Official Statistics

Guide to Tribunal Statistics Quarterly

Published 14 March 2024

1. Introduction

This document accompanies the Tribunal Statistics Quarterly and provides a background overview related to HMCTS Tribunals, focusing on concepts and definitions published in Ministry of Justice statistics. It also covers policy background and changes, statistical publication revision policies, data sources, quality and dissemination.

Additional chapters are included in the Tribunal and Gender Recognition Statistics bulletin, for certain quarters in the year, and have been summarised below:

• September publication: includes an additional chapter and supporting tables relating to more detailed annual Employment and Employment Appeal Tribunal statistics.

• December publication: this provides a more detailed breakdown of the Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND) tribunals by academic year.

• June publication: includes revised annual summaries of all tribunals and additional chapters relating to Adjournments, Postponements, Judicial Salaried and Fee-paid sittings. Also includes the rate of appeal to the SEND Tribunal for the prior calendar year.

Statistical Notices of Further breakdown to the published figures

The following are statistical notices of further tribunal breakdowns that have been published alongside the quarterly Tribunals and Gender Recognition Certificate Statistics in the past year:

June 2023

• An updated statistical notice on Immigration and Asylum (I&A) Detained Immigration Appeals (DIA) to include data to Q4 2022/23.

• ET Fee Refund

September 2023

• An updated statistical notice on Immigration and Asylum (I&A) Detained Immigration Appeals (DIA) to include data to Q1 2023/24.

December 2023

• An updated statistical notice on Immigration and Asylum (I&A) Detained Immigration Appeals (DIA) to include data to Q2 2023/24.

March 2024

• An updated statistical notice on Immigration and Asylum (I&A) Detained Immigration Appeals (DIA) to include data to Q3 2023/24.

2. Structure and Overview of Tribunals

Tribunals are specialist judicial bodies which decide disputes in particular areas of law. Appeals to tribunals are generally against a decision made by a Government department or agency. The main exception to this is the Employment Tribunal where cases are on a party v party basis (specifically, employee versus employer). There are tribunals in England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland covering a wide range of areas affecting day-to-day life. His Majesty’s Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) administers many of them although some are the responsibility of the devolved governments in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. Please note that the quarterly statistics do not include data on tribunals not covered by HMCTS.

Tribunals have a two-tier structure (see Figure 1). The First Tier tribunal hears first instance appeals, primarily (but not exclusively) against certain decisions made by Government departments or other public bodies. The Upper Tribunal generally hears appeals from decisions of the First Tier tribunal although it also deals with certain matters at first instance.

The two tiers are divided into chambers which deal with particular areas of work. There are seven chambers in the First Tier Tribunal:

• War Pensions and Armed Forces Compensation: deals with appeals against decisions made about the entitlement to, or amount of, pension or compensation awarded to ex-service personnel who have been injured, or sustained illness, during service in the Armed Forces.

• Social Entitlement: mainly deals with appeals against decisions about a range of benefits and credits made by the Department for Work and Pensions, His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, and Local Authorities, but also appeals against decisions about Asylum Support and Criminal Injuries Compensation.

• Health, Education and Social Care: this deals with a range of appeals including decisions taken under the Mental Health Act and assessments of Special Educational Needs.

• Tax Chamber: appeals against assessments of direct and indirect taxation and also appeals in cases of MPs’ expenses.

• Immigration and Asylum: appeals against decisions of the Home Office relating to permission to stay in the UK, deportation from the UK and entry clearance to the UK.

• Property: primarily disputes about rent and land valuations.

• General Regulatory: this deals with a wide range of matters, mainly in relation to regulated services, such as Charity, Information Rights, Claims Management, Gambling and Transport.

HMCTS is also responsible for a number of specialist tribunals, including, for example, the Gender Recognition Panel.

The Upper Tribunal has four Chambers: Tax and Chancery, Immigration and Asylum, Lands and Administrative Appeals.

In addition, HMCTS is also responsible for the administration of the Employment Tribunal and the Employment Appeal Tribunal, although these sit outside the unified structure.

Figure 1: First-tier and Upper Tribunal chambers

Appeals to the First Tier Tribunal are against the decisions from government departments and other public bodies. The Upper Tribunal hears appeals against decisions made by the First Tier Tribunal on points of law; specifically, an appeal made over the interpretation of a legal principle or statute. Further appeals may be made, with permission, to the Court of Appeal.

Tribunal judges are legally-qualified. Tribunal members are specialist non-legal members of the panel and include doctors, chartered surveyors, ex-service personnel or accountants. Tribunals often sit as a panel comprising a judge and non-legal members however in some jurisdiction’s cases may be heard by a judge or member sitting alone.

The Tribunal Statistics Bulletin covers information on receipts (i.e. cases received by HMCTS), the outcome of cases by category (e.g. cases disposed of at hearing) and the open caseload (snapshot of live cases at a specific point in time). It also goes into more detail on the three largest tribunals, including statistics on the outcome of appeals and the mean and median time to clear appeals to these tribunals). The three largest tribunals based on volumes of appeals received are; Employment, Immigration and Asylum, and Social Security and Child Support. These Tribunals accounted for an average of 88% of all interim tribunal receipts in the period between 2018/19 to 2022/23.

2.1 Employment

Employment tribunals are independent judicial bodies established to resolve disputes between employers and employees over employment rights.

The following simplified flowchart shows the stages of Employment Tribunal (ET) receipts and disposals. Please note this is a simplified flowchart and does not cover all the possible processes involved.

Figure 2: Employment Tribunal receipts and disposals

* any decision of the ET may be appealed to the EAT, by either party

On 26 July 2017 the Supreme Court in its judgment in R (on the application of Unison) v Lord Chancellor ruled that Employment Tribunal and Employment Appeal Tribunal Fees Order 2013, SI 2013/1893 (“the Fees order”) which came into effect on 29 July 2013 was unlawful under both domestic and EU law because it had the effect of preventing access to justice.

Prior to the Supreme Court judgment, quarterly Tribunals publications included data on Employment Tribunal fees. Following the abolition of ET fees, a final analysis was published on 14 December 2017 covering statistics between 29 July 2013 (when ET fees were first introduced) and 26 July 2017 (when they were abolished). From March 2018, summary statistics relating to the employment tribunal fee refund scheme have been published in Tribunals Statistics Quarterly.

Employment Tribunal claims are counted as received (receipts) once the tribunal has accepted the claim as valid. Claims in employment tribunals can be classified into either single or multiple claims. Single claims are made by a sole employee/worker, relating to alleged breaches of employment rights. Multiple claims are where two or more people bring proceedings arising out of the same facts, usually against a common employer. Both single and multiple claims can involve one or more jurisdictional complaints. Where claims are grouped as multiples, they are processed administratively and managed judicially together. We call these groups of claims ‘multiple claims cases’.

Employment Tribunals transitioned to a new database (Employment Case Management) during March to May 2021. It has not been possible to provide full results from both databases during this migration period on a consistent basis. Therefore, Employment Tribunal (ET) data is not available for Q1 2021/22, and as a result we are unable to present data for the full financial year of 2021/22.

A claim (either single or multiple) can be brought under one or more different jurisdictions, for example under Age Discrimination and Equal Pay. Therefore, the number of jurisdictional complaints is always greater than the total tribunal claims received. Claims are allocated to one of the 12 regional ET offices, based on the employee’s work address. This address is often the employers address though not exclusively.

The trend in multiple claims is more volatile than single claims due to large numbers of claims against a single employer which can skew the national figures. For example, in September 2016 and March 2017, the large increases in ET multiple claims were due to two multiple airline cases relating to the working time directive jurisdiction. This was particularly prevalent prior to October 2013 when a small number of multiple cases against the airline industry had to be resubmitted each quarter.

Under the previous ET fees scheme, claims were separated into two distinct types, each attracting a different fee. ‘Type A’ claims were more straightforward, and so had a lower fee. These included claims about unpaid wages, payment in lieu of notice and redundancy payments. ‘Type B’ claims involved more complicated issues, and therefore attracted a higher fee. These types of claim tended to be those involving unfair dismissal or discrimination complaints.

Single claim cases had standard fees associated with them, whereas multiple claim cases had different fees depending on the number of claimants they contained. When a claim (either single or multiple) had more than one jurisdictional complaint and at least one of the complaints was a Type B, a Type B fee was payable.

Fee Refund Scheme

Following the Supreme Court ruling in July 2017 (as referenced above), all Employment Tribunal fees not fully remitted are eligible for a full refund. In addition, where a case was closed due to the non-payment of a fee, the claimant has been invited to reinstate the case (at the stage at which the fee was not paid).

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) launched a fee refund scheme in October 2017, to reimburse those individuals that had previously paid a fee. The MoJ initially estimated the cost of this scheme to be approximately £33m. Applications may be made by an individual or organisation for each individual fee that was paid, however reimbursements are being made by the Ministry of Justice on a total claim basis, including if a claimant paid for more than one case.

Applications received by the MoJ will be processed to assess validity and the total amount due to each claimant. Refund payments are then made following completion of processing.

Reinstatements

Under the ET fee scheme, when a claimant did not pay the requested fee within the required timeframe, the case would have been struck out due to lack of fee payment. Following the Supreme Court judgement, claimants who had their case struck out for this reason were invited to reinstate their case at the point which it was closed. During October and November 2017, invitations were extended to all relevant claimants to apply to reinstate their case in this manner. Applications are reviewed to assess validity and feasibility to reinstate the case, before being logged as a new case receipt.

Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT)

The main function of the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) is to hear appeals from decisions made by Employment Tribunals. An appeal must be on a point of law, i.e. it must identify flaws in the legal reasoning of the original decision.

The Employment Appeal Tribunal will not normally re-examine issues of fact. It also hears appeals from (and applications relating to) decisions made by the Certification Officer or by the Central Arbitration Committee, however these are infrequent. The EAT may allow an appeal and substitute its own decision for that of the Employment Tribunal, or may remit it back to the Employment Tribunal for rehearing.

2.2 Immigration and Asylum

Immigration and Asylum appeals are against decisions made by the Home Office relating to permission to stay in the UK, deportation from the UK and entry clearance to the UK.

The First-tier Tribunal Immigration and Asylum Chamber (FTTIAC) is an independent Tribunal which deals with appeals against decisions made by the Home Office in immigration, asylum and nationality matters. The Upper Tribunal Immigration and Asylum Chamber (UTIAC) is a superior court of record dealing with appeals against decisions made by the FTTIAC.

