Official Statistics

AAA standards report 2023 to 2024

Published 26 September 2024

Applies to England

This report presents data against each of the 15 screening standards for screening activity related to abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening.

The data source used for this report is AAA SMaRT (screening management and referral tracking).

The NHS AAA screening programme aims to reduce aneurysm-related mortality through early detection, appropriate monitoring and treatment. The NHS AAA screening programme invites men for ultrasound screening during the year (1 April to 31 March) in which they turn 65. Men over 65, who have not previously been screened can self-refer. The programme offers annual or quarterly surveillance for all men who on initial scan are found to have a small or medium aneurysm respectively. Men found to have a large aneurysm are referred into the care of specialised vascular services for potential intervention.

National AAA standards provide a defined set of measures that providers must meet to make sure services are safe and effective. The NHS AAA screening programme published a set of revised standards in April 2020.

This report is an official statistic. Official statistics are an essential public asset. They provide a window on society, the economy, and on the work and performance of government. They are fundamental to the judgements and decisions made by the public, by government, and by a large range of other organisations.

1. AAA Standards

There are 15 national AAA standards included in this report, which are:

  • AAA-S01: completeness of offer (initial screen)
  • AAA-S02: completeness of offer (annual surveillance scan)
  • AAA-S03: completeness of offer (quarterly surveillance scan)
  • AAA-S04: coverage (initial screen)
  • AAA-S05: coverage (annual surveillance scan)
  • AAA-S06: coverage (quarterly surveillance scan)
  • AAA-S07: coverage of the initial screen in men living in deciles 1 to 3
  • AAA-S08: uptake (initial screen)
  • AAA-S09: uptake (annual surveillance scan)
  • AAA-S10: uptake (quarterly surveillance scan)
  • AAA-S11: non-visualised screens
  • AAA-S12: internal quality assurance
  • AAA-S13: nurse assessments
  • AAA-S14: men seen at specialist assessments within 2 weeks
  • AAA-S15: men operated on within 8 weeks

Standards data are published annually. Standard AAA-S04, AAA-S05 and AAA-S06 are also key performance indicators (KPIs), which are published quarterly.

Two thresholds, the acceptable threshold and achievable threshold are specified for each standard.

Provider table

Charts in this report display the internal code used by the AAA programme. This table shows the name of the provider associated with each code.

Code Provider Region
BBW Bristol, Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort South West
BCO Black Country AAA Screening Cohort Midlands
BLM Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort East of England
CAM Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort East of England
CHM Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort North West
CML Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort North West
COV Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort Midlands
CYH Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort North East and Yorkshire
DBY Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort Midlands
DOW Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort South West
ESX Essex AAA Screening Cohort East of England
FRV Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort East of England
GLO Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort South West
HAM Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort South East
HFD Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort East of England
HOE Central England AAA Screening Cohort Midlands
HRW Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort Midlands
KEN Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort South East
LEI Leicester AAA Screening Cohort Midlands
LNC Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort Midlands
MAN Manchester AAA Screening Cohort North West
NOE North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort North East and Yorkshire
NOL North London AAA Screening Cohort London
NOR Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort East of England
NOT Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort Midlands
NRH Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort Midlands
NSS North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort Midlands
PEN Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort South West
SDE South Devon AAA Screening Cohort South West
SOM Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort South West
STW Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort Midlands
SWL South London AAA Screening Cohort London
SYB South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort North East and Yorkshire
THV Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort South East
WSR West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort South East
WSU Sussex AAA Screening Cohort South East
WYO West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort North East and Yorkshire
YOH North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort North East and Yorkshire

Data are presented by financial year (1 April 2023 to 31 March 2024) unless stated otherwise.

2. AAA-S01: completeness of offer (initial screen)

There were 331,219 men aged 65 eligible for AAA screening between 1 April 2023 and 31 March 2024; 99.8% of those eligible men were offered an initial screen within the screening year plus 2 months. The reasons for not being invited include:

  • offered after 31 May 2024
  • incorrect contact details
  • deferring screening
  • opting out of the screening programme
  • not offered

Figure 1: percentage of eligible cohort men offered screening within the screening year plus 2 months, by screening provider, England, 1 April 2023 to 31 March 2024

Figure 1a: percentage of eligible cohort men offered screening within the screening year plus 2 months, in alphabetical order of provider name

Organisation Performance
Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort 99.4%
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort 99.9%
Bristol, Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort 99.9%
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort 99.5%
Central England AAA Screening Cohort 100.0%
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort 100.0%
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort 100.0%
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort 100.0%
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort 100.0%
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort 99.9%
Essex AAA Screening Cohort 100.0%
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort 100.0%
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort 100.0%
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort 99.6%
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort 99.8%
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort 99.4%
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort 99.9%
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort 100.0%
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort 100.0%
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort 99.8%
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort 99.7%
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort 99.9%
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort 99.5%
North London AAA Screening Cohort 100.0%
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort 99.7%
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort 99.8%
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort 99.8%
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort 99.9%
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort 100.0%
Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort 99.9%
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort 99.9%
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort 99.9%
South London AAA Screening Cohort 100.0%
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort 100.0%
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort 99.9%
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort 99.9%
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort 96.1%
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort 100.0%

