“Asian” approaches to peacebuilding?

Modalities, convergences, and differences in India, Japan and China’s approach to supporting peace processes.

From:
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
Published
10 May 2022
Country:
China, India, Japan
Document Type:
Research Paper
Theme:
Governance and Conflict
Authors:
Adhikari, M.

Abstract

Findings

  • A coherent “Asian model” of peacebuilding does not exist, but there are common features which characterize the international conflict management practices of China, Japan, and India.

  • Understanding the specificities of the engagement of Asian states in international conflict management requires mapping their engagement at different levels – global, national, and local – as well as contradictions at the various levels.

  • Differences between Asian states, especially as India and Japan seek to counterbalance China in the region, has created convergence between India, Japan, and Western states, creating momentum for further partnerships and coordination with Western states on issues related to peace and security.

This paper is an output of the Peace and Conflict Resolution Evidence Platform (PEACEREP) programme.

Citation

Adhikari, M. “Asian” Approaches to Peacebuilding?: Modalities, Convergences, and Differences in India, Japan and China’s Approach to Supporting Peace Processes (PeaceRep Report: Global Transitions Series). PeaceRep: The Peace and Conflict Resolution Evidence Platform, University of Edinburgh 2022

“Asian” approaches to peacebuilding? Modalities, convergences, and differences in India, Japan and China’s approach to supporting peace processes

Updates to this page

Published 10 May 2022
Contents