The following simplified flowcharts show the stages of FTTIAC Tribunal receipts and disposals. Please note these do not cover all the possible processes involved.

Figure 3: Immigration and Asylum Tribunal receipts and disposals

The introduction of the Immigration Act 2014 removed a number of existing appeal rights against Home Office decisions and refused applicants can now only appeal by first asserting a fundamental right to enter or remain in the UK. These rights are Protection, Removal of Refugee Status, Human Rights, or European Free Movement. Where appeal rights were removed and the applicant asserts the Home Office has made an error in its decision, there is now a right to an Administrative Review by the Home Office. Deprivation of Citizenship and some Deportation appeal rights were not affected by the implementation of the Act as the appeal right is given by European law.

The Immigration Act was implemented in full from April 2015. This was followed by a transitional period during which the FTTIAC received both pre- and post- Immigration Act appeals. Please see Chapter Policy Background and Changes for more information.

On 1 November 2013, the responsibility for most Immigration and Asylum Judicial Reviews (JRs) transferred from the Administrative Court to the Upper Tribunal, including a bulk transfer of 3,230 live cases. Subsequently, if a Judicial Review needs to be transferred between the two jurisdictions it will be re-registered by the importing office. This is because the Upper Tribunal and Administrative Court have separate case management systems and means that a case may be counted in both sets of figures, if it started the process in one and was concluded in the other. For the number of Immigration and Asylum JR cases that are dealt with by the Administrative court, these can be found in the Civil Justice Statistics Quarterly publication.

2.3 Social Security and Child Support

The following simplified flowchart shows the stages of Social Security and Child Support (SSCS) Tribunal receipts and disposals. Please note these are simplified flowcharts and do not cover all the possible processes involved.

Figure 4: SSCS Tribunal receipts and disposals

*Cleared without a hearing includes strike outs, superseded and withdrawals prior to a hearing.

SSCS tribunals usually account for the largest proportion of receipts – making up an average of 46% of all interim tribunal receipts between 2018/19 to 2022/23. Following the staged introduction of mandatory reconsideration from April 2013, the number of appeals declined in 2013/14, reaching their lowest in July to September 2014. Since then, the number of appeals has in general been gradually increasing. Universal Credit (UC) and Personal Independence Payment (PIP) appeals are currently the main benefit types – making up an average of 61% of all interim tribunal receipts between 2018/19 to 2022/23. PIP was introduced in April 2013 and is replacing^{[footnote 1]} Disability Living Allowance (DLA) for people aged between 16 and 64 who need assistance with personal care or mobility as a result of a physical or mental disability. In addition to new benefit claimants being required to claim for PIP and not DLA, DWP are transitioning individuals already in receipt of DLA to PIP via a reassessment programme.

The composition of an SSCS Tribunal panel varies between appeal types – some appeals can be heard by a Judge sitting alone (such as appeals against decisions on Job Seekers’ Allowance) while some appeal panels include a Medical Member (MM), Senior Medical Member (SMM) or Disability Qualified Tribunal Member (DQTM).

2.4 Tribunal Venue Level Data

FTTIAC and the SSCS tribunal data are now routinely published at a venue level in accompanying FTTIAC and SSCS CSV files, within the suite of tribunal statistics CSV zip files.

SSCS Venue level CSV

The SSCS tribunal venue data was first published in the March 2018 publication, providing the following data:

• Receipts

• Disposals^{[footnote 2]}

• Disposals cleared at hearing^{[footnote 3]}

• Disposals not cleared at hearing^{[footnote 4]}

From the June 2018 publication onwards, further information has been added to the data which includes:

• Decisions upheld, for those cases cleared at hearing^{[footnote 5]}

• Decisions in favour, for those cases cleared at hearing^{[footnote 6]}

• Average number of weeks from receipt to final outcome, for appeals disposed of in the period

This SSCS venue data is grouped by benefit type, based on the following categorisation:

• Personal Independence Payment (PIP) -– which replaced Disability Living Allowance from 8 April 2013, therefore this category also includes Disability Living Allowance reassessed cases.

• Employment Support Allowance (ESA) – includes Employment Support Allowance and Incapacity Benefit reassessment. Employment Support Allowance was introduced in October 2008 and Incapacity Benefit reassessment followed in October 2010.

• Universal Credit – separated out from the ‘other’ category from June 2019 publication onwards. Universal credit was introduced in 2013 to replace six means-tested benefits and tax credits: income based Jobseeker’s Allowance, Housing Benefit, Working Tax Credit, Child Tax Credit, income based Employment and Support Allowance and Income Support. It is being introduced in stages across the UK.

• Others – data includes appeals under all other benefit types processed by the SSCS tribunal. For a full list of benefit types please see tables SSCS_1- SSCS_3 of the Main Tables published alongside this guide.

Total – the total number of cases received and cleared by the SSCS tribunal for all benefit types at each tribunal location (and nationally).

FTTIAC Venue level CSV

FTTIAC venue data was first published in the June 2019 publication, providing:

• Receipts

• Disposals

• Percentage of disposals determined

• Percentage of disposals withdrawn

• Percentage of disposals stuck out

• Percentage of disposals invalid

• Percentage of disposals remitted

• Determined at hearing / papers

• Percentage of determined Allowed

• Percentage of determined Dismissed

• Average number of weeks from receipt to final outcome, for appeals disposed of in the period

FTTIAC venue data is grouped by the following:

• Protection – appeals on the grounds that removal from the United Kingdom would breach the United Kingdom’s obligations under the Refugee Convention. These appeals were previously referred to as asylum appeals.

• Revocation of Protection – appeals on the grounds that removal from the United Kingdom would breach the United Kingdom’s obligations in relation to persons previously adjudged as eligible for a grant of humanitarian protection. Previously included within the classification of asylum.

• EEA Free Movement – on the grounds that Home Office decision is restricting rights under the EEA right to free movement.

• Human Rights – appeals on the grounds that the decision to refuse a human rights claim is unlawful under the Human Rights Act 1998.

• Others – data includes appeals under all other case types processed by FTTIAC. For a full list of case types please see tables FIA_1-FIA_3 of the Main Tables published alongside this guide.

• Total – the total number of cases received and cleared by the FTTIAC tribunal for all appeal types at each tribunal location (and nationally).

Protection and Revocation of Protection cases are grouped together as Asylum/Protection/Revocation of Protection.

Where the number of cases for a hearing outcome is below five for a given benefit, the number of decisions upheld and in favour have been supressed, in order to comply with disclosure requirements. In some cases the total figures for that venue have also been supressed, where for example it would be possible to calculate supressed figures from the total figure provided. Supressed figures are indicated by a “~” notation, and are distinct from zero values.

Average Time Taken figures in the CSV files

The average time taken from receipt to final disposal outcome is published at a benefit level from June 2018 onwards for the SSCS tribunal and from March 2019 onwards for the FTTIAC. Weighted averages are provided at a national level in the published main tables (tables T_2 – T_3), as well as at a tribunal location level in the accompanying CSV file. Weighted averages for a combination of tribunal locations or benefit types can be calculated from the underlying data, using the following methodology:

1. Multiply the total number of disposals by average time to clearance, to obtain the weight.

2. Add the weighted scores together

3. Divide the weighted scores by the overall number of disposals, to arrive at the Calculation of Weighted Average (C.W.A)

An example of this calculation for eight Tribunal venues is shown below:

Venue	Average Time (Weeks)	Total Disposals	Weight = (Sum of Average Time (Week) * (Sum of Total Disposals)	C.W.A
Barnsley	20	75	1,500
Darlington	31	106	3,286
Doncaster	23	128	2,944
Durham	30	123	3,690
Scarborough	23	73	1,679
Sheffield Castle St	24	361	8,664
South Shields	38	136	5,168
York	21	50	1,050
C.W.A = (Sum of Total Weight/Sum of Total Disposals)		3,113	78,660	25

2.5 Gender Recognition Certificates

The Gender Recognition Panel (GRP) was established under the Gender Recognition Act 2004 (GRA) (the Act), which enables transgender or trans people to change their gender legally and gain the rights and responsibilities of their newly-acquired gender. All applications are determined by the Panel(GRP) and applicants who meet the GRA’s requirements are granted a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC).

Under United Kingdom law, individuals are considered by the State to be the sex – either male or female – that is recorded on their birth certificate. The Gender Recognition Act 2004 (GRA), which came into effect on 4 April 2005, enables trans* people who experience gender dysphoria to change their legal sex. They can do this by applying to the GRP for a GRC. A GRC entitles the individual to recognition of the gender stated on the certificate “for all purposes” (except for a number of circumstances set out in the Act). Those with a UK birth certificate may use their GRC to obtain a new birth certificate recording their new name and legal gender.

Individuals seeking to change their gender status must provide the GRP with evidence demonstrating a diagnosis of gender dysphoria; that they have lived permanently in the acquired gender for two years or more; and intend to live in the acquired gender for the rest of their lives. Genital surgery Medical treatment is not a requirement however if this has taken place then the applicant must provide details. More details can be found on the application pages here: https://www.gov.uk/apply-gender-recognition-certificate

The GRP is part of His Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) and comprises legal and medical members, supported by an administrative team. The panel sit in private and consider the documentary evidence supplied by the applicant in support of their application to have their gender recognised. The applicant is not required to appear in person.

There are three application processes for applying for a GRC:

• Standard track applications are submitted if the individual:

1. has been diagnosed with gender dysphoria,

2. has lived in the acquired gender in the UK for at least 2 years and

3. intends to live in the acquired gender for the rest of their lives.

• Alternative track applications are submitted if the individual:

1. has been diagnosed with gender dysphoria or had surgery to change their sexual characteristics,

2. lives in England, Wales or Scotland most of the time,

3. intends to live in the acquired gender for the rest of their lives,

4. is in (or has been in) a protected marriage or protected civil partnership and

5. has lived in the acquired gender for at least 6 years before 10 December 2014 (16 December 2014 for Scottish marriages and civil partnerships).

• Overseas track applications are those submitted under the overseas application process, on the basis of having changed gender under the law of an approved country or territory outside the United Kingdom.

The overseas process requires applicants to demonstrate that they have been legally recognised in their acquired gender in a country or territory that is listed in the Gender Recognition (Approved Countries and Territories) Order 2011. The list is available on gov.uk: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/gender-recognition-certificate-list-of-approved-countries-and-territories.