The data for the report showed the following provider level information:

  • All 38 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≥ 95.0%
  • 23 out of the 38 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≥ 99.9%
  • 15 out of the 38 screening providers achieved 100.0% for this standard
  • West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort had the lowest performance (96.1%), but still met the acceptable threshold

Figure 2: percentage of eligible cohort men offered screening according to the standard definition, by region, England, 1 April 2017 to 31 March 2024

The offer of the initial screen to men in each cohort year was stable between 2013/14 (see previous years reports for data prior to 2017/18) and 2019/20. Following the sharp drop in 2020/21 performance due to the impact of the pandemic, performance has continued to increase year on year into 2023/24, meeting the acceptable threshold and just below the achievable threshold, returning to the levels seen pre-pandemic.

3. AAA-S02: completeness of offer (annual surveillance scan)

Between 1 April 2023 and 31 March 2024 there were 12,400 annual surveillance appointments due and 12,206 had an offer within 6 weeks of their due date (98.4%).

Figure 3: percentage of annual surveillance appointments due where there is an offered appointment within 6 weeks of the due date, by screening provider, England, 1 April 2023 to 31 March 2024

Figure 3a: percentage of annual surveillance appointments due where there is an offered appointment within 6 weeks of the due date, in alphabetical order of provider name

Organisation Performance
Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort 99.4%
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort 100.0%
Bristol, Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort 98.6%
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort 99.6%
Central England AAA Screening Cohort 99.4%
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort 99.1%
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort 98.3%
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort 99.2%
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort 100.0%
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort 99.7%
Essex AAA Screening Cohort 98.9%
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort 99.3%
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort 98.6%
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort 98.9%
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort 98.4%
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort 98.8%
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort 98.0%
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort 96.5%
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort 99.0%
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort 97.0%
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort 97.4%
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort 98.9%
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort 97.3%
North London AAA Screening Cohort 97.1%
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort 99.0%
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort 98.8%
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort 98.2%
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort 98.4%
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort 99.2%
Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort 97.8%
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort 98.4%
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort 97.3%
South London AAA Screening Cohort 97.8%
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort 98.8%
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort 99.1%
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort 97.3%
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort 100.0%
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort 97.6%

The data for the report showed the following provider level information:

  • All 38 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≥ 95.0%
  • 14 out of 38 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≥ 99.0%
  • Black Country AAA Screening Cohort, Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort and West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort had the highest performance (100.0%)
  • Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort had the lowest performance (96.5%), but still met the acceptable threshold

Nationally the proportion of annual surveillance appointments due where an appointment was offered 6 weeks either side of the due date decreased by 0.7 percentage points from 2022/23 to 2023/24, at 98.4%, meeting the acceptable threshold.

4. AAA-S03: completeness of offer (quarterly surveillance scan)

Between 1 April 2023 and 31 March 2024 there were 11,495 quarterly surveillance appointments due and 11,329 had an offer within 4 weeks of their due date (98.6%).

Figure 4: percentage of quarterly surveillance appointments due where there is an offered appointment within 4 weeks of the due date, by screening provider, England, 1 April 2023 to 31 March 2024

Figure 4a: percentage of quarterly surveillance appointments due where there is an offered appointment within 4 weeks of the due date, in alphabetical order of provider name

Organisation Performance
Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort 97.2%
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort 98.9%
Bristol, Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort 99.5%
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort 97.1%
Central England AAA Screening Cohort 96.9%
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort 99.3%
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort 98.8%
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort 99.1%
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort 98.3%
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort 99.4%
Essex AAA Screening Cohort 98.9%
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort 98.4%
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort 99.6%
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort 99.7%
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort 98.0%
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort 99.1%
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort 94.7%
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort 96.3%
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort 98.6%
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort 98.7%
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort 98.2%
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort 98.9%
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort 99.2%
North London AAA Screening Cohort 98.7%
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort 99.2%
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort 100.0%
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort 98.9%
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort 99.7%
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort 99.7%
Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort 100.0%
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort 100.0%
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort 99.4%
South London AAA Screening Cohort 98.4%
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort 99.6%
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort 98.5%
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort 95.9%
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort 98.0%
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort 96.1%

The data for the report showed the following provider level information:

  • 37 out of 38 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≥ 95.0%
  • 16 out of 38 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≥ 99.0%
  • North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort, Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort, Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort had the highest performance (100.0%)
  • Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort had the lowest performance (94.7%) and were the only service to not meet the acceptable threshold

Nationally the proportion of quarterly surveillance appointments due where an appointment was offered 4 weeks either side of the due date increased by 0.1 percentage points from 2022/23 to 2023/24, at 98.6%, meeting the acceptable threshold.

