Annual report and accounts 2022-23: Financial statements (HTML)
Updated 15 December 2023
Applies to England and Wales
Consolidated Statement of
Comprehensive Net Expenditure
for the year ended 31 March 2023
2022-23 | 2021-22 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Core department and agencies | Departmental group | Core department and agencie | Departmental group | ||
Note | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | |
Revenue from contracts with customers | 3 | (1,627,932) | (1,646,704) | (1,545,561) | (1,562,306) |
Other operating income | 4 | (64,091) | (64,332) | (73,244) | (73,243) |
Total operating income | (1,692,023) | (1,711,036) | (1,618,805) | (1,635,549) | |
Staff costs | 5 | 4,303,449 | 4,563,183 | 3,895,744 | 4,148,577 |
Judicial costs | 5 | 642,224 | 642,224 | 613,506 | 613,506 |
Purchase of goods and services | 6 | 2,612,076 | 2,498,230 | 2,398,237 | 2,275,220 |
Depreciation, amortisation and impairment | 7 | 795,474 | 801,826 | 819,589 | 825,891 |
Legal Aid funded provisions | 8 | 1,924,930 | 1,924,930 | 1,742,315 | 1,742,315 |
Other provision expenses | 8 | 85,751 | 86,495 | 273,921 | 273,664 |
Net (gain)/loss on disposal of assets | 9 | (12,750) | (12,719) | 743 | 898 |
Revaluation of non-current and financial assets | 10 | (14,826) | (14,829) | 63,234 | 63,234 |
Other operating expenditure | 11 | 1,493,014 | 1,362,591 | 1,450,596 | 1,355,939 |
Total operating expenditure | 11,829,342 | 11,851,931 | 11,257,885 | 11,299,244 | |
Net operating expenditure before financing | 10,137,319 | 10,140,895 | 9,639,080 | 9,663,695 | |
Finance income | (3) | (3) | - | - | |
Finance expense | 12 | 77,122 | 83,461 | 85,018 | 91,585 |
Borrowing cost on provisions | (1,238) | (1,238) | 3,685 | 3,685 | |
Net operating expenditure before tax | 10,213,200 | 10,223,115 | 9,727,783 | 9,758,965 | |
Taxation | - | 45 | - | - | |
Net expenditure for the year | 10,213,200 | 10,223,160 | 9,727,783 | 9,758,965 | |
Other comprehensive net expenditure | |||||
Items that will not be reclassified to operating expenditure: | |||||
Net (gain)/loss on revaluation of: | |||||
Property, plant and equipment | (806,167) | (806,195) | (708,990) | (708,978) | |
Right of use assets | (19,728) | (19,728) | 87,391 | 87,391 | |
Intangible assets | (9,292) | (9,427) | 2,134 | 2,054 | |
Assets for sale | 509 | 509 | 23 | 23 | |
Remeasurement of pension schemes: | |||||
Cafcass pension scheme | - | (249,322) | - | (108,268) | |
LSC pension scheme | 48,529 | 48,529 | (22,359) | (22,359) | |
By-analogy pension schemes | (41) | (1,443) | 47 | 420 | |
Probation pension schemes | (1,969,664) | (1,969,664) | (950,558) | (950,558) | |
Total comprehensive net expenditure for the year | 7,457,346 | 7,216,419 | 8,135,471 | 8,058,690 |
The notes on pages 169 to 254 form part of these accounts.
Consolidated Statement of
Financial Position
as at 31 March 2023
2022-23 | 2021-22 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Core department and agencies | Departmental group | Core department and agencies | Departmental group | ||
Note | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | |
Non-current assets | |||||
Property, plant and equipment | 13 | 14,608,419 | 14,611,560 | 13,240,377 | 13,242,745 |
Right of use assets | 14 | 1,391,228 | 1,405,091 | 1,423,393 | 1,432,506 |
Intangible assets | 15 | 715,025 | 721,987 | 654,373 | 663,093 |
Investments | 382 | 382 | 381 | 381 | |
LSC pension net asset | 25 | 66,421 | 66,421 | 112,462 | 112,462 |
Probation pension surplus | 25 | 198,982 | 198,982 | - | - |
Trade and other receivables | 17 | 122,254 | 122,258 | 188,532 | 188,537 |
Total non-current assets | 17,102,711 | 17,126,681 | 15,619,518 | 15,639,724 | |
Current assets | |||||
Assets held for sale | 16 | 9,115 | 9,115 | 6,465 | 6,465 |
Inventories | 65,174 | 66,663 | 55,089 | 56,420 | |
Trade and other receivables | 17 | 499,173 | 501,605 | 475,591 | 479,255 |
Cash and cash equivalents | 18 | 302,793 | 359,382 | 181,685 | 222,894 |
Total current assets | 876,255 | 936,765 | 718,830 | 765,034 | |
Total assets | 17,978,966 | 18,063,446 | 16,338,348 | 16,404,758 | |
Current liabilities | |||||
Trade and other payables | 19 | (1,780,290) | (1,778,719) | (1,623,571) | (1,645,624) |
Financial liabilities | 19 | (167,460) | (169,803) | (177,525) | (179,566) |
Provisions | 20 | (1,076,090) | (1,079,836) | (916,691) | (920,237) |
Total current liabilities | (3,023,840) | (3,028,358) | (2,717,787) | (2,745,427) | |
Total assets less current liabilities | 14,955,126 | 15,035,088 | 13,620,561 | 13,659,331 | |
Non-current liabilities | |||||
Trade and other payables | 19 | (37,356) | (38,314) | (37,034) | (38,144) |
Other financial liabilities | 19 | (1,595,529) | (1,607,470) | (1,727,659) | (1,735,024) |
Provisions | 20 | (504,570) | (505,877) | (695,004) | (695,803) |
Cafcass pension net liability | 25 | - | (12,083) | - | (236,267) |
By-analogy pension liabilities | (1,208) | (6,476) | (1,391) | (8,274) | |
Probation pension net liability | 25 | - | - | (1,630,843) | (1,630,843) |
Total non-current liabilities | (2,138,663) | (2,170,220) | (4,091,931) | (4,344,355) | |
Assets less liabilities | 12,816,463 | 12,864,868 | 9,528,630 | 9,314,976 | |
Taxpayers’ equity | |||||
General fund | 7,857,199 | 7,904,979 | 5,241,581 | 5,026,974 | |
Revaluation reserve | 4,959,264 | 4,959,889 | 4,287,049 | 4,288,002 | |
Total taxpayers’ equity | 12,816,463 | 12,864,868 | 9,528,630 | 9,314,976 |
The notes on pages 169 to 254 form part of these accounts.
Antonia Romeo
Principal Accounting Officer
24 November 2023
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
for the year ended 31 March 2023
2022-23 | 2021-22 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Core department and agencies | Departmental group | Core department and agencies | Departmental group | ||
Note | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | |
Cash flows from operating activities | |||||
Net expenditure | CSoCNE | (10,213,200) | (10,223,160) | (9,727,783) | (9,758,965) |
Adjustments for noncash transactions | 2,840,748 | 2,858,221 | 1,547,172 | 1,552,009 | |
Finance expense | 12 | 34,860 | 34,941 | 37,392 | 37,390 |
Movements in pensions | 90,187 | 108,854 | 110,068 | 130,843 | |
(Increase)/decrease in trade and other receivables | 17 | 42,696 | 43,929 | (114,750) | (114,657) |
Less: movements in receivables not passing through the CSoCNE and receivable impairments | (74,643) | (74,647) | (13,090) | (13,085) | |
(Increase) in inventories | (10,085) | (10,243) | (297) | (415) | |
Increase/(decrease) in trade and other payables | 19 | 157,041 | 133,265 | (162,600) | (174,444) |
Less: movements in payables relating to items not passing through the CSoCNE | (131,109) | (113,710) | 34,127 | 33,365 | |
Increase/(decrease) in other financial liabilities | 19 | (142,195) | (137,317) | 1,335,737 | 1,347,704 |
Less: movements in other financial liabilities relating to items not passing through the CSoCNE | 142,195 | 137,317 | - | - | |
Utilisation of provisions | 20 | (2,047,896) | (2,048,096) | (1,984,899) | (1,985,172) |
Intra-departmental adjustment through SoCiTE (between MoJ core and agencies) | (1,996) | (2,617) | (7,689) | (7,912) | |
Other | - | 2 | - | ||
Net cash outflow from operating activities | (9,313,397) | (9,293,263) | (8,946,610) | (8,953,339) | |
Cash flows from investing activities | |||||
Purchase of property, plant and equipment | 13 | (1,137,498) | (1,139,170) | (1,180,664) | (1,181,348) |
Purchase of intangible assets | 15 | (106,323) | (107,290) | (139,049) | (139,968) |
New PFI liabilities in year | - | - | 41,538 | 41,538 | |
Adjust for increase in capital payables | 11,436 | 11,411 | 12,008 | 12,033 | |
Proceeds on disposal of property, plant and equipment | 6,371 | 6,371 | 1,094 | 1,140 | |
Proceeds on disposal of intangible assets | - | 2 | 625 | 626 | |
Proceeds on disposal of assets held for sale | 2,613 | 2,613 | 3,402 | 3,402 | |
Net cash outflow from investing activities | (1,223,401) | (1,226,063) | (1,261,046) | (1,262,577) | |
Cash flows from financing activities | |||||
From the Consolidated Fund (Supply) | 10,720,000 | 10,720,000 | 10,089,757 | 10,089,757 | |
From the Consolidated Fund (non-Supply) | 171,583 | 171,583 | 163,084 | 163,084 | |
Capital element of finance leases and on-balance sheet PFI contracts | (175,785) | (177,796) | (21,307) | (23,868) | |
Repayment of local authority loans | (1,529) | (1,529) | (1,600) | (1,600) | |
Interest paid | (34,860) | (34,941) | (37,392) | (37,390) | |
Net cash inflow from financing activities | 10,679,409 | 10,677,317 | 10,192,542 | 10,189,983 | |
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents in the period before adjustment for receipts and payments to the Consolidated Fund | 142,611 | 157,991 | (15,114) | (25,933) | |
Payments of amounts due to the Consolidated Fund | (21,503) | (21,503) | (17,791) | (17,791) | |
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents in the period after adjustment for receipts and payments to the Consolidated Fund | 121,108 | 136,488 | (32,905) | (43,724) | |
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period | 18 | 181,685 | 222,894 | 214,590 | 266,618 |
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period | 18 | 302,793 | 359,382 | 181,685 | 222,894 |
The notes on pages 169 to 254 form part of these accounts.
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Taxpayers’ Equity
for the year ended 31 March 2023
Core department and agencies | Departmental group | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
General fund | Revaluation reserve | Total reserves | General fund | Revaluation reserve | Total reserves | ||
Note | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | |
Balance at 1 April 2022 |
5,241,581 | 4,287,049 | 9,528,630 | 5,026,974 | 4,288,002 | 9,314,976 | |
Net Parliamentary Funding – drawn down | 10,720,000 | - | 10,720,000 | 10,720,000 | - | 10,720,000 | |
Net Parliamentary Funding – deemed | 179,503 | - | 179,503 | 179,503 | - | 179,503 | |
Unspent Supply drawn down repayable to the Consolidated Fund | (283,368) | - | (283,368) | (283,368) | - | (283,368) | |
Consolidated Fund Standing Services | |||||||
- Judicial salaries | 165,062 | - | 165,062 | 165,062 | - | 165,062 | |
- Lord Chancellor’s salary | 91 | - | 91 | 91 | - | 91 | |
- Utilisation of Judicial Service Award | 6,430 | - | 6,430 | 6,430 | - | 6,430 | |
CFERs payable to the Consolidated Fund | (20,942) | - | (20,942) | (20,942) | - | (20,942) | |
Net expenditure for the year | CSoCNE | (10,213,200) | - | (10,213,200) | (10,223,160) | - | (10,223,160) |
Net gain/(loss) on revaluation of | |||||||
- Property, plant and equipment | - | 806,167 | 806,167 | - | 806,195 | 806,195 | |
- Right of use assets | - | 19,728 | 19,728 | - | 19,728 | 19,728 | |
- Intangible assets | - | 9,292 | 9,292 | - | 9,427 | 9,427 | |
- Assets held for sale | - | (509) | (509) | - | (509) | (509) | |
Remeasurement of pension schemes | |||||||
- Cafcass pension scheme | 25 | - | - | - | 249,322 | - | 249,322 |
- LSC pension scheme | 25 | (48,529) | - | (48,529) | (48,529) | - | (48,529) |
- By-analogy pension schemes | 41 | - | 41 | 1,443 | - | 1,443 | |
- Probation pension schemes | 25 | 1,969,664 | - | 1,969,664 | 1,969,664 | - | 1,969,664 |
Non-cash adjustment | |||||||
- Auditor’s remuneration | 6 | 1,973 | - | 1,973 | 1,973 | - | 1,973 |
- Corporate overhead recharges | 11 | (3,722) | - | (3,722) | - | - | - |
Movements in reserves | |||||||
- Transfers from revaluation reserve | 162,414 | (162,414) | - | 162,758 | (162,758) | - | |
- Absorption accounting transfers between reserves | - | - | - | 147 | (147) | - | |
Other movements | |||||||
Adjustment in respect of prior periods | - | - | - | (58) | - | (58) | |
Prior year OLC and LSB CFER | (17,804) | - | (17,804) | 227 | - | 227 | |
Other | (1,995) | (49) | (2,044) | (2,558) | (49) | (2,607) | |
Balance at 31 March 2023 |
7,857,199 | 4,959,264 | 12,816,463 | 7,904,979 | 4,959,889 | 12,864,868 |
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Taxpayers’ Equity
for the year ended 31 March 2022
Core department and agencies | Departmental group | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
General fund | Revaluation reserve | Total reserves | General fund | Revaluation reserve | Total reserves | ||
Note | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | |
Balance at 1 April 2021 |
3,510,822 | 3,825,800 | 7,336,622 | 3,217,084 | 3,827,022 | 7,044,106 | |
Changes in accounting policy | 68,541 | - | 68,541 | 68,541 | - | 68,541 | |
Restated balance at 1 April 2021 |
3,579,363 | 3,825,800 | 7,405,163 | 3,285,625 | 3,827,022 | 7,112,647 | |
Net Parliamentary Funding – drawn down | 10,089,757 | - | 10,089,757 | 10,089,757 | - | 10,089,757 | |
Net Parliamentary Funding – deemed | 214,504 | - | 214,504 | 214,504 | - | 214,504 | |
Unspent Supply drawn down repayable to the Consolidated Fund | (179,503) | - | (179,503) | (179,503) | - | (179,503) | |
Consolidated Fund Standing Services | |||||||
- Judicial salaries | 155,402 | - | 155,402 | 155,402 | - | 155,402 | |
- Lord Chancellor’s salary | 89 | - | 89 | 89 | - | 89 | |
- Utilisation of Judicial Service Award | 7,593 | - | 7,593 | 7,593 | - | 7,593 | |
CFERs payable to the Consolidated Fund | (2,820) | - | (2,820) | (20,624) | - | (20,624) | |
Net expenditure for the year | CSoCNE | (9,727,783) | - | (9,727,783) | (9,758,965) | - | (9,758,965) |
Net gain/(loss) on revaluation of | |||||||
- Property, plant and equipment | - | 708,990 | 708,990 | - | 708,978 | 708,978 | |
- Right of use assets | - | (87,391) | (87,391) | - | (87,391) | (87,391) | |
- Intangible assets | - | (2,134) | (2,134) | - | (2,054) | (2,054) | |
- Assets held for sale | - | (23) | (23) | - | (23) | (23) | |
Remeasurement of pension schemes | |||||||
- Cafcass pension scheme | 25 | - | - | - | 108,268 | - | 108,268 |
- LSC pension scheme | 25 | 22,359 | - | 22,359 | 22,359 | - | 22,359 |
- By-analogy pension schemes | (47) | - | (47) | (420) | - | (420) | |
- Probation pension schemes | 25 | 950,558 | - | 950,558 | 950,558 | - | 950,558 |
Non-cash adjustment | |||||||
- Auditor’s remuneration | 6 | 1,707 | - | 1,707 | 1,707 | - | 1,707 |
- Corporate overhead recharges | 11 | (3,037) | - | (3,037) | - | - | - |
Movements in reserves | |||||||
- Transfers from revaluation reserve | 158,195 | (158,195) | - | 158,537 | (158,537) | - | |
Other movements | |||||||
Adjustment in respect of prior periods | (5,677) | - | (5,677) | (5,725) | 8 | (5,717) | |
Other | (19,079) | 2 | (19,077) | (2,188) | (1) | (2,189) | |
Balance at 31 March 2022 |
5,241,581 | 4,287,049 | 9,528,630 | 5,026,974 | 4,288,002 | 9,314,976 |
The notes on pages 169 to 254 form part of these accounts.
Notes to the accounts for the year ended
31 March 2023
1a) Statement of accounting policies
1.1 Basis of preparation
These accounts have been prepared in accordance with the Government Financial Reporting Manual (FReM) 2022-23 issued by HM Treasury. The accounting policies contained in the FReM apply International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as adapted or interpreted for the public sector.
Where the FReM permits a choice of accounting policy, the accounting policy which is judged to be most appropriate to our particular circumstances for the purpose of giving a true and fair view has been selected. The particular policies we adopt are described below. They have been applied consistently in dealing with items that are considered material to the accounts.
The preparation of the accounts in conformity with IFRS requires the use of certain critical accounting estimates (see Note 1b).
In addition to the primary statements prepared under IFRS, the FReM requires the department to prepare a Statement of Outturn against Parliamentary Supply and supporting notes showing the outturn against estimates in terms of the net resource requirement and the net cash requirement. These are included within the Parliamentary accountability section in this document.
The functional and presentational currency of the department is the British pound sterling (£).
1.2 Going concern
The financial reporting framework applicable to Government bodies, derived from the HM Treasury Government Financial Reporting Manual, defines that the anticipated continued provision of the entity’s services in the public sector is normally sufficient evidence of going concern. In common with other government departments, the group’s liabilities are expected to be met by future grants of supply and the application of future income, both to be approved annually by Parliament. The department considers there is no reason to believe that future approvals will not be forthcoming. Hence, it is considered appropriate to adopt a going concern basis for the preparation of these financial statements.
1.3 Accounting convention
These accounts have been prepared on an accruals basis under the historical cost convention, modified to account for the revaluation of non-current assets, inventories, financial assets and liabilities and assets held for sale, where material.
1.4 Basis of consolidation
These accounts consolidate the core department, executive agencies and non-departmental public bodies (NDPBs) which fall within the departmental boundary as defined in the FReM and make up the departmental group. A list of entities included within the departmental boundary is given at Note 29.
Where two columns are included, the first contains amounts for the core department and its agencies and the second contains amounts for the departmental group as a whole. Accounting policies are harmonised across the group and all significant intra-departmental balances and transactions between entities within the departmental boundary are eliminated.
All consolidated entities have accounting reference dates that align with the core department.
1.5 Machinery of government changes and restatement of comparatives
There have been no machinery of government changes in 2022-23 (none in 2021-22).
1.6 Changes in accounting policy and disclosures
New standards, amendments and interpretations issued but not effective for the financial year beginning 1 April 2022 and not early adopted
IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts requires a discounted cash flow approach to accounting for insurance contracts. IFRS 17 is to be applied by entities for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2023. The earliest implementation date in central government is 1 April 2025. To assess the impact of the standard, we are reviewing contracts which meet the definition of insurance contracts.
We do not consider that any other new, or revised standard, or interpretation will have a material impact.
1.7 Property, plant and equipment
Initial recognition and capitalisation threshold
Property, plant and equipment is initially recognised at cost, representing the costs directly attributable to acquiring or constructing the asset and bringing it to the location and condition necessary for it to be capable of operating in the manner intended by management.
Such expenditure is capitalised where:
- the asset is held for use in delivering services or for administrative purposes
- it is probable that future economic benefits will flow, or service potential be provided, to us
- it is expected that the asset will be used for more than one financial year, and
- the cost of the asset can be measured reliably
The core department’s capitalisation threshold for individual assets is £10,000. The thresholds across the departmental group range from £500 to £10,000.
Where significant purchases of individual assets which are separately below the capitalisation threshold arise in connection with a single project, they are treated as a grouped asset. The core department’s capitalisation threshold for grouped assets is £1 million. The thresholds across the departmental group range from £500 to £1 million. All thresholds include irrecoverable VAT.
Where an item costs less than the prescribed limit, but forms an integral part of a package whose total value is greater than the capitalisation level, then the item is capitalised.
Where a large asset, for example a building, includes a number of components with significantly different asset lives, e.g. plant and equipment, then these components are treated as separate assets and depreciated over their own useful lives.
Where capital budgets on agency projects are held centrally by MoJ as the parent department, expenditure is first capitalised in the MoJ accounts and transferred to the agencies when the associated project is complete.
Subsequent expenditure
Subsequent expenditure relating to an item of property, plant and equipment is recognised as an increase in the carrying amount of the asset when it is probable that additional future economic benefits or service potential deriving from the cost incurred to replace a component of such item will flow to the group and the cost of the item can be determined reliably. Where a component of an asset is replaced, the cost of the replacement is capitalised if it meets the criteria for recognition above. The carrying amount of the part replaced is de-recognised.
Other expenditure that does not generate additional future economic benefits or service potential, such as repairs and maintenance, is charged to the CSoCNE during the financial year in which it is incurred.
Subsequent valuation method
Land and buildings (including dwellings) are recorded at fair value, as interpreted by the FReM, on the basis of professional valuations, which are conducted for each property at least once every five years. These are primarily undertaken by the Valuation Office Agency (VOA) using the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) appraisal and valuation manual, known as the ‘Red Book’.
In between professional valuations, carrying values are adjusted by the application of indices or through desktop valuations for which different indices are applied depending on the assets. This ensures that carrying values are not materially different from those that would be determined at the end of the reporting period. For buildings the index applied is the Building Cost Information Service Construction data tender price index (TPI) that reflects price changes in the construction sector and is a good indicator of price pressure in building contracts in the UK.
Criminal courts, prisons and some parts of the probation estate are mostly classified as specialised buildings which cannot be sold on the open market. For specialised assets, current value in existing use is interpreted as the present value of the asset’s remaining service potential, which is assumed to be at least equal to the cost of replacing that service potential. Specialised assets are therefore valued at their depreciated replacement cost (DRC) on a modern equivalent asset (MEA) basis in accordance with the FReM and RICS guidance, taking into account the functional obsolescence of the property and other assumptions. An MEA basis assumes that the asset will be replaced with a modern asset of equivalent capacity and location requirements of the services being provided.
Non-specialised properties are valued based on existing use or market value where there is an open market valuation for such properties.
Assets which are held for their service potential and are in use (i.e. operational assets used to deliver either front line services or back-office functions) are measured at their current value in existing use.
In determining whether a non-operational asset is surplus, MoJ assesses whether there is a clear plan to bring the asset back into future use as an operational asset. Where there is a clear plan, the asset is not considered as surplus and is maintained at current value in existing use.
Assets that were most recently held for their service potential but are surplus with no plan to bring them back into use are valued at current value in existing use where there are restrictions which would prevent access to the market at the reporting date. If we can access the market, then the surplus asset is valued at fair value in accordance with IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement.
Assets are revalued and depreciation commences when the assets are brought into use. IT equipment, transport equipment, furniture and fittings, and plant and machinery that are held for operational use are valued at depreciated historic cost where these assets have short useful lives or low values or both, as this is not considered to be materially different from current value in existing use.
Fair value hierarchy and inputs
The valuation technique applied to all fair value figures of surplus properties is the market approach in accordance with IFRS 13; it uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable (i.e. similar) assets.
The inputs to this technique constitute level 2 inputs in each instance. Level 2 inputs are inputs that are observable for the asset, either directly or indirectly. The inputs used take the form of analysed and weighted market evidence such as sales, rentals and yields in respect of comparable properties in the same or similar locations at or around the valuation date.
