expenditure from around 2010-11, mostly due to changes to the scope of civil legal aid introduced by the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders (LASPO) Act from 2013-14, reductions in criminal legal aid workloads and reductions in the fees payable to legal aid providers.
Figure 1: Overall annual legal aid expenditure, by closed-case and RDEL nominal and real terms measures (£m), 2005-06 to 2021-22
(see interactive breakdown here)
Criminal legal aid
| Web Tool | Help | Tables |
** In the magistrates’ court the volume of completed work decreased by 9% and associated expenditure decreased by 7% when compared to the same period last year.**
For more information on trends in criminal legal aid see here
Criminal legal aid can be categorised into Crime Lower and Crime Higher.
Crime Lower (covered in this report) includes police station advice, magistrates’ court and prison law. Table 2.1 provides the Crime Lower workload whereas table 2.2 gives the Crime Lower expenditure.
Crime Higher (covered in this report) covers work in the Crown and Higher Courts.
Figure 2: Crime overview, closed case volumes and expenditure for April to June 2022, and comparison with April to June 2021
(see interactive breakdown of crime)
| Crime Overview | Workload | Expenditure |
|---|---|---|
| Crime | 250,766(0%⬌) | £199.5m (14%⬈) |
| Crime Lower | 212,859(8%⬌) | £61.2m(2%⬊) |
| Crown Court | 37,907(1%⬊) | £138.3m(23%⬈) |
| Crime Lower Category | Workload | Expenditure |
|---|---|---|
| Police Station Advice | 144,533(5%⬈) | £29.5m(5%⬈) |
| Magistrates’ courts | 64,206(9%⬊) | £27.1m(7%⬊) |
| Advice & assistance on appeals | 256(21%⬈) | £505k(21%⬈) |
| Prison Law | 3,853(0%⬊) | £4.1m(3%⬊) |
| Civil work associated with crime | 11(21%⬊) | £37.5k(15%⬈) |
| Crown Court Category | Workload | Expenditure |
|---|---|---|
| Solicitor fee scheme | 18,633(7%⬊) | £77.8m(19%⬈) |
| Advocate fee scheme | 19,269(5%⬈) | £58.7m(26%⬈) |
| High Cost crime cases | 5(67%⬈) | £1.9m(68%⬈) |
Although Crown Court work comprises a relatively small portion of criminal legal aid in terms of volume, it accounts for around two-thirds of all criminal legal aid expenditure. Conversely, advice relating to the police station makes up the largest portion of workload, but a much smaller proportion of expenditure.
Figure 3a: Workload in criminal legal aid, April to June 2011 to April to June 2022
(see interactive breakdown of crime lower)
Figure 3b: Expenditure in criminal legal aid, April to June 2011 to April to June
(see interactive breakdown of crime higher)
Note: Advice and assistance on appeals and civil work associated with crime are excluded from these figures.
Police station advice
This category made up two thirds of the Crime Lower workload between April and June 2022 but less than half of the expenditure. The workload in this period has increased by 5% compared to the previous year, which has shifted volumes to near pre-covid levels, with expenditure increasing by 5% (£1.4m). This reverses the general downward trend seen over the last few years with a decrease in police station advice workload since 2013-14 being seen in arrest statistics for England and Wales [footnote 1][1], which has had a similar decline historically.
The majority of the police station advice workload (89% in April and June 2022) consists of suspects receiving legal help with a solicitor in attendance at the police station, with the rest mainly consisting of legal advice over the telephone.
Applications and grants for representation in the criminal courts
While figures should be interpreted with caution as they may be revised in subsequent quarters as cases move into the Crown court, the number of orders granted for legally-aided representation in the Magistrates’ court decreased by 3% this quarter when compared to the same quarter of the previous year. This continues the downward trend of the last 3 years, which has been largely driven by Summary Only cases.