5. AAA-S04: coverage (initial screen)

Of the 331,219 men aged 65 eligible for AAA screening between 1 April 2023 and 31 March 2024; 81.9% of those eligible men were conclusively tested within the screening year plus 2 months.

Figure 5: coverage - percentage of eligible cohort men conclusively tested within the screening year plus 2 months, by screening provider, England, 1 April 2023 to 31 March 2024

Figure 5a: coverage - percentage of eligible cohort men conclusively tested within the screening year plus 2 months, in alphabetical order of provider name

Organisation Performance
Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort 83.0%
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort 81.4%
Bristol, Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort 82.3%
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort 83.4%
Central England AAA Screening Cohort 75.4%
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort 83.2%
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort 78.7%
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort 84.1%
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort 87.4%
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort 87.6%
Essex AAA Screening Cohort 83.5%
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort 87.0%
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort 85.0%
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort 84.2%
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort 86.2%
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort 83.2%
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort 85.5%
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort 78.7%
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort 85.1%
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort 86.6%
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort 78.5%
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort 84.4%
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort 83.0%
North London AAA Screening Cohort 75.6%
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort 78.5%
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort 84.4%
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort 85.7%
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort 86.8%
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort 87.6%
Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort 87.8%
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort 88.0%
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort 89.4%
South London AAA Screening Cohort 75.4%
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort 82.7%
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort 82.2%
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort 83.6%
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort 76.8%
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort 81.9%

The data for the report showed the following provider level information:

  • 38 out of 38 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≥ 75.0%
  • 14 out of 38 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≥ 85.0%
  • South Devon AAA Screening Cohort had the highest performance (89.4%)
  • South London AAA Screening Cohort had the lowest performance (75.4%), but still met the acceptable threshold

Figure 6: coverage - percentage of eligible cohort men conclusively tested according to the standard definition, by region, England, 1 April 2017 to 31 March 2024

Following the decrease in performance in 2020/21, due to the impact of the pandemic, performance has continued to increase year on year 2023/24, meeting the acceptable threshold and returning to the levels seen pre-pandemic.

6. AAA-S05: coverage (annual surveillance scan)

Of the 12,399 annual surveillance appointments due between 1 April 2023 to 31 March 2024, 91.6% had a conclusive test within 6 weeks of the due date.

Figure 7: coverage - percentage of annual surveillance appointments due where there is a conclusive test within 6 weeks of the due date, by screening provider, England, 1 April 2023 to 31 March 2024

Figure 7a: coverage - percentage of annual surveillance appointments due where there is a conclusive test within 6 weeks of the due date, in alphabetical order of provider name

Organisation Performance
Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort 93.3%
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort 96.5%
Bristol, Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort 92.8%
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort 92.2%
Central England AAA Screening Cohort 91.3%
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort 90.2%
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort 90.8%
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort 95.0%
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort 92.5%
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort 94.5%
Essex AAA Screening Cohort 90.4%
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort 93.8%
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort 93.6%
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort 90.7%
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort 92.4%
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort 91.9%
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort 89.7%
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort 88.0%
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort 94.7%
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort 94.3%
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort 90.3%
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort 94.7%
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort 90.7%
North London AAA Screening Cohort 86.2%
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort 92.5%
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort 93.9%
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort 91.1%
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort 92.1%
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort 94.9%
Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort 92.3%
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort 93.4%
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort 89.3%
South London AAA Screening Cohort 88.3%
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort 94.9%
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort 90.5%
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort 86.5%
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort 93.6%
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort 91.8%

The data for the report showed the following provider level information:

  • 38 out of 38 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≥ 85.0%
  • 2 out of 38 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≥ 95.0%
  • Black Country AAA Screening Cohort had the highest performance (96.5%)
  • North London AAA Screening Cohort had the lowest performance (86.2%), but still met the acceptable threshold

Nationally the proportion of annual surveillance appointments due that had a conclusive test 6 weeks either side of the due date increased by 0.7 percentage points from 2022/23 to 2023/24, at 91.6%, meeting the acceptable threshold.

7. AAA-S06: coverage (quarterly surveillance scan)

Of the 11,495 quarterly surveillance appointments due between 1 April 2023 to 31 March 2024, 92.8% had a conclusive test within 4 weeks of the due date.