For other property assets in continuing use, fair value is interpreted as market value or ‘value in use’. In the Red Book this is defined as ‘market value’ on the assumption that property is sold as part of the continuing enterprise in occupation. The ‘value in use’ of a non-cash-generating asset is the present value of the asset’s remaining service potential, which can be assumed to be at least equal to the cost of replacing that service potential.
Depreciated historical cost is used as a proxy for fair value for those assets with short useful lives or low values, as allowed by the FReM.
Revaluation
Gains arising on revaluation are credited to the revaluation reserve and shown in other comprehensive net expenditure, unless they reverse a revaluation decrease on the same asset. Reversals are credited to the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Net Expenditure (CSoCNE) to the extent of the previous amount expensed, and any excess is credited to the revaluation reserve.
When an asset’s carrying value decreases as a result of a permanent diminution in the value of the asset due to a clear consumption of economic benefit or service potential, the decrease is charged directly to operating expenditure in the SoCNE, with any remaining revaluation reserves balance released to the General Fund.
A revaluation decrease (other than as a result of a permanent diminution) is reversed against any existing amount held in the revaluation reserve in respect of that same asset, with any residual decrease taken to net operating costs in the CSoCNE.
Each year the difference between depreciation based on the revalued carrying amount of the asset charged to the CSoCNE and depreciation based on the asset’s original cost is transferred from the revaluation reserve to the General Fund.
Depreciation
Items of property, plant and equipment are depreciated over their remaining useful economic lives in a manner consistent with the consumption of economic or service delivery benefits.
Depreciation is charged on a straight-line basis at rates calculated to write-off the value of assets, less estimated residual value evenly over their estimated useful lives. The useful lives of buildings are reviewed annually. Where a change in asset life is determined, the asset is depreciated on a straight-line basis over its remaining assessed life. Depreciation commences in the month following the acquisition of a non-current asset for land, buildings and dwellings and in-month for all other non-current assets.
If an item of property, plant and equipment comprises two or more significant components, with substantially different useful lives, each component is treated separately for depreciation purposes and depreciated over its individual useful life.
Estimated useful asset lives are within the following ranges:
Freehold land | Not depreciated |
Leasehold land | Remaining lease period |
Freehold buildings (including dwellings) | Shorter of remaining life or 60 years |
Leasehold buildings (including dwellings) | Shortest of remaining life, remaining lease period or 60 years |
Information technology | Shorter of remaining life or 3 to 15 years |
Plant and equipment | Shorter of remaining life or 3 to 15 years |
Furniture, fixtures and fittings | Shorter of remaining life or 3 to 20 years |
Assets under construction
Assets under construction are valued at historical cost within property, plant and equipment and intangible assets, and are not depreciated or amortised until completed. On completion, the asset’s carrying value is transferred to the respective asset category.
Expenditure is capitalised where it is directly attributable to bringing an asset into working condition, such as external consultant costs, relevant employee costs and an appropriate portion of relevant overheads.
Disposal of non-current assets
Gains and losses on disposal of non-current assets are determined by comparing the proceeds with the carrying amount and are recognised in the CSoCNE.
When revalued assets are sold, the amounts included in the revaluation reserve are transferred to the General Fund.
1.8 Intangible assets
Intangible assets comprise internally developed software for internal use (including such assets under construction), software developed by third parties, and purchased software licences.
Development costs that are directly attributable to the design and testing of identifiable and unique software products controlled by MoJ are capitalised when they meet the criteria specified in the FReM, which has been adapted from IAS 38 Intangible Assets. Other expenditure that does not meet these criteria is recognised as an expense as incurred.
The useful lives of internally developed software range from 1 to 15 years. In accordance with IAS 38 Intangible Assets MoJ reviews the useful economic lives of its intangible assets each financial year.
MoJ utilises an agile development approach. For each module of information technology (IT), amortisation begins when it is ready for its intended use, regardless of whether the IT will be placed into service in planned stages that may extend beyond a reporting period. If the functionality of a module is entirely dependent on the completion of other modules, amortisation begins when both that module and the other modules upon which it is functionally dependent are ready for their intended use.
Purchased software licences are recognised when it is probable that future service potential will flow to MoJ and the cost of the licence can be measured reliably. Such licences are initially measured at cost. Purchased software licences are amortised over the licence period.
As at 31 March 2023, we did not identify any software as a service (SAAS), or any other cloud-based, right of use assets. The capitalisation thresholds across the departmental group range from £500 to £250,000 (including irrecoverable VAT). Subsequent to initial recognition, intangible assets are measured at fair value. As no active market exists for MoJ’s intangible assets, fair value is assessed as replacement cost less any accumulated amortisation and impairment losses (i.e. depreciated replacement cost).
Intangible assets in service are re-measured at the end of each reporting period using the producer price index issued by the Office for National Statistics (ONS).
1.9 Impairment
Impairments are recognised in accordance with IAS 36 Impairment of Assets as adapted by the FReM.
An impairment reflects a diminution in the value of an asset as a result of a clear consumption of economic benefits or service potential. At each reporting date, MoJ assesses all assets for indications of impairment. If any such indications exist, the assets in question are tested for impairment by comparing the carrying value of those assets with their recoverable amounts.
If the recoverable amount of an asset is less than its carrying value, the carrying value of the asset is reduced to its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount of an asset is the higher of its ‘fair value less costs to sell’ and ‘value in use’ (as defined above).
When an asset’s carrying value decreases as a result of a permanent diminution in the value of the asset due to a clear consumption of economic benefit or service potential, the decrease is charged directly to net operating costs in the CSoCNE. If the asset has previously been revalued, any remaining revaluation reserve balance (up to the level of the impairment loss) is released to the General Fund.
At each reporting date we review impairment losses recognised in previous years. Any reversal of an impairment loss is recognised in the CSoCNE to the extent that the original charge, adjusted for subsequent depreciation, was previously recognised, with any remaining amount recognised in the revaluation reserve.
1.10 Non-current assets held for sale
Non-current assets are classified as assets held for sale in accordance with IFRS 5 Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations as interpreted by the FReM: when their carrying amount is to be recovered principally through a sale transaction and a sale is considered highly probable.
Assets held for sale are stated at the lower of their carrying amount immediately prior to classification as ‘held for sale’ or their fair value less the costs of selling the asset. Any subsequent impairment or reversal of impairment is recognised in the CSoCNE. Assets classified as held for sale are not depreciated.
1.11 Leases
Government bodies typically lease properties used for administrative purposes for reasons of efficiency and flexibility. The departmental group also benefits from the lease of land under leases with peppercorn consideration, which could not have been obtained through outright purchase. For other types of asset, the departmental group determines whether to lease or purchase based on value for money considerations, such as whether the underlying asset is required for its entire life or for a more limited period.
IFRS 16 Leases was adopted by most government bodies reporting under the FReM from 1 April 2022. However, HM Treasury permitted MoJ to early adopt the standard from 1 April 2021. IFRS 16 introduced a single lease accounting model that requires a lessee to recognise assets and liabilities for all leases (apart from the exemptions listed below).
Scope and exclusions – the departmental group as lessee
In accordance with IFRS 16 Leases, contracts, or parts of contracts, that convey the right to control the use of an asset for a period of time are accounted for as leases.
Contracts for services are evaluated to determine whether they:
- convey the right to control the use of an identified asset
- incorporate the right to obtain substantially all the economic benefits from the asset throughout the period of use, and
- the department has the right to direct its use
If so, the relevant part of the contract is treated as a lease.
As adapted by the FReM, IFRS 16 has also been applied to leases with nil or nominal (that is, significantly below market value) consideration and arrangements for sharing accommodation between government departments.
MoJ defines the lease term as the non-cancellable period for which a lessee has the right to use an underlying asset, together with both:
- periods covered by an option to extend the lease if the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise that option, and
- periods covered by an option to terminate the lease if the lessee is reasonably certain not to exercise that option
When making the above assessments, MoJ excludes two types of leases:
- those relating to low value items, which it considers as those where the underlying asset would have a cost of less than £10,000 when new, provided those items are not highly dependent on or integrated with other items, and
- contracts whose term is less than 12 months
At inception or on reassessment of a contract that contains a lease component, MoJ assesses whether it is reasonably certain to exercise break options or extension options at the lease commencement date. MoJ reassesses this if there are significant events or changes in circumstances that were not anticipated. In the event that a lease contract has expired, but MoJ remains in occupation pending negotiations for a renewed term, the lease term has been measured as the estimated time until the new contract will be agreed.
Initial recognition – the departmental group as lessee
At the commencement of a lease, the department recognises a right of use asset and a lease liability. Under HM Treasury’s IFRS 16 Application Guidance, irrecoverable VAT on lease payments is not included in the initial measurement of right of use assets and lease liabilities. Where rental invoices state that the charge is exempt from VAT, the full amount is included in the lease liability.
Lease liability
The lease liability is measured at the value of the remaining lease payments discounted either by the interest rate implicit in the lease or, where this is not readily determinable, the department’s incremental rate of borrowing. This rate is advised annually by HM Treasury (0.95% for leases that commenced, transitioned or were remeasured in the calendar year 2022, 3.51% for those commencing or remeasured in 2023).
The measurement of lease payments excludes any VAT payable, and irrecoverable VAT is expensed at the point it falls due in line with IFRIC 21 Levies.
Where a lease includes variable lease payments tied to an inflation index, this is included in the measurement by inflating using HMT CPI inflation rates as published in the Public Expenditure System (PES) Papers for the relevant year. This is the approach set out in the FReM IFRS 16 Application Guidance.
Right of use asset
The right of use asset is measured at the value of the lease liability, adjusted for:
- any lease payments made before the commencement date
- any lease incentives received
- any incremental costs of obtaining the lease, and
- any costs of removing the asset and restoring the site at the end of the lease
However, in accordance with the FReM, where the lease requires nil or nominal consideration (usually referred to as a ‘peppercorn’ lease) the asset will instead be measured at its existing use value, using market prices or rentals for equivalent land and properties, with the difference between the carrying amount of the right of use asset and lease liability treated, upon transition, as notional income.
Enhancements to leased assets, such as alterations to a leased building, are not classified within right of use assets but are classified as property, plant and equipment in accordance with the FReM.
Subsequent measurement – the departmental group as lessee
After initial recognition, the right of use asset will be measured using the fair value model. The departmental group considers that the cost model (measurement by reference to the lease liability) is a reasonable proxy for fair value, in the case of non-property leases, and also for property leases of less than five years or with regular rent reviews. For other leases, the asset will be carried at a revalued amount.
The value of the asset is adjusted for subsequent depreciation and impairment, and for reassessments and modifications of the lease liability as described below. Where the amount of a reduction to the asset exceeds the carrying value of the asset, the excess amount is recognised as expenditure in the CSoCNE.
The lease liability will be adjusted for the accrual of interest, repayments, reassessments and modifications. Reassessments are reappraisals of the probability of the options given by the existing lease contract, for example where we no longer expect to exercise an option; modifications are changes to the lease contract.
Reassessments and modifications are accounted for by either by:
- recalculating the lease term under any new contract terms, taking account of the reasonable certainty or otherwise of exercising an option; or
- applying a new discount rate where applicable.
Expenditure charged to the CSoCNE for each financial year includes interest on the lease liability and a straight-line depreciation charge on the right of use asset over the life of the lease, together with any impairment of the right of use asset and any change in variable lease payments, that was not included in the measurement of the lease payments during the period in which the triggering event occurred. Lease payments are debited against the liability. Rental payments in respect of leases of low value items, or with a term under twelve months, are also expensed.
Finance and operating leases – the departmental group as lessor
Where the department acts as a lessor, the arrangement will be assessed to determine whether it constitutes a finance lease, this being where the risks and rewards incidental to ownership of an underlying asset are substantially transferred to the lessee. For these leases the asset is derecognised, and a receivable is recognised, with accrued interest being treated as income over its life. All other leases are treated as operating leases and rental income is recognised in the CSoCNE on a straight-line basis.
Estimates and judgements
In assessing the lease MoJ needs to make estimates and judgements:
- where a lease is embedded in a contract for services, the amount to be recognised as the right of use asset and lease liability should be the stand-alone price of the lease component only. Where this is not readily observable, a determination will be made by reference for other observable data, such as the fair value of similar assets or price of contracts for similar non-lease components
- MoJ has determined the lease term by assessing the level of certainty as to whether termination or extension options will be exercised. In making these judgements, reliance has been placed on the professional judgement of estates staff, supported by information on corporate asset management plans, other business strategies, investment already made in the underlying asset, ongoing business needs and market conditions
- MoJ has determined that the cost model is a reasonable proxy for fair value in most cases because the rents payable are aligned to open market rates. In the case of longer leases, where there are not regular rent reviews, there is a greater chance of divergence between cost and fair value, hence a professional revaluation is appropriate
- MoJ also leases various non-property assets such as vehicles and IT equipment. It has determined that, at the present time, all non-property leases which are not individually low value, are immaterial. Consequently, no non-property leases have been recognised in these accounts. Non- property leases include assets such as vehicles and IT equipment
1.12 Service Concession Arrangements
Service Concession Arrangements (SCAs), including Private Finance Initiative (PFI) arrangements, are where private sector operators are contractually obliged to provide services to the public in relation to certain infrastructure assets. MoJ defines such arrangements as SCAs if they meet the conditions set out in the FReM and IFRIC 12 Service Concession Arrangements.
The future payment streams of SCAs are assessed to separately identify the infrastructure interest and service components.
MoJ recognises the infrastructure asset at fair value (or the present value of the future minimum infrastructure payments, if lower) as a non-current asset in the CSoFP with a corresponding liability for future payments under the agreement.
The interest element is charged to the CSoCNE over the contract period to produce a constant periodic rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability. The service element is charged to the CSoCNE in the period in which the services are rendered by the operator.
For budgeting purposes, SCAs are evaluated according to the balance of risks and reward of ownership as defined by European System of Accounts (ESA) 10. This means that some SCAs recognised in the accounts are treated differently for budgetary purposes against HM Treasury budgeting controls.
1.13 Employee benefits
Short term benefits such as salaries and wages or post-employment benefits resulting from employment and long term benefits such as long service awards, including termination benefits (for example early departure costs) and pension benefits are recognised at the cost of providing the benefit in the period in which it is earned by the employee, rather than when it is paid or becomes payable.
IAS 19 ‘Employee Benefits’ requires MoJ to recognise the expected cost of the annual leave entitlement of its employees that is accrued at the end of each financial year.
Defined benefit pension schemes
Principal Civil Service Pension Scheme and Judicial Pension Scheme
The provisions of the Principal Civil Service Pension Scheme (PCSPS) cover most past and present employees; salaried and fee-paid judicial office holders are covered by the Judicial Pension Scheme (JPS). Both the PCSPS and the JPS are unfunded defined benefit schemes although, in accordance with the FReM paragraph 8.2 adaptation of IAS 19, the department accounts for these as defined contribution schemes and recognises contributions it pays as an expense in the year in which they are incurred. The legal or constructive obligation is limited to the amount that it agrees to contribute to the fund.
The department is responsible for the administration of the JPS that provides for the pension entitlements of salaried and fee-paid judicial office holders of six other participating bodies.
Pension entitlements are provided to salaried judges under the JPS. In September 2005, a retired fee-paid judicial office holder brought a claim in the Employment Tribunal seeking retrospective parity of treatment with salaried judicial office holders by claiming pension entitlements under the Part Time Workers Regulations.
A UK Supreme Court hearing on 6 February 2013 ruled that a retired fee-paid judicial office holder is entitled to a pension on terms equivalent to those of a salaried judicial office holder. This lead case set the precedent for other stayed cases. Consistent with the accounting for salaried judicial office holders, and in accordance with FReM 8.2, we account for employer contributions payable to the JPS for eligible fee-paid judicial office holders as they are incurred but do not recognise a liability in respect of back payments or the pension liability arising pursuant to the claim. Accordingly, provision for the fee-paid pension entitlement is recognised in the JPS Accounts.
Provisions have been recognised in the department’s accounts for both the liability to fee-paid judicial office holders in respect of the Judicial Service Award, and the separate element of the pension liability relating to fee-paid judges, as neither of these is a liability covered by the JPS and its governing acts.
The JPS is not consolidated within these accounts and further information can be found in the JPS accounts.
Further information about these provisions is set out in Note 20.
Funded pension schemes
Unlike the schemes described above, funded pension schemes are accounted for through the department’s CSoFP, applying IAS 19 Employee Benefits in full. These accounts contain the Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS) for HMPPS probation staff and past employees of the probation trusts (including those who transferred to community rehabilitation companies (CRCs) and/or community rehabilitation services (CRSs), the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass) and the Legal Services Commission Pension Scheme (LSCPS). The cost of providing benefits is determined using the projected unit credit method, with formal actuarial valuations being carried out at the end of every third reporting period (the most recent valuations being as at 31 March 2022). The results of the valuations as at 31 March 2022 were shown in actuarial reports published on 31 March 2023 and were reflected in the 2022-23 accounts.
Past employees of the Probation Trusts, and LGPS probation staff who transferred to CRCs and HMPPS NPS are covered by the provisions of LGPS via one pension fund administered by the Greater Manchester Pension Fund (GMPF). The Secretary of State for Justice has provided a guarantee to GMPF in respect of the CRSs’ participation in the GMPF for pension liabilities that transferred to the CRSs.
The liability or asset recognised in the CSoFP is the present value of the defined benefit obligation at the reporting date less the fair value of plan assets. Any surplus is limited to the present value of any economic benefits available in the form of refunds from the plan or reductions in future contributions to the plan (the ‘asset ceiling’).
The present values of the schemes are calculated by estimating the amount of future benefits that employees have earned in return for their service in the current and prior periods. The benefit is discounted to determine its present value, and the fair values of plan assets are deducted.
Remeasurements (comprising actuarial gains and losses), the effect of the asset ceiling (including irrecoverable surplus adjustments), and the return on plan assets (excluding interest) are recognised within Other Comprehensive Expenditure in the period in which they arise. Under the requirements of IFRIC 14 The Limit on a Defined Benefit Asset, Minimum Funding Requirements and their Interaction, the value of any net pension surplus which was determined under IAS 19 is limited in the financial statements to reflect that the full economic benefit of the surplus in the GMPF is not realisable by HMPPS; this restriction is known as the asset ceiling.
In the case of the LSCPS, MoJ is able to recognise a pension asset as it has an unconditional right to a refund from the LSC during the life of the plan. MoJ can elect to withdraw money out of the fund, to the extent that the funding level doesn’t drop below 105%. Therefore, in the event of a surplus no asset ceiling is applied.
Service costs
Service costs are recognised in the CSoCNE and are spread systematically over the working lives of the employees. The net interest charge to the CSoCNE is calculated by applying the discount rate to the net defined benefit liability or asset.
Other defined benefit pension schemes
The department has separate schemes that are ‘by-analogy’ or similar to the PCSPS. However, they are funded by provisions from the department’s vote and pension payments are administered by the department and made via the payroll system.
Early departure and injury benefit costs
The department is required to pay the additional cost of benefits beyond the normal PCSPS and LGPS benefits in respect of employees who retire early. The total cost is provided in full when the early departure programme has been announced and is binding on the department.
The Civil Service Injury Benefits Scheme (CSIBS) requires the department to pay benefits to any individual who is injured in connection with their employment. Benefits are paid only in respect of loss of earning capacity, and a provision is made for expected future costs.
The early departure and injury benefit provisions are discounted using the rate disclosed in Note 1.18.
1.14 Income
IFRS15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers and the FReM require that, when applying income recognition policies, legislation and regulations which enable an entity to receive cash or another financial asset from another entity should be assessed for performance obligations to match revenue to the performance obligation.
Income is generated directly from the operating activities of the departmental group and includes both budgetary and non-budgetary income. Non-budgetary income is outside the ambit of the departmental group and is surrendered to the Consolidated Fund as CFERs (refer to Annex A, SOPS 4).
Income is stated net of VAT and comprises mainly fees and charges for services which are set on a full cost recovery basis.
MoJ recognises revenue from a number of different sources, primarily from: fees collected by HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) in relation to court fees for services rendered to civil, family court and tribunal users; Legal Aid Agency (LAA) civil representation and criminal case recoveries; Office of the Public Guardian (OPG) fees (largely Power of Attorney fees); HM Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) income (largely prison related) as well as recoveries from other government departments.
Fee Income
HMCTS fee income
The majority of fees paid to HMCTS are for an application to commence the administration of a process or, to a lesser extent, for a court process or for a particular stage of the administration of the court process. The payment of a fee does not convey the right to a decision, or a particular outcome from the court, nor does it set out the timescale or process which will be followed by the court or tribunal, which is at the discretion of the judge. It is a fundamental principle of an independent judiciary that judges do not hold performance obligations to individuals or organisations in relation to court and tribunal activities.
The power to charge fees is conferred by section 92 of the Courts Acts 2003, and the power to charge enhanced fees is conferred by section 180 of the Anti-Social Behaviour Crime and Policing Act 2014. This is the legislation against which HMCTS assesses its performance obligations. This legislation also provides for statutory instruments to set out a price list for the fees to be charged. These statutory instruments, determined in the FReM adaption as contracts under IFRS 15, are interpreted as the performance obligations on HMCTS in respect of the individual fees charged. This does not place a performance obligation on the judiciary.
HMCTS has therefore adopted an income policy which recognises that in the administration of the courts system, HMCTS, whose role is to support the judiciary in their administration of justice, bears a responsibility to applicants to ensure their application is progressed upon receipt of the correct fee.
In recognition of this obligation, HMCTS defers most of its revenue until the issue of an application is completed, or any other obligations are completed that are required as part of the statutory instrument.
Civil fees make up the majority of HMCTS income and can be disaggregated into broad jurisdictional categories. Within each category, there are three significant common performance recognition points: issue, hearing and enforcement.
OPG fee income
For OPG fees and charges, revenue from contracts with customers comprises fees for services which are set based on an OPG full cost recovery basis. Fee income consists of amounts for services rendered from Power of Attorney (POA) applications, supervision of court appointed deputies, and copies of POA certificates.
Fines and penalties
MoJ also collects fines, criminal court charges and fixed penalties imposed by the judiciary or police, and is permitted to retain part of the value of fines and penalties collected. The HMCTS Trust Statement accounts for fines and penalties imposed by the criminal justice system as revenue ultimately payable to the Consolidated Fund, on a gross basis. It also accounts for the cash and balances payable to the Consolidated Fund and third parties in relation to the collection of the fines and penalties amounts.
As there are no specific performance obligations associated with receiving revenue from fines and penalties, the revenue is considered to be a non-exchange transaction and therefore outside the scope of IFRS 15. They are measured at the fair value of amounts received, or receivable, net of judicial cancellations and remissions. Revenue is recognised at the full value of the imposition when a fine or penalty is validly imposed and an obligation to pay arises. Where a penalty is cancelled due to attendance at a training course, as a result of an appeal or for other legal reasons or as a result of settlement by other valid means including imprisonment, revenue is derecognised and the derecognition of revenue is recorded as a reduction against revenue.
The victim surcharge
An additional surcharge is added to fines that are imposed. HMCTS is responsible for collecting the victim surcharge and passing the receipts to MoJ justice reform directorate to fund victims’ services. Revenue is recognised on the same basis as fines.
Recoveries from other government departments and income from the NHS and other healthcare providers
Recoveries from other government departments relate to the recharge of expenditure to other government departments. HMPPS receives income from the NHS in relation to healthcare funding and from the Home Office in relation to Immigration Removal Centres. HMCTS receives funding from DWP and HMRC in respect of the operations of the First Tier Tribunal (Social Security and Child Support). The performance obligation is met, and the revenue recognised, at the time that the services are rendered or goods delivered.
Retail sales
Retail income is generated within HMPPS from retail sales in prison shops. Revenue is recognised at the point the goods are received by the prisoner.
