Research and analysis

Partnerships for People and Place: evaluation and spend mapping annexes

The Partnerships for People and Place evaluation and spend mapping annexes provide a detailed record of the Partnerships for People and Place spend mapping exercise.

Applies to England

Documents

Partnerships for People and Place evaluation and spend mapping: Annex 2-6

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email alternativeformats@levellingup.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Partnerships for People and Place spend monitoring data, January 2024

Request an accessible format.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email alternativeformats@levellingup.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Birmingham, Bradford, Hackney data dashboard

Cornwall data dashboard

Durham data dashboard

Liverpool, Wakefield, Sunderland, Northumberland, Newcastle, East Sussex data dashboard

Luton data dashboard

Southwark data dashboard

Details

The Partnerships for People and Place evaluation and spend mapping annexes provides a unique ‘bottom-up’ view of the funding flows from government departments going to the 13 pilots places to tackle the social challenges identified by each pilot place.

The spend mapping annexes highlight the complexity of central government funding flows into 13 specific pilot places. The annexes include a factual account of the programme selection, short-term outcomes, the programme Theory of Change, and numerous charts and graphs detailing the funding flows for all 13 pilot places.  

In their entirety the annexes show that government department spending is place-based but not necessarily driven by place-priorities, central government to local government spending flows are complex and resource intensive (with a high number of small grants under £100,000 awarded to councils) and that place-based (and national) policy priorities can get lost in the complexity of spending flows.

Updates to this page

Published 10 April 2024

Sign up for emails or print this page