Orders granted for legally-aided representation in the Crown court also decreased by, a greater degree; 8% this quarter compared to last year, comparing to a 4% decrease in Crown Court trial receipts[footnote 2] . Within the legal aid figure, orders relating to either-way offences decreased by 7% (5% in court statistics), while those relating to indictable offences decreased by 2% (5% for the court statistics). The proportion of Crown Court applications granted remains at almost 100%.
Magistrates’ court completed work
Legally-aided representation in the magistrates’ court comprised almost one-third of the workload and just under half of expenditure in Crime Lower between April and June 2022. The volume of completed work (covered in this report) in the magistrates’ court decreased by 9% this quarter when compared to the same period of the previous year. Expenditure also decreased by 7% (£1.9m).
These falls incorporate the accelerated Criminal legal aid reforms since October 2020 which cover payment for work on sending cases to the Crown Court. This new category shown in the tables accompanying this bulletin had 9,505 claims costing around £2.2m completed this quarter.
Crown Court completed work
Completed work volumes within the litigator (solicitor) fee scheme decreased by 7% in April to June 2022 compared to the same period of the previous year, where a 12% increase in trial claims is masked by falls due to extended sentencing at the magistrates’ court and a corresponding decrease in committals for sentence and appeals. This recovery in trial workload is from extra resource within the HMCTS estate and completion of more jury trials from the outstanding backlogs.
In the advocate fee scheme, completed claims increased by 5% compared to the same period last year. Figures here should be interpreted with caution due to temporary scheme changes from accelerated reforms that paid cracked trials at the higher trial fee. This is now captured accurately by the underlying systems and this quarter we have a 28% fall in trial workload but a corresponding 78% increase in cracked trial workload.
Figure 4a: Workload in the Crown Court, April to June 2011 to April to June 2022
(see interactive breakdown here)
In the litigator fee scheme, expenditure increased by 19% in April to June 2022 compared to the same period of the previous year. In the advocate fee scheme, the value of payments increased by 26% compared to the same period of the previous year. Figures for expenditure on work completed in the Crown Court should be interpreted with caution as they may be revised in subsequent quarters as claims are assessed further on appeal and further payments added to the value of some completed claims.
The Very High-Cost Case (VHCC) scheme covers those Crown Court cases which, if the case were to proceed to trial, would likely last more than 60 days. These cases can span several years and, while they may involve small numbers of defendants, the associated expenditure is high in comparison.
There were 5 defendants represented in the VHCC contracts that concluded in the April to June 2022 quarter. Expenditure on this work over the duration of the contracts (i.e. on the closed-case basis) was £1.9m. While workload comprises a tiny proportion of legal aid in the Crown Court overall, the VHCC scheme represents around 1% of the cost, although down from over 15% ten years ago.
Figure 4b: Expenditure in the Crown Court, April to June 2011 to April to June
(see interactive breakdown here)
The large falls in completed expenditure were a consequence of the reduction in the number of jury trials completing in the Crown Court, as all expenditure across the case will be in the final main bill. Figure 4c below, looking at the litigator fee scheme in isolation but equally applicable to both schemes, shows the impact of falling trials on expenditure – these types of cases are more likely to be impacted as they need more courtroom space and distancing measures and are likely to include witnesses and members of the public in the jury pool. Trial completed expenditure has been more adversely affected than guilty pleas and cracked trials, where a defendant changes their plea before the trial, with litigator fee expenditure much lower. Previously it was more than £60m and it is now recovering to levels seen pre-covid.
Figure 4c: Litigator Fee Scheme Crown Court expenditure by claim type, April to June 2015 to April to June 2022
Prison Law
Workload this quarter decreased by 7% compared with the same period in the previous year, driven by advocacy assistance at parole board hearings which decreased by 18% compared to last year and has decreased by 14% since last quarter (see figure 5). Advocacy at parole board hearings currently makes up just over two-fifths of prison law workload, but a much larger proportion of costs (75%), so expenditure on prison law overall decreased by 15% over this period.