Under all circumstances, an applicant must also prove that they are at least 18 years of age at the date of application.

The Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 and the Marriage and Civil Partnerships (Scotland) Act 2014 introduced same-sex marriage which changed the process of obtaining a GRC. Prior to these Acts, a married individual wishing to obtain a GRC had to either divorce or annul their marriage using an Interim GRC and then if they wished to stay with their partner, they could form a civil partnership. The introduction of these Acts means where one individual wishes to obtain a GRC, a marriage can be converted to a same-sex marriage with the consent of the spouse.

An interim GRC is issued to a successful applicant if he or she is married and either needs (or wants) to end that marriage before a full gender recognition certificate can be issued, or is in a civil partnership at the time of the application. The interim certificate is issued to allow the applicant and his or her spouse or civil partner to end their marriage or civil partnership easily. It has no legal significance beyond this use. When the marriage or civil partnership is ended, a full GRC will be issued to the applicant.

Interim certificates are granted to applicants who meet the criteria for gender recognition, but who:

• are not eligible to remain married following their gender recognition because they were married under the law of Northern Ireland or

• are eligible but either they and/or their spouse have decided that they do not wish to remain married after the issue of their full Gender Recognition Certificate or

• are in a protected civil partnership^{[footnote 7]} or Scottish protected civil partnership^{[footnote 8]}, where only one partner has applied for gender recognition (or where both have applied and only one is successful) or

• are in a civil partnership but one which is not a protected or Scottish protected civil partnership.

In these circumstances, once the successful applicant has ended their marriage or civil partnership, they can then be issued a full GRC.

Figure 5: The Gender Recognition Certificate process

2.6 Special Educational Needs and Disability

The First-tier Tribunal Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND) jurisdiction hears appeals against the decision of local authorities in England relating to Education, Health and Care (EHC) plans. It also hears Disability Discrimination claims against schools.

For further information on children with special educational needs, please see the publication by the Department for Education below:

https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/statistics-special-educational-needs-sen

Special Educational Needs (SEN)

The First-tier Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND) tribunal hears appeals against decisions of local authorities in England regarding special educational needs. Children or young people with Special Educational Needs may need extra help because of the effect of their needs on them accessing education. The law does not categorise special educational needs in types of needs but for statistical purposes these include profound and multiple learning difficulty; behavioural, emotional and social difficulty; and speech, language and communication needs.

Appeals to the tribunal can be made in relation to a number of different decisions a Local Authority would make relating to that system which include the refusal to assess a child with special educational needs.

The Children and Families Act 2014 reformed the system of support across education, health and social care to ensure that each of the services were organised with the needs and preferences of the child and their family firmly at the centre, from birth up to the age of 25. The Act introduced Education, Health and Care (EHC) plans – legal documents that set out the education, health and social care support a child or young person with SEN requires when their needs cannot be met by resources available to mainstream early years providers, schools and post-16 institutions. They are focused on the outcomes the child or young person wants to achieve and set out how the services will work together to support those outcomes.

Any child brought to the attention of the local authority as potentially having a special educational need after 1 September 2014 falls under the new scheme. Children with statements of special educational needs underwent a transition process to move them into the new EHC system by March 2018. That transition process is still underway for a small group of children and young people who have yet to be issued with EHC plans. For the period of transition, when both systems are being run in parallel, appeals to the SEND tribunal can therefore arise in relation to either SEN Legal Framework.

The changes brought in under the Children and Families Act 2014 have also extended the reach of the SEND Tribunal. The number of families who can now appeal has increased as a result of the extension of EHC plans to those aged 0-25 (with certain additional criteria attached to the upper age group) where previously statements of SEN covered only school aged children and those in the early years; the granting of appeal rights to young people themselves and those in custody; and because the transfer process from statements and LDAs to EHC plans has opened up new opportunities to appeal. When interpreting the statistics, changes should be treated with caution.

A review was carried out to assess how well the disagreement resolution arrangements established under the Children and Families Act 2014 are working for children and young people with SEND, and their families. Results from the review and the government’s response are published here:

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/send-disagreement-resolution-arrangements-in-england-review

On 3rd April 2018, as part of a two year trial, the SEND Tribunal’s powers were extended to allow it to make non-binding recommendations on the health and social aspects of Education, Health and Care (EHC) plans. The duration of the trial was extended and ended on 31st August 2021 and the powers of the tribunal to make non-binding recommendations mainstreamed from 1st September 2021.

This gives parents and young people a ‘single route’ to raise all their concerns about an EHC plan in one place. Parents and young people are now able to seek recommendations on the health and/or social care elements of an Education, Health and Care (EHC) plan – but only if there is an educational element to the appeal. Before the trial they could only appeal about the special educational needs and provision sections, and the placement section of EHC plans – health and social care issues would only be able to be addressed through alternative routes.

As a result of the SEND reforms, the MoJ and the Department for Education (DfE) publicly consulted on the future of the SEND Tribunal appeal rate between December 2017 and February 2018. The appeal rate to the SEND Tribunal is now published as a percentage of all ‘appealable decisions’ on a calendar year basis. The first such appeal rate, for the calendar year 2017 and three comparative periods from 2014 to 2016, was published as part of the June 2018 publication. For further details on the calculation of this new appeal rate please refer to the published tables.

On 6 September 2019, the Government launched a major review into support for children with special educational needs. The review aims to improve the services available to families who need support, equip staff in schools and colleges to respond effectively to their needs as well as ending what many regard as the ‘postcode lottery’ they often face. The Department for Education published the Green Paper on 29 March 2022.

In 2023/24 table SEND_11 was added to the Annual SEND tables published in Q2 each year. This contains a further breakdown of Section I appeal outcomes by type.

In some cases, more detailed information about the outcomes of an appeal can be found in ‘decision notices’ - written documents issued by the tribunal, which outline the evidence considered in relation to an appeal, as well as any final recommendations and/or decisions. MoJ’s Access to Justice Data Science team are working on developing further insight into decision notices and have extracted this information from PDF files to develop the analysis in table SEND_11.

Data science techniques have been used to extract information from decision notices where the appeal relates to Section I (that is appeals made to challenge and/or amend the institution that the local authority/council has named for the young person in their EHC plan). The three points of information extracted from each decision notice were as follows:

• Which institution was the parents’ preference to be named under Section I?

• Which institution was the local authority’s preference to be named under Section I?

• Which institution was ultimately decided by the tribunal to be named under Section I?

After extracting this information, a comparison was made between the institution ultimately named by the tribunal with the preferences of the parents and the local authority for each appeal. This determined one of five ‘Section I outcomes’ for each appeal which are presented in table SEND_11:

1. Section I = parent and LA preference - this is when, at a hearing, the LA agrees with the parent

2. Section I = parent preference

3. Section I = LA preference

4. Section I = neither parent nor LA preference - this is when the type of school is in contention and the court determines the type of school

5. Could not determine Section I

Caveats to the report:

• It must be noted that due to the technique used, only reports received in PDF format could be extracted. A small number of reports in other formats have been excluded as these could not be extracted via the method used.

• In some instances, it was impossible to determine if the reports had elements of Section I. These were not included in this report.

• This is an ongoing experimental analysis, feedback on the layout or content of the analysis can be provided at CAJS@justice.gov.uk

Disability Discrimination Claims

Disability discrimination claims relate to appeals against a school or academy in England. Schools or academies must not discriminate against a child on grounds of disability in relation to admissions, the provision of education and access to any benefit, facility or service; or exclusions. It is also unlawful for a school to harass or victimise an applicant or child because of disability.

Disability discrimination may be:

• discrimination arising from disability;

• failure to provide a reasonable adjustment for a disabled child;

• direct discrimination;

• indirect discrimination;

• harassment; or

• victimisation

2.7 Adjournments and postponements

Throughout the Tribunal process a case may be adjourned or postponed.

• An adjournment is where, on the day of the hearing, the Panel decides that, for whatever reason, the appeal/case cannot be finalised and has to put off making a final decision to another date (for example because further evidence is required).

• A postponement is where a case is taken out of the list, prior to the commencement of the hearing – parties to an appeal can apply to the Tribunal to have the hearing postponed but it is the Tribunal’s decision as to whether such an application can be granted. The Tribunal can also postpone a case on its own volition.

Data on postponements and adjournments is published in June (Q4 Tribunal and Gender Recognition Certificate Statistics - January to March). It covers five tribunals; First Tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber), Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber), SSCS, Mental Health, Criminal Injuries Compensation; and Special Educations Needs and Disability.

2.8 Tribunal Judicial Salaried and Fee-paid sittings

Sittings by tribunal judges are divided into two categories:

• Fee paid sittings relate to those sittings counted by tribunal judges who are only paid for the days they work, and therefore charge a fee for their time. Judges are paid per sitting (half day/whole day) and not according to individual cases.

• Salaried sittings relate to those days counted by tribunal judges who are paid an annual salary for their work.

The proportion of fee-paid sittings to salaried sittings varies across tribunals. For example, in 2022/23, the majority of sitting days in the Mental Health were fee-paid (90%), whereas the majority of sitting days in the Employment tribunal were salaried (62%).

The high number of sittings for mental health hearings are in part due to listing practices differing for this tribunal, as the majority of these hearings occur outside HMCTS courts or tribunal buildings and in settings such as hospitals, care homes and rehabilitation units. As mental health tribunal hearings are not restricted to two sessions a day, like a court or a tribunal venue, more hearings, and therefore sittings, can occur. Also, considerable flexibility is required as to availability and location of members of the mental health tribunal, requiring a greater proportion of fee-paid sittings if the needs of the patient or the responsible authority are to be accommodated and time limits are to be met. This is especially so given some cases have to be listed for hearing within 7 days of an application being received.

Social Security and Child Support (SSCS) tribunals use fee paid judges to increase the flexibility of the tribunal to deal with the volatility of the workload. It should be noted that SSCS ‘sittings’ are not comparable to the other tribunals, due to a difference in reporting. Half day sessions are recorded rather than whole sitting days and therefore comparisons across tribunals should be used with caution. Published statistics on SSCS judicial sittings (Table JSFP_1) do not include non-legal members.

Employment tribunal and Immigration and Asylum tribunal sitting days can finish earlier or later if the list has been cleared. They will all still be counted as full sitting days, even though some can last less than the SSCS half days.

For Immigration and Asylum tribunals, a minority of appeals are heard by 2 or 3 Judges. Only the sitting day for the panel chair is counted in the published statistics.