Levy income of the Office of Legal Complaints (OLC) and Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Legal Services Act 2007 (the Act) makes provision for the costs of OLC and LSB to be recovered through the imposition of a levy on the legal profession’s approved regulators. In accounting for levy income, section 175 of the Act requires all levy income collected by OLC and LSB to be surrendered to the Consolidated Fund. In return, OLC and LSB receive Grant-in-Aid funding from the core department equal to the income surrendered. Accordingly, a notional transfer to the Consolidated Fund has been shown in the Statement of Changes in Taxpayers’ Equity and an equal amount is shown as a notional Grant-in-Aid receipt from MoJ as the sponsoring department.
LSB and OLC, in conjunction with the department and HM Treasury, are seeking to identify a suitable legislative vehicle to make an amendment to section 175 of the 2007 Act to enable them to retain the levy income and not surrender it in return for an equal grant.
Other income
European Social Fund and other European funding
Through HMPPS, the department receives a financial allocation for delivery of resettlement services to offenders. The funding is used to support offenders considered hard to reach, in both custody and community settings, to increase employability and provide opportunities to access mainstream services. Funding is matched to eligible expenditure on an accruals basis. The performance obligation is met and income recognised when expenditure is incurred that meets the funding payment criteria.
1.15 Grants payable and paid
Grant-in-Aid financing to the department’s NDPBs is reported on a cash basis in the period in which payments are made. Co-funding grants from other government departments are paid to NDPBs via the core department and are included as part of the Grant-in-Aid funding for the year. All Grant-in-Aid and supply funding made by the core department to its agencies and NDPBs is fully eliminated within the departmental group.
The department also makes a small number of grants to a variety of public sector, private sector and voluntary bodies. These grants are recognised at the point at which an authorised request is received from the recipient body, in accordance with the terms of the relevant financial memoranda.
1.16 Costs borne by the Consolidated Fund
The salary and social security costs of senior judges are included in these accounts as a cost and are funded from the Consolidated Fund. Senior judges also receive service award payments under an agreement with the department which are paid from the Consolidated Fund.
1.17 Notional costs
Notional costs comprise statutory auditor’s remuneration, which represents the National Audit Office’s cost for the audit of the department and executive agencies’ accounts, and notional costs for corporate overheads which are recharged to business areas. Such notional costs are credited directly to the General Fund. The majority of the notional recharge costs relate to IT services, estates costs, and shared services processing charges that are centrally managed on behalf of the group, and are eliminated on consolidation.
1.18 Provisions
Provisions are recognised in accordance with IAS 37 Provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets. Provisions are recognised when:
- MoJ has a present legal or constructive obligation, as a result of past events
- it is probable that an outflow of economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation, and
- a reliable estimate can be made for the amount of the obligation
Provisions are measured at the present value of the expenditures expected to be required to settle the obligation. Where the effect of discounting is material, provisions are measured at their present value using the current discount rates set by HM Treasury based on the underlying cash flows: 3.27%, 3.20% and 3.51% for short-term, medium-term and long-term cash flows respectively.
Early departure and injury benefit provisions are discounted using the HM Treasury post-employment benefits real discount rate of 1.70% (2021-22: -1.03%).
The increase in the provision due to passage of time is recognised as interest expense.
1.19 Contingent assets and liabilities
A contingent liability is disclosed when the likelihood of a payment is less than probable, but more than remote, or the obligation cannot be measured reliably. Where the time value of money is material, contingent liabilities required to be disclosed under IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets are stated at discounted amounts.
A contingent asset is a potential asset that arises from past events and whose existence will be confirmed only by the occurrence or non-occurrence of one or more uncertain future events not wholly within the control of MoJ. A contingent asset is disclosed where an inflow of economic benefits is probable.
1.20 Value Added Tax
Most of the MoJ’s activities are outside the scope of VAT and, in general, output tax does not apply and input tax on purchases is not recoverable, except as allowed by HM Treasury’s Contracting Out Direction. Irrecoverable VAT is charged to the relevant expenditure category or included in the capitalised purchase costs of non-current assets, except leases (which are discussed in Note 1.11). Where output tax is charged or input tax is recoverable, the amounts are stated net of VAT.
1.21 Third party assets
MoJ holds, as custodian or trustee, certain assets belonging to third parties. In line with FReM requirements, these assets are not recognised in the CSoFP and are disclosed within Note 28 since neither the department nor the government has a direct beneficial interest in them.
1.22 Financial instruments
Recognition
Financial assets and financial liabilities which arise from contracts for the purchase and sale of non-financial items (such as goods or services), which are entered into in accordance with MoJ’s normal purchase, sale or usage requirements, are recognised when, and to the extent to which, performance occurs. All other financial assets and liabilities are recognised when MoJ becomes party to the contractual provisions to receive or make cash payments.
De-recognition
Financial assets are de-recognised when the contractual rights to receive future cash flows have expired or MoJ has transferred substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership to another entity. Financial liabilities are de-recognised when the obligation is discharged, cancelled or expires.
Classification and measurement of financial assets
In addition to cash and cash equivalents, MoJ has two categories of financial assets:
Financial assets at fair value through profit and loss
Fair value is equal to the market value at the reporting date, and the movement in the value of the assets is recognised immediately in the CSoCNE, as income or as an expense.
Receivables relating to LAA’s statutory charge are measured at fair value in line with the requirements of IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement as they are not solely payments of principal and interest, and therefore do not meet the tests set out in IFRS 9. The practical application of IFRS 13 in respect of LAA’s assets applies the consideration of the three hierarchies set under the standard for determining fair value. This is explained in further detail in the Legal Aid Agency’s Annual Report and Accounts 2022-23, including detail on key assumptions which support the most significant fair value estimates.
MoJ, through HMPPS, holds share investments of £0.4 million (2021-22: £0.4 million) in milk companies due to the milk producing prison farms run by HMPPS at HMP Usk. They are held as financial assets at fair value through profit and loss. Fair value is equal to market value at the reporting date, and the movement in the value of assets is recognised immediately in the SoCNE, as income or as an expense.
Financial assets at amortised cost
Cash and trade and other receivables are held at amortised cost. For assets at amortised cost, the amortised cost balance was reduced where appropriate by an allowance for amounts which were considered to be impaired or uncollectable.
MoJ recognises a provision for expected credit losses on financial assets measured at amortised cost. Any interest receivable or loss arising on impairment is recognised in the Statement of Comprehensive Net Expenditure.
Trade receivables are generally due for settlement within 30 days and are therefore classed as current. A proportion of MoJ’s receivables relate to other government departments and other public bodies. These bodies are funded by Parliament and there is historical evidence to show that this debt is collected. MoJ is therefore not exposed to significant credit risk on these balances.
Receivables that are not due from other public bodies are grouped together for the purpose of working out the expected credit loss. For trade receivables with no significant financing components, IFRS 9 Financial Instruments allows an entity to use a simplified method for calculating expected losses using historical default rates over the expected life of the trade receivables and adjusting for forward-looking estimates. Receivables are shown net of expected credit loss using this approach.
Impairment of financial assets
At the end of each reporting period, MoJ assesses whether there is objective evidence that a financial asset or a group of financial assets is impaired. If there is objective evidence that an impairment loss on such an asset has been incurred, MoJ recognises this in the CSoCNE as the difference between the asset’s carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows.
Classification and measurement – financial liabilities
MoJ has financial liabilities, comprising finance lease liabilities, trade payables, other payables and accruals. All financial liabilities are recognised initially at fair value, net of any transaction costs incurred, and then measured at amortised cost using the effective interest rate method. Where the effect is material, the estimated cash flows of financial liabilities are discounted.
1.23 Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents recorded in the CSoFP and Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows include cash in hand, deposits held at call with banks, other short term highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less at inception and bank overdrafts.
1b) Critical accounting estimates and judgements
Estimates and judgements are regularly evaluated and are based on historical experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances.
Critical accounting estimates and assumptions
The preparation of the financial statements requires the use of judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expenditure during the reporting period. The estimates and assumptions that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year are addressed below.
Revaluation and impairment of non-current assets
Subsequent to initial recognition land and buildings (including dwellings) are recorded at fair value, as interpreted by the FReM, based on professional valuations which are conducted for each property at least once every five years by the Valuation Office Agency, who are independent of MoJ, in accordance with the Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors Appraisal and Valuation Manual. The value of land and buildings fluctuates with changes in construction costs and the current market conditions.
The majority of operational buildings are specialised and are therefore valued at depreciated replacement cost (DRC) to a modern equivalent basis. This modern equivalent is assumed to be in the same location with the same internal area as the existing property. All other buildings are measured at fair value determined from market-based evidence.
All assets other than land and buildings and assets under construction are revalued at each reporting date using the Producer Price Index prepared by the ONS.
Intangible assets include internally generated software and software licences. Internally generated software is initially recognised as assets under construction in the financial statements based on the cost (for example capitalised staff and consultancy costs) of creating that software, which could be a bespoke IT system or a modified existing system. When the system becomes available for use the asset is transferred to Intangible IT and an impairment review is carried out. Subsequently, these assets are revalued using indices as an estimate of the current value of these assets and amortised over the useful life of the asset as estimated by the asset owners.
The carrying amounts of these assets are shown in Notes 13, 15 and 16.
Right of use assets
The cost model has been determined as a reasonable proxy for fair value in most cases, because the rents payable are aligned to open market rates. In the case of longer leases where there are not regular rent reviews, there is a greater chance of divergence between cost and fair value, hence a professional revaluation is appropriate.
In the event that a lease contract has expired, but MoJ remains in occupation pending negotiations for a renewed term, the lease term has been measured as the estimated time until the new contract will be agreed.
Net pension assets and liabilities
The present value of the net pension liability detailed in Note 25 depends on a number of actuarially derived assumptions about inflation, salary and pension trends, discount factors and mortality rates. The estimated net liability or asset is subject to fluctuation and uncertainty due to changes in these assumptions over time and differences between assumptions and actual events. Sensitivity analysis in relation to the key assumptions used in the calculation of the gross pension liability is provided in Note 25.
The pension liabilities for 2022-23 reflect the appropriate assumptions. As a result of the large increase in the discount rate used at 31 March 2022, this has significantly reduced the pension liability for all Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS) employers. All assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis, and at least annually.
Provisions for liabilities and charges
The recognition and measurement of provisions rely on the application of professional judgement, historical experience, and other factors expected to influence future events. Where the likelihood of a liability crystallising is deemed probable and can be measured with reasonable certainty, a provision is recognised. Provision balances which contain regular, homogeneous transactions are often derived from complex financial models. Estimates and assumptions applied in these models are regularly evaluated and reviewed. Where assumptions are significant, a sensitivity analysis has been included to demonstrate how a change in each assumption would affect the assessment. Further information is set out in Note 20.
LAA financial assets
LAA recognises an impairment for expected credit losses on financial assets measured at amortised cost under IFRS 9 Financial instruments. This includes receivables from legal aid providers and clients who are not subject to the statutory charge. Subsequent to initial recognition, at fair value, these assets are carried at amortised cost using the effective interest rate method, less any impairment. Any interest receivable or loss arising on impairment is recognised in the Statement of Comprehensive Net Expenditure.
LAA derecognises a financial asset only when the contractual rights to the cash flows for the asset expire, or it transfers the financial asset and substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership to another entity.
For assets held at amortised cost, IFRS 9 requires LAA to recognise at amortised cost and to then recognise expected credit losses based on historic experience and adjusted for reasonable and supportable forward-looking information such as management’s assessment of likely recoveries. This assessment may be of individual assets (individual impairment) or of a portfolio of assets (collective impairment). An assessment of collective impairment is made of financial assets with similar risk characteristics. For these assets, LAA’s previous experience of losses in each portfolio is used to estimate the degree of impairment on that asset class.
Where such an estimate is made, impairment provisions are made to reduce the carrying value of financial assets accordingly. LAA apply the ‘simplified model’ and recognise lifetime expected credit losses.
The measurement of expected credit loss involves complexity and judgement. Further detail on the valuation model used to generate this estimate and the actual impairments against LAA’s receivables is included in Note 24 to these financial statements.
Default is determined by reference to one or more missed contractual payments but also includes arrangements in place to pay less than contractual payments, fraud and bankruptcy or other indicators. The key areas in which management make estimations and assumptions are trade and other receivables (Note 17 and Note 24) and provisions for liabilities and charges (Note 20).
Critical judgements in applying accounting policies
LAA financial assets
The estimates and associated assumptions included within the financial statements are based on data held by LAA, historical experience and various other factors. These are believed to provide a reasonable basis on which the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources can be estimated.
The key areas in which management make estimations and assumptions are trade and other receivables (Note 17 and Note 24) and provisions for liabilities and charges (Note 20).
Service Concession Arrangements
The classification of arrangements as Service Concession Arrangements requires MoJ to determine, based on an evaluation of the terms and conditions of the arrangements, whether it controls the infrastructure. Where MoJ is judged to control the infrastructure, the contract assets are reflected in the SoFP.
2. Operating expenditure by operating segment
Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with the internal reporting provided to the Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM), that is, categorised according to business group.
The CODM, who is responsible for allocating resources and assessing performance of the operating segments, has been identified as the Executive Committee (ExCo). The segmental analysis presents the financial information based on the structure reported to ExCo.
The segments are:
- Centrally held – centrally managed budgets and the departmental unallocated provision
- Policy and Corporate Services – departmental headquarters functions and the department’s NDPBs
- HMCTS
- HMPPS
- Other delivery agencies – LAA, OPG and CICA
ExCo does not receive a CSoFP analysed by operating segment and therefore such an analysis is not presented here.
2. Operating expenditure by operating segment (continued)
2022-23
Centrally held | Policy and corporate services | HMCTS | HMPPS | Other delivery agencies | Gross total (pre-eliminations) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
£000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | |
Income | ||||||
Income from external customers | (858) | (131,906) | (57,557) | (218,920) | (57,580) | (466,821) |
Internal MoJ income | - | (149,581) | - | - | - | (149,581) |
Interest | - | (236) | - | - | - | (236) |
EU grants | - | - | - | (32,821) | - | (32,821) |
CFERs | - | (20,942) | - | - | - | (20,942) |
Fee income | (353,238) | (30,001) | (725,128) | - | (85,100) | (1,193,467) |
Total income | (354,096) | (332,666) | (782,685) | (251,741) | (142,680) | (1,863,868) |
Expenditure | ||||||
Staff costs | 4,824 | 729,521 | 656,936 | 3,054,332 | 117,605 | 4,563,218 |
Judiciary costs | 21 | 10,458 | 631,745 | - | - | 642,224 |
Accommodation, maintenance and utilities | 2 | 41,496 | 308,312 | 605,206 | 5,280 | 960,296 |
Offender related costs | - | - | - | 619,766 | - | 619,766 |
Service concession charges | - | - | 33,495 | 670,020 | - | 703,515 |
IT services and telecommunications (nonservice concession arrangements) | 5 | 228,101 | 226,790 | 32,934 | 582 | 488,412 |
Contracted probation services (CRCs) | - | - | - | 69,876 | - | 69,876 |
Payments of grant-in-aid to MoJ NDPBs (eliminated on consolidation) | - | 288,031 | - | - | - | 288,031 |
Cost of legal services and disbursements (civil) | - | - | - | - | 6,420 | 6,420 |
Cost of legal services and disbursements (crime) | - | - | - | - | 4,462 | 4,462 |
Provisions provided for in year | (5,324) | 3,253 | (79,396) | (29,168) | 197,130 | 86,495 |
Legal Aid funded provisions | - | - | - | - | 1,924,930 | 1,924,930 |
Rentals under operating leases | - | 7,018 | 11,832 | 2,075 | 475 | 21,400 |
Finance charges on leases and service concession arrangements | - | 7,018 | 14,734 | 12,268 | 194 | 34,214 |
Current grants | - | 286,689 | 25 | 4,434 | - | 291,148 |
Corporation tax | - | 45 | - | - | - | 45 |
Corporate recharges | - | (586,137) | 84,568 | 452,265 | 49,304 | - |
Depreciation | - | 49,026 | 238,747 | 395,186 | 4,657 | 687,616 |
Amortisation | - | 14,997 | 75,639 | 9,717 | 6,947 | 107,300 |
SoCNE impairments | - | - | 262 | (4,455) | 1,014 | (3,179) |
Individually immaterial items of expenditure | 11,908 | 400,834 | 120,600 | 274,852 | 70,676 | 878,870 |
Total expenditure | 11,436 | 1,480,350 | 2,324,289 | 6,169,308 | 2,389,676 | 12,375,059 |
2021-22
Centrally held | Policy and corporate services | HMCTS | HMPPS | Other delivery agencies | Gross total (preeliminations) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
£000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | |
Income | ||||||
Income from external customers | (3,947) | (95,297) | (53,831) | (240,636) | (35,227) | (428,938) |
Internal MoJ income | - | (157,629) | - | - | (19) | (157,648) |
EU grants | - | - | - | (41,539) | - | (41,539) |
CFERs | - | (20,624) | - | - | - | (20,624) |
Fee income | (377,931) | (29,999) | (669,467) | - | (68,557) | (1,145,954) |
Total income | (381,878) | (303,549) | (723,298) | (282,175) | (103,803) | (1,794,703) |
Expenditure | ||||||
Staff costs | (4,181) | 650,181 | 658,534 | 2,733,734 | 110,436 | 4,148,704 |
Judiciary costs | 106 | 9,961 | 603,439 | - | - | 613,506 |
Accommodation, maintenance and utilities | - | 41,353 | 324,081 | 568,180 | 5,436 | 939,050 |
Offender related costs | - | - | - | 578,515 | - | 578,515 |
Service concession charges | - | 78,200 | 32,807 | 618,341 | - | 729,348 |
IT services and telecommunications (nonservice concession arrangements) | 158 | 115,993 | 189,623 | 39,530 | 329 | 345,633 |
Costs of Community Rehabilitation Companies | - | - | - | 179,462 | - | 179,462 |
Payments of grant-in-aid to MoJ NDPBs (eliminated on consolidation) | - | 272,480 | - | - | - | 272,480 |
Cost of legal services and disbursements (civil) | - | - | - | - | 7,162 | 7,162 |
Cost of legal services and disbursements (crime) | - | - | - | - | 3,780 | 3,780 |
Provisions provided for in year | 40,989 | (354) | 43,029 | 29,527 | 160,473 | 273,664 |
Legal Aid funded provisions | - | - | - | - | 1,742,315 | 1,742,315 |
Rentals under operating leases | 1 | 5,686 | 22,034 | 1,787 | 1,124 | 30,362 |
Finance charges on leases and service concession arrangements | - | 7,933 | 15,057 | 13,551 | 93 | 36,634 |
Current grants | - | 243,394 | 25 | 4,713 | - | 248,132 |
Corporate recharges | - | (513,902) | 93,376 | 378,128 | 42,398 | - |
Depreciation | - | 73,699 | 215,174 | 336,581 | 2,731 | 628,185 |
Amortisation | - | 11,868 | 47,654 | 9,912 | 9,907 | 79,341 |
SoCNE impairments | - | 5,609 | 3,889 | 95,687 | 95 | 105,280 |
Individually immaterial items of expenditure | 19,904 | 328,891 | 195,901 | 275,913 | 43,716 | 864,325 |
Total expenditure | 56,977 | 1,330,992 | 2,444,623 | 5,863,561 | 2,129,995 | 11,826,148 |
3. Revenue from contracts with customers
2022-23 | 2021-22 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Core department and agencies | Departmental group | Core department and agencies | Departmental group | |
£000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | |
Fines receipts | 383,239 | 383,239 | 407,924 | 407,924 |
Fee income | 843,642 | 843,642 | 744,061 | 744,067 |
Victim surcharge | 41,351 | 41,351 | 37,864 | 37,864 |
Legal Aid - civil representation recoveries | 14,141 | 14,141 | 16,412 | 16,412 |
Legal Aid - criminal cases recoveries | 21,989 | 21,989 | 17,506 | 17,506 |
Remand income | 29,962 | 29,962 | 32,054 | 32,137 |
Income from NHS and other healthcare providers | 59,779 | 59,779 | 53,927 | 53,927 |
Recoveries from other government departments | 90,506 | 89,896 | 127,411 | 127,013 |
CICA income from the Scottish Government | 19,143 | 19,143 | - | - |
External sales of prison industries | 15,423 | 15,423 | 13,747 | 13,747 |
Retail prison shop income | 72,187 | 72,187 | 67,265 | 67,265 |
In-cell TV income | 1,560 | 1,560 | 547 | 547 |
Training | 9,511 | 9,511 | 1,294 | 1,294 |
Compensation | 4,629 | 4,629 | 5,053 | 5,053 |
Internal customers | 1,736 | 1,736 | 1,509 | 1,509 |
Miscellaneous income | 17,582 | 17,574 | 16,167 | 15,417 |
Revenue within MoJ’s ambit | 1,626,380 | 1,625,762 | 1,542,741 | 1,541,682 |
CFER receipts | 1,552 | 20,942 | 2,820 | 20,624 |
Total | 1,627,932 | 1,646,704 | 1,545,561 | 1,562,306 |
4. Other operating income
2022-23 | 2021-22 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Core department and agencies | Departmental group | Core department and agencies | Departmental group | |
£000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | |
Rental income | 31,270 | 31,270 | 31,705 | 31,705 |
European Social Fund and other European funding | 32,821 | 32,821 | 41,539 | 41,539 |
Miscellaneous income | - | 241 | - | (1) |
Total | 64,091 | 64,332 | 73,244 | 73,243 |
5. Staff and judiciary costs
Staff costs
2022-23 | 2021-22 [footnote 1] |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Permanently employed staff | Other | Ministers | Total | Total | |
£000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | |
Wages and salaries | 3,072,023 | 242,199 | 394 | 3,314,616 | 3,008,041 |
Social security costs | 339,814 | 1,619 | 45 | 341,478 | 286,789 |
Other pension costs | 888,580 | 31 | - | 888,611 | 840,616 |
Sub total | 4,300,417 | 243,849 | 439 | 4,544,705 | 4,135,446 |
Early departure costs | 25,268 | - | - | 25,268 | 15,159 |
Add inward secondments | 15,746 | (1,786) | - | 13,960 | 30,741 |
Less recoveries in respect of outward secondments | (20,750) | - | - | (20,750) | (32,769) |
Total Net Costs | 4,320,681 | 242,063 | 439 | 4,563,183 | 4,148,577 |
Of which: | |||||
Core department and agencies | 4,086,296 | 216,714 | 439 | 4,303,449 | 3,895,744 |
NDPBs | 234,385 | 25,349 | - | 259,734 | 252,833 |
Total | 4,320,681 | 242,063 | 439 | 4,563,183 | 4,148,577 |
Judiciary costs
2022-23 | 2021-22 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Senior judicial salaries | Other judicial salaries | Fee-paid judiciary | Total | Total | |
£000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | |
Wages and salaries | 145,757 | 111,460 | 146,183 | 403,400 | 391,769 |
Social security costs | 20,546 | 15,571 | 15,788 | 51,905 | 47,972 |
Other pension costs | 74,202 | 57,298 | 55,419 | 186,919 | 173,765 |
Total | 240,505 | 184,329 | 217,390 | 642,224 | 613,506 |
All judiciary costs are within the core department and agencies.
Staff and judiciary numbers and further details of related costs, including exit packages, are reported in the Remuneration and Staff Report within the Accountability section.