Since April to June 2020, the workload and expenditure for advocacy assistance at prison discipline hearings has remained low. Year-to-year comparisons show that workload decreased by 31% and expenditure decreased by 24% this quarter compared to last year.
Figure 5a: Prison Law completed workload, April to June 2011 to April to June 2022
Figure 5b: Prison Law completed expenditure, April to June 2011 to April to June 2022
*New categories not shown: ‘advocacy assistance at sentence reviews’ and ‘advocacy assistance at Parole Board reconsideration hearings’
Civil legal aid
| Web Tool | Help | Tables |
Civil legal aid closed case expenditure increased this quarter; up by 16% compared to April to June 2021. This increase is primarily driven by family civil representation expenditure increasing by 20% over the same period. For more info on trends in civil legal aid see here
Civil legal aid can be categorised by area of law into family and non-family. The category of family legal aid covers all work on both private and public family law and includes work associated with the Children Act, domestic abuse, financial provision and family mediation. Non-family legal aid encompasses all work related to immigration, mental health, housing and other non-family law.
Figure 6: Civil overview, closed case volumes and expenditure for April to June 2022, and comparison with April to June 2021
(see interactive breakdown of civil)
| Civil Overview | Workload | Expenditure |
|---|---|---|
| Civil | 62,540(3%⬈) | £219.3m(15%⬈) |
| Family | 28,240(4%⬈) | £181.8m(19%⬈) |
| Non-Family | 29,616(5%⬈) | £36.0m(0%⬌) |
| Family Category | Workload | Expenditure |
|---|---|---|
| Family Public | 17,467(0%⬌) | £143.3m(16%⬈) |
| Family Private | 10,773(13%⬈) | £38.5m(37%⬈) |
| Mediation and MIAMs* | 4,684(17%⬊) | £1.4m(17%⬊) |
| Non-Family Category | Workload | Expenditure |
|---|---|---|
| Immigration | 11,093(13%⬈) | £9.3m(0%⬌) |
| Mental Health | 8,840(2%⬊) | £11.1m(1%⬈) |
| Housing | 6,451(6%⬈) | £4.6m(5%⬊) |
| Other Non-Family | 3,232(1%⬊) | £11.1m(1%⬈) |
*Not included in the Family total
Although workload for family and non-family law cases are similar, Non-family comprises a relatively small proportion of civil legal aid expenditure. Public family legal aid makes up two thirds of family legal aid work and over 80% of expenditure.
Legal help and controlled legal representation
In the last quarter, there was a 3% decrease in legal help new matter starts compared to the same period of 2021. The volume of completed claims increased by 2% while expenditure decreased by 11% in April to June 2022 compared to the same period in 2021 (see further breakdown of legal help).
Figure 7a: Completed workload in legal help and controlled legal representation, April to June 2011 to April to June 2022
Figure 7b: Completed workload expenditure in legal help and controlled legal representation, April to June 2011 to April to June 2022
Family legal help
There was a steep decline to family legal help immediately following the implementation of LASPO Act in April 2013, with a more gradual decline over the last 6 years.
From 1 September 2021, callers to the Civil Legal Advice (CLA) helpline with family issues are no longer referred to specialist telephone advice. Consequently, in April to June 2022, family legal help starts decreased by 29% compared to the same quarter last year. Completed family claims also decreased by 11% and expenditure is down by 12%.
Family mediation involves an independent and impartial professionally-accredited mediator discussing problems with a divorcing or separating couple. A Mediation Information and Assessment Meeting (MIAMs) is an initial meeting between one or both parties and a mediator to see if family mediation could be used to reach agreement without using the courts.