Note: The recording of Sitting days varies greatly across Tribunals, e.g. some include non-legal member sittings and others do not; and so comparisons should be made with caution. As part of data improvement, work is ongoing to ensure Sitting Days are recorded on a consistent basis. Initial work on the Mental Health Tribunal showed that non-judicial sitting days make up a large proportion of the sitting days that are published in this report, and any work to revise the sitting days is likely to reduce the number of days reported by a significant factor, particularly for the Mental Health tribunal.

2.9 Other special tribunals

Agricultural Land

Settles disputes and other issues between agricultural tenants and landlords arising from tenancy agreements held under the Agricultural Holdings Act and certain drainage disputes between neighbours.

Asylum Support

The Home Office consider whether an applicant and their dependants meet the test of destitution and to what extent support should be provided (for example, accommodation and cash for essential needs). If the Home Office refuse to provide support or, after they have been providing support, decide to stop or withdraw it, an asylum seeker can appeal to the Asylum Support Tribunal against their decision.

Care Standards

We’re responsible for handling appeals against decisions by the Secretary of State for Education, the Secretary of State for Health, Care Quality Commission, Ofsted or the Care Council of Wales which exclude, remove or suspend you from a register to work with or care for children or vulnerable adults.

Charity

Hears appeals and reviews against the decision of the Charity Commissioner.

Claims Management Services

Hears appeals from businesses and individuals who provide claims management services in areas including: Personal injury, Criminal injuries compensation, Employment matters, Housing disrepair, Financial products and services and Industrial injury disablement.

Community Right to Bid

This jurisdiction was established by the Department for Communities and Local Government’s Localism Act. Its intention is to allow local communities the opportunity to make a bid for property/land that they feel adds specific value to the community.

Consumer Credit

Hears and decides appeals from licensing decisions made by the Office of Fair Trading. It also hears appeals against penalties issued under money laundering regulations.

Criminal Injuries Compensation

Considers appeals against decisions made by the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority (CICA). They only deal with appeals on claims for compensation for criminal injuries made on or after 1 April 1996 under the Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme.

Examination Boards

Regulated awarding organisations can appeal to the examination board tribunal if they disagree with a decision by Ofqual or the Welsh Government to impose a fine, the amount of the fine or recover the costs of taking enforcement action.

Environment

Hears appeals against notices and penalties issued by the regulators under the Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Act 2008. Any appeal will be against one of the following items: Stop Notice - issued by the regulator ordering the appellant to stop performing an action immediately; Fixed / Variable Monetary Penalty; Compliance Notice -instructing the appellant to do some action specified in the notice; Restoration Notice -ordering the appellant to restore the situation to what it was before he committed the offence; Non-Compliance Penalty; Non-Issue of Completion Certificate to show that the appellant has completed some agreed action; The non-granting of compensation by the regulator or appealing against the amount of compensation offered; Regulatory Cost Recovery Notice - ordering the appellant to pay the regulator’s costs.

Estate Agents

The Tribunal hears appeals against decisions made by the Office of Fair Trading relating to an order prohibiting a person from acting as an estate agent where for example a person has been convicted of an offence involving fraud or other dishonesty; an order warning a person where for example that person has not met their duties under the 1979 Act; a decision refusing to revoke or vary a prohibition order or warning order made under the 1979 Act.

Financial Services & Pensions Regulator

This is not separate Tribunal but part of the Upper Tribunal (Tax & Chancery) Chamber. The former resolves referrals on matters relating to certain decisions of the Financial Services Authority.

Food

Hears appeals against some of the decisions taken by these regulators: Food Standards Agency; Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs; Local Authority Trading Standards Departments. Does not deal with complaints about the regulators or appeals.

Gambling Appeals

Hears appeals against decisions by the Gambling Commission. Appeals come from license holders or applicants for licenses. Appeals follow the Commission’s own review process.

Gangmasters Licensing Appeals

Hears cases against the GLA in the event of a decision to revoke a license; refuse a license application; modify a license; or refuse consent to the transfer of a license.

Immigration Services

Hears appeals against decisions by the Office of the Immigration Services Commissioner, which regulates immigration advisers. Also considers disciplinary charges brought by the Office of the Immigration Services Commissioner against immigration advisers.

Information Rights

Hears appeals from notices issued by the Information Commissioner under the Freedom of Information Act. Relates to mainstream citizen needs about making a freedom of information request.

Lands

Resolves disputes concerning land, such as compulsory purchase of land or property, claims for compensation for loss of value to land or property because of ‘public works’.

Local Government Standards in England

Makes first decisions on local councillors referred for breaches of the Code of Conduct and hears appeals against decisions by local authorities’ standards committees. Was abolished under the Localism Act 2011.

Mental Health

Hears applications and references for people detained under the Mental Health Act 1983 (as amended by the Mental Health Act 2007) or living in the community following the making of a conditional discharge, or a community treatment or guardianship order.

Primary Health Lists

General Practitioners (GPs), Dentists, Optometrists and some Pharmacists need to be on a locally managed performers list before being able to provide NHS services within the area of a Primary Care Trust. The Primary Health Lists jurisdiction hears appeals/applications resulting from decisions made by Primary Care Trusts as part of the local management of such performers’ lists.

Professional Regulation (formerly Alternative Business Structures)

The Legal Services Act 2007 allows for lawyers and non-lawyers to work together to offer legal services-these are known as Alternative Business Structures. (ABS). The ABS will have to apply to an approved regulator for a license. The tribunal hears appeals against decisions of the regulator.

Residential Property

Provides an independent service in England for settling disputes involving private rented and leasehold property, including Rent Cases, Leasehold Enfranchisement Cases, Leasehold Disputes, Housing Act 2004 Cases, Park Homes Cases.

Reserve Forces Appeal

Hears appeals against decisions of Ministry of Defence with regard to call up for military service and exemptions.

Special Educational Needs and Disability

Parents whose children have special educational needs can appeal to the First-tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability - SEND) against decisions made by Local Education Authorities in England about their children’s education.

First Tier Tax Chamber

Hears appeals against decisions relating to tax made by His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC). Appeals can be made by individuals or organisations, single tax payers or large multi-national companies. Appeals range from the relatively simple to the complex across both direct and indirect tax.

Transport

The first-tier hears and decides appeals against decisions of the Registrar of Approved Driving Instructors concern[ing] approved driving instructors, trainee driving instructors, and training provider appeals as well as other matters - for example, bus service permits. The upper tribunal hears appeals against decisions of Traffic Commissioners in connection with the Heavy Goods Vehicles & Public Services Vehicles Operators Licensing Systems.

Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals)

Hears appeals against decisions of the General Regulatory Chamber, the Health, Education and Social Care Chamber, Social Entitlement Chamber, and the War Pensions and Armed Forces Compensation Chamber.

Upper Tribunal (Lands)

The Lands Chamber has jurisdiction to hear appeals against all decisions made by the Property Chamber, and the Leasehold Valuation and Residential Property Tribunals in Wales, except for those relating to land registration cases which must be made to the Tax and Chancery Chamber of the Upper Tribunal.

Upper Tribunal (Tax & Chancery)

The Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) aims to assist those wishing to appeal against, or involved in decisions of the First–tier Tribunal in Tax or Charity cases and people wishing to refer matters relating to certain decisions of the Financial Services Authority and the Pensions Regulator. It also handles appeals against the decision of the Independent Valuer in the case of the Northern Rock shares valuation. It also has jurisdiction over Charity and Land Registration cases. The Tax and Chancery Chamber also has the power to judicially review decisions in certain circumstances. See also Financial Services and Pensions Regulator above.

War Disablement Pension

Social Security Benefit provided for people who were disabled in the Armed Forces between 1914 and 1921 or any time after 2 September 1939. Paid at a rate which varies according to the degree of disablement.

War Widow’s Pension

Social Security Benefit provided for widows of servicemen who died as a result of service in HM Forces. The standard rate of pension may be paid if the widow has a dependant child or is over 40 or is incapable of self-support. The lower rate is paid to childless widows under the age of 40.

3. Policy Background and Changes

Employment Tribunals

Fees for Employment Tribunals and the Employment Appeal Tribunal were introduced for claims and appeals respectively received on or after 29 July 2013, alongside wider reform of procedural rules (following the Underhill Review of Employment Tribunal Rules).

For background information on the reforms please see:

www.justice.gov.uk/tribunals/employment

www.gov.uk/government/consultations/employment-tribunal-rules-review-by-mr-justice-underhill

As a result of the Underhill Review of Employment Tribunal Rules, three new outcome types (Table ET_3) came into effect. These were:

• Dismissed Rule 27 – complaints dismissed by an Employment Judge after initial consideration of claim and response. An Employment Judge can dismiss a claim, or any part of a claim, if s/he considers that it has no reasonable prospect of success, or that the tribunal has no jurisdiction to hear the claim (or part thereof). This is a new provision introduced on 29th July 2013.

• Dismissed upon withdrawal – under new rule 52, an employment tribunal shall issue a judgment dismissing a claim where the claimant withdraws it, unless certain criteria are satisfied. The operation and impact of this new provision is being monitored through these statistics.

• Case discontinued – this records complaints dismissed under rule 40(1) where a party has not satisfied requirements in respect of paying a tribunal fee or demonstrating a case for remission.

On 26 July 2017 the Supreme Court in its judgment in R (on the application of Unison) v Lord Chancellor held that the Employment Tribunals and the Employment Appeal Tribunal Fees Order 2013, SI 2013/1893 (“the Fees order”) which came into effect on 29 July 2013 was unlawful under both domestic and EU law because it had the effect of preventing access to justice. Since it had that effect as soon as it was made, it was therefore unlawful and must be quashed.

As a result, from 27 July 2017 fees for Employment Tribunal and Employment Appeal Tribunal claims are no longer charged. All fees previously paid and not subject to a full remission are now eligible for a full refund. In addition, cases that were closed due to non-payment of a fee are now eligible for reinstatement at the stage at which the case was originally closed. For more information on the refund process please see:

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/applications-open-for-employment-tribunal-fee-refunds-as-scheme-rolls-out

On 6 April 2014, the Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service (Acas) introduced Early Conciliation^{[footnote 9]}. This means that anybody wishing to make an Employment Tribunal Claim must notify Acas first and be offered the chance to settle their dispute without going to court.