6. Purchase of goods and services
2022-23 | 2021-22 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Core department and agencies | Departmental group | Core department and agencies (reclassified) | Departmental group (reclassified) | |
£000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | |
Lease/service concession charges: | ||||
PFI service charges* | 566,928 | 566,928 | 600,817 | 600,817 |
Other service concession charges | 136,587 | 136,587 | 128,531 | 128,531 |
Rentals under operating leases | 21,378 | 21,400 | 30,589 | 30,632 |
Other services: | ||||
Accommodation, maintenance and utilities | 955,170 | 810,548 | 934,029 | 780,975 |
Communications, office supplies and services | 57,791 | 59,264 | 54,849 | 56,589 |
Travel, subsistence and hospitality | 57,568 | 61,098 | 36,255 | 38,489 |
Training and other staff related costs | 99,024 | 103,516 | 74,507 | 78,062 |
IT services and telecommunications (nonservice concession arrangements) | 480,061 | 488,244 | 337,018 | 345,053 |
Professional services | 83,182 | 87,816 | 78,952 | 83,154 |
Other contracted out services | 152,414 | 160,274 | 120,983 | 130,421 |
Shared service outsourcing | - | - | - | 293 |
Auditor’s remuneration and expenses | - | 521 | - | 481 |
Other legal aid service costs | - | 61 | - | 16 |
Non-cash services: | ||||
Auditor’s remuneration and expenses** | 1,973 | 1,973 | 1,707 | 1,707 |
Total | 2,612,076 | 2,498,230 | 2,398,237 | 2,275,220 |
*2021-22 PFI service charges have been reclassified to include £94.2 million reclassified managed prison charges, previously reported within offender related costs in Note 11 Other operating expenditure.
**Non-cash external auditor’s remuneration and expenses represents the statutory audit fees of the core department and agencies. Refer to page 92 in the Governance Statement, for details of total statutory audit fees for the group.
7. Depreciation, amortisation and impairment charges
2022-23 | 2021-22 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Core department and agencies | Departmental group | Core department and agencies | Departmental group | |
£000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | |
Depreciation | 684,114 | 687,616 | 624,554 | 628,185 |
Amortisation | 104,463 | 107,300 | 76,673 | 79,341 |
Impairment of: | ||||
Property, plant and equipment | (4,984) | (4,984) | 99,819 | 99,826 |
Intangible assets | 1,518 | 1,518 | 5,503 | 5,504 |
Right of use assets | 287 | 287 | (50) | (50) |
Increase in receivables impairment | 10,076 | 10,089 | 13,090 | 13,085 |
Total | 795,474 | 801,826 | 819,589 | 825,891 |
8. Provision expense
2022-23 | 2021-22 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Core department and agencies | Departmental group | Core department and agencies | Departmental group | |
£000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | |
Provisions provided in year net of release | 85,751 | 86,495 | 273,921 | 273,664 |
Civil legal help and representation – solicitors’ charges, counsel fees and disbursements | 1,011,854 | 1,011,854 | 907,473 | 907,473 |
Criminal cases – solicitors’ charges, counsel fees and disbursements | 913,076 | 913,076 | 834,842 | 834,842 |
Total | 2,010,681 | 2,011,425 | 2,016,236 | 2,015,979 |
Not included in the provisions expense note are employment tribunal refunds, which are charged against income, and dilapidations provisions which have been capitalised and added to right of use assets.
9. Net (gain)/loss on disposal of assets
2022-23 | 2021-22 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Core department and agencies | Departmental group | Core department and agencies | Departmental group | |
£000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | |
Net (gain)/loss on disposal of: | ||||
Property, plant and equipment | (11,356) | (11,349) | 1,872 | 1,963 |
Intangible assets | - | 24 | (25) | 39 |
Right of use assets | (93) | (93) | - | - |
Assets held for sale | (1,301) | (1,301) | (1,104) | (1,104) |
Total | (12,750) | (12,719) | 743 | 898 |
On 30 September 2022, MoJ transferred the headlease of its main headquarters building, 102 Petty France, to the Government Property Agency (GPA), along with subleasing arrangements that MoJ had previously with other organisations, leasing back a smaller portion of the building from GPA. Under IFRS 16 Leases this requires the right of use asset and corresponding liability to be remeasured separately, with the difference being accounted for in the statement of comprehensive net expenditure. The carrying amount of the liability exceeded that of the right of use asset and this has resulted in £12.1 million credit to profit on disposal.
Alongside the transfer of the 102 Petty France headlease to GPA, fitout works were also transferred, resulting in a £10.7 million debit to capital grants in Note 11.
10. Revaluation of non-current and financial assets charged to CSoCNE
2022-23 | 2021-22 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Core department and agencies | Departmental group | Core department and agencies | Departmental group | |
£000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | |
(Increase)/decrease in the valuation of: | ||||
Property, plant and equipment | (14,406) | (14,406) | 62,874 | 62,874 |
Intangible assets | (412) | (415) | 194 | 194 |
Assets held for sale | (7) | (7) | (94) | (94) |
Investments | (1) | (1) | 260 | 260 |
Total | (14,826) | (14,829) | 63,234 | 63,234 |
11. Other operating expenditure
2022-23 | 2021-22 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Core department and agencies | Departmental group | Core department and agencies (reclassified) | Departmental group (reclassified) | |
£000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | |
Grants: | ||||
Current | 202,605 | 291,148 | 165,836 | 248,132 |
Capital | 15,961 | 15,961 | - | - |
Criminal justice costs: | ||||
Offender related costs | 619,766 | 619,766 | 578,515 | 578,515 |
Youth offender costs | 45,739 | 45,739 | 52,903 | 52,905 |
Contracted probation services | 69,876 | 69,876 | 179,462 | 179,462 |
Judicial and juror costs | 57,239 | 57,239 | 51,883 | 51,883 |
Cost of legal services and disbursements (civil) | 6,420 | 6,420 | 7,162 | 7,162 |
Cost of legal services and disbursements (crime) | 4,462 | 4,462 | 3,780 | 3,780 |
Cost from Central Funds | 13,967 | 13,967 | 12,291 | 12,291 |
Compensation payments | 31,116 | 31,116 | 28,404 | 28,404 |
Other administrative expenditure | 13,424 | 13,601 | 15,794 | 15,938 |
Other programme costs | 103,743 | 188,496 | 105,485 | 197,801 |
Grant-in-aid to NDPBs | 307,609 | - | 272,480 | - |
Non-cash operating expense: | ||||
Corporate notional overhead charge | (3,722) | - | (3,037) | - |
Other pension costs | 541 | 541 | 707 | 707 |
Other non-cash | 4,268 | 4,259 | (21,069) | (21,041) |
Total | 1,493,014 | 1,362,591 | 1,450,596 | 1,355,939 |
12. Finance expense
2022-23 | 2021-22 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Core department and agencies | Departmental group | Core department and agencies | Departmental group | |
£000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | |
Finance charges on leases and service concession arrangements | 34,133 | 34,214 | 36,636 | 36,634 |
Local authority loan interest | 727 | 727 | 756 | 756 |
Non-cash finance expense: | ||||
Net interest on pension schemes | 42,262 | 48,520 | 47,626 | 54,195 |
Total | 77,122 | 83,461 | 85,018 | 91,585 |
13. Property, plant and equipment
Departmental group 2022-23
Land | Buildings | Dwellings | Information technology | Plant and equipment | Furniture, fixtures and fittings | Assets under construction | Total | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
£000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | |
Cost or valuation | ||||||||
At 1 April 2022 | 1,782,971 | 9,835,001 | 53,533 | 615,062 | 500,931 | 39,523 | 1,212,460 | 14,039,481 |
Additions | 1,200 | 40,443 | - | 47,268 | 14,725 | (112) | 1,035,646 | 1,139,170 |
Disposals | (5,250) | (11,582) | - | (9,382) | (15,005) | (452) | 13 | (41,658) |
Reclassifications | (5,198) | 381,173 | (301) | 38,864 | 18,138 | 2,094 | (468,025) | (33,255) |
Restatements | - | (18) | - | - | (13) | - | - | (31) |
Revaluations | 26,625 | 335,746 | (7,600) | 19,030 | 58,992 | 4,066 | - | 436,859 |
Transfers | - | - | - | 54 | - | - | (870) | (816) |
Impairments | (287) | 12,797 | - | 166 | (171) | - | (7,521) | 4,984 |
At 31 March 2023 | 1,800,061 | 10,593,560 | 45,632 | 711,062 | 577,597 | 45,119 | 1,771,703 | 15,544,734 |
Depreciation | ||||||||
At 1 April 2022 | - | (1,955) | (12) | (448,000) | (317,221) | (29,548) | - | (796,736) |
Charged in year | (528) | (444,010) | (825) | (57,980) | (37,821) | (1,752) | - | (542,916) |
Disposals | - | 919 | - | 9,068 | 13,361 | 438 | - | 23,786 |
Reclassifications | - | (737) | 5 | (335) | (25) | 25 | - | (1,067) |
Restatements | - | 9 | - | 2 | 7 | (1) | - | 17 |
Revaluations | 528 | 442,368 | 830 | (13,748) | (43,167) | (3,069) | - | 383,742 |
At 31 March 2023 | - | (3,406) | (2) | (510,993) | (384,866) | (33,907) | - | (933,174) |
Carrying amount at 31 March 2023 |
1,800,061 | 10,590,154 | 45,630 | 200,069 | 192,731 | 11,212 | 1,771,703 | 14,611,560 |
Carrying amount at 1 April 2022 |
1,782,971 | 9,833,046 | 53,521 | 167,062 | 183,710 | 9,975 | 1,212,460 | 13,242,745 |
Asset financing | ||||||||
Owned | 1,635,508 | 8,660,578 | 45,630 | 200,069 | 146,460 | 11,212 | 1,771,703 | 12,471,160 |
Finance leased | - | - | - | - | 46,271 | - | - | 46,271 |
On-balance sheet PFI and other SCAs | 164,553 | 1,929,576 | - | - | - | - | - | 2,094,129 |
Carrying amount at 31 March 2023 |
1,800,061 | 10,590,154 | 45,630 | 200,069 | 192,731 | 11,212 | 1,771,703 | 14,611,560 |
Of the total | ||||||||
Core department and agencies | 1,800,061 | 10,589,414 | 45,630 | 198,984 | 192,724 | 11,073 | 1,770,533 | 14,608,419 |
NDPBs | - | 740 | - | 1,085 | 7 | 139 | 1,170 | 3,141 |
Carrying amount at 31 March 2023 |
1,800,061 | 10,590,154 | 45,630 | 200,069 | 192,731 | 11,212 | 1,771,703 | 14,611,560 |
Seven prisons are run by private sector operators under manage and maintain contracts. Assets covered by these contracts were reported as ‘owned’ in prior years but have been reclassified to ‘on-balance sheet PFI and other service concession arrangements (SCAs)’ in accordance with IFRIC 12 Service Concession Arrangements for 2022-23; the 31 March 2022 balances have been restated. Further details relating to these SCAs are disclosed in Note 21.
Per Note 1b, Critical accounting estimates and judgements, the split of property value at 31 March 2023 by valuation basis is shown in the table below.
Property values at 31 March 2023 | £000 |
---|---|
Property values at depreciated replacement cost | 11,287,143 |
Property values at existing use value | 854,631 |
Properties at market value | 29,353 |
Total | 12,171,126 |
The above does not include leasehold improvements as these are not professionally valued by the Valuation Office Agency. Also reported here are land assets associated with buildings that are not ready for use. The building elements are reported within assets under construction. Assets under construction will not be valued until ready to be made live and are therefore excluded from the analysis by valuation type.
Departmental group 2021-22
Land | Buildings | Dwellings | Information technology | Plant and equipment | Furniture, fixtures and fittings | Assets under construction | Total | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
£000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | |
Cost or valuation | ||||||||
At 1 April 2021 | 1,609,080 | 9,120,029 | 42,747 | 540,770 | 434,635 | 31,248 | 1,083,287 | 12,861,796 |
Adoption of IRFS 16 - reclassification | (1,200) | (115,892) | (987) | - | - | - | - | (118,079) |
Restated balance at 1 April 2021 |
1,607,880 | 9,004,137 | 41,760 | 540,770 | 434,635 | 31,248 | 1,083,287 | 12,743,717 |
Additions | 56,160 | 138,364 | - | 46,155 | 71,001 | 3,585 | 866,083 | 1,181,348 |
Disposals | (1,236) | (1,433) | - | (1,248) | (15,491) | (271) | 21 | (19,658) |
Reclassifications | (8,166) | 642,753 | 7,362 | 69,419 | 19,210 | 3,379 | (746,771) | (12,814) |
Revaluations | 127,899 | 108,125 | 4,411 | (7,700) | 26,308 | 1,582 | - | 260,625 |
Transfers | - | 24 | - | - | (25) | - | 19 | 18 |
Impairments | 434 | (56,969) | - | (32,334) | (34,707) | - | 9,821 | (113,755) |
At 31 March 2022 | 1,782,971 | 9,835,001 | 53,533 | 615,062 | 500,931 | 39,523 | 1,212,460 | 14,039,481 |
Depreciation | ||||||||
At 1 April 2021 | - | (1,854) | - | (398,555) | (280,309) | (27,250) | - | (707,968) |
Charged in year | (583) | (400,027) | (1,095) | (70,643) | (31,299) | (1,211) | - | (504,858) |
Disposals | - | 361 | - | 1,234 | 14,691 | 269 | - | 16,555 |
Reclassifications | - | 143 | 3 | - | - | - | - | 146 |
Revaluations | 583 | 399,422 | 1,080 | 6,046 | (20,313) | (1,358) | - | 385,460 |
Transfers | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Impairments | - | - | - | 13,918 | 9 | 2 | - | 13,929 |
At 31 March 2022 | - | (1,955) | (12) | (448,000) | (317,221) | (29,548) | - | (796,736) |
Carrying amount at 31 March 2022 |
1,782,971 | 9,833,046 | 53,521 | 167,062 | 183,710 | 9,975 | 1,212,460 | 13,242,745 |
Carrying amount at 1 April 2021 |
1,609,080 | 9,118,175 | 42,747 | 142,215 | 154,326 | 3,998 | 1,083,287 | 12,153,828 |
Asset financing (restated) | ||||||||
Owned | 1,620,253 | 8,067,490 | 53,521 | 167,062 | 134,851 | 9,975 | 1,212,460 | 11,265,612 |
On-balance sheet PFI and other SCAs | 162,718 | 1,765,556 | - | - | 48,859 | - | - | 1,977,133 |
Carrying amount at 31 March 2022 |
1,782,971 | 9,833,046 | 53,521 | 167,062 | 183,710 | 9,975 | 1,212,460 | 13,242,745 |
Of the total | ||||||||
Core department and agencies | 1,782,971 | 9,832,412 | 53,521 | 165,516 | 183,708 | 9,789 | 1,212,460 | 13,240,377 |
NDPBs | - | 634 | - | 1,546 | 2 | 186 | - | 2,368 |
Carrying amount at 31 March 2022 |
1,782,971 | 9,833,046 | 53,521 | 167,062 | 183,710 | 9,975 | 1,212,460 | 13,242,745 |
The £118.1 million restated opening balance is due to the reclassification to right of use assets of £45.9 million of leased property (peppercorn leases) within HMCTS, and £72.2 million of finance leases within MoJ Core, under IFRS 16.
14. Right of use leased assets
Departmental group 2022-23
Land | Buildings | Total | |
---|---|---|---|
£000 | £000 | £000 | |
Cost or valuation | |||
At 1 April 2022 | 1,207,527 | 347,280 | 1,554,807 |
Additions | 34,016 | 90,108 | 124,124 |
Disposals | (925) | (6,421) | (7,346) |
Reclassifications | (2,960) | (16,709) | (19,669) |
Remeasurements | - | 37 | 37 |
Revaluations | 8,622 | (53) | 8,569 |
Impairments | - | (287) | (287) |
At 31 March 2023 | 1,246,280 | 413,955 | 1,660,235 |
Depreciation | |||
At 1 April 2022 | (79,374) | (42,927) | (122,301) |
Charged in year | (88,348) | (56,352) | (144,700) |
Disposals | 781 | 195 | 976 |
Reclassifications | - | (263) | (263) |
Remeasurements | - | (15) | (15) |
Revaluations | 6,673 | 4,486 | 11,159 |
At 31 March 2023 | (160,268) | (94,876) | (255,144) |
Carrying amount at 31 March 2023 |
1,086,012 | 319,079 | 1,405,091 |
Carrying amount at 1 April 2022 |
1,128,153 | 304,353 | 1,432,506 |
Of the total | |||
Core department and agencies | 1,086,012 | 305,216 | 1,391,228 |
NDPBs | - | 13,863 | 13,863 |
Carrying amount at 31 March 2023 |
1,086,012 | 319,079 | 1,405,091 |
The group’s lease contracts comprise leases of operational land and buildings. A maturity analysis of lease liabilities is given within Note 19, Trade payables and other financial liabilities.
On 30 September 2022, MoJ transferred the headlease of its main headquarters building, 102 Petty France, to GPA, along with subleasing arrangements that MoJ had previously with other organisations, leasing back a smaller portion of the building from GPA. This has led to a £6.4 million disposal under right of use assets, reflecting the reduction in the scope of the lease.
Departmental group 2021-22
Land | Buildings | Total | |
---|---|---|---|
£000 | £000 | £000 | |
Cost or valuation | |||
At 1 April 2021 | |||
Initial recognition on implementation of IFRS 16 | 1,199,803 | 275,349 | 1,475,152 |
Additions | 93,700 | 74,450 | 168,150 |
Reclassifications | 483 | (559) | (76) |
Revaluations | (86,459) | (2,010) | (88,469) |
Impairments | - | 50 | 50 |
At 31 March 2022 | 1,207,527 | 347,280 | 1,554,807 |
Depreciation | |||
At 1 April 2021 | |||
Charged in year | (79,029) | (44,298) | (123,327) |
Reclassifications | - | (52) | (52) |
Revaluations | (345) | 1,423 | 1,078 |
At 31 March 2022 | (79,374) | (42,927) | (122,301) |
Carrying amount at 31 March 2022 |
1,128,153 | 304,353 | 1,432,506 |
Carrying amount at 1 April 2021 |
- | - | - |
Of the total | |||
Core department and agencies | 1,128,153 | 295,240 | 1,423,393 |
NDPBs | - | 9,113 | 9,113 |
Carrying amount at 31 March 2022 |
1,128,153 | 304,353 | 1,432,506 |
MoJ adopted IFRS 16 Leases from 1 April 2021. As required by the FReM, we implemented it using the cumulative catch-up method, without restatement of prior year figures. The majority of leases, treated as operating leases until 31 March 2021, were recognised on-balance sheet as right of use assets and lease liabilities. As a result, we recognised an additional £1,475.2 million of right of use assets and £1,506.5 million of lease liabilities.
Amounts recognised in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Net Expenditure
2022-23 | 2021-22 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Core department and agencies | Departmental group | Core department and agencies | Departmental group | |
£000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | |
Sub-leasing income | - | - | (24,880) | (24,880) |
Depreciation | 92,320 | 94,458 | 120,690 | 123,019 |
Interest expense | 11,636 | 11,742 | 19,554 | 19,627 |
Low value and short term leases | 6,138 | 6,201 | 8,347 | 8,347 |
Non-recoverable VAT | 11,965 | 11,965 | 13,535 | 13,535 |
Total | 122,059 | 124,366 | 137,246 | 139,648 |
Amounts recognised in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
2022-23 | 2021-22 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Core department and agencies | Departmental group | Core department and agencies | Departmental group | |
£000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | |
Right of use assets | 1,758 | 1,780 | 18,670 | 18,670 |
Interest expense | 11,636 | 11,742 | 19,554 | 19,627 |
Repayment of principal on leases | 85,851 | 87,444 | 127,924 | 130,135 |
Total | 99,245 | 100,966 | 166,148 | 168,432 |
15. Intangible assets
Departmental group 2022-23
Software licences | Information technology | Internally generated software | Assets under construction | Total | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
£000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | |
Cost or valuation | |||||
At 1 April 2022 | 60,707 | 443,001 | 752,684 | 177,454 | 1,433,846 |
Additions | 758 | 2,558 | 4,119 | 99,855 | 107,290 |
Disposals | (422) | 31 | (4,369) | (6) | (4,766) |
Reclassifications | (2,237) | 1,983 | 169,735 | (120,027) | 49,454 |
Revaluations | 1,496 | 11,845 | 19,952 | - | 33,293 |
Transfers | - | - | - | 817 | 817 |
Impairments | - | 100 | - | (1,618) | (1,518) |
At 31 March 2023 | 60,302 | 459,518 | 942,121 | 156,475 | 1,618,416 |
Amortisation | |||||
At 1 April 2022 | (41,229) | (378,993) | (350,531) | - | (770,753) |
Charged in year | (5,045) | (15,366) | (86,889) | - | (107,300) |
Disposals | 391 | (32) | 4,381 | - | 4,740 |
Reclassifications | 540 | (239) | 34 | - | 335 |
Revaluations | (1,212) | (10,556) | (11,683) | - | (23,451) |
At 31 March 2023 | (46,555) | (405,186) | (444,688) | - | (896,429) |
Carrying amount at 31 March 2023 |
13,747 | 54,332 | 497,433 | 156,475 | 721,987 |
Carrying amount at 1 April 2022 |
19,478 | 64,008 | 402,153 | 177,454 | 663,093 |
Asset financing | |||||
Owned | 13,747 | 54,332 | 497,433 | 156,475 | 721,987 |
Carrying amount at 31 March 2023 |
13,747 | 54,332 | 497,433 | 156,475 | 721,987 |
Of the total | |||||
Core department and agencies | 13,311 | 52,928 | 492,436 | 156,350 | 715,025 |
NDPBs | 436 | 1,404 | 4,997 | 125 | 6,962 |
Carrying amount at 31 March 2023 |
13,747 | 54,332 | 497,433 | 156,475 | 721,987 |
Departmental group 2021-22
Software licences | Information technology | Internally generated software | Assets under construction | Total | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
£000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | |
Cost or valuation | |||||
At 1 April 2021 | 42,768 | 451,365 | 460,259 | 382,488 | 1,336,880 |
Additions | 19,683 | 160 | 7,265 | 112,860 | 139,968 |
Disposals | (776) | (6,363) | (6,250) | (600) | (13,989) |
Reclassifications | (593) | 3,832 | 303,221 | (312,573) | (6,113) |
Revaluations | (506) | (5,992) | (5,000) | - | (11,498) |
Transfers | - | - | - | (20) | (20) |
Impairments | 131 | (1) | (6,811) | (4,701) | (11,382) |
At 31 March 2022 | 60,707 | 443,001 | 752,684 | 177,454 | 1,433,846 |
Amortisation | |||||
At 1 April 2021 | (37,187) | (372,241) | (310,437) | - | (719,865) |
Charged in year | (4,789) | (18,615) | (55,937) | - | (79,341) |
Disposals | 712 | 6,362 | 6,250 | - | 13,324 |
Reclassifications | (359) | 359 | - | - | - |
Revaluations | 394 | 5,142 | 3,714 | - | 9,250 |
Transfers | - | - | 1 | - | 1 |
Impairments | - | - | 5,878 | - | 5,878 |
At 31 March 2022 | (41,229) | (378,993) | (350,531) | - | (770,753) |
Carrying amount at 31 March 2022 |
19,478 | 64,008 | 402,153 | 177,454 | 663,093 |
Carrying amount at 1 April 2021 |
5,581 | 79,124 | 149,822 | 382,488 | 617,015 |
Asset financing | |||||
Owned | 19,478 | 64,008 | 402,153 | 177,454 | 663,093 |
Carrying amount at 31 March 2022 |
19,478 | 64,008 | 402,153 | 177,454 | 663,093 |
Of the total | |||||
Core department and agencies | 18,781 | 62,490 | 396,477 | 176,625 | 654,373 |
NDPBs | 697 | 1,518 | 5,676 | 829 | 8,720 |
Carrying amount at 31 March 2022 |
19,478 | 64,008 | 402,153 | 177,454 | 663,093 |
At 31 March 2023 and 31 March 2022 there were no individually material intangible assets.