MIAMs, family mediation starts, and outcomes decreased significantly following the covid-19 restrictions in March 2020. Since, volumes and expenditure had rapidly increased to levels temporarily exceeding pre-covid figures. However, in the latest quarter, MIAMs have decreased by 16% compared to April to June 2021 and currently stand at just a third of pre-LASPO levels. Family mediation starts decreased by 19% and total outcomes decreased by 20%, of which 62% were successful agreements, and are now sitting at around half of pre-LASPO levels.
Figure 8: Family mediation assessments, starts and agreements, April to June 2011 to October to December 2021
(see interactive breakdown for mediation)
Non-family legal help and controlled legal representation
Controlled legal representation relates to representation at tribunal, but unlike civil representation, the decision on whether to grant legal aid is delegated to providers. Legal help and controlled legal representation make up over 95% of both immigration and mental health legal aid cases.
The LASPO Act 2012 made changes to the scope of legal aid for immigration law, but some areas remained in scope. Workload that remains in the immigration category consists largely of asylum-related work. Having fallen by over 45% in April to June 2020, new matter starts in immigration increased by 21% in April to June 2022 compared to the same quarter of the previous year. Completed claims in immigration increased by 14% in the last quarter compared to the previous year whereas expenditure is down by 6%.
Within mental health, most funding is spent on providing assistance to sectioned clients appealing the terms of their detention before a mental health tribunal. Mental health new matter starts decreased by 6% when comparing the latest quarter to the previous year. Completed claims also decreased by 3% and expenditure decreased by 3% over the same period.
Over 80% of legal aid housing work volume is made up of legal help. The volume of legally aided housing work halved between July to September 2012 and July to September 2013. The trend then fluctuated for around 18 months but since 2014 it has been falling. Housing legal aid was particularly affected by covid-19 with starts and completed claims nearly halving again between January to March 2020 and April to June 2020. In April to June 2022, there was a 9% increase in housing work starts compared to the same quarter the previous year. There were also increases in completed claims (5%) but decreases in expenditure (28%).
Civil representation
The number of civil representation certificates granted in the last quarter decreased by 3% compared to the same period of the previous year. However, the number of certificates completed is up 9%, and the associated expenditure increased by 20% over the same period.
Figure 9a: Completed workload in civil representation, April to June 2011 to April to June 2022
(see interactive breakdown here)
Figure 9b: Completed workload expenditure in civil representation, April to June 2011 to April to June 2022
(see interactive breakdown here)
Non-Family Civil Representation
Non-family certificates completed make up 11% of the total civil representation workload and 9% of the expenditure. There are only a small number of immigration and mental health cases in civil representation as most work in these areas consists of controlled legal representation. Housing work represents a large proportion of non-family certificates completed. In the latest period, completed certificates increased by 14% compared to the same period of the previous year.
Family civil representation
While civil representation for public family law remains available, the LASPO Act removed legal aid for most private family law including issues such as contact or divorce. However, legal aid remains available for such cases where there is a risk of domestic violence or child abuse.
Certificates granted for family work decreased by 3% in April to June 2022 compared to the previous year. Whereas, certificates completed increased by 9% and associated expenditure has increased by 20% compared to the same quarter the previous year. The volume and expenditure for closed case domestic violence civil representation increased substantially following the initial impacts of COVID-19. In April to June 2022, certificates completed for domestic violence increased by 15% compared to the same period of the previous year and expenditure has increased 36%. At a cost of £15m in April to June 2022, this is the highest quarterly domestic violence expenditure seen in our series.
In April to June 2022, applications for civil representation supported by evidence of domestic violence or child abuse decreased by 11% compared to the same period of the previous year. The number of these granted decreased by 8% over the same period. The proportion of applications granted remained steady at around 70% from the inception of this type of application until the end of 2015, before increasing to around 80%. The provisional figure for the latest quarter is 84%.
Figure 10: Applications received and total certificates granted via the domestic violence and child abuse gateway, April to June 2013 to April to June 2022
Judicial reviews
Of all civil representation applications granted, around 3,000 a year relate to judicial review; 653 in the last quarter. The number granted in April to June 2022 increased by 12% compared with the same quarter in 2021. Around two thirds of judicial reviews were for public law. Judicial review data is available in the detailed csv accompanying this bulletin.
