Differentiated legitimacy, differentiated resilience: beyond the natural in 'natural disasters'
This paper uses a flood in southern Malawi as an example
Abstract
This paper starts with a flood in southern Malawi. Although apparently a ‘natural’ event, those most affected argued that it was made much worse by the rehabilitation of a nearby irrigation scheme. We use this example to interrogate the current interest in resilience from a perspective informed by political ecology and political economy, arguing that a focus on resilience should not be at the expense of understanding the conditions that shape vulnerability, including the ways in which ‘communities’ are differentiated. Complex factors are at play – and the ways in which these combine can result in a ‘perfect storm’ for some individuals and households. These factors include the effects of history combining with ethnicity, of legitimacy influencing voice, and of the interplay of political dynamics at different levels. In particular, processes of commodification have played an important role in shaping how some may benefit at the cost of catastrophic harm to others.
This is an output from the ‘Innovations to Promote Growth among Small-scale Irrigators in Africa: An Ethnographic and Knowledge-Exchange Approach’ Project
Citation
Elizabeth Harrison & Canford Chiroro (2016) Differentiated legitimacy, differentiated resilience: beyond the natural in ‘natural disasters’, The Journal of Peasant Studies, 44:5, 1022-1042,
Links
Differentiated legitimacy, differentiated resilience: beyond the natural in ‘natural disasters’