TTM10520 - Ship Leasing: Quantitative restrictions on allowances
Restrictions cease to apply: Example
The following example was when the written down allowance for main rate pool was 25% and the special rate pool was 10%. The current rates are 18% and 6% respectively.
A ferry is acquired on 1 January 2004 by Selpats Ferries Ltd (a tonnage tax company) under a finance lease from their bank. The cost of the ship is £90 million.
On 30 June 2006 Selpats Ferries Ltd is taken over by the larger Regian Group of companies (which is not within tonnage tax). Under the rules on mergers, see TTM12300, Selpats Ferries Ltd ceases to be a tonnage tax company and the leasing restrictions cease to apply from 30 June 2006.
The capital allowances available to the bank are as follows (amounts in £000s):
Accounting period ended 31 December 2004
£’000 | 25% pool | 10% pool | Non-qualifying | Total allowances |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cost (90,000, allocated) | 40000 | 40000 | 10000 | - |
WDA | 10000 | 4000 | 0 | 14000 |
Balance c/fwd 18/02/82 | 30000 | 36000 | 10000 | 76000 |
Accounting period ended 31 December 2005
£’000 | 25% pool | 10% pool | Non-qualifying | Total allowances |
---|---|---|---|---|
Balance b/fwd | 30000 | 36000 | 10000 | 76000 |
WDA | 7500 | 3600 | 0 | 11,100 |
Balance c/fwd | 22500 | 32400 | 10000 | 64900 |
Accounting period ended 31 December 2006
As at 30/06/2006 the leasing restrictions stop applying. The ship is treated as disposed of as at 30/06/2006 for its tax written-down value at that point. In this case the tax written down value (TWDV) is worked out by recomputing notional capital allowances for the period on the full ‘qualifying expenditure’ (FA00/SCH22/PARA89 (3) and PARA88 (1)) of £90 million, as if in a single asset pool FA00/SCH22/PARA100):
£’000 | notional single asset pool |
---|---|
Cost | 90000 |
Notional WDA for ye 31/12/2004 | 22500 |
Balance c/fwd and b/fwd | 67500 |
Notional WDA for y/e 31/12/2005 | 16875 |
Balance c/fwd & b/fwd | 50625 |
Notional WDA for 6m 30/6/2006 | 6328 |
TWDV | 44,297 |
This tax written down value of £44,297,000 is treated as if it were a normal disposal and apportioned between the 25% and 10% pools in same proportion as the original cost of the ship (FA00/SCH22/PARA97):
Pool | Proportion of TWDV | Allocated to pool |
---|---|---|
25% pool | 44,297 x 40,000/90,000 | 19688 |
10% pool | 44,297 x 40,000/90,000 | 19688 |
Non-qualifying | 44,297 x 10,000/90,000 | 4921 |
Assuming that the bank has no other ships leased within tonnage tax, the 25% and 10% pools will be closed, with balancing adjustments as follows:
(£’000) | 25% pool | 10% pool | Total |
---|---|---|---|
Balance b/fwd | 22500 | 32400 | - |
Disposal proceeds | -19688 | -19688 | - |
Balancing allowance | 2812 | 12712 | 15,524 |
The bank can then bring a new amount of qualifying expenditure into its normal machinery and plant pool in respect of the ferry. That amount is the original £90 million cost of the ferry reduced at a rate of 25% per year from acquisition on 1 January 2004 to 30 June 2006 (FA00/SCH22/PARA99 (3) and (4)), that is, £44,297,000, as computed above.
The writing down allowance for the bank’s accounting period ended 31 December 2003 (after the CAA01/S220 (1)) restriction) will be:
£44,297,000 x 6/12 x 25% = £5,537,125
References
- FA00/SCH22/PARA99 (change of circumstances, taking out) TTM17571
- FA00/SCH22/PARA100 (determination of tax written down value) TTM17576
- FA00/SCH22/PARA97 (treatment of disposal proceeds) TTM17561
- FA00/SCH22/PARA89 (expressions same meaning as in FA00/PART9) TTM17486
- FA00/SCH22/PARA88(1) (definition of ‘qualifying expenditure’) TTM17481
- Restrictions cease to apply: Introduction TTM10500
- Restrictions cease to apply: Procedure TTM10510
- Tax written down value TTM10530