16. Assets held for sale
31 March 2023 | 31 March 2022 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Core department and agencies | Departmental group | Core department and agencies | Departmental group | |
£000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | |
Balance at 1 April |
6,465 | 6,465 | 9,713 | 9,713 |
Reclassifications | 4,464 | 4,464 | (1,021) | (1,021) |
Disposals | (1,312) | (1,312) | (2,298) | (2,298) |
Revaluations | (502) | (502) | 71 | 71 |
Balance at 31 March |
9,115 | 9,115 | 6,465 | 6,465 |
HMPPS has committed to a plan to sell surplus properties, which are to be sold for commercial use and domestic dwellings. These sites have a combined value of £9.1 million (2021-22: £6.2 million).
As part of an ongoing court rationalisation review, HMCTS sold a number of surplus properties (land and buildings) that were previously used to provide court services. These sites had a combined net book value at 31 March 2022 of £0.3 million.
17. Trade and other receivables
31 March 2023 | 31 March 2022 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Core department and agencies | Departmental group | Core department and agencies | Departmental group | |
£000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | |
Amounts falling due within one year | ||||
Trade receivables | 66,265 | 66,442 | 71,179 | 71,326 |
Other receivables | 168,442 | 170,189 | 179,496 | 181,153 |
Contributions due from funded clients | 959 | 959 | 631 | 631 |
Statutory charge and interest | 11,380 | 11,380 | 12,494 | 12,494 |
Amounts due from service providers | 28,812 | 28,812 | 30,664 | 30,664 |
VAT receivables | 72,448 | 72,448 | 76,728 | 76,728 |
Deposits and advances | 38 | 100 | 40 | 81 |
Prepayments and accrued income | 149,550 | 151,275 | 103,799 | 106,178 |
Intra-departmental receivables | 1,279 | - | 560 | - |
Current total | 499,173 | 501,605 | 475,591 | 479,255 |
Amounts falling due after more than one year | ||||
Sub-leasing receivables | - | - | 64,760 | 64,760 |
Other receivables | 32,789 | 32,789 | 36,395 | 36,395 |
Prepayments and accrued income | 719 | 723 | 49 | 54 |
Contributions due from funded clients | 4,420 | 4,420 | 4,860 | 4,860 |
Statutory charge and interest | 84,326 | 84,326 | 82,468 | 82,468 |
Non-current total | 122,254 | 122,258 | 188,532 | 188,537 |
Total | 621,427 | 623,863 | 664,123 | 667,792 |
The above includes a receivables impairment provision of £247.8 million (2021-22: £246.6 million) for LAA. For further detail on the LAA impairment provision refer to Note 24.
Other receivables includes £103.8 million (2021-22: £109.1 million) from the HMCTS Trust Statement.
Sub-leasing receivables at 31 March 2022 included £64.8 million in respect of the sub-lease of 102 Petty France, the head-lease of which has since been transferred to GPA.
18. Cash and cash equivalents
31 March 2023 | 31 March 2022 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Core department and agencies | Departmental group | Core department and agencies | Departmental group | |
£000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | |
Balance at 1 April |
181,685 | 222,894 | 214,590 | 266,618 |
Net change in cash and cash equivalents | 121,108 | 136,488 | (32,905) | (43,724) |
Balance at 31 March |
302,793 | 359,382 | 181,685 | 222,894 |
Of which: | ||||
Government Banking Service | 271,663 | 302,693 | 154,587 | 182,109 |
Commercial banks and cash in hand | 31,130 | 56,689 | 27,098 | 40,785 |
Total | 302,793 | 359,382 | 181,685 | 222,894 |
18.1 Reconciliation of liabilities arising from financing activities
Amendments to IAS 7 introduced a requirement for an entity to provide disclosures that enabled users of the financial statements to evaluate changes in liabilities arising from financing activities, including both cash and non-cash changes. The table below provides a breakdown of movements in liabilities arising from financing activities.
Departmental group
Opening liabilities at 1 April 2022 | Cash flows (out)/in | Interest charged | Capital repayment | Interest paid | Net additions and IFRS 16 adjustments | Closing liabilities at 31 March 2023 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
£000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | |
Capital element of finance leases and on-balance sheet PFI contracts | - | (177,796) | - | 177,796 | - | - | - |
Repayment of local authority loans | - | (1,529) | - | 1,529 | - | - | - |
Interest paid | - | (34,941) | (34,941) | - | 34,941 | - | - |
Longterm borrowings | 20,751 | - | 746 | (1,529) | (746) | - | 19,222 |
Lease liabilities | 1,596,864 | - | 20,014 | (139,329) | (20,014) | 40,479 | 1,498,014 |
PFI and SCA liabilities | 317,639 | - | 14,181 | (38,467) | (14,181) | - | 279,172 |
Total | 1,935,254 | (214,266) | - | - | - | 40,479 | 1,796,408 |
Departmental group
Opening liabilities at 1 April 2021 | Cash flows (out)/in | Interest charged | Capital repayment | Interest paid | Adjustments upon adoption of IFRS16 | Closing liabilities at 31 March 2022 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
£000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | |
Capital element of finance leases and on-balance sheet PFI contracts | - | (23,868) | - | 23,868 | - | - | - |
Repayment of local authority loans | - | (1,600) | - | 1,600 | - | - | - |
Interest paid | - | (37,390) | (37,390) | - | 37,390 | - | - |
Longterm borrowings | 22,351 | - | 756 | (1,600) | (756) | - | 20,751 |
Finance lease liabilities | 97,013 | - | 7,935 | 93,668 | (7,935) | (190,681) | - |
Lease liabilities | - | - | 11,692 | (130,135) | (11,692) | 1,726,999 | 1,596,864 |
PFI and SCA liabilities | 305,040 | - | 17,007 | 12,599 | (17,007) | - | 317,639 |
Total | 424,404 | (62,858) | - | - | - | 1,536,318 | 1,935,254 |
19. Trade payables and other financial liabilities
19.1 Payables
31 March 2023 | 31 March 2022 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Core department and agencies | Departmental group | Core department and agencies | Departmental group | |
£000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | |
Amounts falling due within one year | ||||
Trade payables | 119,634 | 127,295 | 100,546 | 109,766 |
Taxation and social security | 82,106 | 88,098 | 76,205 | 80,583 |
Capital payables | 195,521 | 195,548 | 184,085 | 184,137 |
Other payables | 102,435 | 103,352 | 95,649 | 96,561 |
Accruals | 775,618 | 792,937 | 803,545 | 820,899 |
Deferred income | 95,549 | 95,773 | 88,799 | 89,048 |
Amounts due to solicitors, counsel and advice agencies | 70,875 | 70,875 | 59,638 | 59,638 |
Contribution refunds to funded clients | 2,048 | 2,048 | 1,284 | 1,284 |
Creditor for pension transfer deficit: amounts payable to LGPS | - | - | 4,219 | 4,219 |
Amounts issued from the Consolidated Fund for supply but not spent at year end | 283,368 | 283,368 | 179,503 | 179,503 |
CFERs due to be paid to the Consolidated Fund: | ||||
- received | 19,425 | 19,425 | 2,182 | 19,986 |
- receivable | - | - | - | - |
Intra-departmental payables | 33,711 | - | 27,916 | - |
Current total | 1,780,290 | 1,778,719 | 1,623,571 | 1,645,624 |
Amounts falling due after more than one year | ||||
Local authority loan balances | 19,222 | 19,222 | 20,751 | 20,751 |
Deferred income | - | 911 | - | 1,110 |
Other payables | 18,134 | 18,181 | 16,283 | 16,283 |
Non-current total | 37,356 | 38,314 | 37,034 | 38,144 |
Total | 1,817,646 | 1,817,033 | 1,660,605 | 1,683,768 |
19.2 Other financial liabilities
31 March 2023 | 31 March 2022 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Core department and agencies | Departmental group | Core department and agencies | Departmental group | |
£000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | |
Amounts falling due within one year | ||||
Lease incentive creditors | 87 | 87 | 87 | 87 |
Lease liabilities | 131,537 | 133,880 | 138,972 | 141,013 |
Imputed finance lease element of onbalance sheet PFI contracts | 35,836 | 35,836 | 38,466 | 38,466 |
Current total | 167,460 | 169,803 | 177,525 | 179,566 |
Amounts falling due after more than one year | ||||
Lease liabilities | 1,352,193 | 1,364,134 | 1,448,486 | 1,455,851 |
Imputed finance lease element of onbalance sheet PFI contracts | 243,336 | 243,336 | 279,173 | 279,173 |
Non-current total | 1,595,529 | 1,607,470 | 1,727,659 | 1,735,024 |
Total | 1,762,989 | 1,777,273 | 1,905,184 | 1,914,590 |
20. Provisions for liabilities and charges
2022-23 | 2021-22 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Core department and agencies | Departmental group | Core department and agencies | Departmental group | |
£000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | |
Balance at 1 April | 1,611,695 | 1,616,040 | 1,554,681 | 1,559,109 |
Provided in the year | 2,213,725 | 2,215,444 | 2,117,726 | 2,119,285 |
Provisions not required written back | (195,626) | (196,437) | (79,498) | (80,867) |
Provisions utilised in the year | (2,047,896) | (2,048,096) | (1,984,899) | (1,985,172) |
Borrowing costs (unwinding of discount) | (1,238) | (1,238) | 3,685 | 3,685 |
Balance at 31 March |
1,580,660 | 1,585,713 | 1,611,695 | 1,616,040 |
Analysis of expected timing of discounted cash flows | ||||
Not later than one year | 1,076,090 | 1,079,836 | 916,691 | 920,237 |
Later than one year but not later than five years | 275,952 | 277,186 | 329,706 | 330,474 |
Later than five years | 228,618 | 228,691 | 365,298 | 365,329 |
Balance at 31 March |
1,580,660 | 1,585,713 | 1,611,695 | 1,616,040 |
Provisions by type 2022-23
Judicial Service Award | Injury benefit scheme | Early departure costs | Costs from Central Funds | Legal claims | Repayment schemes (OPG and HMCTS) | CICA pre-tariff scheme | CICA tariff scheme | Leasehold dilapidations | LAA outstanding balances on funded cases | Other | Total | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
£000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | |
Balance at 1 April 2022 |
162,760 | 164,774 | 80,408 | 25,463 | 104,436 | 17,535 | 524 | 164,765 | 87,002 | 710,947 | 97,426 | 1,616,040 |
Provided in the year | - | 1,732 | - | 45,692 | 81,018 | 747 | 864 | 150,654 | 6,400 | 1,924,930 | 3,047 | 2,215,444 |
Not required and written back | (31,681) | (51,881) | (18,799) | - | (17,293) | - | - | (279) | (3,411) | - | (73,093) | (196,437) |
Utilised in the year | (14,183) | (6,097) | (4,191) | (42,424) | (22,139) | (3,366) | (700) | (146,301) | (1,930) | (1,805,566) | (1,199) | (2,048,096) |
Reclassifications between provisions categories | - | - | - | - | 77 | - | - | - | - | - | (77) | - |
Borrowing costs (unwinding of discount) | 600 | - | 1,179 | - | (3,388) | - | - | 371 | - | - | - | (1,238) |
Balance at 31 March 2023 |
117,496 | 108,528 | 58,597 | 28,731 | 142,711 | 14,916 | 688 | 169,210 | 88,061 | 830,311 | 26,464 | 1,585,713 |
Analysis of expected timing of discounted cash flows | ||||||||||||
Not later than one year | 28,700 | 5,962 | 4,319 | 28,731 | 24,688 | 5,441 | 688 | 132,878 | 15,728 | 830,311 | 2,390 | 1,079,836 |
Later than one year but not later than five years | 52,000 | 21,938 | 15,313 | - | 112,746 | 9,475 | - | 36,332 | 22,775 | - | 6,607 | 277,186 |
Later than five years | 36,796 | 80,628 | 38,965 | - | 5,277 | - | - | - | 49,558 | - | 17,467 | 228,691 |
Balance at 31 March 2023 |
117,496 | 108,528 | 58,597 | 28,731 | 142,711 | 14,916 | 688 | 169,210 | 88,061 | 830,311 | 26,464 | 1,585,713 |
Judicial Service Award and fee-paid judicial claims
The Judicial Service Award (JSA) was created to equalise the tax position of judicial pensions affected by the provisions of the Finance Act 2004. Following the introduction of the Fee-Paid Judicial Pensions Scheme on 1 April 2017, the provision held for JSAs covers the liability to both salaried and fee-paid judges. The provision is calculated by the Government Actuary’s Department (GAD), taking into account the number of reckonable years served by the existing judiciary and the projected final salaries or fee earnings of existing members. JSA benefits ceased to accrue on 31 March 2022, as a result of the introduction of the Reformed 2022 Judicial Pension Scheme. JSAs accrued before that date remain the liability of MoJ and where members continue in active service remain linked to salaries or fee-rates at retirement.
The JSA provision takes into account liabilities arising from recent litigation. In November 2018 the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) extended the period of service to be taken into account in calculating pensions for eligible fee-paid judges, and in December 2019 the UK Supreme Court ruled that the time limit to make a pension claim ran from three months from the date of retirement rather than from the end of fee-paid service, thereby extending the number of potential eligible claimants.
In June 2019, the Supreme Court refused the government permission to appeal the McCloud and Sergeant cases, which decided that the transitional protection provisions in the Judicial Pension Scheme (JPS) 2015 Regulations were unlawful on grounds of age discrimination.
The JSA provision of £117.5 million can be analysed as follows:
£m | |
Salaried judicial office holders | 60.9 |
Fee-paid judicial office holders | 25.1 |
Transitional protection | 20.0 |
Length of service protection | 11.5 |
Total | 117.5 |
---|
Sensitivity analysis
A sensitivity analysis for the JSA provision was undertaken by GAD to identify the impact of changes in the assumptions used to calculate the liability as at 31 March 2023. Each change is shown separately to enable the reader to understand the impact that an adjustment would have on the accounts. The following assumptions are used in the calculation of this provision:
- Discount rate: The liability is accounted for under IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets and uses the general provisions discount rate as published by HM Treasury. The discount rate is used to calculate the present value of expected future cash flows. The sensitivity analysis shows the impact of a +0.5% change in the discount rate for the short term, medium term and long term. A +0.5% change in the rate which would result in a reduction in the liability of 2.0% or £1.7 million.
- (Long-term) salary increase: A long-term salary increase of CPI +2.0% pa is used to calculate the provision. This is in keeping with the Judicial Pension Scheme resource accounts. The sensitivity analysis shows the impact of a +0.5% change in the earnings assumptions which would result in an increase in the liability of 2.5% or £2.2 million.
- Post-employment rates: This sensitivity shows the impact of calculating the provision using the post-employment benefits discount rate of 4.15% rather than the general provisions rates. This would increase the liability by 1.5% or £1.3 million.
- Retirement age: This is the unweighted average age at which members are assumed to retire on grounds other than ill health in each of the Judicial Pension Schemes. A one-year increase in the retirement age assumption would have a negligible impact on the liability.
- Inflation: A service award is paid when a member retires and is dependent on the earnings assumptions but not inflation.
Approximate effect on total liability |
||
---|---|---|
Change in assumption | % | £m |
1. Discount rate: +0.5% per annum | +2.0 | - £1.7 |
2. (Long-term) salary increase: +0.5% per annum | +2.5 | +£2.2 |
3. Post-employment rates | - 1.5 | - £1.3 |
4. Retirement age: all members retire 1 year later | Nil | Nil |
5. Inflation: +0.5% per annum | Nil | Nil |
MoJ was required to compensate eligible retired fee-paid judges for the additional pension benefits due, including interest where applicable, until the Judicial Pension Scheme (JPS) was amended by legislation to allow full benefits to be paid from the scheme. The scheme was amended on 1 April 2023 and the remaining payments will be made by JPS. MoJ has retained a provision of £1.9 million for compensation of an interest like nature which is not payable by JPS. This is included within the total for ‘Other Provisions’.
Injury benefits scheme
HMPPS meets the costs of the Civil Service Injury Benefit Scheme (CSIBS) for payments granted under the scheme after 1 April 1998. The scheme pays benefits to any PCSPS member who suffers disease or injury, which is wholly or partially attributable to the nature of their duty, or who suffers an attack or similar act which is directly attributable to employment within the service. Benefits are paid only in respect of loss of earning capacity, and a provision is made for expected future costs. The Government Actuary’s Department (GAD) provides HMPPS with annuity rates each year covering whole of life (for total liability value), 1 year and 1 to 5 years (for cash flow values). These assumptions take the time value of money into account.
Early departure costs
The department meets the additional costs of benefits beyond normal PCSPS benefits for employees who retire early. This involves paying amounts determined by the pension administrator annually to PCSPS over the period between early departure and normal retirement date. The department provides for this in full when the early retirement programme becomes binding on the department by establishing a provision for the estimated payments discounted at the HM Treasury nominal rate of 4.5% (2021-22: 1.55%).
Costs from Central Funds
Under the terms of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985, acquitted defendants who have applied for legal aid and been found ineligible may, in limited circumstances, obtain an order from the Crown Court to recover their costs. LAA estimates the value of unbilled costs to arrive at the amount disclosed in the accounts as a provision. The amount is an estimate of the expenditure required to settle any obligation at the reporting period end date.
Legal claims
Provision has been made for all known claims where legal advice indicates that it is more likely than not that the claim will be successful, and the amount of the claim can be reliably estimated. The figures represent the best estimate of the amount payable. Legal claims which are likely to succeed with a lesser degree of certainty or cannot be estimated reliably are disclosed as contingent liabilities in Note 26.
CICA pre-tariff schemes
The pre-tariff scheme provision reflects CICA’s liabilities in respect of all outstanding cases incurred prior to 1996 which remain to be settled in future years. In accordance with CICA’s accounting policies, the provision is reviewed annually and reflects the likely settlement values at the year-end based on the circumstances of each application at that time. CICA’s estimate of the likely settlement requires judgement and the final payment may differ from this estimate.
Pre-tariff scheme award values are assessed by the First-Tier Tribunal (FTT). This assessment includes the application of a discount rate (the Lord Chancellor’s discount rate, which is currently -0.25%). The award values assessed by the FTT are not then further discounted by CICA, due to uncertainties surrounding both the final liability and the settlement date. Additionally, due to these uncertainties, all pre-tariff liabilities are classed as falling due within one year, and have not been discounted by HM Treasury’s discount rate.
CICA does not hold any assets in respect of these liabilities; compensation will be paid from Parliamentary funding in the year of settlement.
CICA tariff schemes
The provision for tariff schemes is reflective of CICA’s liabilities under the 1996, 2001, 2008 and 2012 Schemes. CICA recognises liabilities that are based upon an evaluation of total applications that are currently known and received by CICA but have not yet been processed through to award; these are referred to as claims reported but not completed (CRBNC). The overall liability for the tariff scheme is £205.7 million with £169.2 million included in this provisions note and £36.5 million included as a tariff scheme accrual within Note 19 (31 March 2022: £164.8 million and £30.1 million). Where an event has occurred on or before the reporting date, but an application has not yet been made, CICA recognises this as an unquantifiable contingent liability. This is because no legal obligation as a result of a past event exists. It is only where an application for compensation has been received that an obligation is recognised in relation to the Scheme.
The provision model for tariff schemes estimates a provision for three different categories of case:
- Not Decided: These are cases which are still under assessment by CICA and therefore a potential monetary value has not yet been determined. In order to estimate a provision for these cases, the model builds historical profiles of average award values, aggregated by tariff band and case age, which are then applied to the population of outstanding cases. A further adjustment is made to account for the fact that a subset of the live case population will be ‘nil-assessed’ i.e. will not attract a monetary award. The proportion of such cases is determined based upon an assessment of the historical proportion of nil-assessed cases within each tariff band.
- Decided: These are live cases that have been sufficiently assessed to determine their potential monetary value, but where a decision letter has not been issued to the applicant. Until a decision letter is issued, the monetary value may be subject to revision arising from changes in the circumstances of the applicant, checks by CICA resulting in the identification of error or a change in value determined by the timing at which an offer is made to the applicant. Additionally, until the decision letter is issued there is uncertainty over the timing of discharge of the liability. Where a decision letter has been sent to the applicant, the award is classified as ‘on offer’ and accrued for, rather than included in the tariff provision.
- On Offer Not Accrued: Once an offer is made, the award value is accrued and therefore no provision is required. However, in a small proportion of such cases the applicant does not accept the compensation offered and an adjustment is made to account for this. The proportion is removed from the total ‘on offer’ accrual and added back into the value of the provision. The percentage is determined based upon an assessment of the historical level of the proportion of cases where this occurs.
Since applications are determined under the scheme in force at the date of application, the tariff provision model calculates the provision for pre-2012 schemes (1996, 2001 and 2008) and the current 2012 scheme separately.
The number of remaining live cases for the pre-2012 schemes is low and decreasing. As at 31 March 2023, the provision model has therefore been adjusted to estimate value based on operational judgments around the likely compensation for each individual case, with an adjustment for likely changes to currently assessed values on appeal, which is calculated based on appeal rates for cases resolved in the past three years.
The following key assumptions underpin the provision for post-2012 tariff schemes:
- Average value: average value profiles for both tariff bands and case age are derived from historical case data.
- % nil value: the proportion of cases which will be assessed at nil value is derived from historical case data.
- Decided to offer: the calculation assumes that decided cases will be paid out at 100% of their decided value.
- Tariff profiles: profiles are created by using data for years in which at least 95% of cases have been decided.
- Timing: the expected timing in which the liability is discharged is calculated on the basis of operational capacity.
- Discounting: the liabilities are discounted, based on the expected timing of discharge, at HM Treasury’s nominal discount rate. The real rate is not used, as tariff schemes compensation payments are not subject to inflationary pressures. The discount is unwound over the life of the provision, with the unwinding disclosed as a finance charge in the Statement of comprehensive net expenditure.
HM Treasury discount rates used are as follows:
31 March 2023 | 31 March 2022 | |
---|---|---|
Years | % | % |
1 to 5 | 3.27 | 0.47 |
6 to 10 | 3.20 | 0.70 |
11+ | 3.51 | 0.95 |
CICA does not hold any assets in respect of tariff schemes liabilities; compensation will be paid from Parliamentary funding in the year of settlement.
Tariff schemes sensitivity analysis
A sensitivity analysis for the tariff provision has been undertaken to identify the impact of any changes to key assumptions. Each assumption within the provision model has been identified, a reasonable change identified and the impact on the overall financial liability calculated. These changes include flexing historical data trends to show the potential impact on the provision. For each assumption which is being analysed for sensitivity, only that assumption is changed. If two or more assumptions are changed at one time, the actual sensitivity of a change in assumption may be obscured because of the potential interrelation of the assumptions.
The following tables show the impact of adjusting the key assumptions. The ranges of the sensitivity tests shown are based on the variability of past data. They do not represent the maxima or minima of past observed values nor the full range of possible outcomes, but they do capture future values that could plausibly occur. Each change is shown separately but in practice combinations are possible as different assumptions can be correlated.
Pre-2012 Change | 2012 Change | Total Change | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Assumption | £000 | £000 | £000 | |
Average value | Low profile | (1) | (10,416) | (10,417) |
Average value | High profile | 1 | 10,416 | 10,417 |
% nil value | +5% | - | (15,375) | (15,375) |
% nil value | - 5% | - | 15,375 | 15,375 |
Decided to offer | - 5% | - | (189) | (189) |
Decided to offer | +5% | - | 189 | 189 |
Tariff profiles | Max | - | 2,114 | 2,114 |
Tariff profiles | 75% decided | - | 725 | 725 |
Tariff profiles | 50% decided | - | (232) | (232) |
Timing | All year one | 43 | 1,311 | 1,354 |
Timing | All year three | (293) | (8,987) | (9,280) |
Timing | Even over three years | (126) | (3,865) | (3,991) |
Leasehold dilapidations
Dilapidation costs are an estimate of the expenditure required to return vacated leased buildings to their original condition as at the date of commencement of the lease. The movement in the year is as a result of updated information relating to property vacations, new properties leased during the year, and changes in the cost per square metre of the properties leased due to the general market conditions’ impact on prices.