Figure 8: coverage- percentage of quarterly surveillance appointments due where there is a conclusive test within 4 weeks of the due date, by screening provider, England, 1 April 2023 to 31 March 2024

Figure 8a: coverage - percentage of quarterly surveillance appointments due where there is a conclusive test within 4 weeks of the due date, in alphabetical order of provider name

Organisation Performance
Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort 88.6%
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort 94.8%
Bristol, Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort 93.7%
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort 92.6%
Central England AAA Screening Cohort 87.2%
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort 97.1%
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort 91.7%
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort 96.5%
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort 92.3%
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort 93.6%
Essex AAA Screening Cohort 94.4%
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort 96.9%
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort 94.3%
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort 95.1%
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort 91.7%
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort 94.1%
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort 89.1%
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort 88.9%
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort 93.8%
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort 96.4%
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort 91.5%
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort 95.1%
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort 92.9%
North London AAA Screening Cohort 92.6%
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort 91.6%
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort 95.2%
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort 92.0%
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort 95.4%
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort 97.3%
Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort 97.6%
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort 92.1%
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort 95.8%
South London AAA Screening Cohort 84.9%
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort 98.2%
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort 91.9%
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort 86.7%
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort 90.5%
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort 92.1%

The data for the report showed the following provider level information:

  • 32 out of 38 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≥ 90.0%
  • 12 out of 38 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≥ 95.0%
  • South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort had the highest performance (98.2%)
  • South London AAA Screening Cohort had the lowest performance (84.9%)

The following providers did not meet the acceptable threshold:

  • South London AAA Screening Cohort
  • Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort
  • Central England AAA Screening Cohort
  • Beds Luton & MK AAA Screening Cohort
  • Lancashire & S.Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort
  • Kent & Medway AAA Screening Cohort

Nationally the proportion of quarterly surveillance appointments due that had a conclusive test within 4 weeks of the due date increased by 0.4 percentage points from 2022/23 to 2023/24, at 92.8%, meeting the acceptable threshold.

8. AAA-S07: coverage of the initial screen in men living in deciles 1 to 3

Nationally for 2023/24, 74.2% of men in the eligible cohort who were tested and lived in a lower super output area (LSOA) classed as decile 1 to 3 in the English indices of deprivation (IoD) 2019. This contrasts with 81.9% for the overall cohort.

Figure 9: coverage - percentage of men in the eligible cohort who were tested and who lived in a lower super output area (LSOA) classed as decile 1 to 3 in the English indices of deprivation (IoD) 2019, by screening provider, England, 1 April 2023 to 31 March 2024

Figure 9a: coverage - percentage of men in the eligible cohort who were tested and who lived in a lower super output area (LSOA) classed as decile 1 to 3 in the English indices of deprivation (IoD) 2019, in alphabetical order of provider name

Organisation Performance
Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort 72.9%
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort 76.6%
Bristol, Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort 74.7%
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort 74.7%
Central England AAA Screening Cohort 68.2%
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort 77.0%
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort 72.5%
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort 74.7%
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort 80.4%
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort 78.5%
Essex AAA Screening Cohort 75.9%
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort 78.8%
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort 76.1%
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort 73.3%
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort 79.0%
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort 76.8%
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort 80.4%
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort 69.9%
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort 74.9%
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort 82.6%
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort 71.9%
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort 75.9%
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort 77.5%
North London AAA Screening Cohort 71.6%
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort 66.8%
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort 77.3%
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort 78.7%
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort 81.4%
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort 82.7%
Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort 78.5%
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort 81.9%
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort 83.4%
South London AAA Screening Cohort 66.4%
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort 77.3%
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort 72.5%
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort 69.1%
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort 71.5%
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort 74.9%

The data for the report showed the following provider level information:

  • 21 out of 38 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≥ 75.0%
  • None of the 38 screening providers reached the achievable threshold of ≥ 85.0%
  • South Devon AAA Screening Cohort had the highest performance (83.4%)
  • South London AAA Screening Cohort had the lowest performance (66.4%)

Figure 10: coverage - percentage of men in the eligible cohort who were tested and who lived in a lower super output area (LSOA) classed as decile 1 to 3 in the English indices of deprivation (IoD) 2019, England, 1 April 2020 to 31 March 2024

Men living in more deprived areas are less likely to attend for screening but are more likely to have an aneurysm. It is important for providers to engage with men living in more deprived areas to make sure they can make a personal informed choice.

This standard is now in the fourth year of being reported and should be reviewed alongside standard 4. It was first introduced in April 2020, however performance during 2020/2021 was impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Performance has increased year on year, and although it remains below both the acceptable and achievable thresholds it just now just 0.8% off meeting the acceptable threshold.

9. AAA-S08: uptake (initial screen)

There were 330,473 men offered AAA screening between 1 April 2023 and 31 March 2024; 82.1% of those men offered an initial screen were conclusively tested within the screening year plus 2 months.