Social Security and Child Support

From April 2013, changes to the appeal process through the Welfare Reform Act 2012 began to be introduced. There were three changes:

• DWP will reconsider all decisions before an appeal can be lodged (known as mandatory reconsideration);

• appeals must be sent directly to HMCTS (known as direct lodgement);

• there are time limits for DWP to return its responses to HMCTS^{[footnote 10]}.

Mandatory reconsideration and direct lodgement were introduced for Personal Independence Payment and Universal Credit appeals in April 2013. On 28 October 2013, they were introduced for all other DWP-administered benefits and child maintenance cases, and for appeals against decisions made by HMRC on 1 April 2014.

Direct lodgement means that up to 28 days (42 days in child maintenance cases) is now included in the HMCTS processing time, as appeal responses now need to be requested from the DWP and HMRC. DWP publish Mandatory Reconsiderations data for both PIP and ESA here:

https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/personal-independence-payment-statistics

https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/employment-and-support-allowance-outcomes-of-work-capability-assessment

Immigration and Asylum

Prior to the Immigration Act 2014, there had been changes to Family Visit Visa appeal rights. First, the Immigration Appeals (Family Visitor) Regulations 2012 which came into force on 9 July 2012 restricted the right of appeal to a narrower definition of family visitor^{[footnote 11]}. Secondly, the Crime and Courts Act 2013 removed the full right of appeal for family visitors and this change came into effect for new visa applicants on 25 June 2013. A limited right of appeal still remains on Human Rights or Race Discrimination grounds.

Immigration Act 2014

The removal of appeal rights under the Immigration Act 2014 has been phased, initially focusing on applications made and refused in the UK under the Home Office’s points based system.

In October 2014, refusals for points based applications from students and their dependents had their associated appeal rights removed. Appeal rights were also removed for non-European Foreign National Offenders. In March 2015, the scope of the Immigration Act was extended to include the remaining points based decisions made in the UK. Finally, in April 2015, the Immigration Act was implemented in full for decisions made both in the UK and overseas.

Due to the phasing in of the new appeal rights under the Immigration Act 2014 and the additional steps introduced in some cases before a decision with an appeal right is given, the receipt of Post-Act cases from the points based decisions was slower than anticipated.

Since the Act was fully implemented, the majority of appeals result from refusals where these fundamental rights have been raised and considered as part of the initial application, allowing them to enter the appeal process more quickly.

Gender Recognition Certificates (GRC)

The introduction of the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 and the Marriage and Civil Partnerships (Scotland) Act 2014 changed the law in England & Wales and Scotland, meaning it is now possible for some married applicants to remain married while obtaining gender recognition. Prior to December 2014, if an applicant was married or in a civil partnership, they had to annul or dissolve the marriage/ civil partnership before being granted a full GRC.

Special Educational Needs and Disability Reforms

The Children and Families Act 2014 reformed the system of support across education, health and social care to ensure that each of the services were organised with the needs and preferences of the child and their family firmly at the centre, from birth up to the age of 25. The Act introduced Education, Health and Care (EHC) plans – legal documents that set out the education, health and social care support a child or young person with SEN requires when their needs cannot be met by resources available to mainstream early years providers, schools and post-16 institutions. They are focused on the outcomes the child or young person wants to achieve and set out how the services will work together to support those outcomes.

The number of families who can now appeal has increased as a result of the extension of EHC plans to those aged 0-25 (with certain additional criteria attached to the upper age group) where previously statements of SEN covered only school aged children and those in the early years; the granting of appeal rights to young people themselves and those in custody; and because the transfer process from statements and LDAs to EHC plans has opened up new opportunities to appeal. The SEND reforms are specifically designed to make the support system less adversarial.

As a result of the extension of EHC plans, the Ministry of Justice, in conjunction with the Department for Education, consulted in December 2017 – February 2018 on a change to the SEN appeal rate published in order to reflect the new wider population of potential appellants. Please refer to the document “Response to consultation on changes to the rate of appeal to the Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND) Tribunal” included as part of the March 2018 publication for more details. The first annual (calendar year) appeal rate using this new methodology was published as part of the June 2018 publication.

4. Data Sources and Quality Assurance Checks

Information presented in this report is management information drawn from a number of different administrative sources. Although care is taken when processing and analysing the data, the details are subject to inaccuracies inherent in any large-scale recording system and it is the best data that is available at the time of publication. HMCTS is examining the quality of management information. Thus, it is possible that some revisions may be issued in future publications.

The statistics are based on case management systems where a number of processes are recorded throughout the life of an appeal. In some instances, a case can re-enter the process or have a number of outcomes, meaning that there is not necessarily one receipt or one disposal per case. Thus, care should be taken when comparing receipts and disposals.

Data sources

The data presented in the Tribunal and Gender Recognition Certificate Statistics Quarterly is sourced from a number of administrative sources owned and managed by HMCTS, who provide the data to a central statistics team in MoJ for publication. The different Tribunals management information systems are listed below;

• Immigration and Asylum: The database used by HMCTS to record Tribunal information with respect to Immigration and Asylum is called ARIA. ARIA went live in 2000 and holds around 150,000 records (receipts) per year.

• Employment: ETHOS: The database used by HMCTS to hold information with respect to Employment (single and multiple) Tribunals. The database went live in 2007 and holds around 200,000 records per year. After a period of time after a case has closed (normally a year) the records are archived onto a separate database called COIT. Employment Tribunals transitioned to a new temporary database (Employment Case Management) during March to May 2021. In September 2022, ET transitioned to a new case management system (Reform ECM) from Employment Case Management.

• Employment Appeal Tribunal: The database used by HMCTS to store and process information with respect to Employment Appeal Tribunals is called Flymsys.

• Employment Tribunal Fees: The data on fees and remissions was sourced from the Employment Tribunal Fees administrative system, which was used for case management and the processing of remission applications and fee payments.

• Employment Tribunal Fee Refunds: The data on fee refund payments is taken from the Liberata payment system, used by HMCTS to process refund applications.

• Social Security and Child Support: The database used by HMCTS to hold Tribunal information with respect to the Social Security and Child Support is called GAPS2. This database went live in 2007 and holds around 400,000 records per year.

• Mental Health – The database used by HMCTS to record Tribunal information with respect to Mental Health Tribunals is called MARTHA. MARTHA went live in 2008 and holds around 30,000 records (receipts) per year.

• There are also a range of smaller systems that hold information on the special tribunals. Some of this data is in the progress of being migrated onto the GAPS2 system. This includes information on Special Educational Needs.

Immigration and Asylum tribunal - differences with Home Office statistics

Asylum appeals data published by Home Office Migration Statistics are sourced from the Home Office Case Information Database (CID) and relate to main asylum applicants at the First-tier Tribunal Immigration and Asylum Chamber. Records on the database are updated from record-level data provided by HMCTS, who produce similar statistics for main appellants. This procedure provides consistent data across all datasets relating to asylum published in the release Immigration Statistics, but it is different from those published by the Ministry of Justice.

The Ministry of Justice statistics provide counts of principal appellants sourced from the HMCTS database. Within these statistics there tend to be higher numbers of principal appellants than main asylum applicant appeals because:

1. HMCTS has a wider definition of asylum appeals, including some human rights cases and appeals on extensions of asylum, humanitarian protection and discretionary leave; and

2. Principal appellants include some individuals classed as dependants by the Home Office.

The Home Office statistics on immigration and asylum appeals at First-tier Tribunal and subsequent stages are available from: www.gov.uk/government/collections/immigration-statistics-quarterly-release

Gender Recognition Certificates

Figures on Gender Recognition Certificates cover those that are applied for and granted by His Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service’s Gender Recognition Panel (GRP). This panel is not a Tribunal but is presided over by a Tribunal Judge. The data are taken from a central database in the Ministry of Justice called GLiMR.

The figures presented in this bulletin are collected from officials at the GRP. The data collected are quality-assured and validated in a process that highlights inconsistencies between quarters, and other areas. Checks are made to ensure that each month’s data are arithmetically correct, with subtotals and grand totals correctly summed. Unusual values encountered are queried with the data supplier to confirm whether these are correct, or are an error in the information provided which requires amendment.

Quality assurance checks

Automated quality checks using R scripts are embedded in the publication process to produce trends and highlight any anomalies in the data. Checks are also performed to ensure all data within the tables is consistent. Data is compared against previous returns to allow quarter on quarter comparisons.

If any of these checks reveal an anomaly or what looks to be an error, the team will investigate further, either with the data providers in HMCTS, or with their operational colleagues. This results in either an explanation for the finding, a correction, or commentary in the publication to assist users with interpretation where we can’t make a correction.

At least once per year, an analyst external to the Civil Justice Statistics team conducts a full set of quality assurance checks as set out in the Office of Statistical Responsibility Quality Assurance toolkit, noting down any issues found to feed back to the team.

To avoid discrepancies in reporting due to policy changes, work is conducted alongside HMCTS Operational and Policy colleagues to ensure strict data assurance protocols are adhered to and data being received from each court is consistent and of acceptable quality before it is published. All new data undergo this external quality check before publication.

Being from an administrative system, data is subject to clerical and input errors. The volume of these errors is believed to be low and assumed to be random across all cases. As such they are not believed to impact on the integrity of the overall trends in the data. Any subsequent corrections required prior to publication are actioned and if required any amendments required following publication are made – fully adhering to the Department’s revisions policy.

Revisions

The statistics in the latest quarter are provisional and are therefore liable to revision to take account of any late amendments to the administrative databases from which these statistics are sourced. The standard process for revising the published statistics to account for these late amendments is as follows:

An initial revision to the statistics for the latest quarter may be made when the next edition of this bulletin is published. Further revisions may be made when the figures are reconciled at the end of the year. If revisions are needed in the subsequent year, these will be clearly annotated in the tables.

Explanatory Notes

The following symbols have been used throughout the tables in this bulletin:

..	=	Not available
-	=	Nil
(r)	=	Revised data

Spreadsheet files of the tables contained in this document are also available to download along with csv files of historical information.

Users of the statistics

The main users of the Tribunals and Gender Recognition Certificate statistics are Ministers and officials in central government responsible for developing policy with regards to tribunals.

Other users include lawyers and academics, other central government departments such as the Department for Education, the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS), the Home Office and the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), and non-governmental bodies, including various voluntary organisations, with an interest in administrative justice.

