Annex B: autonomous last mile resupply performance matrix
Updated 29 June 2017
1. Note
- relevant challenge is indicated by number (for example challenge 1 is denoted by 1)
- performance targets are assessed red where no amber criteria is met
Target | 1 | 2 | 3 | Amber | Green | Notes | Proposed test and evaluation approach | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
non stop range | x | >300m | >3km, out to 30km (beyond if capable) | Range does not include return leg of mission | For ranges that exceed suitable test and evaluation environment, command and control link range to be tested separately from platform range. (Platform range to be simulated by circuit-routes) | |||
System lift capacity | x | >5kg | >50kg | Weight of material supplier is willing to demonstrate being moved by supplied system to claimed range. | Wide range of weighed equipment to be provided for purposes of real-world payload demonstration. | |||
Payload size and shape | x | Any size of item(s) up to 10cm x 10cm x 10cm | Any size of item up to 1m x 1m x 1m | Approximate size of typical NATO pallet cubic load | ‘Representative volumes to be provided. Full range of equipment available for ‘real world’ demonstration. | |||
Speed | x | >8kph | >30kph | Average speed over demonstrated mission at range and in environment claimed. | Record average time to complete missions. Specified times are based on performance to beat a loaded dismount running (amber) or quad bike and trailer’s JSP800 specified max speed (green). | |||
Turn around time and effort | x | x | x | Less than 10 minutes by a team of three or fewer | Length of time required to unload, refuel / recharge, perform maintenance, plan, and load the system for each resupply mission.Essentially a measure of the time the system is not available for mission use and an indicator of the simplicity of operation and system reliability. | Averaged for every mission over the course of the trial period. Battery charging / replaceable component maintenance can be done concurrently with resupply missions. | ||
Terrain types | x | x | Land environment (rural) | Urban, littoral, forest / jungle, mountain, desert | Baseline requirement analogous to terrain a Land-Rover typical vehicle is capable of maneuvering over. Urban to include delivery into OR onto buildings. Forest environment to be of sufficient density to not permit access by Land-Rover sized vehicle. Mobility definitions for guidance are found in DEFSTAN 23-06. | Littoral, Desert-to be trialed separately. Mountain terrain performance to be demonstrated through modelling. | ||
Operator control requirements / autonomy levels | x | x | Waypoint control. C2 link maintained. | Automatic route planning. Automatic obstacle avoidance + re-plan. Automatic terminal guidance. Beyond visual line of sight. Automatic tasking / monitoring / mission management. | In all cases, basic mapping of terrain is provided to users / systems. Automatic terminal guidance can rely upon sub-systems (e.g. beacons) provided to the sender and receiver. BVLOS can rely upon a safety spotter if required. | Automatic route planning to be tested through observation of system operation. Obstacle avoidance + re-plan and automatic terminal guidance to be tested by demonstration. Remote safety pilot / operators are permitted on the basis of safety but all manual interventions are to be declared & recorded. | ||
Contested environment | x | x | GPS denied capable. Tamper-proof / aware. Signatures minimised. | GPS will not spoofed in trial - supplier to demonstrate ability through recorded position estimates against a GPS truth. System signature while platform(s) in motion in acoustic, visual, thermal and RF bands to be ideally lower than a quad bike and trailer. | GPS denied operation to be tested by simulation (ie contractors to demonstrate tamper-proof or awareness to be demonstrated - attempted tampering can be physical or electronic, at supplier’s choice). | |||
Physical Environmental conditions | x | Off-road wind speeds >10 m/s standard atmospherics | High wind and altitude (air vehicles only). Adverse off-road terrain. (Ground vehicles only). Extreme temperatures. Operation at night. | High wind => 20 m/s consistent measured at point of launch (demonstrated where possible, modeled where not). High altitude => 15,000 ft pressure altitude - tested through modelling. Extreme terrain - supplier willing to demonstrate operation in conditions to include mud, water crossings, sand and/or snow and slopes and rocky terrain - target is to match mobility offered by quad bike and trailer. Baseline requirement intended to permit operation outdoors at typical Army test and evaluation site. Extreme temperatures =< -20C and >+40C | Temperature extremes to be verified by design at sub-system level. Extreme physical environments if demonstrated are to include sufficient safety-cases to account for increased risk of operation. | |||
Supportability and Interchangeability | x | x | x | Transportable. Supportable. | Physical and Electronic integration into vehicle / base. Integrated with automatic logistics demand management system | System to be demonstrated as being transportable by an existing Army logistics vehicle. | No particular vehicle is to be specified - intent is that supplier can demonstrate their system will not require procurement of specialist support vehicles. Evidence to be provided that vehicle integration is feasible - no GFE is to be provided for suppliers to conduct full integration. Launch + recovery techniques used in ‘full integration’ to be demonstrated. |