Figure 11: uptake - percentage of eligible men offered screening who are conclusively tested within the screening year plus 2 months, by screening provider, England, 1 April 2023 to 31 March 2024

Figure 11a: uptake - percentage of eligible men offered screening who are conclusively tested within the screening year plus 2 months, in alphabetical order of provider name

Organisation Performance
Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort 83.6%
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort 81.5%
Bristol, Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort 82.4%
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort 83.8%
Central England AAA Screening Cohort 75.4%
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort 83.2%
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort 78.7%
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort 84.1%
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort 87.4%
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort 87.7%
Essex AAA Screening Cohort 83.5%
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort 87.0%
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort 85.1%
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort 84.6%
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort 86.4%
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort 83.6%
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort 85.5%
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort 78.7%
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort 85.1%
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort 86.8%
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort 78.7%
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort 84.5%
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort 83.4%
North London AAA Screening Cohort 75.6%
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort 78.8%
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort 84.6%
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort 85.8%
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort 86.8%
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort 87.6%
Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort 87.9%
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort 88.0%
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort 89.5%
South London AAA Screening Cohort 75.4%
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort 82.8%
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort 82.2%
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort 83.7%
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort 79.9%
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort 81.9%

The data for the report showed the following provider level information:

  • 38 out of 38 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≥ 75.0%
  • 14 out of 38 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≥ 85.0%
  • South Devon AAA Screening Cohort had the highest performance (89.5%)
  • South London AAA Screening Cohort had the lowest performance (75.4%), but still met the acceptable threshold

Figure 12: uptake - percentage of men offered screening who are conclusively tested within the initial screening year plus 2 months, by region, England, 1 April 2017 to 31 March 2024

The percentage of men offered screening who were conclusively tested has remained relatively stable, even throughout the pandemic, and has seen an increase of 1.6 percentage points from 2022/23 to 2023/24, to 82.1%, meeting the acceptable threshold.

10. AAA-S09: uptake (annual surveillance scan)

Of the 12,206 annual surveillance appointments that were offered within 6 weeks of the due date, 93.0% had a conclusive test within the 6 weeks between 1 April 2023 to 31 March 2024.

Figure 13: uptake - percentage of annual surveillance appointments offered where there is a conclusive test within 6 weeks of the due date, by screening provider, England, 1 April 2023 to 31 March 2024

Figure 13a: uptake - percentage of annual surveillance appointments offered where there is a conclusive test within 6 weeks of the due date, in alphabetical order of provider name

Organisation Performance
Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort 93.9%
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort 96.5%
Bristol, Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort 94.2%
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort 92.5%
Central England AAA Screening Cohort 91.8%
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort 91.1%
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort 92.4%
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort 95.8%
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort 92.5%
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort 94.8%
Essex AAA Screening Cohort 91.4%
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort 94.4%
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort 95.0%
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort 91.7%
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort 93.9%
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort 93.0%
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort 91.5%
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort 91.3%
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort 95.7%
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort 96.9%
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort 92.7%
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort 95.8%
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort 93.3%
North London AAA Screening Cohort 88.7%
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort 93.5%
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort 95.0%
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort 92.8%
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort 93.6%
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort 95.7%
Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort 94.4%
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort 94.9%
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort 91.7%
South London AAA Screening Cohort 90.3%
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort 96.0%
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort 91.3%
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort 88.9%
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort 93.6%
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort 94.1%

The data for the report showed the following provider level information:

  • 36 out of 38 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≥ 90.0%
  • 7 out of 38 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≥ 95.0%
  • Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort had the highest performance (96.9%)
  • North London AAA Screening Cohort had the lowest performance (88.7%)

The following providers did not meet the acceptable threshold:

  • North London AAA Screening Cohort
  • Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort

Nationally the proportion of annual surveillance appointments offered where there was a conclusive test within 6 weeks of the due date decreased by 0.1 percentage points from 2022/23 to 2023/24, at 93.0%, but still continuing to meet the acceptable threshold.

11. AAA-S10: uptake (quarterly surveillance scan)

Of the 11,329 quarterly surveillance appointments offered within 4 weeks of the due date, 94.2% had a conclusive test within 4 weeks between 1 April 2023 to 31 March 2024.

Figure 14: uptake - percentage of quarterly surveillance appointments offered where there is a conclusive test within 4 weeks of the due date, by screening provider, England, 1 April 2023 to 31 March 2024

Figure 14a: uptake - percentage of quarterly surveillance appointments offered where there is a conclusive test within 4 weeks of the due date, in alphabetical order of provider name

Organisation Performance
Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort 91.2%
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort 95.9%
Bristol, Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort 94.1%
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort 95.5%
Central England AAA Screening Cohort 90.0%
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort 97.8%
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort 92.8%
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort 97.4%
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort 94.0%
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort 94.2%
Essex AAA Screening Cohort 95.4%
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort 98.4%
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort 94.7%
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort 95.4%
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort 93.5%
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort 94.9%
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort 94.1%
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort 92.3%
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort 95.1%
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort 97.7%
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort 93.2%
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort 96.2%
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort 93.7%
North London AAA Screening Cohort 93.8%
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort 92.3%
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort 95.2%
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort 93.0%
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort 95.7%
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort 97.6%
Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort 97.6%
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort 92.1%
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort 96.3%
South London AAA Screening Cohort 86.3%
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort 98.6%
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort 93.2%
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort 90.4%
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort 92.3%
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort 95.9%

The data for the report showed the following provider level information:

  • 37 out of 38 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≥ 90.0%
  • 17 out of 38 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≥ 95.0%
  • South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort had the highest performance (98.6%)
  • South London AAA Screening Cohort had the lowest performance (86.3%)

Nationally the proportion quarterly surveillance appointments offered where there was a conclusive test within 4 weeks of the due date increased by 0.4 percentage points from 2022/23 to 2023/24, at 94.2%, continuing to meet the acceptable threshold.