LAA outstanding balances on funded cases
The LAA funds legal aid across four main schemes: Civil Representation, Legal Help, Crime Higher and Crime Lower. Provisions for work in progress on funded cases, by scheme category, are as follows:
At 31 March 2023 | £000 |
---|---|
Civil Representation | 298,891 |
Legal Help | 47,460 |
Crime Lower | 46,296 |
Crime Higher | 437,664 |
Total | 830,311 |
At any point in time there will be unbilled costs for each of these schemes, pertaining to live cases. The value of unbilled work and costs is estimated each year using complex models and based on the latest data available. The resulting work in progress (WIP) provisions are estimates of the expenditure required to settle any obligation in existence at the end of the reporting period. As per IAS 37, ‘Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets’, WIP liabilities are recognised as provisions, rather than as payables, due to the measurement uncertainty.
As all liabilities for funded cases are expected to be settled within the next 12 months, no discounting of provisions for the time value of money is applied.
In recognition of the uncertainty inherent in estimates, a sensitivity analysis is performed for each major class of funded WIP provision. Reasonable changes are made to the key assumptions in the models and the impact on the final WIP balance calculated. Assumptions have been changed to either represent those that would have been used by the model based on historical data trends or flexed by a percentage that is considered appropriate by management to show the impact on the provision. For each assumption that is being analysed for sensitivity, only that assumption is changed: if two or more assumptions are changed at one time, the actual sensitivity of a change in assumption is obscured because of the potential interaction between the assumptions.
Overarching assumptions
Underlying the estimates of liabilities for unbilled work across all of the Legal Aid funding schemes, and Central Funds, is the modelling assumption that costs accrue at a constant rate throughout the lifetime of cases. This is a simplifying modelling assumption. In reality, it is accepted that costs are generally concentrated towards the beginning and the end of legal matters. LAA have demonstrated, however, that over a sufficiently large population of cases, this concentration of costs averages out to be equivalent to the assumption used within the modelling, that costs accrue at a constant rate.
Further information on the assumptions for the civil representation and crime higher provisions, which are material to the MoJ financial statements, is provided below. Equivalent information for the legal help and crime lower provisions is available in LAA’s Annual Report and Accounts.
Civil representation valuation methodology
Civil Representation relates to legal aid for representation by barristers and solicitors in civil cases that go to court. The Civil Representation WIP provision is calculated using past patterns of activity taken from completed transactions and assuming that these are a reasonable indicator of likely activity on live cases. Within the Civil Representation funding scheme, cases can attract payments at multiple stages throughout their duration. In estimating the WIP provision, historical information is used to derive profiles that indicate the length of time that passes between subsequent transactions, and separate profiles that indicate the average value of payments relative to their distance in time from any prior transaction. These profiles are derived for each distinct category of law funded within Civil Representation, independently for each expenditure stream within the scheme. These profiles are then combined to produce probabilistic estimates of the value of work likely to have been conducted on cases upon which the previous transaction (or the case start date) was a given number of days before the estimate, and these estimates are then applied to the population of cases that are live at the end of the accounting period to determine the estimate of liability.
Civil representation: key assumptions
The impact of COVID-19 was taken into account when estimating the liabilities within the Legal Aid funding schemes. For Civil Representation the following amendments have been made:
- Duration profile: The model implicitly assumes that recent historical billing timing profiles are an indicator of future timing profiles for equivalent workstreams. The model also assumes that bill volumes beyond 1,500 days from a prior transaction are negligible.
- Final billing duration: it can take some time for providers to compile and submit their bills to LAA once work has completed on a case: the estimate assumes that the average delay will be equivalent to that seen in the preceding quarter, however this does vary to a small degree over time.
- Average bill value: The model implicitly assumes that recent historical bill values are an indicator of future bill values for equivalent workstreams.
- Provider COVID-19 billing behaviour: the COVID-19 pandemic prompted significant changes in the pattern of provider billing, with more frequent claims throughout the lifetime of cases. In addition to this, the cost of cases for work in the family courts has increased at an accelerated rate. These two relatively sudden changes would not ordinarily have been picked up through the model’s consideration of historical billing patterns, so an adjustment has been applied to the model to amend the billing profiles to reflect these more recent developments. This adjustment is applied through assessing the extent to which billing frequency and price have varied before and after the COVID-19 pandemic and adjusting the profiles that are generated based on pre-pandemic data to account for this movement. The effect of this is to assume that liabilities for work in progress tend to be held for less time due to the increased billing frequency, but for higher values due to increased case costs.
Civil representation: sensitivity analysis
The Civil Representation work in progress provision is calculated on a case-by-case basis using past patterns of activity, with multiple potential duration and cost outcomes. The calculations are segmented between the different expenditure streams and between different milestones in a case’s lifecycle. The model estimates activity to the next financial event in each expenditure stream, reflecting the business realities of billing timing.
The reasonable alternative assumptions below have been arrived at by observing the maximum historical high and low points within the actual source data of the respective models, adjusted for projected future trends.
The impact of the following reasonable alternatives to these inputs has been quantified:
Increase in net financial liability |
(Decrease) in net financial liability |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Assumptions tested | Assumption | £m | Assumption | £m |
Duration profile1 | Max duration + 1 year |
25.6 | Max duration - 1 year |
(25.6) |
Final billing duration2 | +15 days | 0.2 | - 15 days | (0.2) |
Average final bill value | +15% | 46.4 | - 15% | (46.4) |
Profile variance3 | - 15% | 21.9 | +15% | (34.9) |
1 Duration profile: In order to estimate the provision, profiles outlining the timing and magnitude of costs on civil representation cases are calculated. There is a degree of uncertainty in the calculation of these profiles, particularly due to the inherent time lag. LAA therefore make the assumption that the level of variance could be equal to the variance if this year’s profile was extended by 1 year. LAA have assumed this degree of variance can be seen in either direction.
2 Final billing duration: it can take some time for Legal Aid providers to compile and submit their bills to LAA once work has completed on a case. The estimate of the provision assumes that the average delay will be equivalent to that seen in the preceding quarter, however this does vary to a small degree over time. LAA therefore make the assumption that this delay could vary by up to 15 days in either direction.
3 Profile variance: In estimating the provision, LAA have made an adjustment to calculated billing profiles to account for recent changes in value and billing duration. These adjustments are based on emerging trends and therefore are subject to some uncertainty, which this variance represents.
Using these reasonable alternative assumptions, the fair value of the financial liabilities at 31 March 2023 could be higher by up to +22.3% (£94.1 million) or lower by up to -25.4% (-£107.1 million).
The above inputs are case data driven, with an overlay of management judgement, for example, choosing the number of years’ historical case data to use in creating historical profiles. It should be noted the inherent sensitivity of the Civil Representation WIP provision is such that relatively small percentage movements in the above inputs could lead to the estimate crystallising at a significantly different amount. All assumptions are reviewed periodically to ensure they remain appropriate.
Crime higher valuation methodology
The Crime Higher Graduated Fee Scheme WIP estimates are calculated by considering cohorts of case starts and modelling their progress through the legal aid system, considering when the case completes, when the work is done on the case and the different types of bills that may be incurred in order to reflect the way the scheme operates as closely as possible. A separate calculation is then done to estimate the amount that has already been paid on these cases through interim payments.
Key assumptions in the Crime Higher WIP model are as follows:
- Duration profile: the model implicitly assumes that recent case duration profiles are an indicator of future case duration profiles for equivalent workstreams.
- Completion rates: the model implicitly assumes that historical representation order completion rates are indicative of future completion rates
- Interim completions: the model implicitly assumes that the proportion of cases that have received an interim bill that later go on to have further bills remains consistent over time.
- Average bill value: the model implicitly assumes that recent historical bill values are an indicator of future bill values for equivalent workstreams.
Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, model profiles have been constructed entirely from data relating to cases that finished prior to March 2020, with any adjustments deemed necessary due to ongoing pandemic-driven effects overlaid. Beyond March 2020 the impacts of the pandemic on levels of demand and court activity created various effects in the data that it was deemed were not representative of likely behaviour going forwards, and so did not form a reliable profile baseline. In 2022-23, activity in the Crown Court has sufficiently stabilised that LAA now have a sufficient baseline of post-pandemic data to construct profiles driven entirely by these more recent data, and so profiles have been updated on this basis.
The Crime Higher graduated fee schemes allow for Legal Aid providers to claim disbursements for incidental and third-party costs. Where the value of these disbursements exceeds £100, providers can claim on an interim basis as and when the expense arises. On this basis, in prior years LAA’s provision for unbilled work did not account for disbursement costs. Recent analysis suggests that a majority of disbursements are not claimed on an interim basis, and the decision has therefore been taken that providing for those costs that do not take advantage of interim billing is appropriate. However, sufficient information to be able to profile the billing behaviour of these costs does not exist. The liability for these costs has therefore been estimated using billing behaviour profiles derived from the core graduated fee scheme costs.
Crime higher: sensitivity analysis
Below are the reasonable alternative scenarios modelled. These relate to the flexing of certain assumptions, such as the number of cases expected to close or the amount of time a case takes to go through the system.
Increase in net financial liability | (Decrease) in net financial liability | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Assumptions tested | Assumption | £m | Assumption | £m |
Price profiles1 | +10.0% | 41 | - 10.0% | (41) |
Completion rates2 | +2.5% | 39 | - 2.5% | (35) |
Case durations3 | +10.0% | 30 | - 10.0% | (32) |
1 Price profiles: there is a degree of uncertainty in assuming that future prices will follow historical patterns, as prices vary to a small degree over time. The sensitivity analysis considers that prices could vary by as much as 10% in either direction.
2 Completion rates: a number of representation orders never attract a bill, and so do not close. The model uses historical data to determine the likely proportion that these cases represent of the live case population. There is inherent uncertainty in assuming that the proportion will be similar to that seen historically, which this sensitivity represents. The proportion is flexed by 2.5% in either direction, representing the variance that is seen in the proportion over time.
3 Case durations: the estimate of the provision assumes that average case durations will be consistent with those seen in recent prior periods, however durations do vary to a small degree over time. LAA therefore make the assumption that durations could vary by up to 10% in either direction.
Using these reasonable alternative assumptions, the fair value of the financial liabilities at 31 March 2023 could be higher by up to +25.1% (£110 million) or lower by up to -24.6% (-£107.8 million).
Other provisions
OPG repayment scheme: Provision has been made for the estimated cost of repayment for Power of Attorney (POA) and supervision fees recovered in excess of costs. The estimated cost of POA scheme refunds is based on the volume of cases and value of surplus for each year from 1 April 2013 to 31 March 2017. The estimated cost of supervision scheme refunds is based on the number of assessments and supervisions which took place between 1 April 2008 and 31 March 2015.
The provision is reviewed annually and reflects the likely settlement values at the year end.
Employment Tribunals and Employment Appeal Tribunal Fee Repayment Scheme: this scheme arises from a Supreme Court judgment on 26 July 2017 quashing the Employment Tribunals and the Employment Appeal Tribunal Fees Order 2013/1893. HMCTS identified £32.2 million in fees paid and to date have refunded £18.6 million including interest. As HMCTS are not able to reliably estimate the probability that the remaining fees will be claimed and refunded no provision is recognised, but a contingent liability of £13.8 million is disclosed.
In July 2018 the Court of Protection, Civil Proceedings and Magistrates’ Courts Fees (Amendment) Order 2018 became law. The statutory order reduced a small number of fees which were mistakenly set above cost. These changes affect fees charged for certain proceedings in the Court of Protection (COP), particular fees relating to civil proceedings in the magistrates’ courts (including Council Tax Liability Orders – CLTOs), fees for general applications in insolvency proceedings and the fees charged for High Court Judges sittings as arbitrators. The refund scheme applicable to these cases was launched by MoJ in January 2020.
The CTLO liability remains as a provision for £3.7 million due to uncertainty of timing to discharge the liability to each recipient. In 2022-23 HMCTS refunded £2 million (2021-22: HMCTS refunded £31 million and recognised an accrual of £0.5 million).
Following an internal review of fees, it was determined that an incorrect fee for low value personal injury claims was charged; the error arose as a result of a single flat fee being charged for cases which should have been treated as money claims and had a sliding fee scale applied. This has resulted in an overcharge of £16.4 million for which a refund scheme was launched in October 2020.
The refund provisions for Personal injury and other claims (COP, Insolvency, RCJ and other fees) at 31 March 2023 were estimated at £4.5 million, and HMCTS continues to accept the liability for all claims until the end of the qualifying period. The balance of the liability is shown as a contingent liability of £9.8 million for personal injury claims and £9.3 million for other claims (COP, Insolvency, RCJ and other fees).
Other provisions include a provision for an onerous lease of undeveloped land of £14.5 million (2021-22: £73.7 million). The decrease of £59.2 million relates to a change in the discount rate used to calculate the onerous lease provision.
21. Commitments under PFI and Service Concession Arrangements
21.1 Arrangements not recognised on the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position
As at 31 March 2023 there are no off-balance sheet PFI commitments.
21.2 Arrangements recognised on the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position
Project name | Entity | Contract start date | Duration (years) | Description |
---|---|---|---|---|
PFI contracts | ||||
Hereford and Worcester Magistrates’ Courts | HM Courts and Tribunals Service | March 2000 | 25 | Provision of serviced accommodation for magistrates’ courts at Bromsgrove, Kidderminster, Worcester and Redditch. The contract term can be extended by mutual agreement for another 10 years. At the end of the contract term the buildings shall revert to HMCTS at no cost. |
Humberside Magistrates’ Courts | HM Courts and Tribunals Service | March 2000 | 25 | Provision of serviced magistrates’ courthouses in Hull, Beverley and Bridlington. On expiry, HMCTS has the option of taking the assets back for a nominal amount of £3 million. |
Manchester Magistrates’ Court | HM Courts and Tribunals Service | March 2001 | 25 | Provision of serviced accommodation at Manchester Magistrates’ Court at Spinningfields in Manchester. The contract term can be extended by mutual agreement by up to ten years. At the end of the contract term the building shall revert to HMCTS at no cost. |
Derbyshire Magistrates’ Courts | HM Courts and Tribunals Service | August 2001 | 27 | Provision of serviced accommodation for magistrates’ courts at New Mills, Chesterfield and Derby. The contract term can be extended (subject to agreement of mutually acceptable terms) by up to five years. At the end of the contract term the buildings shall revert to HMCTS at no cost. |
East Anglia | HM Courts and Tribunals Service | October 2002 | 25 | Provision of Crown Court centres in Ipswich (five criminal courtrooms) and Cambridge (three criminal courtrooms). At the end of the contract term the buildings in Ipswich and Cambridge will revert to HMCTS at no cost. |
Exeter | HM Courts and Tribunals Service | November 2002 | 30 | Provision of a courthouse comprising four criminal courts, one civil court and four District Judge hearing rooms. At the end of the contract term the building will revert to HMCTS at no cost. |
Sheffield | HM Courts and Tribunals Service | November 2002 | 25 | Provision of a Family Hearing Centre in Sheffield. At the end of the contract term HMCTS has the option of acquiring the under lease at the lower of its open market value or £2 million. |
Avon and Somerset Magistrates’ Court | HM Courts and Tribunals Service | August 2004 | 27 | Provision of serviced accommodation at Bristol Magistrates Court, North Somerset Magistrates’ Court and Avon and Somerset Probation HQ and Training Centre, both at Worle. The contract term can be extended by mutual agreement by up to five years. At the end of the contract term the buildings shall revert to HMCTS at no cost. |
HMP Ashfield | HMPPS | November 1999 | 25 | Design, build, finance and operate a 400-place young offenders and juveniles category B prison at Pucklechurch, near Bristol; converted in 2013 to hold adult offenders. |
HMP Forest Bank | HMPPS | January 2000 | 25 | Design, build, finance and operate an 800-place category B prison, HMP Forest Bank, on site of former Agecroft power station. |
HMP Rye Hill | HMPPS | January 2001 | 25 | Design, build, finance and operate a 600-place category B prison, HMP Rye Hill at Onley, near Rugby. |
HMP Dovegate | HMPPS | July 2001 | 25 | Design, build, finance and operate a 1,060-place category B prison and therapeutic community facility at HMP Dovegate, Marchington. |
HMP Bronzefield | HMPPS | June 2004 | 25 | Design, build, finance and operate a 500-place category B prison at Ashford in Middlesex. |
HMP Peterborough | HMPPS | March 2005 | 25 | Design, build, finance and operate an 840-place category B prison at Peterborough in Cambridgeshire. |
HMP Thameside | HMPPS | March 2012 | 25 | Design, build, finance and operate a 900-place category B prison at Woolwich in London. |
Oakhill Secure Training Centre | HMPPS | May 2004 | 25 | Design, construct and manage a secure training centre, located in Milton Keynes, Oakhill. |
Prisoner Escort Custody Service | HMPPS | August 2020 | 10 | The supply and running of the prison vans and escorts. |
Other service concession arrangements | ||||
HMP Doncaster | HMPPS | October 2011 | 15 | Manage and maintain a 1,145-place category B prison at Doncaster in South Yorkshire. |
HMP Oakwood | HMPPS | April 2012 | 15 | Manage and maintain a 2,100-place category C prison at Featherstone in the West Midlands. |
HMP Northumberland | HMPPS | December 2013 | 15 | Manage and maintain a 1,348-place category C prison at Morpeth in Northumberland. |
HMP Five Wells | HMPPS | November 2020 | 10 | Manage and maintain a 1,680-place category C prison at Wellingborough in Northampton. |
HMP and YOI Parc | HMPPS | December 2022 | 10 | Manage and maintain a 1,652-place category B prison and 60 place Young Offenders Institution at Bridgend in South Wales. |
HMP Altcourse | HMPPS | December 2022 | 10 | Manage and maintain a 1,164-place category B prison at HMP Altcourse, Liverpool (in mobilisation phase at 31 March 2023). |
HMP Lowdham Grange | HMPPS | February 2023 | 10 | Manage and maintain a 920-place category B prison at Lowdham in Nottingham. |
The total amount charged in the CSoCNE in respect of the service element of on-balance sheet (SoFP) PFI or other service concession transactions was £703.5 million (2021-22: £635.1 million).
Seven prisons are run by private sector operators under Manage and Maintain contracts. Assets covered by these contracts were reported as ‘Owned’ in prior years but have been reclassified to ‘On-balance sheet (SoFP) PFI and other service concession arrangement contracts’ in accordance with IFRIC 12 Service Concession Arrangements.
Details of the imputed finance lease charges under service concession arrangements recognised on the CSoFP are given in the table below for each of the following periods:
31 March 2023 | 31 March 2022 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Core department and agencies | Departmental group | Core department and agencies | Departmental group | |
£000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | |
Rentals due not later than one year | 48,224 | 48,224 | 52,626 | 52,626 |
Rentals due later than one year but not later than five years | 161,071 | 161,071 | 172,582 | 172,582 |
Rentals due later than five years | 140,689 | 140,689 | 177,404 | 177,404 |
349,984 | 349,984 | 402,612 | 402,612 | |
Less: interest element | (70,812) | (70,812) | (84,973) | (84,973) |
Present value of obligations | 279,172 | 279,172 | 317,639 | 317,639 |
The present value of liabilities under service concession arrangements recognised on the CSoFP are given in the table below for each of the following periods:
31 March 2023 | 31 March 2022 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Core department and agencies | Departmental group | Core department and agencies | Departmental group | |
£000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | |
Rentals due not later than one year | 35,836 | 35,836 | 38,466 | 38,466 |
Rentals due later than one year but not later than five years | 126,568 | 126,568 | 132,441 | 132,441 |
Rentals due later than five years | 116,768 | 116,768 | 146,732 | 146,732 |
Present value of obligations | 279,172 | 279,172 | 317,639 | 317,639 |
Details of the minimum service charge under service concession arrangements recognised on the CSoFP are given in the table below for each of the following periods:
31 March 2023 | 31 March 2022 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Core department and agencies | Departmental group | Core department and agencies | Departmental group | |
£000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | |
Service charge due within one year | 683,997 | 683,997 | 633,928 | 633,928 |
Service charge due later than one year but not later than five years | 2,258,276 | 2,258,276 | 1,506,195 | 1,506,195 |
Service charge due later than five years | 1,556,944 | 1,556,944 | 1,137,836 | 1,137,836 |
Total | 4,499,217 | 4,499,217 | 3,277,959 | 3,277,959 |
22. Capital commitments
Capital expenditure contracted for at the end of the reporting period but not included in these financial statements is as follows:
31 March 2023 | 31 March 2022 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Core department and agencies | Departmental group | Core department and agencies | Departmental group | |
£000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | |
Property, plant and equipment | 559,108 | 559,108 | 206,774 | 206,774 |
Intangible assets | 11,240 | 11,240 | 17,116 | 17,116 |
Total | 570,348 | 570,348 | 223,890 | 223,890 |
23. Other financial commitments
MoJ has entered into non-cancellable contracts (which are not leases or PFI contracts), for the provision of services including the management of prisons and other contracted out services.
The payments to which MoJ is committed are as follows:
31 March 2023 | 31 March 2022 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Core department and agencies | Departmental group | Core department and agencies (Restated) | Departmental group (Restated) | |
£000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | |
Not later than one year | 128,783 | 131,191 | 283,262 | 286,312 |
Later than one year but not later than five years | 111,739 | 115,411 | 147,733 | 148,111 |
Total | 240,522 | 246,602 | 430,995 | 434,423 |
The 31 March 2022 figures have been restated to exclude the commitments under Manage and Maintain contracts which are now disclosed within Note 21.
24. Financial instruments
IFRS 7 ‘Financial Instruments: Disclosures’, requires disclosure of the role that financial instruments have had during the year in creating or changing risks an entity faces in carrying out its business.
As the cash requirements of MoJ are met through the Parliamentary Supply Estimates process, financial instruments play a more limited role in creating and managing risk than would apply to a non-public sector body of a similar size. MoJ’s exposure to financial risk is mainly in respect of credit risk in relation to LAA’s receivables.
LAA receivables
The LAA is exposed to minimal market, liquidity or interest rate risk: exposure to financial risk is mainly in respect of credit risk in relation to receivables.
Under the Legal Aid Act 1974, the Legal Aid Act 1988, the Access to Justice Act 1999 and the LASPO Act 2012, where funded clients have recovered or preserved property rather than obtaining damages, recoverable costs may be secured by a charge against the property. Under the Community Legal Service (Financial) Regulations 2000 as amended by the Community Legal Service (Financial) (Amendment) Regulations 2005 and the Civil Legal Aid (Statutory Charge) Regulations 2013, some of these debts are interest bearing debts that have interest due on the outstanding balance at 8% per annum.
The income for statutory charge, statutory charge interest, contributions due from funded clients and recovery of defence costs are initially recognised under IFRS 15 ‘Revenue from Contracts with Customers’.
LAA receivables risk identification and management
The LAA has an inherent risk within trade and other receivables, as these are not predisposed to straightforward cash collections. The LAA recognises this risk and mitigates it in the case of statutory charge debts, where enforcement of the debt may be deferred, by securing land charges and using active credit management policies to recover unsecured debts. In some cases the debt collection activities are outsourced to commercial debt collectors.
The size of the risk is reflected in the receivables impairment provision and cumulative fair value losses that total £247.8 million (31 March 2022: £246.6 million).
LAA receivables valuation
The valuation of trade and other receivables includes an element of estimation.
Statutory charge and interest receivables are measured at fair value through the profit and loss in accordance with IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement, as they are not solely payments of principal and interests, and therefore do not meet the tests set out in IFRS 9, Financial Instruments. These receivables are measured using techniques that use inputs that have a significant effect on the recorded fair value that are not based on observable market data.
Other LAA receivables are measure at amortised cost, and LAA recognises an impairment for credit losses, using the effective interest rate method, less any impairment. Any loss arising on impairment is recognised in the Statement of Comprehensive Net Expenditure.
