Tug of war - Ethical decision-making to enable humanitarian access in high-risk environments
This report is part of the Secure Access in Volatile Environments (SAVE) research programme
Abstract
This Network Paper seeks to contribute to solutions to an important and vexing problem: how can humanitarian organisations help people caught up in conflicts, when these conflicts make it dangerous for aid workers to operate safely? Many humanitarian staff and organisations believe that being ethical and principled is the best, most proven way to protect the people they seek to help and themselves. Being principled is therefore both a moral and a practical choice. As described in this paper, however, the fundamental humanitarian principles come into tension with one another, and the environment forces aid organisations to make compromises. Any breach of ethical standards or humanitarian principles poses a risk to the organisation being able to fulfil its mission of saving lives and relieving suffering. Agencies can effectively deal with this by adopting a risk management approach, in which they view such compromises as a risk to assess and then mitigate, deny or accept.
This paper seeks to provoke discussion and reflection among aid practitioners about some of the difficult practical and moral questions they face when trying to reach people in need of assistance in war zones. It provides illustrative examples and suggests promising practice, drawing primarily on research conducted for Secure Access in Volatile Environments (SAVE) research programme exploring how to deliver an effective humanitarian response amid high levels of insecurity. The research involved extensive fieldwork in 4 of the most dangerous aid settings at that time – Afghanistan, South Central Somalia, South Sudan and Syria.
Citation
Haver, K. (2016) ‘Tug of war - Ethical decision-making to enable humanitarian access in high-risk environments’. Humanitarian Practice Network Paper No 80. November. London: Overseas Development Institute
Link