Exceptional Case Funding (ECF)
The Exceptional Case Funding (ECF) scheme was introduced as part of LASPO. An ECF application for civil legal services is made where a case falls outside the scope of civil legal aid but the client or conducting solicitor believes failure to provide funding would be a breach of the Human Rights Act 1998.
There were 877 applications for ECF received from April to June 2022. This is a 10% decrease from the same quarter last year. 827 (94%) of these were new applications.
Of the 877 ECF applications received between April and June 2022, 94% (822) had been determined by the LAA as of 01 September 2022. 77% (634) of these were granted, 12% (96) were refused and 8% (67) rejected (see figure 11).
Figure 11: Volume of ECF applications received, April to June 2014 to April to June 2022
(see interactive breakdown here)
Among the ECF applications received between April and June 2022, immigration (68%), inquest (11%), and family (12%) remained the most requested categories of law. The increase in ECF applications over the last six years is driven by an increase in immigration applications.
Figure 12: Volume of ECF determinations by outcome, April to June 2015 to April to June 2022
(see interactive breakdown here)
Further information
This publication presents quarterly data trends. For more detailed commentary, and statistics on providers of legal aid, Central Funds and diversity in legal aid, please refer to the annual publication.
Our statisticians regularly review the content of publications. Development of new and improved statistical outputs is usually dependent on reallocating existing resources. As part of our continual review and prioritisation, we welcome user feedback on existing outputs including content, breadth, frequency and methodology. Please send any comments you have on this publication including suggestions for further developments or reduction in content.
National Statistics status
National Statistics status means that official statistics meet the highest standards of trustworthiness, quality and public value. All official statistics should comply with all aspects of the Code of Practice for Official Statistics.
They are awarded National Statistics status following an assessment by the Authority’s regulatory arm. The Authority considers whether the statistics meet the highest standards of Code compliance, including the value they add to public decisions and debate.
It is the Ministry of Justice’s responsibility to maintain compliance with the standards expected for National Statistics. If we become concerned about whether these statistics are still meeting the appropriate standards, we will discuss any concerns with the Authority promptly. National Statistics status can be removed at any point when the highest standards are not maintained, and reinstated when standards are restored.
Contact
Press enquiries should be directed to the Ministry of Justice press office:
Tel: 020 3334 3536
Email: newsdesk@justice.gsi.gov.uk
Other enquiries about these statistics should be directed to the Justice Statistics Analytical Services division of the Ministry of Justice:
Carly Gray,
Ministry of Justice
Tel: 07784 275495
Email: statistics@justice.gov.uk
Tables and Data
-
A set of Tables, which give further detail and full time-series for each scheme and interactive versions can be found for Crime and Civil.
-
An ods spreadsheet download for all ‘Tables’, which provide full time-series for each scheme.
-
Also an accessible version of ods spreadsheet download for all ‘Tables’, which also provide full time-series for each scheme.
-
Main data and Civil detailed data: Detailed files to enable independent analysis, provided in .csv (Comma delimited) format.
Help
-
User Guide to legal aid statistics: This provides comprehensive information about data sources as well as key legislative changes.
-
Index of data in Legal aid statistics: A guide to the data published in the .ods files, lists of available data from Legal Aid systems and guidance on how to work with the data.
-
Quality Statement: This provides detail on how legal aid statistics meet user needs
Web tool
- Data visualisation tool A web-based tool allowing the user to view and customize charts and tables based on the published statistics.
Next update: 15 December 2022
URL: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/legal-aid-statistics
© Crown copyright Produced by the Ministry of Justice
Alternative formats are available on request from statistics.enquiries@justice.gov.uk
[1] www.gov.uk/government/collections/police-powers-and-procedures-england-and-wales