5. Change of Names of Tribunals

Tribunal or Jurisdictional Name	Formerly known as:	Details of Changes/Date of Creation
Agricultural Land and Drainage	Formerly Agricultural Land Tribunals. Title changed following creation of the Property Chamber	Jul-13
Asylum Support (AS)	Asylum Support Tribunal. Transferred to HMCTS (former Tribunals Service) from the Home Office	Apr-07
Care Standards (CS)	Care Standards Tribunal	Apr-07
Charity	N/A	Mar-08
Community Right To Bid	N/A	Oct-12
Consumer Credit	Consumer Credit Tribunal	Apr-08
Control of Trade in Endangered Species Regulations	N/A	Jul-17
Copyright Licensing	Hears appeals against decisions made by the Secretary of State for Business Innovation and Skills under the Copyright (Regulation of Relevant Licensing Bodies) Regulations 2014	Apr-14
Electronic Communications & Postal Services	Hears appeals against decisions made by the Interception of Communications Commissioner under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers (Monetary Penalty Notices and Consents for Interceptions) Regulations 2011	Apr-13
Environment	N/A	Jul-17
Estate Agents	Estate Agent Appeals Tribunal. Transferred to HMCTS from the former Department for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform, now the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS).	Apr-08
Examination Board	Created in May 2012 as part of the General Regulatory Chamber.	May-12
Food	The food jurisdiction of the General Regulatory Chamber was established in January 2013 and hears appeals against decisions taken by these certain regulators. These include: Food Standards Agency; Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs; Local Authority Trading Standards Departments.	Jan-13
First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) & Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)	Asylum and Immigration Tribunal. The ‘First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)’ and ‘Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)’ (FTTIAC and UTIAC), replaced the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal (AIT)	Feb-10
Gangmasters Licensing Appeals	N/A	Sep-11
Individual Electoral Registration	New legislation requires individuals to register to vote rather than relying on a member of the household registering for all household members. The Tribunals hears appeals against the issuing of a penalty notice by an Electoral Registration Officer.	Oct-14
Immigration Services	Immigration Services Tribunal. The Immigration Services Tribunal transferred into the General Regulatory Chamber of the First-tier Tribunal	Jan-10
Land Registration	Formerly The Adjudicator to HM Land Registry. Title changed following creation of the Property Chamber	Jul-13
Local Government Standards in England	Adjudication Panel for England. Transferred to the HMCTS from the Standards Board for England (SBE)	Apr-09
Nitrates Vulnerable Zones	A jurisdiction of the First Tier (General Regulatory) Chamber. Hears appeals against the designation of Nitrate Vulnerable Zones (NVZs) by the Department of Environment Food and Rural Affairs.	Apr-16
Pensions Regulation	Hears appeals against decisions made under the Pension Schemes Act 2015	Jan-15
Police Complaints Commissioner (England and Wales)	N/A	Apr-15
Primary Health Lists	Family Health Services Appeal Authority (FHSAA) transferred into HMCTS	Apr-09
Professional Regulation	Previously Alternative Business Structures	Created October 2011 Changed name April 2013
Reserve Forces Appeal Tribunals	Transferred to the HMCTS from the Ministry of Defence	Apr-09
Residential Property Tribunal. Comprises Rent Assessment, Housing Act 2004, Housing & Planning Act 2016, Right to Buy, Park Homes, Leasehold Valuation.	Residential Property Tribunals Service	Jul-11
First-tier Tax Chamber	The Tax Chamber of the First-tier Tribunal was established on 1 April 2009. It replaces the four former separate Tax Tribunals, namely: The General Commissioners; the Special Commissioners; VAT & Duties; and Section 706 Tribunals.	Apr-09
Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)	The Upper Tribunal (AAC) was established in November 2008 under the TCE Act 2007, replacing the Office of Social Security and Child Support Commissioners (OSSCSC). Information presented for 2007-08 refers to OSSCSC, and for November 2008 onwards to the Upper Tribunal Admin Appeals Chamber.	Nov-08
Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery)	The Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) was established on 1 April 2009. It hears appeals against, or involved in, decisions of the First–tier Tribunal in Tax or Charity cases and referrals relating to certain decisions of the FSA and the Pensions Regulator.	Apr-12
Upper Tribunal Immigration and Asylum Chamber	The Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) was established on 1 April 2009. It hears appeals against, or involved in, decisions of the First–tier Tribunal in Tax or Charity cases and referrals relating to certain decisions of the FSA and the Pensions Regulator.	Apr-12
Upper Tribunal Immigration and Asylum Chamber	The Upper Tribunal, Immigration and Asylum Chamber decides applications for judicial review of certain decisions made by the Secretary of State for the Home Department, entry clearance officers and others, under immigration legislation	Nov-13
War Pensions and Armed Forces Compensation Chamber	Pensions Appeal Tribunal (PAT) became the War Pensions and Armed Forces Chamber	Nov-08
Welfare of Animals	Hears appeals resulting from decisions made under The Animal Welfare (Licensing of Activities Involving Animals) (England) Regulations 2018.	Feb-15
Microchipping of Dogs (Engalnd)	Hears appeals resulting from decisions made under The Microchipping of Dogs (England) Regulations 2015	Apr-15
Upper Tribunals (Tax and Chancery)	Upper Tribunals (Tax and Chancery) had subsumed the functions of the Financial Services and Markets and Pensions Regulator tribunal in 2009, but the figures had been reported as separate entities. Financial Services and Markets and Pensions Regulator figures are now reported under Upper Tribunals (Tax and Chancery), from January 2019.	Jan-19

6. Special Tribunal Jurisdictions

Special Tribunal Jurisdictions	Tribunal Chamber
Agricultural Land and Drainage	First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)
Asylum Support	First-tier Tribunal (Social Entitlement Chamber)
Care Standards	First-tier Tribunal (Health, Education and Social Care Chamber)
Charity	First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber)
Claims Management Services (England and Wales)	First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber)
Community Right To Bid	First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber)
Consumer Credit	Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
Control of Trade in Endangered Species Regulation	First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber)
Copyright Licensing	First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber)
Criminal Injuries Compensation	First-tier Tribunal (Social Entitlement Chamber)
Electronic Communications & Postal Services	First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber)
Environment	First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber)
Estate Agents	First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber)
Examination Board	First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber)
Financial Services and Markets & Pensions Regulator	Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)
First-tier Tribunal (Tax)	First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber)
Food	First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber)
Gambling Appeals	First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber)
Gangmasters Licensing Appeals	Gangmasters Licensing Appeals
Gender Recognition Panel[footnote 12]	Gender Recognition Panel
Immigration Services	First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber)
Individual Electoral Registration	First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber)
Information Rights [footnote 13]	First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber)
Land Registration	First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)
Local Government Standards in England	First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) [Defunct as of 2012]
Mental Health	First-tier Tribunal (Health, Education and Social Care Chamber)
Nitrates Vulnerable Zones [footnote 14]	First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber)
Pensions Regulation	First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber)
Police Complaints Commissioner (England and Wales)	First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber)
Primary Health Lists	First-tier Tribunal (Health, Education and Social Care Chamber)
Professional Regulation	First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber)
Reserve Forces Appeal Tribunals	Reserve Forces Appeal Tribunals
Residential Property Tribunals	First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)
Special Commissioners (Income Tax)	First-tier Tribunal (Tax)
Special Educational Needs and Disability	First-tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability)
Transport	Traffic Commissioner appeals – Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber). Driving Standard Agency (Approved Driving Instructor Registrar) appeals – First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber)
Upper Tribunal (Lands)	Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber)
Upper Tribunal (Tax & Chancery)	Upper Tribunal (Tax & Chancery)
VAT & Duties	First-tier Tribunal (Tax)
War Pensions and Armed Forces Compensation Chamber	First-tier Tribunal (War Pensions and Armed Forces Compensation Chamber)
Welfare of Animals	First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber)

7. Useful Publications

For previous publications of all Tribunals Statistics please see:

www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ministry-of-justice/series/tribunals-statistics

For more information on the context for this publication and the work of HMCTS, please see:

https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/hm-courts-and-tribunals-service/about

Further information on the structure of the tribunal system can be found here:

www.judiciary.gov.uk/about-the-judiciary/the-justice-system/court-structure/

For information on Tribunal judgements please see:

www.bailii.org/databases.html##uk

Scotland

For information on non-MoJ Mental Health Tribunals Scotland please see:

www.mhtscotland.gov.uk/mhts/Annual_Reports/Annual_Reports_main

For Additional Support Needs Tribunals in Scotland please see:

https://www.healthandeducationchamber.scot/additional-support-needs/12

Information on the Private Rented Housing Panel (prhp), which help Scottish tenants and landlords resolve their differences can be found at the following link:

http://www.gov.scot/Topics/Built-Environment/Housing/privaterent/tenants/money/fairrent/phrp

Northern Ireland

For information on Tribunals in Northern Ireland not covered by this report please see the following publications:

https://www.justice-ni.gov.uk/topics/statistics-and-research/ni-courts-and-tribunals-service-statistics#toc-0

Employment Tribunals

In 2013, the former Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) published a study on claimants who had been successful at the employment tribunal and were awarded money:

www.gov.uk/government/publications/payment-of-employment-tribunal-awards

A further ad hoc analysis of the findings from the 2013 survey of employment tribunal applications published by BIS can be found here:

www.gov.uk/government/statistics/employment-tribunal-applications-2013-survey-findings

Latest quarterly statistics compiled by Acas on Early Conciliation can be found at the following location:

http://www.acas.org.uk/index.aspx?articleid=5203

The Employment Tribunal data differs slightly between the Tribunals publication and the Acas publication, for the following reasons:

• There is a lag between original tribunal receipt and the case being input into the Acas system which means the data will always be slightly out of line.

• Acas data excludes any case with no relevant jurisdictions and also any case which is a resubmission of an existing dispute (both of which would be included in the ET statistics).

• Acas report on “net” cases, i.e. count each matter only once (not once-per-claimant), provided they have the dispute and representation in common. Therefore, if in ten claimant cases, three are linked, there are eight net cases (seven single plus one multiple).

