Assessing equity in national legal frameworks for REDD plus : The case of Indonesia

This paper draws on a case study of Indonesia

Abstract

Schemes for reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation, and enhancing carbon stocks (REDD+) have raised concerns about their effects on forest communities and social equity more generally. National legal frameworks play a critical role in mediating these concerns within different country contexts, from the definition of fundamental constitutional rights to the articulation of specific REDD+ legislation. However, the complexity of REDD+ and its associated legal frameworks makes assessing the balance of rights, responsibilities, benefits and costs challenging indeed. This paper draws on a case study of Indonesia to illustrate how the application of an equity framework can help navigate this complexity.

This research was supported by the Ecosystem Services for Poverty Alleviation (ESPA) programme

Citation

Ituarte-Lima, C., McDermott, C.L., Mulyani, M., Assessing equity in national legal frameworks for REDD plus : The case of Indonesia, Environmental Science & Policy, vol.44, issue10, pp.291-300, 2014

Assessing equity in national legal frameworks for REDD plus : The case of Indonesia

Updates to this page

Published 1 January 2014