12. AAA-S11: non-visualised screens

Screening providers should aim to minimise the percentage of screens that cannot be visualised. Therefore, the lower the value the better for this standard. Nationally 1.0% of cohort screens were non-visualised in 2023/24.

Figure 15: test - percentage of screening encounters where aorta could not be visualised, by screening provider, England, 1 April 2023 to 31 March 2024

Figure 15a: test - percentage of screening encounters where aorta could not be visualised, in alphabetical order of provider name

Organisation Performance
Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort 1.3%
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort 0.7%
Bristol, Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort 1.2%
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort 1.3%
Central England AAA Screening Cohort 0.5%
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort 0.5%
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort 1.8%
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort 1.2%
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort 0.4%
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort 1.0%
Essex AAA Screening Cohort 3.1%
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort 0.4%
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort 0.7%
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort 1.0%
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort 2.2%
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort 0.9%
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort 0.4%
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort 0.7%
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort 0.3%
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort 2.2%
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort 4.1%
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort 0.4%
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort 0.1%
North London AAA Screening Cohort 0.6%
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort 0.8%
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort 0.1%
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort 0.6%
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort 1.2%
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort 0.7%
Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort 2.1%
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort 0.5%
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort 1.2%
South London AAA Screening Cohort 0.9%
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort 0.3%
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort 1.2%
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort 0.4%
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort 1.2%
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort 2.2%

The data for the report showed the following provider level information:

  • 36 out of 38 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≤ 3.0%
  • 22 out of 38 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≤ 1.0%
  • North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort had the lowest performance (0.1%) (lower the value the better)
  • Manchester AAA Screening Cohort had the highest performance (4.1%) (lower the value the better)

The following providers did not meet the acceptable threshold:

  • Manchester AAA Screening Cohort
  • Essex AAA Screening Cohort

Figure 16: test - percentage of screening encounters where aorta could not be visualised, by region, England, 1 April 2017 to 31 March 2023

The percentage of non-visualised screens is stable across England over the series. For 2023/24, performance remained at 1.0%, and met the achievable threshold.

13. AAA-S12: internal quality assurance

Of the 2,298 men with a small or medium size aneurysm (aorta ≥ 3.0 to < 5.5cm), 87.8% had their screens reviewed within 21 days of the scan taking place, in 2023/24

Figure 17: test - percentage of abnormal screens (aorta ≥ 3.0 to < 5.5cm) reviewed within 21 calendar days of the initial screen date, by provider, England, 1 April 2023 to 31 March 2024

Figure 17a: test - percentage of abnormal screens (aorta ≥ 3.0 to < 5.5cm) reviewed within 21 calendar days of the initial screen date, in alphabetical order of provider name

Organisation Performance
Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort 86.8%
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort 62.5%
Bristol, Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort 80.8%
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort 87.1%
Central England AAA Screening Cohort 57.6%
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort 96.2%
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort 99.2%
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort 97.4%
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort 90.0%
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort 41.4%
Essex AAA Screening Cohort 31.6%
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort 77.6%
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort 100.0%
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort 90.5%
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort 90.3%
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort 100.0%
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort 89.7%
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort 100.0%
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort 97.4%
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort 88.4%
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort 90.3%
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort 100.0%
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort 65.8%
North London AAA Screening Cohort 93.4%
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort 100.0%
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort 89.2%
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort 88.6%
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort 97.8%
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort 95.7%
Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort 47.9%
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort 88.1%
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort 100.0%
South London AAA Screening Cohort 97.3%
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort 100.0%
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort 97.2%
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort 100.0%
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort 100.0%
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort 100.0%

The data for the report showed the following provider level information:

  • 34 out of 38 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≥ 60.0%
  • 18 out of 38 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≥ 95.0%

The following providers had the highest performance (100.0%):

  • Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort
  • Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort
  • Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort
  • Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort
  • North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort
  • South Devon AAA Screening Cohort
  • South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort
  • Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort
  • West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort
  • West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort
  • Essex AAA Screening Cohort had the lowest performance (31.6%)

The following providers did not meet the acceptable threshold:

  • Essex AAA Screening Cohort
  • Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort
  • Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort
  • Central England AAA Screening Cohort

Nationally the proportion men with a small or medium size aneurysm (aorta ≥ 3.0 to < 5.5cm) that had their screens reviewed within 21 days of the scan taking place increased by 2.9 percentage points from 2022/23 to 2023/24, at 87.8%, continuing to meet the acceptable threshold.