Social Security and Child Support

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) publishes appeals data for Employment and Support Allowance (ESA) and Personal Independence Payment (PIP), for further information see:

https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/personal-independence-payment-statistics

https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/employment-and-support-allowance-outcomes-of-work-capability-assessment

First-tier Tribunal (Mental Health)

For more information about applications and outcomes against detention and community orders under the Mental Health Act (2019/20), please see:

http://www.cqc.org.uk/content/monitoring-mental-health-act-report

Registry Trust Statistics

Since 1st April 2009, details of enforced monetary tribunal awards relating to individuals, companies or businesses have been added to the Register. Details of an award are only added to the Register once steps have been taken in the high court or county court to enforce the award. The Register will then show the amount of the debt. Please see the following link for Statistics on this area:

https://www.registry-trust.org.uk/stats/

Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND)

For more information on Special Education Needs, please see the following page:

https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/statistics-special-educational-needs-sen

Gender Recognition Certificates

More information about the gender recognition application process and guidance notes can be found on the Ministry of Justice website at:

https://www.gov.uk/apply-gender-recognition-certificate

Further information about the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 can be found at:

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/2010-to-2015-government-policy-equality/2010-to-2015-government-policy-equality##appendix-7-equal-marriage

Further information about the Marriage and Civil Partnership (Scotland Act) 2014 can be found at:

www.nrscotland.gov.uk/news/2014/same-sex-marriage-in-scotland-news

8. Glossary

This chapter covers terms used in the Tribunal and Gender Recognition Certificate Statistics Quarterly, focusing on concepts and definitions published in the Ministry of Justice statistical publications.

There are three main types of Tribunal, covering almost 80% of all Tribunal work (as of the interim receipts average between 2018/19 to 2022/23). There are also smaller ‘special’ Tribunals covering other more detailed activities. The main types of Tribunal are:

• Immigration and Asylum (IA)

• Employment Tribunals (ET)

• Social Security and Child Support (SSCS)

• Specials – other smaller Tribunals, including Mental Health

Academic year

Reporting year beginning and ending in September

Adjournment

Where, on the day of the hearing, the Panel decides that, for whatever reason, the appeal/case cannot be finalised and has to put off making a final decision to another date, for example because further evidence is required.

Appellant

A person who applies to a higher court for a reversal of the decision of a lower court.

Open caseload

The number of cases outstanding at the end of the period and still waiting to be dealt with to completion.

Decision in favour (SSCS)

Decision in favour of the appellant.

Decision upheld (SSCS)

Decision made by the First Tier Agency and withheld by the Tribunal.

Disposal

A disposal is the closure of a case when work has ceased to be done. This can be through a claim being withdrawn, settled, dismissed or being decided at a hearing.

DWP

Acronym for the Department of Work and Pensions

Employment Tribunal Claim

A claim may be brought under more than one jurisdiction or subsequently amended or clarified in the course of proceedings, but will be counted only once.

Employment Tribunal Jurisdiction

The Employment Tribunal powers to hear a claim are determined by legislation, with statutory provisions defining the ambit of the jurisdiction that can be covered by a claim to an Employment Tribunal.

Employment Tribunal Jurisdictional mix

A claim may contain a number of grounds, known as jurisdictional cases. In any hearing, the tribunal has to decide upon the merits of the claim made under each jurisdiction; for example, unfair dismissal and sex discrimination. The total number of jurisdictions covered by each case gives a truer measure of caseload than the number of claims. The jurisdictions covered by ET are wide ranging, from discrimination and unfair dismissals to issues around salary and working conditions.

Employment Tribunal single and multiple claims

Claims to the Employment Tribunal may be classified into two broad categories – singles and multiples. Multiple cases are where two or more people bring cases, involving one or more jurisdiction(s) usually against a single employer but not necessarily so, for instance in TUPE cases, and always arising out of the same or very similar circumstances. As a multiple, the cases are processed together.

Hearing

The hearing is a meeting at which the tribunal panel considers evidence (either orally or paper based) and reaches a decision (where the decision may be to adjourn or to agree a final outcome).

HMCTS

Acronym for His Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service

Hearing clearance (SSCS)

These are cleared via a Tribunal (could be a panel or member of the Judiciary sitting alone) with a decision/outcome.

Nitrates Vulnerable Zones (NVZ) Tribunal

From April 2016, the Tribunal hears appeals against the designation of NVZs by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA). The Tribunal is quadrennial and hears appeals in relation to NVZ notices issued once every four years to landowners by DEFRA.

Non-hearing clearance (SSCS)

These are cases withdrawn prior to a hearing, struck out or superseded. There is no Tribunal judgement.

Oral Hearing

A hearing where the party(ies) and/or their representative(s) attend (this can be by telephone or by video conference).

Outcome of hearing

The outcome of the hearing is the final determination of the proceedings or of a particular issue in those proceedings; it may include an award of compensation, a declaration or recommendation and it may also include orders for costs, preparation time or wasted costs either in favour or against an appellant. Note: ET records outcomes for each act (or jurisdiction), not for the hearing.

Paper Hearing

Consideration of the case using documents, and not requiring any physical appearance by the parties.

Postponement

Where a case is taken out of the list, prior to the commencement of the hearing – can be done by the applicant, or any other party.

Receipt

Volumetric term covering the acceptance of a case by a HMCTS Tribunal. Also known as a ‘case’ for Employment Tribunals.

Settlement

Cases settled without the need for a hearing. A third party may have been involved in the process.

Withdrawal

The applicant/claimant/appellant ceases action either before or at the hearing.

8.1 Immigration and Asylum Cases

Asylum

Appeals against a refusal to grant asylum, including asylum claims which raise Human Rights grounds.

Deportation

Appeals against deportation orders made against people by the Home Secretary.

Entry Clearance Officer (ECO)

Appeals generated by people who are not already in the UK, but have been refused permission to enter or stay in the UK for a fixed period of time, or live here permanently.

Family Visit Visa (FVV)

Appeals against decisions not to allow temporary visits to see family in the UK.

FTTIAC

Acronym for the First Tier Immigration and Asylum Chamber

Human Rights Appeals

A separate Human Rights Appeal category was introduced in the Tribunal in 2001, following the implementation of the Human Rights Act 1998 to allow the consideration of Human Rights arguments for cases where those grounds were not considered at the original human rights appeal. Since then, a range of in-country case types raising Human Rights grounds have been recorded under this category when they would have been more appropriately recorded against another case type. The Tribunal has made a recent change to its administrative processes to record such cases more suitably, which will explain any drop in numbers in the Human Rights (Other) appeal category.

Immigration Appeals (Family Visitor Regulations 2012)

Legislation which stated that foreign nationals who had been refused clearance to visit family on a short stay would also lose their right to appeal.

Managed Migration

Appeals generated by people already in the UK who have been refused permission to extend their stay here (either permanently or temporarily). This appeal type will also cover occasions where an individual has their permission to be in the UK revoked.

UTIAC

Acronym for Upper Tribunal Immigration and Asylum Chamber. Handles appeals for decisions made by the FTTIAC and also specific categories of Judicial Reviews.

8.2 Employment and Employment Appeal Cases

ACAS

Acas provides free and impartial information and advice to employers and employees on all aspects of workplace relations and employment law. They also provide conciliation and mediation services to help resolve workplace problems and avoid having to go to a tribunal

Age Discrimination

Discrimination or victimisation on grounds of age

Case Discontinued

This records complaints dismissed under rule 40(1) where a party has not satisfied requirements in respect of paying a tribunal fee or demonstrating a case for remission

Disability discrimination

Suffered a detriment, discrimination and/or dismissal on grounds of disability or failure of employer to make reasonable adjustments

Discrimination on grounds of Religion or Belief

Discrimination or victimisation on grounds of religion or belief

Discrimination on grounds of Sexual Orientation

Discrimination or victimisation on grounds of sexual orientation

Dismissed Rule 27

Complaints dismissed by an Employment judge and initial consideration of claim and response

Dismissal upon withdrawal (Rule 52)

An employment tribunal shall issue a judgement dismissing a claim where the claimant withdraws it unless certain criteria are satisfied.

Equal pay

Failure to provide equal pay for equal value work

National minimum wage

Suffer a detriment and/or dismissal related to failure to pay the minimum wage or allow access to records

Part Time Workers Regulations

Suffer less favourable treatment and/or dismissal as a result of being a part time employee by comparison to a full time employee

Race discrimination

Discrimination or victimisation on grounds of race or ethnic origin

Redundancy – failure to inform and consult

Application by an employee, their representative or trade union for a protective award as a result of an employer’s failure to consult over a redundancy situation

Redundancy pay

Failure of the Secretary of State to pay a redundancy payment following an application to the National Insurance fund

Sex discrimination

Discrimination or victimisation on grounds of sex, marriage or transgender

Suffer a detriment / unfair dismissal – pregnancy

Suffer a detriment and/or dismissal on grounds of pregnancy, child birth or maternity

Transfer of an undertaking - failure to inform and consult

Failure of the employer to consult with an employee rep. or trade union about a proposed transfer

Unauthorised deductions (formerly Wages Act)

One of three conditions have to be met for you to lawfully make deductions from wages or take payments from a worker. If this is not the case, then the deduction is unauthorised. For the deduction or payment to be authorised it must be

• required or authorised by legislation (for example, income tax or national insurance deductions;

• authorised by the worker’s contract - provided the worker has been given a written copy of the relevant terms or a written explanation of them before it is made; or

• consented to by the worker in writing before it is made

Underhill Review

A consultation led by Mr Justice Underhill which aimed to address the complex nature of employment tribunals

Unfair dismissal

Appeals on the grounds that an employer does not have a good reason for dismissing a person, or follow the company’s formal disciplinary or dismissal process.

Working Time Directive

Appeal by a person who has been served with an improvement or prohibition notice under the Working Time Regulations 1998. Can include complaints by a worker that employer has failed to allow them to take or to pay them for statutory annual leave entitlement and failure to limit weekly or night working time, or to ensure rest breaks.

Written pay statement

Failure to provide a written pay statement or an adequate pay statement

Written statement of reasons for dismissal

Failure to provide a written statement of reasons for dismissal or the contents of the statement are disputed

Written statement of terms and conditions

Failure to provide a written statement of terms and conditions and any subsequent changes to those terms

8.3 Social Security and Child Support

30 Hours Free Childcare Scheme

All 3 and 4-year-olds in England already get 15 hours a week, or 570 hours a year of free early education. If their parents are living and working in England, 3 and 4-year-olds may be entitled to 30 hours free childcare. An extra 570 hours of free childcare a year, so 1,140 hours in total. This 30 hours free childcare scheme was introduced in September 2017.

Attendance Allowance

Social Security benefit for people aged 65 or over who need help with personal care because of a mental or physical disability. There are two rates, a lower rate for attendance during day or night, and a higher rate for day and night.