The LAA provides for impairment of receivables based on historical cash collection experience and management assessment of likely recoveries, for each category of debt. This analysis is also used to inform the expected cash flows for trade and other receivables that are measured at fair value. This assumes that future performance will be reflective of past performance and there will be no significant change in the payment profile or recovery rates within each identified group of receivables. To address the risk that this assumption is incorrect, the LAA undertakes a rollback review to compare previous estimated repayment profiles with the actual experience in subsequent years, to assess the accuracy of the profile and resulting impairment, adjusting assumptions where required. There have been no material adjustments to the assumptions as a result of this review at 31 March 2023.
Past payment profiles used in the estimation of the receivables impairment have been adjusted to ignore variations in repayment profiles seen during the COVID-19 pandemic, since LAA do not believe that repayment behaviour from this period is representative of likely behaviour going forwards.
LAA’s receivables have been discounted over the period from the reporting date to the expected date of collection, to reflect the effect of the time value of money. This has a material impact on their present value. Each class of receivable is discounted over periods commensurate with historical cash flow patterns, at a rates mandated by HM Treasury. At 31 March 2023 these were: 1.9% nominal and (1.1%) and (0.2%) in excess of RPI real until February 2030 and post February 2030 respectively (31 March 2022: 1.9% nominal and (1.1%) and (0.2%) in excess of RPI real until February 2030 and post February 2030 respectively).
LAA receivables sensitivity analysis
LAA’s receivables impairment models use historical recovery profiles by debt category to estimate the provision required against debt balances. The impairment model is underpinned by specific assumptions including: the life of debt, the expected remittance profiles, and the discount rates above.
The impact of the following reasonable possible alternatives to these assumptions has been considered:
- cash received evenly throughout the year rather than at the end of the year
- predicted cash receipts used to calculate the impairment provision cashflows +/- 10%
- discount rate +/- 1%
Increase/(decrease) in net financial assets
31 March 2023 | 31 March 2022 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Assumption | £m | £m | |
Income received | Evenly through the year | 2.4 | 1.7 |
Expected cash inflows based on historic repayment profiles |
+10% | 9.7 | 14.6 |
Expected cash inflows based on historic repayment profiles |
- 10% | (10.3) | (14.7) |
Discount rate | +1% | (9.1) | (8.4) |
Discount rate | - 1% | 10.5 | 9.4 |
Highest change | 22.6 | 25.7 | |
Lowest change | (19.3) | (23.1) |
These assumptions are reviewed annually and changed if management believe alternative assumptions are a better reflection of the underlying trends.
Other credit risks
Credit risk related to fines and penalties collection and banking activities is explained in the HMCTS Trust Statement.
The department is exposed to minimal credit risk in respect of other financial assets. The maximum exposure to credit risk is equal to the carrying amount of outstanding receivable balances. The department manages its credit risk by undertaking background and credit checks prior to establishing a debtor relationship.
The IFRS 9 approach to impairment provisioning is a forward-looking ‘expected loss’ approach. Expected losses on the department’s financial assets are not considered to be material.
Fair values
In accordance with IFRS 9 each financial asset is classified at initial recognition, or at the point of first adoption of IFRS 9, into one of three categories:
- financial assets at fair value through profit and loss (‘FVTPL’)
- financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income (‘FVOCI’) or
- financial assets at amortised cost
For assets at amortised cost, the amortised cost balance was reduced where appropriate by an allowance for amounts which were considered to be impaired or uncollectible.
Financial liabilities are classified into one of two categories:
- financial liabilities at FVTPL
- financial liabilities at amortised cost
Categories of financial assets and financial liabilities: carrying value compared to fair value
The following tables summarise the carrying amounts and fair values of financial assets and liabilities.
31 March 2023 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Assets at FVTPL | Assets at FVOCI | Assets at amortised cost | Total | |
Financial assets: | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 |
Cash at bank and in hand | - | - | 359,382 | 359,382 |
Trade and other receivables | 93,994 | - | 395,158 | 489,152 |
Other financial assets | 382 | - | - | 382 |
Total | 94,376 | - | 754,540 | 848,916 |
Liabilities at FVTPL | Liabilities at amortised cost | Total | ||
Financial liabilities: | £000 | £000 | £000 | |
Trade and other payables | - | 1,238,242 | 1,238,242 | |
Other financial liabilities | - | 1,777,273 | 1,777,273 | |
Total | - | 3,015,515 | 3,015,515 |
31 March 2022 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Assets at FVTPL | Assets at FVOCI | Assets at amortised cost | Total | |
Financial assets: | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 |
Cash at bank and in hand | - | - | 222,894 | 222,894 |
Trade and other receivables | 93,727 | - | 389,306 | 483,033 |
Other financial assets | 381 | - | - | 381 |
Total | 94,108 | - | 612,200 | 706,308 |
Liabilities at FVTPL | Liabilities at amortised cost | Total | ||
Financial liabilities: | £000 | £000 | £000 | |
Trade and other payables | - | 1,217,246 | 1,217,246 | |
Other financial liabilities | - | 1,914,590 | 1,914,590 | |
Total | - | 3,131,836 | 3,131,836 |
MoJ considers that the carrying amounts for cash and cash equivalents, trade payables and other liabilities approximate to their fair value due to the short-term maturities of these instruments.
Fair value hierarchy
MoJ uses the following hierarchy for determining and disclosing the fair value of financial instruments by valuation technique:
- Level 1: quoted (unadjusted) prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
- Level 2: other techniques for which all inputs that have a significant effect on the recorded fair value are observable, either directly or indirectly
- Level 3: techniques which use inputs that have a significant effect on the recorded fair value that are not based on observable market data
All of the financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value fall within level 3.
25. Pension costs
Reconciliation of net pension (liability)/asset 2022-23:
Cafcass Pension | LSC Pension | Probation Pension | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Present value of obligation | Fair value of plan assets | Net (liability)/asset | Present value of obligation | Fair value of plan assets | Net (liability)/asset | Present value of obligation | Fair value of plan assets | Net (liability)/asset | |
£000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | |
Balance at 1 April 2022 | (917,308) | 681,041 | (236,267) | (350,793) | 463,255 | 112,462 | (6,774,717) | 5,143,874 | (1,630,843) |
Current service cost | (35,746) | - | (35,746) | - | - | - | (252,798) | - | (252,798) |
Past service cost | (13) | - | (13) | - | - | - | (4,695) | - | (4,695) |
Settlements | - | - | - | (541) | - | (541) | - | - | - |
Net interest | (24,551) | 18,397 | (6,154) | (9,339) | 12,368 | 3,029 | (184,516) | 139,246 | (45,270) |
Total recognised in the CSoCNE | (60,310) | 18,397 | (41,913) | (9,880) | 12,368 | 2,488 | (442,009) | 139,246 | (302,763) |
Scheme participants’ contributions | (5,956) | 5,956 | - | - | - | - | (34,391) | 34,391 | - |
Employer contributions | - | 16,775 | 16,775 | - | - | - | - | 162,924 | 162,924 |
Benefits paid after net transfers | 22,451 | (22,451) | - | 10,428 | (10,428) | - | 163,141 | (163,141) | - |
Total cash flows | 16,495 | 280 | 16,775 | 10,428 | (10,428) | - | 128,750 | 34,174 | 162,924 |
Actuarial gains/(losses) Changes in demographic assumptions | (4,441) | - | (4,441) | 7,045 | - | 7,045 | 149,141 | - | 149,141 |
Changes in financial assumptions | 342,679 | - | 342,679 | 117,066 | - | 117,066 | 2,603,910 | - | 2,603,910 |
Experience gains/(losses) | (78,627) | - | (78,627) | (24,709) | - | (24,709) | (406,774) | (70,674) | (477,448) |
Return on assets excluding amounts included in net interest | - | (10,289) | (10,289) | - | (147,931) | (147,931) | - | (48,610) | (48,610) |
Gain/(loss) due to effects of asset ceiling under IFRIC 14 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | (257,329) | (257,329) |
Remeasurements through Other Comprehensive Net Expenditure | 259,611 | (10,289) | 249,322 | 99,402 | (147,931) | (48,529) | 2,346,277 | (376,613) | 1,969,664 |
Balance at 31 March 2023 |
(701,512) | 689,429 | (12,083) | (250,843) | 317,264 | 66,421 | (4,741,699) | 4,940,681 | 198,982 |
Of which | |||||||||
Core department and agencies | - | - | - | (250,843) | 317,264 | 66,421 | (4,741,699) | 4,940,681 | 198,982 |
NDPBs | (701,512) | 689,429 | (12,083) | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Balance at 31 March 2023 |
(701,512) | 689,429 | (12,083) | (250,843) | 317,264 | 66,421 | (4,741,699) | 4,940,681 | 198,982 |
Reconciliation of net pension (liability)/asset 2021-22:
Cafcass Pension | LSC Pension | Probation Pension | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Present value of obligation | Fair value of plan assets | Net (liability)/asset | Present value of obligation | Fair value of plan assets | Net (liability)/asset | Present value of obligation | Fair value of plan assets | Net (liability)/asset | |
£000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | |
Balance at 1 April 2021 | (930,080) | 613,113 | (316,967) | (366,206) | 455,093 | 88,887 | (7,010,827) | 4,600,816 | (2,410,011) |
Current service cost | (37,287) | - | (37,287) | - | - | - | (275,730) | - | (275,730) |
Past service cost | - | - | - | - | - | - | (3,240) | - | (3,240) |
Administration costs | - | - | - | (556) | - | (556) | - | - | - |
Net interest | (19,382) | 12,895 | (6,487) | (7,226) | 8,998 | 1,772 | (141,598) | 92,218 | (49,380) |
Total recognised in the CSoCNE | (56,669) | 12,895 | (43,774) | (7,782) | 8,998 | 1,216 | (420,568) | 92,218 | (328,350) |
Scheme participants’ contributions | (5,607) | 5,607 | - | - | - | - | (33,886) | 33,886 | - |
Employer contributions | - | 16,206 | 16,206 | - | - | - | - | 156,960 | 156,960 |
Benefits paid after net transfers | 20,247 | (20,247) | - | 10,409 | (10,409) | - | 164,149 | (164,149) | - |
Total cash flows | 14,640 | 1,566 | 16,206 | 10,409 | (10,409) | - | 130,263 | 26,697 | 156,960 |
Actuarial gains/(losses) Changes in demographic assumptions | 9,263 | - | 9,263 | 727 | - | 727 | 40,708 | - | 40,708 |
Changes in financial assumptions | 48,785 | - | 48,785 | 22,791 | - | 22,791 | 498,074 | - | 498,074 |
Experience gains/(losses) | (3,247) | - | (3,247) | (10,732) | - | (10,732) | (12,367) | - | (12,367) |
Return on assets excluding amounts included in net interest | - | 53,467 | 53,467 | - | 9,573 | 9,573 | - | 424,143 | 424,143 |
Remeasurements through Other Comprehensive Net Expenditure | 54,801 | 53,467 | 108,268 | 12,786 | 9,573 | 22,359 | 526,415 | 424,143 | 950,558 |
Balance at 31 March 2022 |
(917,308) | 681,041 | (236,267) | (350,793) | 463,255 | 112,462 | (6,774,717) | 5,143,874 | (1,630,843) |
Of which | |||||||||
Core department and agencies | - | - | - | (350,793) | 463,255 | 112,462 | (6,774,717) | 5,143,874 | (1,630,843) |
NDPBs | (917,308) | 681,041 | (236,267) | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Balance at 31 March 2022 |
(917,308) | 681,041 | (236,267) | (350,793) | 463,255 | 112,462 | (6,774,717) | 5,143,874 | (1,630,843) |
The assumptions used by the actuaries were:
Cafcass Pension | LSC Pension | Probation Pension | Cafcass Pension | LSC Pension | Probation Pension | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2022-23 | 2022-23 | 2022-23 | 2021-22 | 2021-22 | 2021-22 | |
% | % | % | % | % | % | |
Inflation assumption | 2.70 | 2.80 | n/a | 3.00 | 3.25 | n/a |
Rate of increase in salaries | 3.95 | n/a | 3.75 | 4.25 | n/a | 3.95 |
Pension increase rate | 2.70 | 2.80 | 2.95 | 3.00 | 3.25 | 3.20 |
Discount rate | 4.70 | 4.75 | 4.75 | 2.70 | 2.70 | 2.70 |
Pension accounts revaluation rate | 2.70 | n/a | n/a | 3.00 | n/a | n/a |
The major categories of scheme assets for 2022-23 were:
Cafcass Pension | LSC Pension | Probation Pension | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quoted | Unquoted | Total | Value as a percentage of total scheme assets | Quoted | Unquoted | Total | Value as a percentage of total scheme assets | Quoted | Unquoted | Total | Value as a percentage of total scheme assets | |
£000 | £000 | £000 | % | £000 | £000 | £000 | % | £000 | £000 | £000 | % | |
Equities | 455,713 | 101,346 | 557,059 | 80.8 | 52,999 | - | 52,999 | 16.7 | 1,986,070 | - | 1,986,070 | 38.2 |
Gilts | 47,571 | - | 47,571 | 6.9 | 193,089 | - | 193,089 | 60.9 | - | - | - | - |
Corporate bonds | 31,714 | - | 31,714 | 4.6 | 64,028 | - | 64,028 | 20.2 | 486,096 | - | 486,096 | 9.4 |
Property | 7,584 | 15,167 | 22,751 | 3.3 | - | - | - | - | - | 202,234 | 202,234 | 3.9 |
Cash and cash equivalents | - | 15,857 | 15,857 | 2.3 | 3,640 | - | 3,640 | 1.1 | 131,861 | - | 131,861 | 2.5 |
Investment funds and unit trusts | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 865,649 | 1,137,285 | 2,002,934 | 38.5 |
Other | - | 14,478 | 14,478 | 2.1 | - | 3,508 | 3,508 | 1.1 | - | 388,815 | 388,815 | 7.5 |
Total | 542,582 | 146,848 | 689,430 | 100.0 | 313,756 | 3,508 | 317,264 | 100.0 | 3,469,676 | 1,728,334 | 5,198,010 | 100.0 |
The major categories of scheme assets for 2021-22 were:
Cafcass Pension | LSC Pension | Probation Pension | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quoted | Unquoted | Total | Value as a percentage of total scheme assets | Quoted | Unquoted | Total | Value as a percentage of total scheme assets | Quoted | Unquoted | Total | Value as a percentage of total scheme assets | |
£000 | £000 | £000 | % | £000 | £000 | £000 | % | £000 | £000 | £000 | % | |
Equities | 461,746 | 81,725 | 543,471 | 79.8 | 104,724 | - | 104,724 | 22.6 | 2,151,612 | - | 2,151,612 | 41.8 |
Gilts | 50,397 | - | 50,397 | 7.4 | 328,514 | - | 328,514 | 70.9 | - | - | - | - |
Corporate bonds | 32,690 | - | 32,690 | 4.8 | - | - | - | - | 446,376 | - | 446,376 | 8.7 |
Property | 10,897 | 16,345 | 27,242 | 4.0 | - | - | - | - | - | 199,278 | 199,278 | 3.9 |
Cash and cash equivalents | - | 19,750 | 19,750 | 2.9 | 25,170 | - | 25,170 | 5.4 | 160,864 | - | 160,864 | 3.1 |
Investment funds and unit trusts | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 940,294 | 882,041 | 1,822,335 | 35.4 |
Other | - | 7,491 | 7,491 | 1.1 | - | 4,847 | 4,847 | 1.1 | - | 363,409 | 363,409 | 7.1 |
Total | 555,729 | 125,312 | 681,041 | 100.0 | 458,408 | 4,847 | 463,255 | 100.0 | 3,699,146 | 1,444,728 | 5,143,874 | 100.0 |
Sensitivity analysis – change in assumptions relative to 31 March 2023 actuarial assumptions for Cafcass pension liabilities (based on the change in liabilities):
The sensitivity analysis is intended to provide an indication of the impact on the value of the scheme’s liabilities from the risks highlighted below.
Actuarial value of liabilities on 31 March 2023 | Actuarial value of liabilities on 31 March 2022 | |
---|---|---|
£000 | £000 | |
0.1% decrease in discount rate | 713,438 | 934,737 |
0.1% increase in the salary increase rate | 702,214 | 919,143 |
1 year decrease in post retirement mortality age rating* | 719,751 | 885,202 |
0.1% increase to pension increase rate | 712,035 | 932,902 |
*A rating of +1 year means that members are assumed to follow the mortality pattern of the base table for an individual that is one year older than them.
Sensitivity analysis – change in assumptions relative to 31 March 2023 actuarial assumptions for LSC pension liabilities (based on total liabilities):
Actuarial value of liabilities on 31 March 2023 | Actuarial value of liabilities on 31 March 2022 | |
---|---|---|
£000 | £000 | |
Base case | 250,843 | n/a |
0.5% decrease in discount rate | 269,499 | 384,329 |
1 year increase in life expectancy | 260,877 | 364,825 |
0.5% p.a. increase in inflation | 267,252 | 380,056 |
Sensitivity analysis – change in assumptions relative to 31 March 2023 actuarial assumptions for Probation Pension liabilities (based on total liabilities):
Actuarial value of liabilities on 31 March 2023 | Actuarial value of liabilities on 31 March 2022 | |
---|---|---|
£000 | £000 | |
Base case | 4,741,699 | 6,774,717 |
0.1% decrease in Real Discount Rate | 4,827,199 | 6,910,590 |
1 year increase in member life expectancy | 4,931,367 | 7,045,706 |
0.1% increase in the Salary Increase Rate | 4,752,380 | 6,789,259 |
0.1% increase in the Pension Increase Rate (CPI) | 4,817,743 | 6,894,947 |
The principal demographic assumption is the mortality assumption (i.e. member life expectancy). For sensitivity purposes, actuaries estimate that a one-year increase in life expectancy would approximately increase the employer’s defined benefit obligation by around 3% to 5%. In practice the actual cost of a one-year increase in life expectancy will depend on the structure of the revised assumption (i.e. if improvements to survival rates predominantly apply at younger or older ages). For 2022-23, a one-year increase in member life expectancy would increase the liability by 4% or £189.7 million.
25.1 Cafcass pension scheme
Employees of Cafcass are members of the Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS) through the West Yorkshire Pension Fund (WYPF). The scheme provides funded defined benefits based on pensionable salary. The assets of the scheme are held separately from those of Cafcass and are invested in managed funds. Employer contribution rates are determined by a qualified actuary and on the basis of triennial valuations.
The scheme assets are measured at fair value. Scheme liabilities are measured using a projected unit method and discounted at the current rate of return on a high-quality corporate bond of equivalent term and currency to the liability.
The pension scheme surplus (to the extent that it is considered recoverable) or deficit is recognised in full on the face of the Statement of Financial Position. The movement in the scheme surplus/deficit is split between operating charges (within staff costs) and reserves in the case of actuarial gains and losses.
Funding/governance arrangements of the LGPS
The funded nature of the LGPS requires participating employers and its employees to pay contributions into the fund, calculated at a level intended to balance the pension liabilities with investment assets. Information on the framework for calculating contributions to be paid is set out in LGPS Regulations 2013 and the fund’s ‘Funding strategy statement’. The employer contribution rate for 2022-23 was 19.4% (plus an additional lump sum payment of £0.19 million).
The last actuarial valuation was at 31 March 2022 and the contributions to be paid until 31 March 2026 resulting from that valuation are set out in the fund’s ‘Rates and adjustment certificate’ (employer contributions over this period will be: 2023-24: 19.1%; 2024-25: 18.6% and 2025-26 18.1%).
The Fund Administering Authority, City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council, is responsible for the governance of the fund.
Assets
The assets allocated to the employer in the fund are notional and are assumed to be invested in line with the investments of the fund for the purposes of calculating the return over the accounting period. The fund holds a significant proportion of its assets in liquid investments. As a consequence, there will be no significant restriction on realising assets if a large payment is required to be paid from the fund in relation to an employer’s liabilities. The assets are invested in a diversified spread of investments and the approximate split of assets for the fund as a whole (based on data supplied by the Fund Administering Authority) is shown in the disclosures.
The Fund Administering Authority may invest a small proportion of the fund’s investments in the assets of some of the employers participating in the fund if it forms part of their balanced investment strategy.
Duration of liabilities
The duration of liabilities is the average period between the calculation date and the date at which benefit payments fall due. The calculated duration, based on the output of the most recent valuation exercise at 31 March 2022, is 16.6 years.
Risks associated with the fund in relation to accounting
Asset volatility
The liabilities used for accounting purposes are calculated using a discount rate set with reference to corporate bond yields. If assets underperform this yield this will create a deficit in the accounts. The fund holds a significant proportion of growth assets which, while expected to outperform corporate bonds in the long term, creates volatility and risk in the short term in relation to the accounting figures.
Changes in bond yield
A decrease in corporate bond yields will increase the value placed on the liabilities for accounting purposes although this will be marginally offset by the increase in the assets as a result (to the extent the fund invests in corporate bonds).
Inflation risk
The majority of the pension liabilities are linked to either pay or price inflation. Higher inflation expectations will lead to a higher liability value. The assets are not perfectly correlated with inflation meaning that an increase in inflation will increase the deficit.
Life expectancy
The majority of the fund’s obligations are to provide benefits for the life of the member following retirement, so increases in life expectancy will result in an increase in the liabilities.
Exiting employers
Employers who leave the fund (or their guarantor) may have to make an exit payment to meet any shortfall in assets against their pension liabilities. If the employer (or guarantor) is not able to meet this exit payment the liability may in certain circumstances fall on other employers in the fund. Further the assets at exit in respect of ‘orphan liabilities’ may, in retrospect, not be sufficient to meet the liabilities. This risk may fall on other employers. ‘Orphan liabilities’ are currently a small proportion of the overall liabilities in the fund. The ‘Funding strategy statement’ sets out the risk management strategies for the risks that impact on the funding strategy of the Pension Fund. One of these strategies, for example, is that the Fund Administering Authority has diversified investments held to mitigate the risk of asset volatility.
25.2 LSC pension scheme (LSCPS) – closed
On 1 April 2013, under the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act, the LSC was abolished and replaced by an executive agency of the department, LAA.
Nature of benefits, regulatory framework, and other entity’s responsibilities for governance of the LSCPS
The LSCPS is a registered defined benefit final salary scheme. The average duration of the LSCPS scheme liabilities as at 31 March 2023 was 14.7 years. It has a crown guarantee, with the department as the sponsoring employer, but in effect retains most of the UK regulatory framework for pensions including ‘scheme specific funding’. The LSCPS is operated under trust and as such, the trustees of the Scheme are responsible for operating the Scheme and have a statutory responsibility to act in accordance with the Scheme’s ‘Trust deed and rules’, in the interests of the beneficiaries of the LSCPS and UK legislation (including trust law). Any contributions that are paid to the LSCPS are defined by a funding arrangement between the trustees and the department.
Risks to which the LSCPS exposes the department
The nature of the LSCPS exposes the department to the risk of paying unanticipated contributions to the Scheme in times of adverse experience. The most financially significant risks are likely to be:
- members living for longer than expected
- higher than expected actual inflation
- lower than expected investment returns
- the risk that movements in the value of the Scheme’s liabilities are not met by corresponding movements in the value of the Scheme’s assets
- the LSCPS hedges 90% of its interest rate and inflation exposure as assessed on a gilts basis using index-linked and fixed-interest gilts
- the LSCPS also holds a historical buy-in policy (approximatively 1% of scheme accounts) which fully matches benefits covered by the policy
The trustees of the LSCPS maintain a risk register which they use to determine appropriate responses to mitigate the risks identified. These include maintaining a high level of hedging for interest rate and inflation changes and a prudent approach when setting future longevity assumptions.
Expected contributions over the next accounting period and future funding arrangements
The department does expect to contribute to the LSCPS for the year to 31 March 2023. The ‘Schedule of contributions’ dated 2 November 2016 sets out the current contributions payable by the department to the Scheme. Future contributions depend on the Scheme’s funding position at each formal valuation and are set out in the Scheme’s funding framework.