14. AAA-S13: nurse assessments

Of the 2,995 men who had a small or medium aneurysm detected (aorta ≥ 3.0 to < 5.5cm) at initial screen and the number of men who had a medium aneurysm detected (aorta ≥ 4.5 to < 5.5cm) at the annual surveillance scan, 69.9% had a nurse assessment within 12 weeks of their conclusive scan.

Figure 18: test - percentage of men who had a small or medium aneurysm detected (aorta ≥ 3.0 to < 5.5cm) at initial screen and the number of men who had a medium aneurysm detected (≥ 4.5 to < 5.5cm) at the annual surveillance scan who had a nurse assessment ≤ 12 weeks of their conclusive scan, by provider, England, 1 April 2023 to 31 March 2024

Figure 18a: test - percentage of men who had a small or medium aneurysm detected (aorta ≥ 3.0 to < 5.5cm) at initial screen and the number of men who had a medium aneurysm detected (≥ 4.5 to < 5.5cm) at the annual surveillance scan who had a nurse assessment ≤ 12 weeks of their conclusive scan, in alphabetical order of provider name

Organisation Performance
Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort 73.6%
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort 73.0%
Bristol, Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort 61.5%
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort 48.6%
Central England AAA Screening Cohort 70.3%
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort 62.6%
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort 77.2%
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort 93.1%
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort 80.3%
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort 51.2%
Essex AAA Screening Cohort 76.8%
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort 68.6%
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort 85.5%
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort 50.5%
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort 66.7%
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort 55.0%
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort 75.7%
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort 76.4%
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort 88.1%
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort 69.8%
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort 61.7%
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort 80.9%
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort 94.5%
North London AAA Screening Cohort 70.2%
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort 61.5%
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort 68.7%
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort 50.0%
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort 80.3%
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort 61.5%
Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort 50.0%
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort 76.1%
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort 86.2%
South London AAA Screening Cohort 64.8%
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort 80.8%
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort 45.5%
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort 56.0%
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort 74.5%
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort 92.1%

The data for the report showed the following provider level information:

  • 36 out of 38 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≥ 50.0%
  • 10 out of 38 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≥ 80.0%
  • North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort had the highest performance (94.5%)
  • Sussex AAA Screening Cohort had the lowest performance (45.5%)

The following providers did not meet the acceptable threshold:

  • Sussex AAA Screening Cohort
  • Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort

Nationally the proportion of men eligible for a nurse assessment who attended an appointment increased by 1.9 percentage points from 2022/23 to 2023/24, to 69.9%, which met the acceptable threshold.

15. AAA-S14: men seen at specialist assessments within 2 weeks

Of the 985 men with an aorta ≥ 5.5cm or men with an aorta ≥ 4.0cm that has grown ≥ 1cm in one year, 922 (93.6%) were seen by a vascular specialist within 2 weeks of their last conclusive scan.

Figure 19: referral - percentage of men with aorta ≥ 5.5cm or men with an aorta ≥ 4.0cm that has grown ≥ 1cm in one year, seen by vascular specialist within 2 weeks, by screening provider, England, 1 April 2023 to 31 March 2024

Figure 19a: referral - percentage of men with aorta ≥ 5.5cm or men with an aorta ≥ 4.0cm that has grown ≥ 1cm in one year, seen by vascular specialist within 2 weeks, in alphabetical order of provider name

Organisation Performance
Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort 68.4%
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort 100.0%
Bristol, Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort 87.5%
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort 100.0%
Central England AAA Screening Cohort 87.9%
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort 100.0%
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort 100.0%
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort 100.0%
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort 96.3%
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort 96.8%
Essex AAA Screening Cohort 93.8%
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort 100.0%
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort 96.7%
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort 90.3%
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort 86.7%
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort 90.0%
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort 91.7%
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort 96.9%
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort 85.0%
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort 100.0%
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort 93.5%
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort 81.8%
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort 96.4%
North London AAA Screening Cohort 93.3%
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort 89.7%
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort 95.0%
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort 93.3%
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort 84.0%
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort 96.0%
Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort 91.7%
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort 97.2%
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort 100.0%
South London AAA Screening Cohort 75.0%
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort 100.0%
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort 100.0%
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort 97.1%
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort 100.0%
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort 100.0%

The data for the report showed the following provider level information:

  • 29 out of 38 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≥ 90.0%
  • 21 out of 38 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≥ 95.0%

The following providers had the highest performance (100.0%):

  • Black Country AAA Screening Cohort
  • Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort
  • Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort
  • Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort
  • Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort
  • Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort
  • Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort
  • South Devon AAA Screening Cohort
  • South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort
  • Sussex AAA Screening Cohort
  • West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort
  • West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort
  • Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort had the lowest performance (68.4%)

The following providers did not meet the acceptable threshold:

  • Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort
  • South London AAA Screening Cohort
  • Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort
  • Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort
  • Leicester AAA Screening Cohort
  • Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort
  • Bristol, Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort
  • Central England AAA Screening Cohort
  • North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort

Nationally the percentage of men seen for a specialist assessment within 2 weeks of their last conclusive scan increased by 0.5 percentage points from 2022/23 to 2023/24, to 93.6%, continuing to meet the acceptable threshold.