Bereavement Benefit

Any or all of the range of Bereavement Benefits that were introduced on 9 April 2001. These replaced the old system of Widows’ Pension and can be claimed by men and women whose spouse died on or after 9 April 2001. Widows whose husband died before this date receive transitional protection and would continue to receive Widows’ Pension.

Bereavement Payment

Widows/widowers are eligible to receive Widow’s/Bereavement Payments if their late spouse satisfied certain National Insurance contribution conditions. Widows are also eligible if their late husband died as the result of an industrial injury or disease and she was aged under 60 when her late husband died; or if she was aged over 60 and he was not entitled to a Category A Retirement Pension when he died. The payment is a tax free lump sum of £2,000. For the purposes of the Sources of Income tables in this publication, this is treated as covering a period of one year.

Bereavement Allowance

A Social Security benefit paid for up to 52 weeks to widows and widowers who were aged 45 or over, but less than pension age, when their spouse died. Bereavement Allowance cannot be received at the same time as Widowed Parent’s Allowance. The amount paid is on a sliding scale depending on the widow or widower’s age.

Bereavement Support Payment Scheme

Bereavement Support Payment is a benefit paid to widows, widowers, or surviving civil partners who are bereaved on or after 6 April 2017. It replaces Bereavement Allowance, Widowed Parents Allowance and Bereavement Payment for people whose husband or wife died on or after 6 April 2017.

Carer’s Allowance

A Social Security benefit for people who are aged 16 or over; not in full-time education with 21 hours or more a week of supervised study; not earning more than the lower earnings limit for National Insurance after certain deductions have been made (such as Income Tax); and spending at least 35 hours a week caring for someone who is ill or disabled. The ill or disabled person must be getting either higher or middle rate Disability Living Allowance Care component or Attendance Allowance or a Constant Attendance Allowance at the maximum rate under the War Pensions or Industrial Injuries Scheme.

Child Benefit

Social Security benefit paid for each child under 16 year or aged under 19 and still in full time non advanced education.

Council Tax Benefit

Social Security benefit administered by the local authority designed to help people on low incomes pay their Council Tax. There are two types of Council Tax Benefit, maximum Council Tax Benefit (Main Benefit) and Second Adult Rebate. Council Tax Benefit may be received for a further four weeks by people aged under 60 when they start working full time following a period of at least six months being unemployed, by people on a Government Training Scheme or on Income Support as a lone parent or carer (Extended Payment).

Diffuse Mesothelioma Scheme

The Diffuse Mesothelioma Scheme was introduced on 5 April 2014 by the Mesothelioma Act 2014. The scheme is designed to provide substantial payments to sufferers of Diffuse Mesothelioma (a condition which arises from exposure to asbestos) and their dependants who cannot access compensation elsewhere.

Disability Living Allowance (DLA)

A tax-free benefit for disabled people who need help with mobility or care costs. DLA has two components which can be paid together or on their own:

1. A care component for people who have needed help with personal care for at least 3 months and are likely to go on needing that help for at least a further 6 months.

2. A mobility component for people who have had walking difficulties for at least 3 months and are likely to continue to have those difficulties for at least a further 6 months.

Personal independence payment (PIP) was introduced as a new benefit in April 2013 to replace DLA for people aged between 16 and state pension age.

Employment support allowance (ESA)

Someone who is ill or disabled may be eligible for Employment and Support Allowance (ESA) which offers financial support if the person is unable to work and/or personalized help in becoming employed if the recipient is able to. ESA is supported and administered by DWP.

Housing Benefit

Social Security benefit administered by local authorities which is designed to help people who rent their homes and have difficulty meeting their housing costs. Council tenants on Housing Benefit get a rent rebate which means that their rent due is reduced by the amount of that rebate. Private and housing association tenants usually receive Housing Benefit (or rent allowance) personally, although sometimes it is paid direct to the landlord. Housing Benefit may be received for a further four weeks by people aged under 60 when they start working full time following a period of at least six months being unemployed, by people on a Government Training Scheme or on Income Support as a lone parent or carer (Extended Payment).

Incapacity Benefit

Replaced Sickness Benefit and Invalidity Benefit from 13 April 1995. It is paid to people who are assessed as being incapable of work and who meet the contribution conditions.

Income Support

Social Security benefit for adults aged 18 or over who are working less than 16 hours a week, or have a partner working less than 24 hours a week and who have less money coming in than the law says they need to live on. In general, Income Support is now only available to people who are not required to be available for work such as pensioners, lone parents and sick and disabled people. It is made up of personal allowances for each member of the benefit unit, premiums for any special needs and housing costs, principally for mortgage interest payments. It is often paid to top up other benefits or earnings from part time work.

Industrial Injuries Disablement Benefit

Social Security benefit provided for employees who are disabled because of an industrial accident or prescribed industrial disease. To get the basic benefit the person needs a medical assessment of the degree of their disability.

Jobseeker’s Allowance

Replaced Unemployment Benefit and Income Support for unemployed people on 7 October 1996. It is payable to people under state pension age who are available for, and actively seeking, work of at least 40 hours per week. Certain groups of people, including carers and those with a physical or mental condition, are able to restrict their availability to less than 40 hours depending upon their personal circumstances. There are contribution based and income-based routes of entry to Jobseeker’s Allowance. The different elements are separated in the ‘any income related benefit’ and ‘any non-income related benefit’ categories.

Road Traffic (NHS Charges)

The Road Traffic (NHS Charges) Act 1999 came into force on 5 April 1999. This act allows the Compensation Recovery Unit (CRU) to recover NHS hospital charges from road traffic accidents where a compensation payment is made on or after 5 April 1999.

Severe Disablement Allowance

Social Security benefit provided for people who are incapable of work and do not satisfy the contributions conditions for Incapacity Benefit. Severe Disablement Allowance was abolished for new claimants on 6th April 2001. However, certain people entitled to SDA before that date can continue to receive it. Claimants needed to be aged between 16 and 65 when they made their claim and must have been incapable of work for at least 28 weeks.

Social Fund

Made up of regulated and discretionary payments. Maternity Funeral and Cold Weather Payments are governed by regulations. They are available to people who are on certain Social Security benefits and who meet various other conditions. The discretionary part of the Social Fund provides help in the form of non-repayable grants and interest-free loans. The discretionary payments are Community Care Grants, budgeting Loans and Crisis Loans.

Tax-Free Childcare Scheme

Tax-Free Childcare scheme was introduced on 21 April 2017 and has been gradually rolled out over 2017, for parents of children aged under four (from 31 August), and parents of disabled children aged under 17 (from 28 Jul 2016).

Widowed Parent’s Allowance

A widow or widower is eligible if his or her late husband or wife met certain National Insurance contribution conditions. Widowed Mother’s Allowance or Widowed Parent’s Allowance can be paid to a widow or widower as long as he or she is entitled to Child Benefit for at least one qualifying child, or she is pregnant by her late husband, or in certain cases of artificial insemination. Child dependency increases are paid for each child.

8.4 Gender Recognition Certificates

Alternative Track

An applicant using the alternative application form must show that they meet the following four conditions:

• were a party to a protected marriage or a protected civil partnership or a Scottish protected marriage or a Scottish protected civil partnership on or before the date of the application;

• have lived full time in the acquired gender for at least 6 years before the 10 December 2014 and have continued to live in the acquired gender until the date the application was made, (for Scottish protected marriages and civil partnerships this date is the 16 December 2014);

• either have or have had gender dysphoria or else have undergone surgical treatment to modify sexual characteristics;

• And are ordinarily resident in England, Wales or Scotland.

Gender Dysphoria

The sense of unease that a person may have because of a mismatch between their biological sex and their gender identity one’s biological sex.

Gender Recognition Act 2004 (GRA)

Enables transgender or trans people to change their gender legally and gain the rights and responsibilities of their acquired gender. All applications are determined by the Gender Recognition Panel (GRP) and applicants who meet the GRA’s requirements are granted a Gender Recognition Certificate.

Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC)

Issued by the Gender Recognition Panel (GRP), shows that a person has satisfied the criteria for legal recognition in the acquired gender.

Gender Recognition Panel (GRP)

The GRP was established under the Gender Recognition Act 2004 (GRA). Its function is to assess applications from transgender or trans people seeking to obtain a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC).

Interim GRC

Issued to a successful applicant if he or she is married or in a civil partnership at the time of the application and does not have consent from the partner to continue in that marriage or civil partnership.

Transgender or Trans

Transgender or trans is an umbrella term used to describe people who have a gender identity that is different to the sex recorded at birth.

Tracks

There are three application processes for obtaining a GRC: Standard track, Overseas track and Alternative track.

Standard track

Applications are those submitted under the standard application process, on the basis of living permanently in the acquired gender for two years or more.

Overseas track

Applications are those submitted under the overseas application process, on the basis of having changed gender under the law of an approved country or territory outside the United Kingdom.

1. Department for Work and Pensions Official Statistics on Personal Independent Payment (PIP) show a continued increase in registrations and clearances since the introduction of PIP in April 2013: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/personal-independence-payment-statistics ↩

2. A SSCS appeal may be captured more than once as a hearing or non-hearing should the original decision be overturned, set aside or an Upper Tier Tribunal re-hearing is granted. ↩

3. Cases cleared at hearing include some withdrawals. ↩

4. Cases cleared without a hearing includes strike outs, superseded and withdrawals prior to a hearing. ↩

5. Decisions Upheld are those cases where the original decision by the First tier agency is upheld. ↩

6. Decisions in favour are those cases where the original decision is revised in favour of the customer. ↩

7. Protected civil partnership: means a civil partnership under the law of England and Wales. It would include a civil partnership contracted on UK consular premises or on an armed forces base, where the couple elected England and Wales as the relevant part of the UK. ↩

8. Scottish protected civil partnership: is a civil partnership registered in Scotland. It would include a civil partnership contracted on UK consular premises or on an armed forces base, where a couple elected Scotland as the relevant part of the UK. ↩

9. www.Acas.org.uk/index.aspx?articleid=4028 ↩

10. Introduced October 2014 ↩

11. www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2012/1532/pdfs/uksi_20121532_en.pdf ↩

12. The Gender Recognition Panel is managed by the GRC office but is not a tribunal jurisdiction. It operates under the: Gender Recognition Act 2004 ↩

13. Information Rights cases now include appeals under the new GDPR regulations, from September 2018. ↩

14. Nitrate Vulnerable Zone appeals run quadrennially. Please see the Glossary for more information. ↩