Independent report

Cross Cutting Evaluation of DFID’s Approach to Remote Management in Somalia and North-East Kenya

An evaluation of the remote programme management (RPM) practices adopted by DFID and its implementing partners in Kenya and Somalia.

Documents

Details

Over the past 2 decades, aid and development agencies have more frequently undertaken interventions in countries that are experiencing violent conflict or pose other security risks to staff and beneficiaries. In order to mitigate these risks, agencies now often use remote management practices and tools. These vary in terms of degree, from situating decision-makers remotely, to locating staff at a distance from project activities.

In some cases, remote programme management is a provisional response to temporary security and logistical challenges that make direct implementation of programmes impossible. However, in some areas ongoing violent conflict and natural disasters have created complex emergencies that have continued over an extended period of time. In this type of response, remote management practices have become the new norm.

Updates to this page

Published 20 February 2015
Last updated 25 January 2016 + show all updates
  1. Cross Cutting Evaluation of DFID's Approach to Remote Management in Somalia and Noth-East Kenya (January 2015) added

  2. First published.

Sign up for emails or print this page