The funding arrangements and asset ceiling are set out in Section 18 of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012. Where the value of the Scheme assets is more than 105% of the value of the Scheme’s technical provisions on the effective date of an actuarial valuation, this constitutes a refundable surplus. The department can request payment of amounts not exceeding the refundable surplus.
The Scheme would be required to make payment unless advised by the actuary that, because of events subsequent to the date of the actuarial valuation, payment would reduce the value of the assets of the Scheme to less than 105% of the value of the Scheme’s technical provisions.
25.3 Probation pension schemes
HMPPS offers retirement benefits within the Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS) to probation staff working within the Probation Service (PS).
With effect from 1 June 2014, HMPPS is responsible for the overall pension liability for past and present LGPS employees employed in the Probation Service (formerly the NPS), including the former probation trusts and the former community rehabilitation companies (and their sub-contracted bodies) and, with effect from 26 June 2021, the current LGPS employees within the outsourced community rehabilitation service (CRS) providers. The total net pension position is recorded within the HMPPS accounts. The contracts with the CRS providers (and previously with the CRCs) were designed so that the CRSs paid a fixed fee, with the pension liability risk remaining with HMPPS. The total LGPS pension liability transferred to HMPPS on 1 June 2014, under absorption accounting and the transforming rehabilitation programme, which saw the creation of CRCs and NPS. Up to 31 May 2014, 35 probation trusts accounted for their pension liability separately via locally administered pension funds.
Under the transforming rehabilitation programme, the probation trusts were dissolved and the NPS (within HMPPS) and the outsourced CRCs were created on 1 June 2014. At this point, the community rehabilitation companies became LGPS admitted bodies under the responsibility of HMPPS who became the LGPS scheme employer.
Past employees of the probation trusts, and LGPS probation staff who transferred to community rehabilitation companies and HMPPS NPS are covered by the provisions of LGPS via one pension fund, GMPF, administered by their local authority council, Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council. The assets and liabilities from the former probation trusts’ own pension funds were transferred to GMPF.
From 25 June 2021, the contracts with the community rehabilitation companies ended and the majority of LGPS employees transferred into the Probation Service, with a few remaining LGPS employees transferred to 13 of the new outsourced CRS providers. The 13 outsourced providers became LGPS admitted bodies, under the responsibility of HMPPS as the scheme employer. The total pension liability will continue to be the responsibility of HMPPS and will be reported in the HMPPS annual report and accounts.
The LGPS is a statutory scheme primarily governed by the LGPS Regulations 2013 and the LGPS (Transitional Provisions, Savings and Amendment) Regulations 2014. These are subject to amendment over time. The LGPS is a funded, multi-employer defined benefit scheme. An LGPS pension scheme liability is recognised in these accounts in accordance with IAS 19.
A liability arises as employees earn their future entitlement to payments when they retire. The pension fund is subject to an independent triennial actuarial valuation to determine each employer’s contribution rate. The contribution rates reflect benefits as they are accrued and reflect the past experience of the schemes. The LGPS provides benefits on a ‘final salary’ basis, up to 31 March 2014, at a normal retirement age of 65. For pensionable service up to 31 March 2008, benefits accrued at the rate of 1/80th of pensionable salary for each year of service. In addition, a lump sum equivalent to 3/80ths of final pay for every year of total membership is payable on retirement. Benefits accrued at the rate of 1/60th of pensionable salary for service from 1 April 2008 to 31 March 2014 with no automatic lump sum.
From 1 April 2014, the scheme provides benefits on a career average revalued earnings (CARE) basis. Benefits accrue at the rate of 1/49th of pensionable salary for each year of service.
The scheme permits employees to take a lump sum payment on retirement in exchange for a reduction in their future annual pension. Members pay contributions of between 5.5% and 12.5% of pensionable earnings. Member contributions changed from 1 April 2014 and benefits accrued from this date are on a CARE basis, with protections in place for those members in the scheme before the changes took effect.
For the year to 31 March 2023, HMPPS paid employers’ contributions of £174.7 million to GMPF, relating to current probation staff, at 29.6% (2021-22: £145.6 million at 29.6%). The increase in contributions paid is due to the former CRC employees transferring into HMPPS on 26 June 2021 and joining the LGPS.
Following the 2022 triennial valuation, the employer contribution rates for 2023-24 to 2025-26 will be 26.5%.
The pension position as at 31 March 2023, as detailed in the table, is based on the actuarial report from Hymans Robertson LLP, the independent actuary for GMPF, in compliance with IAS 19. There were no plan curtailments or settlements during the year. Full details of GMPF’s investment strategy statement ‘Funding strategy statement’, including its annual report and financial statements, and responsibilities of the GMPF management panel can be found on the GMPF website www.gmpf.org.uk. Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council is the administering authority of GMPF.
A number of assumptions are made as part of the actuarial valuation process and the major assumptions are set out in the table above. The assumptions underlying the calculation of the net liability as at 31 March 2022 are used for accounting purposes as required under IAS 19.
Risks associated with the fund in relation to accounting
The net pension position for 2022-23 is shown in the disclosure above. This reflects the appropriate assumptions; all assumptions remain subject to annual review. As the economic climate changes and more information becomes available assumptions will be updated to reflect this.
HMPPS is only liable for the pension obligations due to GMPF relating to Probation Service employees (and ultimately the CRS employees under the Secretary of State for Justice Pension Guarantee). HMPPS is not liable for pension obligations of other employers that participate in the LGPS with GMPF.
Should HMPPS move to another pension fund or pension scheme, any exit payment to cover the pension liability due would be determined by GMPF and their actuary. However, there are no plans to move to another pension fund or pension scheme.
Discount rate
The discount rate is the most significant financial assumption for assessing pension obligations. An increase in the discount rate results in a decrease in the value of the pension liability for accounting purposes and vice versa. The discount rate used in these financial statements, as required by IAS 19, is based on the market yields on high quality corporate bonds valued as at the reporting date of 31 March. Hymans corporate bond yield curve is based on the constituents of the iBoxx AA corporate bond index. The discount rate assumptions set by the actuary are considered appropriate. The large increase in discount rate compared to last year has resulted in a significant reduction in the pension liability.
Inflation
The inflation assumption is the second most significant financial assumption for assessing pension obligations and, typically, drives the assumption for salary growth and pension increases (to the extent they are inflation linked). A higher inflation assumption will lead to an increase in pension liabilities. The government announced the measure of Retail Price Index will change from 2030 to be in line with Consumer Prices Index including housing costs. This has been allowed for when deriving the inflation assumption. This has resulted in a decrease this year in the projection for future pension increases and salary growth. However, the actual increase in pension rate from April 2023 of 10.1% has resulted in an experience loss.
Mortality
The baseline mortality assumptions are based on analysis carried out by longevity experts Club Vita. Future life expectancy predictions use their continuous mortality investigation model. For 2022-23 the continuous mortality investigation (CMI) 2021 model has been used, which uses more up to date longevity data, including the temporary impact of COVID-19.
Risk mitigation strategies
The GMPF management panel carries out a similar role to the trustees of a pension scheme. They are key decision makers for:
- investment strategy
- monitoring investment activity and performance
- overseeing administrative activities
- guidance to officers in exercising delegated powers
- reviewing governance arrangements
Each local authority within Greater Manchester is represented on the management panel, along with the department. There have been no concerns raised by MoJ to date on GMPF’s investment or funding strategy or asset performance.
McCloud judgment (impact on LGPS)
The December 2018 McCloud Judgment found that transitional arrangements put in place during the reform of firefighters and judges pension schemes were discriminatory on grounds of age. The government has confirmed this ruling also applies to the LPGS. Based on the findings of the Government Actuary’s Department, published in June 2019 and taking account of the proposed remedial action published by HM Treasury in July 2020 in their consultation document, Hymans Robertson LLP calculated an estimated past service cost applicable to HMPPS and Cafcass. The impact of the McCloud judgment was accounted for in the 2019-20 HMPPS and Cafcass accounts under IAS 19.
The government response to the consultation for unfunded pension schemes was published in February 2021 (updated for LGPS 6 April 2023). On 13 May 2021, a written Ministerial Statement on McCloud and LGPS was made. Further information can be found at https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-statements/detail/2021-05-13/hcws26.
For the 2022 valuation, McCloud liabilities were included as set out in Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities 2022 valuation letter. The actuary has advised that no further adjustment to the cost in the pension obligation is required for 2022-23. Further information on the McCloud Judgment can be found at www.civilservicepensionscheme.org.uk/your-pension/remedy/.
Accounting for a net pension surplus and asset ceiling restriction
The net pension position at 31 March 2023 was a net surplus of £456.3 million as set out in the actuary report provided by Hymans, under IAS 19.
IAS19 requires that the discount rate is determined by reference to market yields at the end of the reporting period, on high quality AA corporate bonds of a currency and duration consistent with the currency and duration of the benefit obligations. The discount rate at 31 March 2023 is much higher compared to the previous year, reflecting a higher yield on high-quality corporate bonds and significantly reducing the pension obligation. This is the primary reason for the overall net surplus at 31 March 2023.
Under the requirements of ‘IFRIC 14: The Limit on a Defined Benefit Asset, Minimum Funding Requirements and their Interaction’, HMPPS is required to consider whether it is appropriate to limit the amount of net pension surplus in the financial statements which was determined under IAS 19 if the full economic benefit cannot be obtained. IAS 19 provides a definition of an asset ceiling for these purposes as the present value of any economic benefits available in the form of refunds from the plan or reductions in future contributions to the plan, with the lower of the surplus and the asset ceiling being recognised. IFRIC 14 provides further guidance on calculating figures for an asset ceiling with reference to minimum funding requirements.
A refund would only be available to HMPPS on exiting the scheme. However, participation in the current pension scheme is dictated by statute meaning an exit would rely on the occurrence of an uncertain future event not wholly within HMPPS’ control, i.e. an act of Parliament. Therefore, HMPPS does not have an unconditional right to a refund of the surplus.
The appropriate method is therefore to consider the economic benefit available as a contribution reduction. HMPPS has concluded that primary contributions to the scheme (18.1%) and those related to ill health retirements (4.3%) establish a minimum funding requirement for future contributions under IFRIC 14. The economic benefit available as a reduction in future contributions is calculated as the sum of:
a) any amount that reduces future minimum funding requirement contributions for future service because the entity made a prepayment; and
b) the estimated future service cost less the estimated minimum funding requirement contributions that would be required for future service in those periods if there were no prepayment as described in (a).
In determining this, HMPPS made a number of judgments, most significantly:
- HMPPS consider it appropriate to treat the current service charge and the primary contributions as continuing in perpetuity as there is no intention to cease operations of the probation service, nor to change the pension scheme available to employees of the service
- the additional contributions to meet ill health retirement (IHR) costs are discretionary with the rate set as part of the triennial valuation. While HMPPS would anticipate continuing to fund early retirement on the grounds of ill health via this mechanism, the financial commitment only exists for the three year period covered by the valuation. In calculating minimum funding requirements under IFRIC 14 HMPPS therefore judge the appropriate period over which to include the IHR contributions to be three years
HMPPS is required to make contributions of 4.1% in relation to past service. IFRIC 14 requires that to the extent that the contributions payable will not be available after they are paid into the plan, the entity shall recognise a liability when the obligation arises. HMPPS has judged that the appropriate period over which to consider the secondary contributions is 20 years as the actuarial assessment indicates that this is how long it will take for the scheme to be fully funded and for these secondary contributions to therefore end.
Annuity rates for these three time periods were provided by the scheme’s actuary using the same assumptions as the IAS 19 calculation as described on page 241.
Having applied the IFRIC 14 in line with the above facts and judgments, based on the present value of expected reductions in future contributions to the plan, the IAS 19 surplus of £456.3 million was reduced to £199 million. Additional details of mortality assumptions and in year movements in the GMPF defined benefit obligation are given in Note 18 (Pensions) to the financial statements in the HMPPS Annual Report and Accounts 2022-23.
26. Contingent assets and liabilities
Contingent liabilities disclosed under IAS 37
MoJ has contingent liabilities as defined within IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets.
Quantified contingent liabilities
31 March 2023 | 31 March 2022 | |
---|---|---|
£m | £m | |
Headquarters employment tribunals including judicial claims | ||
The department is currently defending several employment tribunal claims at various stages | 6.1 | 0.2 and unquantified |
Headquarters European Court of Human Rights claims | ||
The department is currently engaged in several cases at the European Court of Human Rights | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Headquarters other legal claims | ||
The department is engaged with a number of legal claims including judicial reviews challenging refusal to pay compensation for miscarriages of justice, and refusal to provide legal aid funding | 0.4 | Unquantified |
Headquarters Data Protection Act | ||
There are claims against the department for alleged failure to comply with the Data Protection Act | 0.1 | Unquantified |
HMPPS injury claims | ||
HMPPS failed claims for injury to staff prisoners and public, and for third party contract disputes | 45.2 | 113.9 |
HMCTS fee refunds – employment tribunal fees | ||
HMCTS operates a refund scheme following the quashing of the Employment Tribunals and Employment Appeal Tribunal Fees Order 2013/1893 in July 207 | 13.8 | 13.9 |
HMCTS fee refunds – low value personal injury claim fees | ||
HMCTS operates a refund scheme to refund personal injury claim fees that were incorrectly charged as a flat rate rather than on a sliding scale | 9.8 | 10.5 |
HMCTS fee refunds – other fees | ||
HMCTS operates a refund scheme for fees charged for certain proceedings in the Court of Protection, the magistrates’ courts, insolvency proceedings and fees charged for High Court Judges sittings as arbitrators | 9.3 | 9.3 |
HMCTS legal cases | ||
HMCTS is involved in various legal cases dealing with ex gratia, compensation and other claims | 0.8 | 1.4 |
Parole Board | ||
The Parole Board is involved in a claim which may result in compensation | 0.1 | - |
Total | 86.1 | 149.7 |
The contingent liability disclosed for headquarters’ employment tribunals has increased significantly due to new evidence emerging during the course of on-going claims that has changed our assessment of whether a contingent liability exists and can be quantified, and new cases being brough in 2022-23.
The contingent liability disclosed for HMPPS for personal injury claims has decreased significantly due to the closure of one specific legal challenge in 2022-23.
Unquantified contingent liabilities
Judicial claims for fee-paid judges sitting in retirement: Following a legal challenge, the MoJ has conceded that the current policies for sitting in retirement (where a judge may retire and draw a pension from their salaried office, and then sit in a fee-paid office), do not apply equally to fee-paid judges. We intend to consult on changes to rectify this. In the interim, there is potential for affected judges to bring compensation claims in respect of this and in the longer term for pension benefits to become payable earlier, increasing the actuarial value of the pension liability. This effect cannot currently be estimated and, should there be a change to the pattern of retirement, will be reflected in the ongoing regular valuations process.
Judicial claims for discrimination between fee-paid and salaried judges: There are also a number of other legal claims in relation to discrimination between fee-paid and salaried judges, which may give rise to further pension claims. At present we are unable to provide a reliable estimate of the potential liability until the appeals process has been completed.
Incidents ‘incurred but not yet received’ (IBNYR): CICA holds an unquantifiable contingent liability in respect of a possible future obligation to individuals who have been victims of violent crime as of 31 March 2023. This liability depends upon uncertain future events occurring and an application being submitted to CICA which meets the criteria set out in the relevant scheme. Although CICA recognises that this contingent liability exists in respect of IBNYR, the amount of the obligation cannot be measured with sufficient reliability. This is because it is not possible to establish with any reliable certainty the total number of eligible victims who sustained eligible criminal injuries, the likelihood of an application being made and then qualifying for compensation, according to the multiple criteria contained in the Scheme, and thereafter predicting with any reasonable certainty the potential value of any award which may be made, and the timescale in which this may occur.
Offers not accepted within time limits: Under the Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme 2012, a claimant’s legal entitlement to an award crystallises on the date on which CICA receives written notice of acceptance by the claimant. There are cases where the deadline for acceptance has passed but CICA has not yet withdrawn the offer. CICA may exercise its discretion under the Scheme in favour of the claimant, and not withdraw the offer even though the deadline has passed. The total value of cases ‘on-offer’ and passed the deadline is £0.4 million; any possible liability would therefore be below that value.
Quantified contingent assets
31 March 2023 | 31 March 2022 | |
---|---|---|
£m | £m | |
LAA costs orders | ||
LAA has two contingent assets in relation to costs orders from legal proceedings | 29.0 | 29.1 |
Total | 29.0 | 29.1 |
27. Related party transactions
Associated departments and other central government bodies
MoJ is the parent of LAA, HMCTS, HMPPS, CICA and OPG agencies and the sponsor of NDPBs as listed in Note 29. All of these bodies are related parties with which the department has had various material transactions during the year. In accordance with the requirements of the FReM these transactions have not been reported.
In addition, the department had a number of transactions with other government departments and central government bodies, as well as with local authorities. The most significant of these transactions have been with HM Revenue and Customs, Home Office, PCSPS and HM Treasury.
Management personnel
The brother of Nick Goodwin, the CEO of HMCTS, is a partner at Ward Hadaway, a law firm offering legal representation for cases that fall within the provision of the Legal Aid Agency. In 2022-23, Legal Aid Agency made payments totalling £2.2 million (202122: £1.6 million) to Ward Hadaway.
Other
Registry Trust Limited is a private company limited by guarantee with no share capital. It maintains the Register of County Court judgements on behalf of the Lord Chancellor and the Secretary of State for Justice. Revenue recognised from the Registry Trust Limited in the year amounted to £0.6 million (202122: £0.6 million) with a total debtor balance due to us as at 31 March 2023 of £0.0 million (202122: £0.0 million).
Other interests and related parties of ministers which do not concern the department are disclosed at: www.gov.uk/government/publications/list-of-ministers-interests.
During 2022-23 no other board members or related parties have undertaken any transactions with MoJ. Compensation paid to management, including taxable benefits, is disclosed in the Remuneration and Staff Report.
28. Third party assets
MoJ holds, as custodian or trustee, certain assets belonging to third parties. These assets are not recognised in the CSoFP and neither MoJ nor the government has a direct beneficial interest in them.
Funds in court
MoJ manages funds held in court on behalf of clients who may be involved in a civil legal action, patients who are under the Court of Protection because they are not able to manage their property and affairs, and children under the age of 18. Client assets held at year end comprised cash, an Equity Index Tracker Fund and securities.
Cash holdings represent funds invested by UK Debt Management Office on behalf of the Accountant General in the Court Funds Investment Account and foreign exchange balances held on behalf of clients.
31 March 2023 | 31 March 2022 | |
---|---|---|
£000 | £000 | |
Cash at bank and on deposit | 2,282,065 | 2,611,167 |
Securities | 75,043 | 82,512 |
Total | 2,357,108 | 2,693,679 |
Other third party assets
Official Solicitor and Public Trustee (OSPT) | Criminal injuries awards (CICA) | Pending legal aid amounts (LAA) | Bail monies (HMCTS) | Prisoner monies (HMPPS) | Total | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
£000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | £000 | |
Cash | 5,761 | 81,673 | 20,054 | 73,377 | 14,395 | 195,260 |
Investments | 54,800 | - | - | - | - | 54,800 |
Non-cash assets | 9,248 | - | - | - | - | 9,248 |
At 31 March 2023 | 69,809 | 81,673 | 20,054 | 73,377 | 14,395 | 259,308 |
At 31 March 2022 | 69,237 | 84,350 | 17,016 | 57,465 | 15,004 | 243,072 |
The rationale for each principal holding of third party assets is as follows:
- The Official Solicitor (OS) administers trusts and estates as administrator/trustee of last resort. The OS acts as last resort litigation friend, and in some cases solicitor, for adults who lack mental capacity and children (other than those who are the subject of child welfare proceedings) in court proceedings because they lack decision making capacity in relation to the proceedings. The Public Trustee (PT) acts as executor or trustee where they have been appointed under a will or a new settlement with the aim of providing an effective executor and trustee service of last resort. The figures above represent the most up to date information available about assets managed by the OS and PT on behalf of clients
- CICA holds third party compensation awards to minors. The purpose of this action is to ensure that the victim will be the sole beneficiary of the award (including accrued interest) when they reach their majority (18 years of age). Where appropriate, interim payments are made: requests for these are assessed on a case by case basis.
- LAA holds funds in respect of damages awarded to legally aided civil law clients and contributions payable by legally aided defendants in Crown Court trials. The outcome of the case and final costs assessment determine whether these funds are retained by LAA or return to the clients.
- HMCTS holds cash consisting of bail monies and monies held on behalf of court users while cases progress.
- HMPPS holds cash on behalf of offenders.
29. The departmental boundary
Entities within the departmental boundary
Entities within the departmental boundary comprise supply financed agencies and those entities listed in the Government Resources and Accounts Act 2000 (Estimates and Accounts) Order 2022, known as the Designation Order, is set out below.
The core department
These are entities that are accounted for within the core accounting boundary. These entities are managed independently of the department.
- Advisory Committees on Justices of the Peace in England and Wales
- Assessor of Compensation for Miscarriages of Justice
- Chief Coroner’s Office
- Civil Justice Council
- Civil Procedure Rule Committee
- Criminal Procedure Rule Committee
- Family Justice Council
- Family Procedure Rule Committee
- Independent Advisory Panel on Deaths in Custody
- Independent Monitoring Boards of Prisons, Immigration Removal Centres and Short Term Holding Facilities
- Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman
- Judicial College
- Judicial Conduct and Investigations Office
- Judicial Office
- Law Commission
- Office of the Commissioner for Victims and Witnesses
- Office of HM Inspectorate of Prisons
- Office of HM Inspectorate of Probation
- Office of the Judge Advocate General
- Office of the Official Solicitor
- Office of the Prisons and Probation Ombudsman for England and Wales
- Prison Service Pay Review Body
- Public Trustee
- Recognition Panel
- Sentencing Council for England and Wales
- Tribunal Procedure Committee
Supply financed agencies
- Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority
- HM Courts and Tribunals Service
- HM Prison and Probation Service
- Legal Aid Agency
- Office of the Public Guardian
Other entities captured in the Departmental group including Executive NDPBs
- Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service
- Criminal Cases Review Commission
- Gov Facility Services Limited
- Independent Monitoring Authority for the Citizens’ Rights Agreements
- Judicial Appointments Commission
- Legal Services Board
- Office for Legal Complaints
- Parole Board for England and Wales
- Youth Justice Board for England and Wales
- Press Recognition Panel[footnote 2].
The Annual Reports and Accounts for the individual entities can be found at: www.gov.uk/official-documents
30. Events after the reporting period
In accordance with the requirements of IAS 10 Events After the Reporting Period, events are considered up to the date on which the accounts are authorised for issue. The date the accounts are authorised for issue is interpreted as the same date the accounts are certified by the Comptroller and Auditor General.
Reinforced Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (RAAC) is a lightweight form of precast concrete, less durable than traditional concrete. Its use was most prevalent in buildings built or extended between 1950-1990, though there are some limited examples of its continued use into 1990s. Ongoing surveys of our estate have, to date, not indicated a widespread use of RAAC, with the majority of the properties built outside the period when RAAC was routinely used. In the buildings where the presence of RAAC has now been confirmed, remediation works have commenced where guidance suggests that is the correct course of action. In all other cases RAAC is being monitored. There is a range of possible outcomes in terms of levels of remediation required in the event that RAAC is identified. Based on the outcomes of surveys completed to date and the estimated effect that the presence of RAAC has on building valuations, we do not expect a material impact on the valuations of buildings within the financial statements.
-
As part of the probation reform programme over 7,000 staff from the Community Rehabilitation Companies (CRCs), their parent organisations and supply chain, transferred into HMPPS in June 2021 on termination of the contracts with the CRCs. ↩
-
The 2017-18 Designation Order established the Press Recognition Panel (PRP) as part of the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) departmental boundary. This is an administrative action on behalf of government with no change to the Lord Chancellor’s responsibilities as stated under the Charter. DCMS remain the policy lead in relation to the PRP. ↩