16. AAA-S15: men operated on within 8 weeks

Of the 810 men with an aorta of ≥ 5.5cm or men with an aorta ≥ 4.0cm that has grown ≥ 1cm in one year, deemed fit for intervention and not declining 31.6% were operated on by a vascular specialist within 8 weeks.

Figure 20: referral - percentage of men with aorta ≥ 5.5cm or men with an aorta ≥ 4.0cm that has grown ≥ 1cm in one year, deemed fit for intervention and not declining, operated on by a vascular specialist within 8 weeks, by screening provider, England, 1 April 2023 to 31 March 2024

Figure 20a: referral - percentage of men with aorta ≥ 5.5cm or men with an aorta ≥ 4.0cm that has grown ≥ 1cm in one year, deemed fit for intervention and not declining, operated on by a vascular specialist within 8 weeks, in alphabetical order of provider name

Organisation Performance
Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes AAA Screening Cohort 25.0%
Black Country AAA Screening Cohort 85.7%
Bristol, Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort 0.0%
Cambridgeshire AAA Screening Cohort 42.9%
Central England AAA Screening Cohort 12.0%
Central Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort 29.4%
Cheshire and Merseyside AAA Screening Cohort 31.6%
Coventry and Warwick AAA Screening Cohort 58.3%
Derbyshire AAA Screening Cohort 33.3%
Dorset and Wiltshire AAA Screening Cohort 7.4%
Essex AAA Screening Cohort 13.3%
Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort 0.0%
Gloucester and Swindon AAA Screening Cohort 22.2%
Hampshire AAA Screening Cohort 75.0%
Hereford and Worcester AAA Screening Cohort 25.0%
Hertfordshire AAA Screening Cohort 26.3%
Kent and Medway AAA Screening Cohort 15.6%
Lancashire and South Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort 35.7%
Leicester AAA Screening Cohort 20.0%
Lincolnshire AAA Screening Cohort 18.2%
Manchester AAA Screening Cohort 25.0%
Norfolk and Waveney AAA Screening Cohort 37.0%
North East and North Cumbria AAA Screening Cohort 49.0%
North London AAA Screening Cohort 25.0%
North Yorkshire and Humber AAA Screening Cohort 40.9%
North and South Staffordshire AAA Screening Cohort 21.1%
Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort 0.0%
Nottinghamshire AAA Screening Cohort 15.0%
Peninsula AAA Screening Cohort 52.6%
Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin AAA Screening Cohort 20.0%
Somerset and North Devon AAA Screening Cohort 55.6%
South Devon AAA Screening Cohort 82.4%
South London AAA Screening Cohort 27.3%
South Yorkshire and Bassetlaw AAA Screening Cohort 15.0%
Sussex AAA Screening Cohort 12.1%
Thames Valley AAA Screening Cohort 45.8%
West Surrey AAA Screening Cohort 62.5%
West Yorkshire AAA Screening Cohort 64.7%

The data for the report showed the following provider level information:

  • 5 out of 38 screening providers met the acceptable threshold of ≥ 60.0%
  • 2 out of 38 screening providers also reached the achievable threshold of ≥ 80.0%
  • Black Country AAA Screening Cohort had the highest performance (85.7%)
  • Bristol, Bath and Weston AAA Screening Cohort, Five Rivers AAA Screening Cohort and Northamptonshire AAA Screening Cohort had the lowest performance (0.0%)

Figure 21: referral - percentage of men with aorta ≥ 5.5cm or men with an aorta ≥ 4.0cm that has grown ≥ 1cm in one year, deemed fit for intervention and not declining, operated on by a vascular specialist within 8 weeks, by region, England, 1 April 2017 to 31 March 2024

The percentage of men operated on within 8 weeks continues to gradually increase nationally, post pandemic. For 2023/24, performance has improved 1.5 percentage points from 2022/23, but it is still considerably less than the acceptable threshold.

17. Outcomes

There were 41 AAA ruptures during the screening year, 35 of which were fatal. 20 of the deaths were in men on surveillance (3.6% of the deaths in surveillance) and 15 had been referred for surgery. For the men referred to surgery, 6 had been turned down or had declined the operation and 9 died while waiting for surgery. Of the 9, 6 died after waiting more than 8 weeks for surgery. In 2022/23, 8 men died while waiting for surgery, 5 of which died after waiting more than 8 weeks from their referral.