When does decision-making reflect agency? Evidence from the rural Philippines
This paper empirically tests the extent to which different aspects of decision-making are correlated with the Relative Autonomy Index.
Abstract
Decision-making is often used as a proxy for agency, the ability to set goals and act on them, although there are several theoretical critiques of this approach. Using unique data from the rural Philippines, this paper empirically tests the extent to which different aspects of decision-making are correlated with the Relative Autonomy Index (RAI), a measure of agency that has been validated for use in lower-income countries. Being a decision-maker (as asked in common survey questions) is only weakly related to the Relative Autonomy Index for women, and not at all for men. Having input into decisions and, to a greater extent, the ability to make personal decisions if desired are strongly associated with the RAI for both genders. The quantitative and qualitative data indicate that these concepts better capture the ability to make choices in line with one’s personal goals, while being a decision-maker instead reflects being responsible for the outcome or managing the execution of a task, often in the face of limited options. The findings caution against focusing on being a decision-maker as a sole indicator of agency and have practical implications for both conceptualizing and measuring agency.
This output is part of the Africa Gender Innovation Lab (GIL) programme
Citation
Arugay AA and others. ‘When does decision-making reflect agency? Evidence from the rural Philippines’ Policy Research Working Paper, World Bank Group, Washington, D.C. 2024
Links
When does decision-making reflect agency? Evidence from the rural Philippines